Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme

Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in High-Risk Neonates at Kalaburagi Region of Northern Karnataka: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

The study estimated the prevalence of hearing impairment in high-risk neonates and effect of high-risk factors on the hearing. A hospital-based cross sectional study was conducted on 327 neonates with high-risk factors. All the high-risk babies were screened using TEOAE and AABR followed by diagnostic ABR testing. Six (2%) of high-risk neonates were found to have bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss. Risk factors associated with hearing impairment include multiple risk factors of Preterm delivery, hyperbilirubinemia, congenital anomalies, neonatal sepsis, viral or bacterial infection, positive family history of hearing loss and prolonged NICU stay. Further, the inclusion of AABR along with TEOAE has been shown to be a useful tool in reducing false-positive rates and identifying hearing loss.

Perinatal factors influencing the neonatal hearing screening results

Background

Previous studies have indicated that the majority of cases with “failed” results related to transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) test have the normal hearing. The present study aimed to assess the possible relationships between perinatal factors and the false-positive OAE results.

Methods

A case-control study was carried out in an Iranian Hospital in 2020. Based on the OAE results on the first day of life, newborns were divided into 2 groups; Control group included subjects with “Pass” OAE results. Every neonate with “Fail” OAE result was referred for auditory brainstem response (ABR). Neonates with bilateral fail OAE but normal ABR results (false-positive OAE) were considered as the case group. All recorded data were analyzed to assess the possible correlations between maternal/neonatal factors and the false-positive OAE results.

Results

One hundred and eighty-one neonates entered the study. Of all included neonates, 87 (48.1%) cases showed bilateral fail OAE and 94 (51.9%) subjects passed the OAE test. Normal ABR results (false-positive OAE) were observed in all cases with bilateral fail OAE. Comparisons of variables affecting the OAE results showed that of all perinatal factors, neonate’s sex (p = 0.046) and cesarean section (p = 0.003) were the only influencing factors that increased the risk of false-positive OAE results.

Conclusion

Based on the results, the cesarean section delivery and neonate’s male sex increased the risk of false-positive results related to OAE test. Implementing other screening tests such as ABR or Automated ABR as the initial screening test could be suggested for such cases.

Vulnerable Child Syndrome and Newborn Screening Carrier Results for Cystic Fibrosis or Sickle Cell

OBJECTIVES

To measure parental perceptions of child vulnerability, as a precursor to developing a population-scale mechanism to mitigate harm after newborn screening.

STUDY DESIGN

Participants were parents of infants aged 2-5 months. Parental perceptions of child vulnerability were assessed with an adapted version of the Vulnerable Baby Scale. The scale was included in the script for a larger study of telephone follow-up for 2 newborn blood screening samples (carrier status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy). A comparison sample was added using a paper survey with well-baby visits to an urban/suburban clinic.

RESULTS

Sample sizes consisted of 288 parents in the cystic fibrosis group, 426 in the sickle cell hemoglobinopathy group, and 79 in the clinic comparison group. Parental perceptions of child vulnerability were higher in the sickle cell group than cystic fibrosis group (P < .0001), and both were higher than the clinic comparison group (P < .0001). Parental perceptions of child vulnerability were inversely correlated with parental age (P < .002) and lower health literacy (P < .015, sickle cell hemoglobinopathy group only).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased parental perceptions of child vulnerability seem to be a bona fide complication of incidental newborn blood screening findings, and healthcare professionals should be alert to the possibility. From a public health perspective, we recommend routine follow-up after incidental findings to mitigate psychosocial harm.

Parents' satisfaction with a trial of a newborn hearing screening programme in Jordan

OBJECTIVE

This study examines parents' satisfaction level toward a trial of a newborn hearing screening programme (NHSP) that was applied in King Abdullah II University Hospital (KAUH) in Jordan over one year. This is the first study that investigated parents' satisfaction toward a hearing screening programme in the Arab countries, and the results will improve any future screening programmes in the Arabian region.

METHOD

The main tool for this study was a questionnaire that was translated and modified from the original version of the Parental Satisfaction with the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (PSQ-NHSPs1). The questionnaire consisted of 19 items covering five main aspects of the NHSP. The parents' responses were not anonymously given where the parents whose children had undergone the hearing screening were contacted by phone using the data record of the hospital.

