Unscheduled return visits within 72 hours to an assessment unit

Changing characteristics of hospital admissions but not the children admitted-a whole population study between 2000 and 2013

There are increasing numbers of emergency medical paediatric admissions. Our hypothesis was that characteristics of children and details of their emergency admissions are also changing over time. Details of emergency admissions in Scotland 2000-2013 were analysed. There were 574,403 emergency admissions, median age 2.3 years. The age distribution, proportion of boys and socioeconomic status of children admitted were essentially unchanged. Emergency admissions rose by 49% from 36/1000 children per annum to 54/1000 between 2000 and 2013. Emergency admissions that were discharged on the same day rose by 186% from 8.6/1000 to 24.6/1000. The mean duration of emergency admission fell from 1.7 to 1.0 days. The odds for an emergency admission with upper respiratory infection, "viral infection", tonsillitis, bronchiolitis and lower respiratory tract infection all rose. In contrast the odds for an emergency admission with asthma and gastroenteritis fell.

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics of children with emergency admissions have not changed substantially but characteristics of admissions have changed considerably, in particular admissions which are short stay and due to respiratory infection are much more common. The fall in the absolute number of children with some acute medical diagnoses suggests that the rise in admissions is not necessarily inexorable. What is Known: • Emergency admission prevalence is rising in many countries across Europe. What is New: • Our paper is the first to comprehensively analyse emergency medical paediatric admissions by exploring how characteristics of admissions and the children admitted have changed over time for a whole population. • The "take home message" is that whilst characteristics of emergency admissions have changed (e.g. number, duration of stay, readmissions, diagnoses), the characteristics of the children have not changed.

Tools for 'safety netting' in common paediatric illnesses: a systematic review in emergency care

CONTEXT

Follow-up strategies after emergency department (ED) discharge, alias safety netting, is often based on the gut feeling of the attending physician.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically identify evaluated safety-netting strategies after ED discharge and to describe determinants of paediatric ED revisits.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane central, OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies of any design reporting on safety netting/follow-up after ED discharge and/or determinants of ED revisits for the total paediatric population or specifically for children with fever, dyspnoea and/or gastroenteritis. Outcomes included complicated course of disease after initial ED visit (eg, revisits, hospitalisation).

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and study quality. As meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of studies, we performed a narrative synthesis of study results. A best-evidence synthesis was used to identify the level of evidence.

RESULTS

We summarised 58 studies, 36% (21/58) were assessed as having low risk of bias. Limited evidence was observed for different strategies of safety netting, with educational interventions being mostly studied. Young children, a relevant medical history, infectious/respiratory symptoms or seizures and progression/persistence of symptoms were strongly associated with ED revisits. Gender, emergency crowding, physicians' characteristics and diagnostic tests and/or therapeutic interventions at the index visit were not associated with revisits.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the heterogeneous available evidence, we identified a set of strong determinants of revisits that identify high-risk groups in need for safety netting in paediatric emergency care being related to age and clinical symptoms. Gaps remain on intervention studies concerning specific application of a uniform safety-netting strategy and its included time frame.

Physicians' assessment of pediatric returns to the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Return visits to the Emergency Department (ED) requiring admission are frequently reviewed for the purpose of quality improvement. Treating physicians typically perform this review, but it is unclear if they accurately identify the reasons for the returns.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the characteristics of pediatric return visits to the ED, and the ability of treating physicians to identify the root causes for these return visits.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study reviewed all returns within 96 h of an initial visit over a 2-year period at a tertiary care pediatric ED. Baseline characteristics were determined from review of patients' charts. The treating physicians, the primary author, and independent reviewers identified the root cause for the returns.

RESULTS

There were 97,374 patients that presented to the ED during the study, and 1091 (1.1%) of these children returned to the ED and were admitted. Returns were most common among children aged<5 years, arriving between 3:00 p.m. and 11:00 p .m. via private transportation, with infectious diseases. The physician involved in the care of the patient attributed 3.1% of returns to potential deficiencies in medical management, whereas the independent reviewers attributed 13% to potential deficiencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Both returns and the subset of returns due to potential deficiencies in management are more common than previously estimated, rendering review of returns a valuable quality improvement tool. However, EDs should not rely exclusively on the treating physicians to identify the reason for returns, as they seem to underestimate the frequency of returns due to potential deficiencies in medical management.

