Biosynthetic human growth hormone treatment in the UK: an audit of current practice. Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study

Growth hormone prescribing patterns in the UK, 2013-2016

INTRODUCTION

Prescribing of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) for growth failure in UK children is based on guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. In 2013, the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes initiated a national audit of newly prescribed rhGH treatment for children and adolescents. In this review, we have examined prescribing practices between 2013 and 2016.

METHODS

All patients ≤16.0 years of age starting rhGH for licensed and unlicensed conditions in the UK were included. Anonymised data on indication and patient demographics were analysed.

RESULTS

During the 4 years, 3757 patients from 76 of 85 (89%) centres started rhGH. For each licensed indication, proportions remained stable over this period: 56% growth hormone deficiency (GHD), 17% small for gestational age (SGA), 10% Turner syndrome, 6% Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), 3% chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) and 2% short stature homeobox deficiency (SHOXd). However, the unlicensed category decreased from 10% (n=94) in 2013 to 5% (n=50) in 2016. The median age of patients starting rhGH was 7.6 years (range 0.1-16.0). Patients with PWS were significantly younger (median 2.2 years, range 0.2-15.1) compared with other indications (p<0.0001) and were followed by the SGA group (median 6.2 years, range 1.3-15.6, p<0.0001). Boys predominated in all groups except for PWS and SHOXd.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate significant engagement of prescribing centres in this audit and a decline in unlicensed prescribing by half in this 4-year period. Patients in the PWS group were younger at initiation of rhGH compared with other indications and had no male predominance unlike GHD, SGA and CRI.

Response to growth hormone therapy in Indian patients

OBJECTIVE

To analyse response to growth hormone therapy on Indian patients with short stature.

METHODS

Data were collected on 71 patients of short stature on GHT. All patients underwent clinical and hormonal evaluation. GHD was diagnosed in the presence of short stature (height SDS < 2) and peak GH levels < 10 ng/ml. Bone age was estimated using Tanner Whitehouse 3 method (TW3).

RESULTS

Primary GHD (73%) was the commonest diagnosis among patients on GHT, followed by organic GHD (12.6%), genetic syndromes (8.4%) and systemic diseases (5.4%). Mean chronological age at presentation was 10.07+/-3.26 years (median-11 years, range 3-15 years), mean height age was 6.98+/-2.82 years (median 7.5 years, range 1-13 years) and mean bone age (available for 55 patients) was 7.19+/-3.1 years (median 8.2 years, range 1.3-13 years). Patients with systemic diseases (6.75+/-3.5 years) presented earlier, compared to patients with GHD (10.27+/-3.16 years) and genetic syndromes (10.18+/-3.20 years) (p=0.349). Most of the patients on GHT were in the age group 9-15 years (60.6%). Mean height gain with GHT was 8.7+/-2.7 cm (median 8.3 cm, range 3.0-13 cm) during 1st year then decreased to 6.9+/-2.4 cm (median 7.0 cm, range 3.0-12.5 cm) in the second year, and was maintained through the third year (mean 7.1+/-3.0 cm, median 7.0, range 3.0-13 cm). Among patients with GHD, those with primary deficiency had significantly better response to GHT in 1st year than secondary deficiency (9.0+/-2.65 vs 6.8+/-3.03 cm, p = 0.026). Response to GHT was negatively correlated with CA (r-0.27, p = 0.05), HA (r-0.47, p = 0.027) and BA (r-0.31, p=0.022) at presentation. Four patients (5.6%) developed hypothyroidism and one patient each developed disseminated tuberculosis and rickets. One patient of Turner's syndrome died of adrenal carcinoma. Short follow up and absence of measurement of IGF-1 and IGFBP3 were major limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to GHT in Indian patients is comparable to western counterparts. Maximum height gain on GHT is during the first year than decreases in second year, but is maintained through third year. Patients with primary GHD had better response than secondary GHD. Response to GHT is negatively correlated with chronological, height and bone age at presentation.

Factors Determining Patient Choice of Device for GH Therapy

AIM

To assess the factors determining patient choice of GH device, and whether offering free patient choice improves compliance with GH therapy.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study performed on patients offered free choice of GH device in a regional growth clinic. In a subgroup having home delivery, GH compliance was assessed using ampoule counts.

RESULTS

125 patients (74 (59%) male), median (range) 9.30 (1.0-18.3) years were commenced on GH from January 2001 to March 2004, and offered free choice of device. 68 (54%) chose a needled device, and 57 (46%) needle-free. There was no statistical difference in age, sex or diagnostic category between the two groups. Light blue devices were more likely to be chosen by males (p=0.056). Questionnaires giving reasons for choosing a device were available in 40, and a further 50 gave reasons for both choosing a specific device and not choosing others. Other than choice of needled/needle-free device, the factor most likely to determine choice was 'ease of use'. Only 6 (4.8%) subsequently changed device, and compliance remained high but unchanged at approximately 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no specific features which determine what GH device a patient will choose. For those units offering free patient choice, a wide range of different devices should be made available.