RESULTS

The majority of the parents were very satisfied with the programme overall and showed great support and appreciation for the effort in testing their babies and increasing their awareness. The satisfaction levels varied among the specific aspects of the programme. Good portion of the parents did not receive the brochure containing information about the screening, and almost half of them did not know the results of the hearing screening.

CONCLUSION

Parents were overall satisfied with neonatal hearing screening programme that was conducted at KAUH. However, parents were less satisfied with information related to the test procedure and results. Parents' responses in this study could be used to improve any future hearing screening program in Jordan or in the Arab countries.

High-frequency otoacoustic emissions in universal newborn hearing screening

OBJECTIVE

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are currently used in many newborn hearing screening programs as the initial hearing test, typically testing frequencies between 1 and 4 or 6 kHz, but they have been associated with high false-positive rates. The objective was to investigate the possible benefit of high-frequency DPOAEs for reducing false-positive rates.

METHODS

255 healthy newborns (138 males and 117 females) undergoing conventional hearing screening based on DPOAE and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) testing were recruited. High-frequency DPOAE amplitudes, noise floors and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured for f2 frequencies up to 12 kHz.

RESULTS

Of the 255 newborns who participated in this study, 23 (9%) failed the conventional DPOAE test but passed the AABR test, and 8 (3%) failed both tests. For an SNR threshold of 6 dB, high-frequency DPOAE tests at f2 = 4, 6, 8 and 10 kHz resulted in a reduction in the false-positive rate from 9% to 0.4%, or to zero if only three of the four frequencies were required to exceed the threshold. SNRs were lower in newborns with birth weights greater than 4000 g; lower at 2 kHz in newborns with a gestational age of 41 weeks; slightly higher in vaginally-delivered newborns; and higher at 2 kHz with increasing age in the group that failed the conventional DPOAE test but passed AABR.

CONCLUSION

High-frequency DPOAEs resulted in a reduction in the DPOAE failure rate and the false-positive rate. These findings may be helpful in universal newborn hearing screening programs.

Feasibility of newborn hearing screening in a public hospital setting in South Africa: A pilot study

Objectives

The current pilot study aimed to explore the feasibility of newborn hearing screening (NHS) in a hospital setting with clinical significance for the implementation of NHS. Context-specific objectives included determining the average time required to screen each neonate or infant; the most suitable time for initial hearing screening in the wards; as well as the ambient noise levels in the wards and at the neonatal follow-up clinic where screening would be conducted.

Method

A descriptive, longitudinal, repeated measures, within-subjects design was employed. The pilot study comprised 11 participants who underwent hearing screening. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results

The average time taken to conduct hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response was 18.4 minutes, with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions taking the least time. Ambient noise levels differed between wards and clinics with the sound level readings ranging between 50 dBA and 70 dBA. The most suitable screening time was found to be the afternoons, after feeding times.

Conclusion

Findings highlight important considerations when embarking on larger scale NHS studies or when planning a hospital NHS programme. Current findings suggest that NHS can be efficiently and effectively conducted in public sector hospitals in South Africa, provided that test time is considered in addition to sensitivity and specificity when deciding on a screening protocol; bar recognised personnel challenges.

Wideband reflectance measurements in newborns: Relationship to otoscopic findings

OBJECTIVES

Newborn hearing screening includes testing with otoacoustic emissions and the auditory brainstem response. Unfortunately, both tests are affected by the presence of material in the ear canal and middle ear such as vernix, meconium, and amniotic fluid. The objective of this study was to determine to what extent occlusion of the ear canal as seen on otoscopy affects wideband energy reflectance measurements in newborns. A secondary objective was to obtain additional normative wideband reflectance data in newborns.

METHODS

Newborns from a well-baby nursery were enrolled. Wideband energy reflectance measurements and otoscopy were done immediately after the hearing screening. Occlusion of the ear canal as seen on otoscopy was described on a scale of 0-100%.