Setting up a Paediatric Rapid Access Outpatient Unit: views of general practice teams

Background

Rapid Access Outpatient Units (RAOUs) have been suggested as an alternative to hospital inpatient units for the management of some acutely unwell children. These units can provide ambulatory care, delivered close to home, and may prevent unnecessary hospital admission. There are no qualitative data on the views of primary care practitioners regarding these types of facilities. The aim of the study was to explore the opinions of primary care practitioners regarding a newly established RAOU.

Methods

The RAOU was established locally at a district general hospital when inpatient beds were closed and moved to an inpatient centre, based six miles away at the tertiary teaching hospital.

Qualitative, practice based group interviews with primary care practitioners (general practitioners (GPs), nurse practitioners and practice nurses) on their experiences of the RAOU. The data collection consisted of three practice based interviews with 14 participants. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was used to evaluate the data.

Results

There was positive feedback regarding ease of telephone access for referral, location, and the value of a service staffed by senior doctors where children could be observed, investigated and discharged quickly. There was confusion regarding the referral criteria for the assessment unit and where to send certain children. A majority of the practitioners felt the utility of the RAOU was restricted by its opening hours. Most participants felt they lacked sufficient information regarding the remit and facilities of the unit and this led to some uneasiness regarding safety and long term sustainability.

Conclusion

Practitioners considered that the RAOU offered a rapid senior opinion, flexible short term observation, quick access to investigations and was more convenient for patients. There were concerns regarding opening hours, safety of patients and lack of information about the unit's facilities. There was confusion about which children should be sent to the unit. This study raises questions regarding policy in regard to the organisation of paediatric services. It highlights that when establishing alternative services to local inpatient units, continual communication and engagement of primary care is essential if the units are to function effectively.

A prospective cohort study comparing hospital admission for gastro-enteritis with home management

OBJECTIVES

To compare physical and psychological outcomes in children presenting at Accident and Emergency Departments (A&E), diagnosed with gastro-enteritis and admitted to hospital with those of a similar age, sex and severity of illness discharged home. The physical and psychological well-being of children in these two groups, in the month after the episode, were compared as was further use of health care services.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

METHODS

A comparison of 116 children aged 1-6 years with gastro-enteritis, presenting at A&E over a 6 months period. Admitted children were compared with children discharged, of a similar age, sex and illness severity (triage score) with follow-up at 1 week and 1 month. Clinical history, psychosocial factors, investigations and outcomes were recorded at presentation and physical, psychological and family outcomes at 1 week and 1 month.

RESULTS

Of 116 children, 112 (97%) completed the study (56 in each group). No differences were detected in psychosocial factors, socio-economic status, family factors, time of arrival at A&E or waiting times. Parental perception of illness was greater in the admitted group (P < 0.005), but was recorded after the decision on admission was made. At 1 week follow-up admitted children had increased separation anxiety compared with children who were discharged (P < 0.05), but this difference disappeared at 1 month. Clinical outcomes were the same for both groups, although admitted children had more investigations (91% vs. 39%). Parents were equally satisfied with their child's treatment, but one-third of children in both groups sought further consultation with a health professional in the following week.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no statistically significant difference in socio-demographic data, time of arrival at A&E, waiting times, clinical and psychosocial outcomes in children with acute gastro-enteritis admitted to hospital compared with a group of children of similar age, gender and severity of illness managed at home. However, parents seek reassurance and follow-up of acutely ill children, even if the child is admitted to hospital, which has service and resource implications.

Actividad de una unidad de observación en un servicio de urgencias de un hospital terciario: dos años de experiencia

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of the activity of a short stay observation unit (SSOU) in a tertiary hospital, and to analyze its influence on the hospitalization rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The activity of the SSOU during the first 2 years after opening is described. Descriptive variables were registered. Hospitalization activity during the first 5 months after opening the unit was compared with the activity during the same period in the previous year.

RESULTS

From June 1, 2001 to May 31, 2003, 74,989 patients were admitted to the emergency department (ED) and 2,438 (3.25 %) were transferred to the SSOU. The mean age of the patients was 64.55 months. The mean length of stay was 5 hours and 50 minutes. The main discharge diagnoses were gastrointestinal disease (30.2 %), accidents (15 %), respiratory illness (12.5 %) and febrile syndrome (9.8 %). The hospitalization rate in patients admitted to the ED was 5.8 % from June 1, 2000 to October 1, 2000 and was 4.28 % in the same period in 2001. The mean diagnosis-related group (DRG)-weight was 0.8648 in 2000 and was 0.9078 in 2001. Total weight was 680.66 in 2000 and 495.69 in 2001, allowing an approximate saving of 329,162 Euros.

