AB1071 The Use of Visual Analogue Scale in Rheumatic Disease: Validation of an Electronic Version: Table 1

Measurement Comparability of Electronic and Paper Administration of Visual Analogue Scales: A Review of Published Studies

BACKGROUND

Visual analogue scales (VASs) are used in a variety of patient-, observer- and clinician-reported outcome measures. While typically included in measures originally developed for pen-and-paper completion, a greater number of clinical trials currently use electronic approaches to their collection. This leads researchers to question whether the measurement properties of the scale have been conserved during the migration to an electronic format, particularly because electronic formats often use a different scale length than the 100 mm paper standard.

METHODS

We performed a review of published studies investigating the measurement comparability of paper and electronic formats of the VAS.

RESULTS

Our literature search yielded 26 studies published between 1997 and 2018 that reported comparison of paper and electronic formats using the VAS. After excluding 2 publications, 23 of the remaining 24 studies included in this review reported electronic formats of the VAS (eVAS) and paper formats (pVAS) to be equivalent. A further study concluded that eVAS and pVAS were both acceptable but should not be interchanged. eVAS length varied from 21 to 200 mm, indicating that 100 mm length is not a requirement.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature supports the hypothesis that eVAS and pVAS provide comparable results regardless of the VAS length. When implementing a VAS on a screen-based electronic mode, we recommend following industry best practices for faithful migration to minimise the likelihood of non-comparability with pVAS.

Brief report: the disability of chronic chikungunya arthritis

In 50% of patients, chikungunya fever (CHIKF) is followed by arthritic pain that is often chronic, painful, and disabling. To better define the spectrum of pain and disability in chronic CHIK arthritis (CCA), we evaluated 35 consecutive CCA patients seen in a Brazilian rheumatology clinic, using a pain Visual Analog Scale and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. In our patients, pain and disability levels were of the same magnitude as are seen in other serious rheumatic diseases. The mean score for 19 patients with moderate disability was 1.42± 0.20 (median 1.37). The median HAQ-DI score for the entire group was 1.25. These findings underscore the morbidity imposed by CCA and the urgent need for improvements in management.