Piperacillin in early neonatal infection

Treatment Strategies Against Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Success so Far and the Road Ahead

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the leading complications of type-2 diabetes mellitus. It is associated with neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb in patients with diabetes. There are four stages of wound healing, namely hemostasis phase, inflammatory phase, proliferative phase and maturation phase. In the case of DFU, all these stages are disturbed which lead to delay in healing and consequently to lower limb amputation. Conventional dosage forms like tablets, creams, ointments, gels and capsules have been used for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer for many years.

INTRODUCTION

In this review, the global prevalence as well as etiopathogenesis related to diabetic foot ulcer have been discussed. The potential role of various synthetic and herbal drugs, as well as their conventional dosage forms in the effective management of DFU have been discussed in detail.

METHODS

Structured search of bibliographic databases from previously published peer-reviewed research papers was explored and data has been represented in terms of various approaches that are used for the treatment of DFU.

RESULTS

About 148 papers, including both research and review articles, were included in this review to produce a comprehensive as well as a readily understandable article. A series of herbal and synthetic drugs have been discussed along with their current status of treatment in terms of dose and mechanism of action.

CONCLUSION

DFU has become one of the most common complications in patients having diabetes for more than ten years. Hence, understanding the root cause and its successful treatment is a big challenge because it depends upon multiple factors such as the judicious selection of drugs as well as proper control of blood sugar level. Most of the drugs that have been used so far either belong to the category of antibiotics, antihyperglycaemic or they have been repositioned. In clinical practice, much focus has been given to dressings that have been used to cover the ulcer. The complete treatment of DFU is still a farfetched dream to be achieved and it is expected that combination therapy of herbal and synthetic drugs with multiple treatment pathways could be able to offer better management of DFU.

Monotherapy with amikacin or piperacillin-tazobactum empirically in neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis are started on antibiotics empirically. Antibiotic resistance to conventionally used antibiotics is increasingly being reported. Antenatal maternal antibiotic exposure in this setting contributes to low yield on blood culture drawn at birth, limiting the planning of antibiotics based on culture reports. A head-to-head comparison for selecting the appropriate antibiotic is one strategy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare monotherapy with amikacin against piperacillin-tazobactum as an empirical therapy in neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis.

DESIGN

Randomized open-label controlled trial with stratification and block randomization.

SETTINGS

Tertiary care neonatal unit in India

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive inborn neonates delivered between 01 May 2009 and 30 April 2011 who were ≥28 week gestation and/or ≥1000 g birth weight with risk factors for early-onset sepsis.

INTERVENTION

Randomized to receive either amikacin or piperacillin-tazobactum, after stratifying as asymptomatic or symptomatic within 1 h of birth.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Incidence of treatment failure to the allocated antibiotic defined as blood culture isolate reported resistant to the allocated antibiotic or progression of the illness, necessitating a change of antibiotic.

RESULTS

Of 204 eligible cases, 187 were enrolled. Seventeen babies were excluded. A total of 128 neonates were stratified as asymptomatic and 59 as symptomatic. In all, 64 of the asymptomatic cases received amikacin and 64 received piperacillin-tazobactum, while 29 symptomatic babies received amikacin and 30 received piperacillin-tazobactum. Five babies had blood culture-positive sepsis, and 28 babies had strong suspicion of sepsis. There was no difference in the treatment failure in the amikacin group (3 of 93; 3.2%) compared with piperacillin-tazobactum group (2 of 94; 2.1%) (p > 0.01) and no difference in the incidence of second infection, fungal sepsis and all-cause mortality at day 7 and 28 between the two study groups (p > 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with amikacin as an empirical antibiotic did not result in a higher incidence of treatment failure in neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis as compared with piperacillin-tazobactum. Both antibiotics were effective in management of babies with early-onset sepsis.

