1
|
Garnero P, Landewé R, Chapurlat RD. The role of biochemical markers of joint tissue remodelling to predict progression and treatment efficacy in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:1207-1217. [PMID: 32011708 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Structural damage is a hallmark in RA, spondyloarthropy (SpA) and psoriatric arthritis (PsA). Its progression is difficult to predict and current radiological or inflammatory biological markers lack sensitivity. Biochemical markers of bone, cartilage and synovial tissues provide a dynamic indication of the anabolism and catabolism of joint tissues and can be easily measured by immunoassays. Novel biochemical markers including post-translational modifications of matrix proteins and enzyme-generated neoepitopes with increased tissue and/or biological pathway specificity have been developed. Their evaluation in clinical trials of novel biologic therapies and epidemiological studies indicated that their measurements could be useful to predict progression of structural damage and treatment efficacy, independently of current clinical, radiological and biological indices of disease activity. In this paper we briefly describe the latest developments in biochemical markers and critically analyse the clinical data assessing the utility of established and novel biochemical markers in RA, SpA and PsA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Garnero
- INSERM Research Unit 1033-Lyos, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Robert Landewé
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henrotin Y, Bannuru R, Malaise M, Ea HK, Confavreux C, Bentin J, Urbin-Choffray D, Conrozier T, Brasseur JP, Thomas P, Hick AC, Marinello A, Giordan N, Richette P. Hyaluronan derivative HYMOVIS® increases cartilage volume and type ii collagen turnover in osteoarhritic knee: data from MOKHA study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:293. [PMID: 31215422 PMCID: PMC6580647 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2667-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this pilot study was to identify biological, clinical or structural biomarkers of an intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection efficacy (HYMOVIS®) for the design of a larger placebo-controlled clinical trial studying the disease-modifying activity of this treatment. METHODS Forty six patients with symptomatic knee Osteoarthritis (OA) were enrolled in this open-label, prospective, multicenter, pilot study. Patients received two treatment cycles of intra-articular injections (3 mL) of HYMOVIS® (8 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid hexadecylamide) at 6 months interval. Each treatment cycle involved two intra-articular injections 1 week apart. All patients had Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the target knee at baseline and 1 year, and blood samples to assess joint biomarkers. The primary outcome was the change in type II collagen-specific biomarkers (Coll2-1, Coll2-1NO2 and CTX-II) after HYMOVIS® treatment versus baseline. Secondary endpoints included levels changes in aggrecan chondroitin sulfate 846 epitope (CS-846), Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein (COMP), procollagen type II N-terminal propeptide (PIIANP), Matrix Metalloprotease (MMP)-3, Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and Interleukin (IL)-6 serum biomarkers, the ratio Coll2-1/PIIANP, CTX-II/PIIANP, variation of MRI cartilage volume, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) index. RESULTS Coll2-1 serum levels significantly increased overtime while Coll2-1NO2 levels were only increased at D360. Serum PIIANP levels also progressively and significantly enhanced with time. In contrast, other serum biomarker levels including CTX-II, CS-846, COMP, MMP-3, MPO or IL-6 did not change significantly overtime. Interestingly, the ratios Coll2-1/PIIANP and CTX-II/PIIANP decreased, indicating a decrease of cartilage catabolism. Compared to baseline value, MRI cartilage volume and thickness increased in lateral femoral and lateral trochlea compartments and not in medial compartment. These results, in addition to an improvement of T2 mapping score suggest a positive structural effect of the product. Interestingly, WORMS effusion score, an indicator of synovitis, significantly decreased. Finally, global KOOS score and subscales significantly increased overtime while pain at rest, walking pain and patients or investigators global assessment of disease activity decreased. The safety profile was favorable with a low incidence of injection-site pain. CONCLUSION HYMOVIS®, a well-tolerated intra-articular treatment, significantly enhanced type II collagen turnover as suggested by the increase in Coll2-1 and PIIANP levels and cartilage volume observed by MRI in lateral knee compartment. Importantly, this study provides critical information for the design of a larger phase III clinical trial investigating Disease Modifying effect of HYMOVIS®. TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12227846 11/02/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yves Henrotin
- Bone and Cartilage Research Unit, Arthropole Liège, Université de Liège, Institute of Pathology, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Artialis SA, GIGA Tower, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Raveendhara Bannuru