RESULTS

A total of 156 babies were enrolled (mean age = 25 hours). A statistically significant difference in the reflectance at ambient pressure was found between the 0-70% and 80-100% occlusion groups. There was no significant difference in reflectance between the right and the left ears. The median reflectance pattern generally followed that of previous studies but in certain frequency regions the present reflectance values were higher.

CONCLUSION

A significant increase in reflectance occurs when 70%-80% of the ear-canal diameter is occluded. Taking otoscopy findings into account may improve the interpretation of reflectance measurements. However, further studies are required to better establish the relationship between canal occlusion and reflectance.

Factors affecting parent-child relationships one year after positive newborn screening for cystic fibrosis or congenital hypothyroidism

OBJECTIVE

Examine factors that mediate parent-infant relationships 12 months after positive newborn screening (NBS).

METHODS

We examined effects of infant diagnosis, parents' perceptions of child vulnerability and child attachment, parental depression and anxiety on parent-infant feeding interactions for 131 mothers and 118 fathers of 131 infants whose NBS and diagnostics confirmed cystic fibrosis (CF, n = 23), congenital hypothyroidism (CH, n = 35), CF carrier status (CF-C, n = 38), or healthy normal NBS (H, n = 35).

RESULTS

Separate composite indicator structural equation models for mothers and fathers showed that neonatal diagnosis was not associated with increased anxiety or depression. In comparison with the healthy group, CF group parents reported higher perceptions of child vulnerability (p < .001, p = .002), and CF-C group fathers viewed their children as more attached (p = .021). High maternal perception of child vulnerability was associated with low perceptions of child attachment (p = .001), which was associated with task-oriented feeding behavior (p = .016, p = .029). Parental task-oriented feeding behavior was associated with less positive (p < .001, p < .001) and more negative interactions (p < .001, p = .001) with their infants. High paternal perception of child vulnerability was associated with negative parent interactions (p < .001). High parental affective involvement and verbalization was associated with high infant affective expressiveness, communicative skills, and social responsiveness (mothers' p < .001, fathers' p < .001). High parental negative effect and/or inconsistent and intrusive behavior were associated with infant dysregulation and irritability (mothers, p < .001, fathers, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The severity of conditions identified through NBS can affect parents' perceptions of their child's vulnerability and attachment. Infant feeding problems in the context of chronic health conditions, like CF, could represent signs of more deeply rooted concerns regarding the parent-child relationship that merit additional clinical evaluation.

Factors associated with parental perception of child vulnerability 12 months after abnormal newborn screening results

We identified factors associated with elevated parental perceptions of child vulnerability (PPCV) 12 months after newborn screening (NBS) of 136 children: healthy, normal results (H, n = 37), cystic fibrosis carriers (CF-C, n = 40), congenital hypothyroidism (CH, n = 36), and cystic fibrosis (CF, n = 23). Controlling for infant and parent characteristics, mixed logit structural equation modeling showed direct paths to elevated PPCV included parent female sex, CF diagnosis, and high documented illness frequency. PPCV was positively associated with maternal parenting stress. Infants with CF and CF carriers had significantly more documented illness frequency than H group infants. The CH group did not differ significantly from the H group and had no paths to PPCV. Unexpectedly high documented illness frequency among infants who are CF carriers warrants further investigation.

Identification of developmental-behavioral problems in primary care: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Recent mandates and recommendations for formal screening programs are based on the claim that pediatric care providers underidentify children with developmental-behavioral disorders, yet the research to support this claim has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To review research literature for studies regarding pediatric primary care providers' identification of developmental-behavioral problems in children.

METHODS

On the basis of a Medline search conducted on September 22, 2010, using relevant key words, we identified 539 articles for review. We included studies that (1) were conducted in the United States, (2) were published in peer-reviewed journals, (3) included data that addressed pediatric care providers' identification of developmental-behavioral problems in individual patients, (4) included an independent assessment of patients' developmental-behavioral problems, such as diagnostic interviews or validated screening instruments, and (5) reported data sufficient to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Studies were not limited by sample size. Eleven articles met these criteria. We used Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria to evaluate study quality. Although the studies were similar in many ways, heterogeneous methodology precluded a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Sensitivities for pediatric care providers ranged from 14% to 54%, and specificities ranged from 69% to 100%. The authors of 1 outlier study reported a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 61%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatricians are often the first point of entry into developmental and mental health systems. Knowing their accuracy in identifying children with developmental-behavioral disabilities is essential for implementing optimal evaluation programs and achieving timely identification. Moreover, these statistics are important to consider when planning large-scale screening programs.