Antibiotics and Antifungals in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Review

The incidence of infections is higher in the neonatal period than at any time of life. The basic treatment of infants with infection has not changed substantially over the last years. Antibiotics (with or without supportive care) are one of the most valuable resources in managing sick newborn babies. Early-onset (ascending or transplacental) or late-onset (hospital acquired) infections present different chronology, epidemiology, physiology and outcome. Some classes of antibiotics are frequently used in the neonatal period: penicillins, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, monobactams, carbapenems. Other classes of antibiotics (chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, macrolides, clindamycin, rifampicin and metronidazole) are rarely used. Due to emergence of resistant bacterial strains in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU), other classes of antibiotics such as quinolones and linezolid will probably increase their therapeutic role in the future. Although new formulations have been developed for treatment of fungal infections in infants, amphotericin B remains first-line treatment for systemic Candida infection. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is almost always undesirable. Challenges from pathogens and antibiotic resistance in the NICU may warrant modification of traditional antibiotic regimens. Knowledge of local flora and practical application of different antibiotic characteristics are key to an effective and safe utilization of antibiotics and antifungals in critical newborns admitted to the NICU, and especially in very low birth weight infants.

Pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the CSF of children and adolescents

The adequate management of central nervous system (CNS) infections requires that antimicrobial agents penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and achieve concentrations in the CNS adequate for eradication of the infecting pathogen. This review details the currently available literature on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibacterials in the CNS of children. Clinical trials affirm that the physicochemical properties of a drug remain one of the most important factors dictating penetration of antimicrobial agents into the CNS, irrespective of the population being treated (i.e. small, lipophilic drugs with low protein binding exhibit the best translocation across the BBB). These same physicochemical characteristics determine the primary disposition pathways of the drug, and by extension the magnitude and duration of circulating drug concentrations in the plasma, a second major driving force behind achievable CNS drug concentrations. Notably, these disposition pathways can be expected to change during the normal process of growth and development. Finally, CNS drug penetration is influenced by the nature and extent of the infection (i.e. the presence of meningeal inflammation). Aminoglycosides have poor CNS penetration when administered intravenously. Intrathecal gentamicin has been studied in children with more promising results, often exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration. There are very limited data with intrathecal tobramycin in children. However, in the few patients that have been studied, the CSF concentrations were highly variable. Penicillins generally have good CNS penetration. Aqueous penicillin G reaches greater concentrations than procaine or benzathine penicillin. Concentrations remain detectable for ≥ 12 h. Of the aminopenicillins, both ampicillin and parenteral amoxicillin reach adequate CNS concentrations; however, orally administered amoxicillin resulted in much lower concentrations. Nafcillin and piperacillin are the final two penicillins with pediatric data: their penetration is erratic at best. Cephalosporins vary greatly in regard to their CSF penetration. Few first- and second-generation cephalosporins are able to reach higher CSF concentrations. Cefuroxime is the only exception and is usually avoided due to its adverse effects and slower sterilization of the CSF than third-generation agents. Ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefixime and cefepime have been studied in children and are all able to adequately penetrate the CSF. As with penicillins, concentrations are greatest in the presence of meningeal inflammation. Meropenem and imipenem are the only carbapenems with pediatric data. Imipenem reaches higher CSF concentrations; however, meropenem is preferred due to its lower incidence of seizures. Aztreonam has also demonstrated favorable penetration but only one study has been completed in children. Both chloramphenicol and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (cotrimoxazole) penetrate into the CNS well; however, significant toxicities limit their use. The small size and minimal protein binding of fosfomycin contribute to its favorable CNS PK. Although rarely used, it achieves higher concentrations in the presence of inflammation and accumulation is possible. Linezolid reaches high CSF concentrations; however, more frequent dosing might be required in infants due to their increased elimination. Metronidazole also has very limited information but it demonstrated favorable results similar to adult data; CSF concentrations even exceeded plasma concentrations at certain time points. Rifampin (rifampicin) demonstrated good CNS penetration after oral administration. Vancomycin demonstrates poor CNS penetration after intravenous administration. When combined with intraventricular therapy, CNS concentrations are much greater. Of the antituberculosis agents, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and streptomycin have been studied in children. Isoniazid and pyrazinamide have favorable CSF penetration. Streptomycin appears to produce unpredictable CSF levels. No pediatric-specific data are available for clindamycin, daptomycin, macrolides, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones. Daptomycin, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines have demonstrated favorable CNS penetration in adults; however, data are limited due to their potential pediatric-specific toxicities and newness within the marketplace. Macrolides and clindamycin have demonstrated poor CNS penetration in adults and thus have not been studied in pediatrics.