- Center for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis, Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| | - Michel Malaise
- Service de Rhumatologie - CHU Sart-Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Hang-korng Ea
- Service de Rhumatologie - Centre Viggo Petersen, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | | | - Jacques Bentin
- Service de Rhumatologie - CHU Brugmann, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Thierry Conrozier
- Service de Rhumatologie - Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Trévenans, France
| | | | - Philippe Thomas
- Service de Rhumatologie - CHR Metz-Thionville - Hôpital Bel Air, Thionville, France
| | | | | | | | - Pascal Richette
- Service de Rhumatologie - Centre Viggo Petersen, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kemp GJ, Birrell F, Clegg PD, Cuthbertson DJ, De Vito G, van Dieën JH, Del Din S, Eastell R, Garnero P, Goljanek–Whysall K, Hackl M, Hodgson R, Jackson MJ, Lord S, Mazzà C, McArdle A, McCloskey EV, Narici M, Peffers MJ, Schiaffino S, Mathers JC. Developing a toolkit for the assessment and monitoring of musculoskeletal ageing. Age Ageing 2018; 47:iv1-iv19. [PMID: 30203052 PMCID: PMC6127513 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The complexities and heterogeneity of the ageing process have slowed the development of consensus on appropriate biomarkers of healthy ageing. The Medical Research Council–Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA) is a collaboration between researchers and clinicians at the Universities of Liverpool, Sheffield and Newcastle. One of CIMA’s objectives is to ‘Identify and share optimal techniques and approaches to monitor age-related changes in all musculoskeletal tissues, and to provide an integrated assessment of musculoskeletal function’—in other words to develop a toolkit for assessing musculoskeletal ageing. This toolkit is envisaged as an instrument that can be used to characterise and quantify musculoskeletal function during ‘normal’ ageing, lend itself to use in large-scale, internationally important cohorts, and provide a set of biomarker outcome measures for epidemiological and intervention studies designed to enhance healthy musculoskeletal ageing. Such potential biomarkers include: biochemical measurements in biofluids or tissue samples, in vivo measurements of body composition, imaging of structural and physical properties, and functional tests. This review assesses candidate biomarkers of musculoskeletal ageing under these four headings, details their biological bases, strengths and limitations, and makes practical recommendations for their use. In addition, we identify gaps in the evidence base and priorities for further research on biomarkers of musculoskeletal ageing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham J Kemp
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease (IACD), University of Liverpool, William Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Fraser Birrell
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Musculoskeletal Research Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Peter D Clegg
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease (IACD), University of Liverpool, William Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Daniel J Cuthbertson
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease (IACD), University of Liverpool, William Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Giuseppe De Vito
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Institute for Sport and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jaap H van Dieën
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Van der Boechorststraat 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Del Din
- Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Institute of Neuroscience/Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard Eastell
- Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Patrick Garnero
- Division of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Katarzyna Goljanek–Whysall
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease (IACD), University of Liverpool, William Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | | | - Richard Hodgson
- Centre for Imaging Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Malcolm J Jackson
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease (IACD), University of Liverpool, William Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Sue Lord
- Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Institute of Neuroscience/Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claudia Mazzà
- Department of Mechanical Engineering & INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Anne McArdle
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease (IACD), University of Liverpool, William Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Marco Narici
- MRC-ARUK Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, Derby Royal Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, UK
| | - Mandy J Peffers
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease (IACD), University of Liverpool, William Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| | - Stefano Schiaffino
- Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), Via Orus 2, Padova, Italy
| | - John C Mathers
- Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- The MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bay-Jensen AC, Reker D, Kjelgaard-Petersen CF, Mobasheri A, Karsdal MA, Ladel C, Henrotin Y, Thudium CS. Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: soluble biomarkers and the BIPED criteria. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24:9-20. [PMID: 26707988 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Revised: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review and summarize biomarker data published from April 2014 to May 2015 to provide insight to the ongoing work in the field of osteoarthritis (OA). Furthermore, to summarize the BIPED criteria and set it in context of the medical needs of 2015. METHODS PubMed was used as searching machine: Time period 2014/04/01-2015/05/01, MeSH term [Biomarker] AND [Osteoarthritis], Language; English, Full text available. Reviews were excluded. Only papers describing protein based biomarkers measured in human body fluids from OA patients were included. RESULTS Biomarkers of joint tissue turnover, cytokines, chemokines and peptide arrays were measured in different cohorts and studies. Amongst those were previously tested biomarkers such as osteocalcin, Carboxy-terminal cross-linked fragment of type II collagen (CTX-II) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). A majority of the biomarker were classified as I, B or B biomarkers according to the BIPED criteria. Work is continuing on testing biomarkers in OA. There is still a huge, unmet medical need to identify, test, validate and qualify novel and well-known biomarkers. A pre-requisite for this is better characterization and classification of biomarkers to their needs, which may not be reached before higher understanding of OA phenotypes has been gained. In addition, we provide some references to some recent guidelines from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) on qualification and usage of biomarkers for drug development and personalized medicine, which may provide value to the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Bay-Jensen
- Rheumatology, Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - D Reker
- Rheumatology, Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - A Mobasheri
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, United Kingdom; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Arthritis Research UK Pain Centre, Medical Research Council and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom; Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Fahd Medical Research Center (KFMRC), King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - M A Karsdal
- Rheumatology, Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark
| | - C Ladel
- OA Research & Early Clinical Development, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Y Henrotin
- Bone and Cartilage Research Unit, Arthropole Liège, University of Liège, Institute of Pathology, Liège, Belgium
| | - C S Thudium
- Rheumatology, Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Ishiguro N, Yamanaka H, Yoneda T, Ohira T, Okubo N, Genant HK, van der Heijde D. Effect of denosumab on Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a dose-response study of AMG 162 (Denosumab) in patients with RheumatoId arthritis on methotrexate to Validate inhibitory effect on bone Erosion (DRIVE)-a 12-month, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 75:983-90. [PMID: 26585988 PMCID: PMC4893103 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate efficacy and safety of three different regimens of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) ligand (RANKL), for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods In this multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II study, 350 Japanese patients with RA between 6 months and <5 years, stratified by glucocorticoid use and rheumatoid factor status, were randomly assigned to subcutaneous injections of placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (Q6M), every 3 months (Q3M) or every 2 months (Q2M). All patients basically continued methotrexate treatment and had a supplement of calcium and vitamin D throughout the study. The primary endpoint was change in the modified Sharp erosion score from baseline to 12 months. Results Denosumab significantly inhibited the progression of bone erosion at 12 months compared with the placebo, and the mean changes of the modified Sharp erosion score at 12 months from baseline were 0.99, 0.27 (compared with placebo, p=0.0082), 0.14 (p=0.0036) and 0.09 (p<0.0001) in the placebo, Q6M, Q3M and Q2M, respectively. Secondary endpoint analysis revealed that denosumab also significantly inhibited the increase of the modified total Sharp score compared with the placebo, with no obvious evidence of an effect on joint space narrowing for denosumab. As shown in previous studies, denosumab increased bone mineral density. No apparent difference was observed in the safety profiles of denosumab and placebo. Conclusions Addition of denosumab to methotrexate has potential as a new therapeutic option for patients with RA with risk factors of joint destruction. Trial registration number JapicCTI-101263.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Naoki Ishiguro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yamanaka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Yoneda
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | - Harry K Genant
- Departments of Radiology, Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|