Anxiety of the mothers with referred baby during Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the anxiety among mothers whom their babies have failed test results in the first stage of Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out on mothers whom their baby have positive test results in the first stage of Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Program. Face to face interview was conducted to obtain data on sociodemographic profiles, knowledge about hearing loss and past medical history. Symptoms experienced by the mothers due to positive hearing test results and level of anxiety were measured by using the Malay translation Beck Anxiety Inventory questionnaire. These mothers were then given an appointment to come for the second screening six weeks after the first screening. The same questionnaire was given to them before the start of the second screening. SPSS version 11.5 was used for data entry and analysis. Wilcoxon signed Rank Test was used to compare the level of anxiety between the first and second screening.

RESULTS

From a total of 78 mothers who were participated during the first screening, 50 of them have completed the study at the second screening (response rate=64%). Fifty-two percent of them knew about the hearing screening before hand. Ninety-six percent of the mothers became alert about their child response towards sounds after they knew that their child had failed the first hearing screening. During the first screening, 74% of the mothers felt mild anxiety which was decreased to 68% before the mothers undergone the second screening. Moderate anxiety was felt by 10% of the mothers during both the first and second screening. There were 8% of the mothers having severe anxiety during the first screening but have reduced to half (4%) before the mothers undergone the second screening. The anxiety level was significantly less before the second screening with the median score of 5 (IQR: 13.0) compared to after the first screening (8, IQR=14.25); p=0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

There are considerable portion of the mothers of false-positive test result during Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Program experienced unacceptable anxiety. This group of mothers needs to be identified and given a necessary help.

Long-term evaluation of genetic counseling following false-positive newborn screen for cystic fibrosis

This cross-sectional mixed method study was a long-term follow-up evaluation of families who participated in an earlier survey of their understanding of cystic fibrosis (CF) genetics and their infants' false-positive CF newborn screening (NBS) results. Thirty-seven of the original 138 parents participated in the follow-up telephone survey. Results showed parents who received genetic counseling at the time of their infants' diagnostic sweat tests had significantly higher long-term retention of genetic knowledge than those without genetic counseling. However, both groups still had misconceptions and lacked accurate information about the actual risk associated with being a CF carrier. Most parents either had already informed (65%) or planned to inform (19%) their children about the child's carrier status. Mean child age at the time of disclosure was 9.2 years. Situational prompts were the most common reasons for informing their children. Neither parental knowledge, medical literacy, nor parental education predicted whether parents informed their children about their carrier status. False-positive NBS results for CF were not associated with parental perceptions of child vulnerability 11-14 years after the testing. Although the sample from this study was small, these findings underscore the benefits of genetic counseling at the time of the diagnostic sweat test and offer information that can assist parents in talking with their children about the implications of having one CFTR mutation.

Triagem auditiva neonatal: um estudo na cidade de Curitiba - PR

OBJETIVO: verificar a prática de Triagem Auditiva Neonatal na cidade de Curitiba-PR. MÉTODOS: inicialmente foi realizado um levantamento do número de maternidades e/ou hospitais com maternidades existentes na cidade de Curitiba, mediante a consulta no Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde. Constatou-se a existência de um total de 59 hospitais cadastrados, sendo que três destes são maternidades e 18 são hospitais com maternidade. A partir do levantamento feito, foi estabelecido um contato com o profissional responsável por cada uma das instituições, sendo questionado quanto à existência de um programa de Triagem Auditiva Neonatal e para aqueles que o apresentavam foi entregue um questionário a fim de obter informações a respeito do referido serviço. RESULTADOS: constatou-se que apenas 23,8% das maternidades realizam Triagem Auditiva Neonatal, sendo que destas, 20% é universal para neonatos a termo e 80% universal para neonatos de alto risco. A triagem em todos os serviços é realizada com Emissões Otoacústicas Evocadas por Estímulo Transiente. CONCLUSÃO: mediante o estudo realizado verificou-se que a lei número 14588 - 22/12/2004 não está sendo rigorosamente cumprida. Apesar da demanda aliada à importância da detecção precoce, a Triagem Auditiva Neonatal não é realizada em todas as maternidades existentes e mesmo naquelas nas quais há um fonoaudiólogo e a triagem auditiva é realizada, esta não é universal.