Optimizing Growth Hormone Efficacy: An Evidence-Based Analysis

For almost two decades, recombinant growth hormone (GH) has been in abundant supply to treat GH-deficient subjects to final height, yet the results continue to be suboptimal. Although there are numerous potential causes for this underachievement, the issues of poor compliance, ineffective dosing and lack of efficacy monitoring have been frequently promulgated to explain the phenomenon. Compliance is tied to knowledge, which is best promoted at the time of diagnosis by hospital-based personnel. GH pens have improved acceptability, but data on improvement in compliance are lacking. No GH device or delivery system has yet been shown to increase final height. Daily (or six times per week) dosing is clearly more effective, but increasing GH dose, especially during puberty, has a tendency to advance bone age and pubertal progression, which mitigates many of the effects. Finally, titration of dose to the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I level may prove to be useful in promoting final height; however, the converse is not true, i.e. increments in IGF-I level have not been shown to correlate with increments in height velocity. Thus, these issues with respect to achievement of final height are far from solved.

Uk audit of childhood growth hormone prescription, 1998

AIMS

To identify all young people prescribed growth hormone in the UK as of 1 October 1998 and to determine their age, sex, and the indication for therapy.

METHODS

Cross sectional national postal audit through members of the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (BSPED) and other paediatricians identified as potential prescribers of growth hormone. Main outcome measures were age, sex, and numbers of children receiving growth hormone by diagnostic category, analysed throughout the UK and by NHS region.

RESULTS

A total of 3228 children (aged 0.3 to 23.9 years) receiving growth hormone were identified by contacting 171 paediatricians (149 BSPED members). Of these, 2395 (74%) were identified who were under 16 years-representing 19.8/100 000 children in that age range in the UK-and in whom full data concerning diagnostic category were available. In the under 16s, there were 1209 (50.4%) boys and 1186 (49.6%) girls (excluding the 477 girls with Turner's syndrome: 63% boys and 37% girls). A total of 78% of the prescriptions were for licensed indications (primary and secondary growth hormone deficiency, Turner's syndrome, and chronic renal disease); 22% were for unlicensed indications (intrauterine growth restriction, bony dysplasia, Noonan syndrome, and other "short normals"). These proportions are similar to those reported in previous audits and by postmarketing surveillance from Pharmacia & Upjohn Ltd in the year 2000. Patterns of treatment were relatively uniform between regions.

CONCLUSIONS

A national audit of UK growth hormone prescription indicates uniform prescribing practice between regions, low levels of prescription beyond licensed indications, and stable patterns of prescribing practice over the past two years.

Growth and endocrine disorders in multisystem Langerhans' cell histiocytosis

INTRODUCTION

Langerhans' cell histiocytosis is a rare disorder, with diabetes insipidus occurring in up to half of patients. Causes of growth failure include the illness itself, treatments used and growth hormone insufficiency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified all patients with an endocrinopathy secondary to Langerhans' cell histiocytosis (LCH). Growth data were analysed from all patients with multisystem involvement.

RESULTS

Of 144 patients with multisystem LCH, 50 had an endocrinopathy, 49 of whom had diabetes insipidus. Growth hormone insufficiency (GHI) was present in 21 patients, seven of whom had other anterior pituitary deficiencies as well (gonadotrophin deficiency + GHI n = 2, gonadotrophin deficiency + TSH deficiency + GHI n = 2, panhypopituitarism n = 3). GH insufficiency, the development of which appeared to be independent of pituitary radiation, occurred at a median age of 8.3 years (4.7-18 years) and at a median interval of 3.5 years (0-11.8 years) after diagnosis of LCH. The median height SDS at diagnosis of growth hormone insufficiency was -2.9. Thirteen of the patients with growth hormone insufficiency attained final height with a median height SDS of -1.2. The final height SDS of 15 patients without GH insufficiency was closer to target height SDS, but not statistically different from that of the GH insufficient group.

CONCLUSIONS

GH therapy significantly improves growth in GH insufficient patients with Langerhans' cell histiocytosis. Early institution of GH therapy may further improve height outcome. However, most children with Langerhans' cell histiocytosis regardless of endocrine function, failed to reach target height.

A rational approach to short stature: focus on use and abuse of growth hormone

The abundant supply of recombinant growth hormone has raised interesting possibilities of several new applications. While supplementation of the missing hormone in patients with growth hormone deficiency is still the undisputed primary indication for its use, there is now convincing evidence of its usefulness in the therapy of short stature due to Turner syndrome and pre-transplant chronic renal failure in childhood. Numerous studies on patients with other causes of short stature have failed to show any significant benefit in final adult height. Social pressures notwithstanding, it is still premature to advocate the use of this expensive therapy for indications other than the three stated above especially since our understanding of potential long-term complications from such treatment is far from complete.

Functional appliance therapy in conjunction with growth hormone treatment. A case report

A case of Turners' syndrome is presented, in which a successful orthodontic treatment was facilitated by the administration of human growth hormone (HGH).