CONCLUSIONS

The opening of the SSOU has been useful in the assessment and treatment of common childhood diseases and has helped reduce the hospitalization rate, increase the complexity of inpatients and lower costs.

Hospital based alternatives to acute paediatric admission: a systematic review

AIMS

To synthesise published evidence of the impacts of introducing hospital based alternatives to acute paediatric admission.

METHODS

Systematic review of studies of interventions for children with acute medical problems. Main outcome measures were: admission or discharge, unscheduled returns to hospital, satisfaction of parents and general practitioners, effects on health service activity, and costs.

RESULTS

Twenty five studies were included: one randomised controlled trial, 23 observational or cross-sectional studies, and one qualitative study. Many studies were of uncertain quality or were open to significant potential bias. About 40% of children attending acute assessment units in paediatric departments, and over 60% of those attending acute assessment units in A&E departments, do not require inpatient admission. There is little evidence of serious clinical consequences in children discharged from these units, although up to 7% may subsequently return to hospital. There is some evidence that users are satisfied with these services and that they are associated with reductions in inpatient activity levels and certain hospital costs. Evidence about the impact of urgent outpatient clinics is very limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports a view that acute paediatric assessment services are a safe, efficient, and acceptable alternative to inpatient admission, but this evidence is of limited quantity and quality. Further research is required to confirm that this type of service reorganisation does not disadvantage children and their families, particularly where inpatient services are withdrawn from a hospital.

Patterns of admissions for children with special needs to the paediatric assessment unit

BACKGROUND

Children with special needs present a challenge to those involved in their care.

AIMS

To determine the role of the acute assessment unit for these children.

METHODS

Case notes and other records were reviewed for information on referrals, admissions, readmission within 7 and 28 days, length of stay, and management of 86 children registered for special needs. The study covered five years between January 1997 and December 2001.

RESULTS

Of the 86 children, 48 (58%) were boys; 62 children had cerebral palsy and 52 learning disability. There were 914 episodes, with 44% of these being self referrals and 35% from general practitioners; 35.5% of the episodes were managed in the assessment unit. The average length of stay in hospital was 5 days, ranging from <24 hours to 63 days; 37.5% of those admitted to the ward stayed for less than 24 hours. Respiratory tract infections and seizures were the main reasons for referral and admission.

CONCLUSION

Children with special needs tend to have a predictable pattern of conditions requiring inpatient care. One third of the inpatients episodes did not need a prolonged stay in hospital. This latter group of children could be managed at home with support of community nurses. Integrated care pathways need to be developed to minimise disruption to their lives. Appropriate resources should be made available to achieve these goals.

[Effectiveness of a short-stay observation unit in a pediatric emergency department]

Short-Stay Observation Units (SSOUs) in paediatric emergency departments are effective in reducing inpatient admissions but can also generate excessive short-stay hospitalisations. The aim of the study was to evaluate both these consequences and the different missions of SSOUs.

METHODS

This prospective study included all children admitted in a 10-bed-medico-surgical SSOU of a tertiary-care paediatric emergency department from September 4, to October 31, 2001. At the time of SSOU admission, the physician indicated the purpose of the admission and which decision he would have made in the absence of a SSOU.

RESULTS

Five hundred and nine children (median age = 4 years, chronic disease: 26%, trauma: 34%) were included, accounting for 15% of admissions. The mean length of stay was 14 +/- 8h. The decision in the absence of a SSOU would have been: inpatient hospitalization (77%), transfer to another hospital in the absence of inpatient room vacancy (7%), discharge home (10%), prolonged waiting in the emergency ward (4%), do not know or not indicated (2%). The SSOU admission was deemed appropriate in 81%: discharge home within 24h was likely in 65% and the final orientation of the child was uncertain in 16%. The admission was debatable in 13% and inappropriate in 6%. Sixty six per cent of children were discharged home.

CONCLUSION

The SSOU reduced inpatient hospitalisations, generated few inappropriate short stay hospitalisations, and seemed particularly efficient for paediatric diseases. Proposed indicators should allow inter-hospital comparisons.