Screening to detect permanent childhood hearing impairment in neonates transferred from the newborn nursery

OBJECTIVES

The focus of this report is hearing screening of newborns transferred from the regular nursery to a specialized area. The purpose of the study undertaken was: (1) to determine whether screening coverage in this population was achieved; (2) to establish whether the linkage between neonatal screening and the diagnostic follow-up was carried out correctly; (3) to better determine the incidence of permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) in this at-risk population.

METHODS

Six population centres averaging 12,000 births annually participated (Bordeaux, Lille, Paris, Marseille, Toulouse and Lyon). Automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) (Natus ALGO 3i) screening was performed in two stages: i.e. infants with initial "positive" results were screened a second time using the same technique. Of the 117,103 babies born during the study period, 4972 neonates were "transferred" and comprised the population for this report (4.2% of the total births).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Screening results for 4972 "transferred" neonates were compared with those of non-transferred neonates (N=112,131). Screening coverage of eligible infants was significantly lower (75.4%) in "transferred" neonates (3750 infants screened) compared to 97.5% coverage of non-transferred neonates (109,349 infants screened). The rate of positive results after the first stage AABR was higher in the "transferred" population (11.1%) than in the non-transferred population (6.5%). Of the 415 "transferred" newborns with initial positive screens, 91.3% were rechecked as stipulated in the project protocol. The second pre-discharge AABR ascertained that in half of the cases auditory function had normalized in the day. Of the 183 "transferred" infants whose result remained suspect at the conclusion of both stages of the neonatal screen (4.9% of the tested population), only 70.5% returned to the audiology centre for diagnostic follow-up. The incidence of bilateral PCHI was markedly higher (4/1000) in "transferred" infants than in the non-transferred population (1.08/1000).

CONCLUSIONS

The difficulty of obtaining universal screening coverage in "transferred" infants was, unfortunately, verified in this prospective, multicentre study. Further, the diversity of our "transferred" population was not much greater than that revealed by careful analysis of published hearing screening studies in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants. The influence of risk factors and their more or less complex combinations is apparent.

Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline

OBJECTIVES

Universal infant hearing screening using otoacoustic emission and auditory brain-stem response audiometry is widely administered to attain the goals of early identification of, and intervention for hearing impairment. Concerns regarding screening specificity have, however, been raised. False positives may result from vernix occlusion in the ear canal or transient middle ear effusion, and can result in substantial costs to health care systems. The current study investigates the effects of age and time interval between tests on hearing assessment results.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred and seventeen positive screens from a 2-stage distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) screening programme in Hong Kong, who subsequently received diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) assessment and monitoring, were investigated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in diagnostic ABR results were compared among infants of different ages at tests, and with different time lapses after DPOAE screening. The proportion of those having persistent hearing impairment, conductive loss and impairment of moderate degree or above, were also compared.

RESULTS

A significantly higher rate of normal ABR thresholds (60%versus 24%) was noted in infants assessed after age 50 days, and in infants diagnostically assessed with a time lapse of over 20 days post-DPOAE screening (65%versus 42%).

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying diagnostic ABR assessment may reveal a higher percentage of normal thresholds, and hence probably higher specificity. Time delay may allow for spontaneous resolution of transient outer and middle ear conditions. However, the goals of early identification and intervention, as well as possible parental anxiety with delayed assessment, should also be considered when reviewing infant hearing screening schedules.

Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation

OBJECTIVE

This review is an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force on universal newborn hearing screening to detect moderate-to-severe permanent, bilateral congenital hearing loss. We focus on 3 key questions: (1) Among infants identified by universal screening who would not be identified by targeted screening, does initiating treatment before 6 months of age improve language and communication outcomes? (2) Compared with targeted screening, does universal screening increase the chance that treatment will be initiated by 6 months of age for infants at average risk or for those at high risk? (3) What are the adverse effects of screening and early treatment?