Antibiotics in neonatal infections: a review

The bacteria most commonly responsible for early-onset (materno-fetal) infections in neonates are group B streptococci, enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae and Listeria monocytogenes. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis, are the main pathogens in late-onset (nosocomial) infections, especially in high-risk patients such as those with very low birthweight, umbilical or central venous catheters or undergoing prolonged ventilation. The primary objective of the paediatrician is to identity all potential cases of bacterial disease quickly and begin antibacterial treatment immediately after the appropriate cultures have been obtained. Combination therapy is recommended for initial empirical treatment in the neonate. In early-onset infections, an effective first-line empirical therapy is ampicillin plus an aminoglycoside (duration of treatment 10 days). An alternative is ampicillin plus a third-generation cephalosporin such as cefotaxime, a combination particularly useful in neonatal meningitis (mean duration of treatment 14 to 21 days), in patients at risk of nephrotoxicity and/or when therapeutic monitoring of aminoglycosides is not possible. Another potential substitute for the aminoglycoside is aztreonam. Triple combination therapy (such as amoxicillin plus cefotaxime and an aminoglycoside) could also be used for the first 2 to 3 days of life, followed by dual therapy after the microbiological results. In late-onset infections the combination oxacillin plus an aminoglycoside is widely recommended. However, vancomycin plus ceftazidime (+/- an aminoglycoside for the first 2 to 3 days) may be a better choice. Teicoplanin may be a substitute for vancomycin. However, the initial approach should always be modified by knowledge of the local bacterial epidemiology. After the microbiological results, treatment should be switched to narrower spectrum agents if a specific organism has been identified, and should be discontinued if cultures are negative and the neonate is in good clinical condition. Penicillins and third-generation cephalosporins are generally well tolerated in neonates. There is controversy regarding whether therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides will decrease toxicity (particularly renal damage) in neonates, and on the efficacy and safety of a single daily dose versus multiple daily doses of these drugs. Toxic effects caused by vancomycin are uncommon, but debate still exists over the need for therapeutic drug monitoring of this agent. When antibacterials are used in neonates, accurate determination of dosage is required, particularly for compounds with a low therapeutic index and in patients with renal failure. Very low birthweight infants are also particularly prone to antibacterial-induced toxicity.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibacterial drugs in neonates

Neonatal patients are surviving longer due to the rapid advances in medical knowledge and technology. Our understanding of the developmental physiology of both preterm and full term neonates has also increased. It is now apparent that differences in body composition and organ function significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of antibacterial drugs in neonates, and dosage modifications are required to optimise antimicrobial therapy. The penicillins and cephalosporins are frequently used in neonates. Although ampicillin has replaced benzylpenicillin (penicillin G) for empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis, many of the other penicillins may be used in neonates for the management of various infections. Increased volume of distribution (Vd) and decreased total body clearance (CL) affect the disposition of penicillins and cephalosporins. Decreased renal clearance (CLR) due to decreased glomerular filtration and tubular secretion is responsible for the decreased CL for most of the beta-lactams. Aminoglycoside Vd is affected by the increased total body water content and extracellular fluid volume of neonates. The increased Vd, in part, accounts for the extended elimination half-life (t1/2) observed in neonates. Aminoglycoside CL is dependent on renal glomerular filtration which is markedly decreased in neonates, especially those preterm. These drugs appear to be less nephrotoxic and ototoxic in neonates than in older patients, and the role of serum concentration monitoring should be limited to specific neonatal patients. Other antibiotics such as vancomycin, teicoplanin, chloramphenicol, rifampicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, metronidazole and cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim plus sulfamethoxazole) may be used in certain clinical situations. The emergence of staphylococcal resistance to penicillins has increased the need for vancomycin. With the exceptions of vancomycin and chloramphenicol, the efficacy and safety of these other agents in neonates have not been established. The need for serum vancomycin concentration monitoring may be limited, as with aminoglycosides, while safety concerns warrant the routine monitoring of serum chloramphenicol concentrations in neonates. Dosing guidelines are provided, based on the pharmacokinetics of the drugs and previously published recommendations. These dosing guidelines are intended for initial therapy, and close therapeutic monitoring is recommended for maintenance dose requirements to optimise patient outcome. There has been an enormous increase in our knowledge of neonatal physiology and drug disposition. Fortunately, many of the antibacterial drugs used in neonates (e.g. penicillins and cephalosporins) are relatively safe. It will be important to evaluate all newly developed antibiotics in neonates to assure their maximum efficacy and safety.

