Boyer O, Bérody S. Congenital nephrotic syndrome: is early aggressive treatment needed?-No.
Pediatr Nephrol 2020;
35:1991-1996. [PMID:
32462257 DOI:
10.1007/s00467-020-04556-w]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The management of infants with congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) is very challenging as they are prone to severe complications such as hemodynamic disturbances, infections, thromboses, and impaired growth, and most will develop end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within a few years. Since the seventies, an "aggressive" approach, including daily albumin infusions, early nephrectomies, dialysis, and transplantation, has dramatically improved survival and morbidity. More recent case-note reviews have reported successful conservative treatment (using optimized nutrition, complication prophylaxis, and delayed renal replacement therapy), which led to similarly good outcomes and low complication rates. This questions the indications for early preemptive bilateral nephrectomy and dialysis given the mortality and morbidity rates in dialysis in infants and their life-long management with possible repeated transplantations. Two large series provide the most recent evidences supporting the conservative management: firstly, at least 55% children with CNS are not spontaneously in ESKD at the age of 2 years; secondly, albumin tapering/discontinuation and hospital discharge are possible before nephrectomy; and lastly, CNS complication rates are similar in case of preemptive nephrectomies or conservative care. Until now, no clear genotype-phenotype correlation has been identified to guide clinical management. Taken together, these data support the safety of conservative care until ESKD in a subset of patients with CNS.
Collapse