METHODS

Medline and Cochrane databases were searched to identify articles published since the 2002 recommendation. Data from studies that met inclusion criteria were abstracted, and studies were rated for quality with predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

A good-quality retrospective study of children with hearing loss indicates that those who had early versus late confirmation and those who had undergone universal newborn screening versus none had better receptive language at 8 years of age but not better expressive language or speech. A good-quality nonrandomized trial of a large birth cohort indicates that infants identified with hearing loss through universal newborn screening have earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those not screened. These findings are corroborated by multiple descriptive studies of ages of referral, diagnosis, and treatment. Usual parental reactions to an initial nonpass on a hearing screen include worry, questioning, and distress that resolve for most parents. Cochlear implants have been associated with higher risks for bacterial meningitis in young children.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with hearing loss who had universal newborn hearing screening have better language outcomes at school age than those not screened. Infants identified with hearing loss through universal screening have significantly earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those identified in other ways.

The universal newborn hearing screening program at the University Hospital of Ferrara: focus on costs and software solutions

In the present paper, the authors report the results of the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) project at the University Hospital of Ferrara. A total of 6,759 full-term newborns and a total of 1,016 NICU babies were tested at the University Hospital of Ferrara, from January 2000 to December 2006. The paper presents information from clinically acceptable screening procedures developed and tested during the 6 years of the program and addresses two questions pertinent to hearing screening: (i) the cost-estimate of a UNHS program based on European economical and administration premises and (ii) the development of a database-structure for the evaluation of the UNHS/NHS performance and the individual patient tracking.

Improving the quality of medical prescriptions in neonatal units

BACKGROUND

Pediatric units, especially neonatal units, are highly vulnerable to error generally and to medication error in particular. Potential failures are distributed across the entire medication process, occurring mostly at the time of medication prescription and during preparation for drug administration.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of violations of good prescribing practice before and after the implementation of several measures aimed at improving the quality of the medical prescription.

METHODS

Before and after evaluation study with prospective data collection in a third level neonatal unit. 6,320 handwritten medical prescriptions for neonates admitted in the first study period and 1,435 in the second period were analyzed. Training on good prescribing practice and the implementation of a pocket PC-based automatic dosage calculation system were the interventions. The main outcome measure was the proportion of prescriptions with violations of good prescribing practice: incorrect dose, units, dose interval, route of administration or legibility.

RESULTS

Incorrect prescriptions decreased from 39.5% before the intervention to 11.9% after, with an adjusted prevalence ratio of 0.29 (0.25-0.34). The number of wrongly specified items on a single prescription decreased from 11.1% of the prescriptions with two or more wrongly specified items in the first period to 1.3% in the second period, with a prevalence ratio of 0.09 (0.05-0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Violations of good prescribing practice are common in neonatal units. A simple intervention should improve the quality of handwritten medical prescriptions for newborns admitted to intensive care settings.

Neonatal newborn hearing screening: four years' experience at Ferrara University Hospital (CHEAP project): part 1

The Child Hearing Early Assessment Programme (CHEAP) regional project, was a combined departmental approach (Audiology, Neonatology) of the University Hospital of Ferrara, aimed at identifying neonatal hearing impairment and defining early intervention strategies. Aims of this project have been: (i) construction of a neonatal screening programme using evoked otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses; (ii) the calculation of a precise estimate of cost-benefits for every child tested; (iii) the development of an information flow instrument (database) for the storage of data and the statistical analysis of the results. The present report refers only to the results of the project related to the otoacoustic emission data from well-babies and intensive care unit residents. In the period January 2000-December 2004, 4269 full-term newborns and 654 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit babies were tested at the Neonatology Department. The cost of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening was estimated at Euro 9.20 per child, considering the use of the ILO-292 apparatus, and Euro 8.28 per child in the case of an automatic screener. In this screening model, the initial hardware costs can be re-iterated into budget in a period of two years, if 1000 children per year are tested.