The role of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma

Factors affecting the choice of budesonide in the therapy of croup, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Introduction

Budesonide is one of inhaled corticosteroids with an established position in the therapy of croup, bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Aim

To assess factors affecting the choice of budesonide in the therapy of croup, asthma and COPD by specialists and general practitioners in daily clinical practice.

Material and methods

This multicentre, open-label, post-marketing survey was performed nation-wide with the participation of 1113 doctors and 100,980 patients treated with budesonide. The study questionnaire included questions about factors affecting the choice of budesonide and assessing the prescription pattern of the drug.

Results

The doctors frequently declared use of budesonide in monotherapy in patients with croup, and in polytherapy in asthma and COPD (with salmeterol or formoterol and with formoterol, respectively). The most important factors affecting the choice of budesonide, as declared by doctors, were safety, efficacy, good personal experience with the use of this medication and recommendations of scientific associations. Budesonide in monotherapy was prescribed in 63.7%, 49.7%, and only 13.5% of patients with croup, asthma and COPD, respectively. The most important factors which determined the choice of this drug were safety (from 78.7% to 91.0%), efficacy (from 78.9% to 90.5%) and good personal experience of doctors (from 65.6% to 84.5%).

Conclusions

Budesonide is still frequently chosen in the treatment of croup, asthma and COPD by Polish specialists and general practitioners because of its efficacy, safety and considerable experience in the application. Acquired clinical experience of physicians prevails over the issued recommendations of scientific societies regarding the use of budesonide in daily clinical practice.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression in asthmatic children on inhaled corticosteroids: part 1. Which test should be used?

The effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) has been regarded as a 'benign physiological response'. A recent survey suggests that adrenal crisis might be more common in asthmatic children on ICS than previously thought. The clinical features of adrenal insufficiency are non-specific and can easily be missed. Accurate biochemical assessment of the axis is therefore mandatory. A review of the literature determined that all basal adrenal function tests, including plasma cortisol profiles, cannot identify which children can respond to stress. There is no evidence to suggests that the degree of the physiological adjustment of the HPA to ICS predicts clinically significant HPA suppression. Only gold standard adrenal function tests can assess the integrity of the whole axis. Of the two available tests, the correctly performed overnight metyrapone test (with ACTH levels) is safe and better by far. The use of cortisol profiles should only be used to demonstrate differences in systemic activity of various ICS and delivery devices. Regulatory bodies should insist on trials that evaluate the HPA with a gold standard adrenal function test before it is declared safe and allowed to be marketed. A re-analysis of studies that have utilized gold standard adrenal function tests only might identify the lowest safe dose and duration of ICS.

Are inhaled corticosteroids associated with an increased risk of fracture in children?

Inhaled corticosteroids are widely used in the long-term management of asthma in children. Data on the relationship between inhaled corticosteroid therapy and osteoporotic fracture are inconsistent. We address this issue in a large population-based cohort of children aged 4-17 years in the UK (the General Practice Research Database). The incidence rates of fracture among children aged 4-17 years taking inhaled corticosteroids (n=97,387), taking bronchodilators only (n=70 984) and a reference group (n=345,758) were estimated. Each child with a non-vertebral fracture (n=23,984) was subsequently matched by age, sex, practice, and calendar time to one child without a fracture. Fracture incidence was increased in children using inhaled corticosteroids, as well as in those receiving bronchodilators alone. With an average daily beclomethasone dose of 200 microg or less, the crude fracture risk relative to nonusers was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96-1.26]; with dosage of 201-400 microg, it was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.08-1.39); and with dosages over 400 microg, it was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.11-1.67). This excess risk disappeared after adjustment for indicators of asthma severity. The increased risk of fracture associated with use of inhaled corticosteroids is likely to be the result of the underlying illness, rather than being directly attributable to inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

Fluticasone and beclometasone: what are their effects on children's growth?

Fear of growth retardation may account for the underuse of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma, despite compelling evidence of their effectiveness. This fear may be reduced with newer agents with lower oral bioavailability if their theoretical advantage of fewer systemic adverse effects than the standard treatment of inhaled beclometasone is realized in practice. This review aims to determine if one of the newer agents, inhaled fluticasone, has less effect on the growth of pre-pubertal asthmatic children than inhaled beclometasone. The outcome measure was growth velocity. Two double blind, randomized controlled trials were identified. In one of the studies the mean growth velocity in the fluticasone group was 0.7 cm/year greater than in the beclometasone group. In the second, smaller study the mean growth velocity in the fluticasone group was 0.8 cm/year greater. There is therefore some evidence that fluticasone has less (if any) adverse effect on growth.

Inadequate asthma treatment practices and noncompliance in Israel

Childhood asthma morbidity and mortality are increasing despite improvements in asthma therapy. The changes over the past decade in the guidelines for treatment of children with severe asthma have led to a reduction in admissions and readmissions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The Israeli medical infrastructure is exemplary in its capability of extending appropriate medical services to its entire population. Our objective was to look at the background of preventive maintenance treatment and treatment during an acute episode in children admitted to PICUs with severe asthma, and to identify areas that could be targeted for change. A 5-year retrospective chart audit on acute asthma admissions was conducted in two PICUs of general community hospitals representative of the provision of medical care in Israel. The prehospitalization preventive management and acute treatment prior to PICU admission were evaluated, and the number of admissions and readmissions was recorded. The index admission was the first episode of acute asthma for only 3% of the children: 25% of patients required readmission, and 15% of these to the PICU. In spite of a proven history of acute exacerbations of the disease, only 60% were on continuous treatment between attacks, and 29% of them had abruptly discontinued treatment, most of them shortly before the onset of the index attack. Inhaled steroids were used as maintenance and preventive treatment by less than one-third of the children, with the other two-thirds receiving mainly beta-2 agonists drugs. In conclusion, an unacceptably large proportion of asthmatic children do not receive the recommended maintenance and preventive treatment because of poor compliance, lack of education, or insufficient healthcare provision. This has probably led to avoidable recurrences of acute asthma exacerbations and unnecessary use of PICU facilities. These findings suggest that steps for implementing recommended guidelines and an educational program are needed.

Acute asthma

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is the most common medical emergency in children. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates and poses a tremendous societal burden worldwide. Management of the acute attack involves a stepwise approach that includes beta-agonist and steroid therapy, the mainstay of emergency treatment. Most patients will respond to this regime and can be discharged from the emergency department. Failure to respond to treatment necessitates hospital admission and sometimes admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Management in the ICU involves intensification of pharmacologic therapy, including nonstandard therapies, in an attempt to avoid intubation and ventilation. When needed, mechanical ventilatory support can be rendered fairly safe with little morbidity if the likely cardiorespiratory physiologic derangements are appreciated and if appropriate ventilatory strategies are used. In the past two decades, the availability of newer potent medications and changes in approach to monitoring and ventilatory strategies have resulted in a decrease in ICU morbidity and mortality rates. Research endeavors are presently underway to further characterize the underlying mechanisms of the disease and are likely to lead to novel therapies. This article reviews the approach to management of acute severe asthma.