Quadrennial review of a paediatric emergency assessment unit

The primary aim of this article is to report on one aspect of a quadrennial study designed to explore the appropriateness and impact of the development of a paediatric emergency assessment unit (PEAU) as a response to increases in paediatric emergencies presenting to a south-western regional child health unit. In particular, this article will present the findings of a prospective audit of admissions to the PEAU over a 1-month period during the latter part of 2002. The primary method of data collection utilized a structured survey instrument developed using a design and automatic data computer software package, completed by the nursing staff. Anonymized descriptive data were obtained from 223 children admitted to the PEAU during one calendar moth and authorized by the appropriate clinical directorate audit committee as part of its ongoing commitment to the full implementation of clinical governance. The data presented primarily relate to children admitted during the official opening times of the PEAU, and those presenting out of hours. The data analysis demonstrates a reduction in the number of children staying overnight in hospital since the opening of the PEAU, with the majority of children being referred by their own family doctor. Only one child in the sample was readmitted to the PEAU within 24 hours, and two within 24 hours of discharge as inpatients. Although thought to be pertinent, only one child admitted after official closing of the PEAU and out of hours was described as being admitted for social reasons. The International Classification of Diagnosis (ICD) 10 (World Health Organization (WHO), 1994) classifications of the children admitted to the PEAU reflect those found in other similar studies. Overall, the results of this investigation demonstrate that a PEAU can offer an efficient service to GPs, families and others as a route of referral, thus mitigating unnecessary overnight stays for individual children.

A seven year experience of medical emergencies in the assessment unit

AIMS

To analyse retrospectively all referrals to the assessment unit during a seven year period, to determine their sources and destination.

METHODS

All referrals over the seven year period were analysed. Parental satisfaction was determined using a questionnaire in some of the patients. The disease pattern and the investigations performed were determined. The community nurses' working hours and type of work done were analysed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 43 496 children were seen in the unit. Over 65% of the patients were referred by the general practitioners; 13 517 (34.2%) of those referred to the unit were discharged directly from the unit. Respiratory disorders and gastrointestinal problems were commonly seen. The children discharged from the unit did not have significantly more tests done on them. Most of the parents whose children were discharged from the unit were happy to be managed at home. The community nurses attended many children who needed intravenous therapy and advice on fluid rehydration. Community nurses reduce admission to the wards by working with other members in the assessment unit. This in turn provides a single point of entry and bridges the gap between primary and secondary care. We suggest recommendations on setting up such a unit.

A short stay or 23-hour ward in a general and academic children's hospital: are they effective?

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the usefulness of a short stay or 23-hour ward in a pediatric unit of a large teaching hospital, Westmead Hospital, and an academic Children's hospital, The New Children's Hospital, to determine if they are a useful addition to the emergency service.

METHODS

This is a descriptive comparison of prospectively collected data on all children admitted to the short stay ward at Westmead Hospital (WH) during 1994 and the short stay ward at the New Children's Hospital (NCH) during 1997-98. These hospitals service an identical demographic area with the latter (NCH) a tertiary referral center. The following outcome measures were used: length of stay, appropriateness of stay, rate of admission to an in-hospital bed, and rate of unscheduled visits within 72 hours of discharge. Adverse events were reported and patient follow-up was attempted at 48 hours after discharge in all cases.

RESULTS

The short stay ward accounted for 10.3% (Westmead Hospital) and 14.7% (New Children's Hospital) of admissions, with 56% medical in nature, 30% surgical, and the remainder procedural or psychological. Admission patterns were similar, with asthma, gastroenteritis, convulsion, pneumonia, and simple surgical conditions accounting for most short stay ward admissions. The short stay ward increased hospital efficiency with an average length of stay of 17.5 hours (Westmead Hospital) compared to 20.5 hours (New Children's Hospital). The users of the short stay ward were children of young age less than 2 years, with stay greater than 23 hours reported in only 1% of all admissions to the short stay ward. The rate of patient admission to an in-hospital bed was low, (4% [Westmead Hospital] compared to 6% [New Children's Hospital]), with the number of unscheduled visits within 72 hours of short stay ward discharge less than 1%. There were no adverse events reported at either short stay ward, with parental satisfaction high. The short stay ward was developed through reallocation of resources from within the hospital to the short stay ward. This resulted in estimated savings of $1/2 million (Westmead Hospital) to $2.3 million (New Children's Hospital) to the hospital, due to more efficient bed usage.

CONCLUSION

This data demonstrates the robust nature of the short stay ward. At these two very different institutions we have shown improved bed efficient and patient care in a cost-effective way. We have also reported on greater parental satisfaction and early return of the child with their family to the community.