A randomised prospective comparison of cefotaxime versus netilmicin/penicillin for treatment of suspected neonatal sepsis

In an open prospective study performed in 2 neonatal units, infants with suspected neonatal sepsis (SNS) of unknown microbial cause were randomly allocated to receive treatment with either cefotaxime (CTX) or netilmicin plus penicillin (N + P). 236 patients were entered into the trial, of whom 222 were evaluable. The number of 'definitely' and 'probably' infected babies was similar in both groups. There was no difference in clinical outcome between patients in the 2 treatment groups and no side effects were recorded for either of the antibiotic regimens. Antibiotic sensitivity testing of bacterial isolates from peripheral sites showed almost universal sensitivity of potential pathogens to both antibiotic regimens at the start of treatment in all infants. Thereafter, organisms resistant to CTX were isolated from patients in both treatment groups, possibly reflecting the antibiotic sensitivity profile of the colonising bacteria in both neonatal units. The results of this study indicate that either CTX or N + P are suitable, in our units, for the 'blind' treatment of early SNS. In units where listerial infections are prevalent, specific cover should be added to CTX. For SNS developing after admission, the choice of antibiotics will depend upon the background antibiotic sensitivity profile of the colonising bacteria.

Ceftazidime in neonatal infections

Ninety one neonates received 108 courses of intravenous ceftazidime (25 mg/kg, 12 hourly) over a study period of 15 months. Fourteen had clinically and bacteriologically proved infections. Only one of these had resistant organisms. Four (two with group B beta haemolytic streptococcal infections, one with Escherichia coli meningitis, and one with Staphylococcal aureus septicaemia) failed to respond despite adequate treatment. Bacteriological eradication or clinical improvement, or both, were obtained in the remaining nine. Routine biochemical and haematological values were monitored and there were no side effects. High serum ceftazidime concentrations, well exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration for most common neonatal pathogens were obtained and maintained throughout treatment. Penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid was excellent in eight of the nine cases studied. Ceftazidime has a theoretical role as a broad spectrum antibiotic suitable for neonatal use with no evident side effects. In this study, however, it was only appropriate for Gram negative infections, and was ineffective against Gram positive organisms. Ceftazidime cannot therefore be recommended as monotherapy before the results of bacteriological culture are known.

Piperacillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Piperacillin is one of the new generation of semisynthetic penicillins which can be administered intravenously or intramuscularly. It has a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Although piperacillin has shown greater activity against beta-lactamase-producing organisms than the other penicillins, it is hydrolysed by the plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases (TEM-1). Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa is better than that of ticarcillin, carbenicillin and mezlocillin. Although only limited controlled studies have been reported, in those which have been conducted and in a larger number of open studies piperacillin was effective in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and lower respiratory tract infections, particularly pneumonia, caused by Gram-negative bacilli. Favourable clinical results have been obtained in patients with infections caused by mixed aerobic/anaerobic organisms (such as intra-abdominal infections) but the relatively average in vitro activity of piperacillin against Bacteroides fragilis may not indicate its usage in situations where this organism is the suspected or proven pathogen. Piperacillin in combination with an aminoglycoside or a 'third generation' cephalosporin gave encouraging results in the treatment of infections in immunocompromised patients, whilst its penetration into the diseased central nervous system and lack of toxicity indicate a potential value in the treatment of neonatal Gram-negative bacillary meningitis, particularly where the causative organism is Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Whether piperacillin alone is appropriate therapy for conditions usually treated with aminoglycosides (other than pseudomonal infections) needs additional clarification, but if established as equally effective in such conditions it has the advantages of its apparent lack of serious adverse effects and freedom from the need to undertake plasma concentration monitoring. These advantages would not, however, apply when considering one of the new (third generation) cephalosporins as alternative therapy in non-pseudomonal infections. Generally, however, it is still considered necessary to treat serious and complicated infections with combination therapy, either a cephalosporin, or in cases of resistance to P. aeruginosa an aminoglycoside.