Pneumocystis and glucocorticoid use: to prophylax or not to prophylax (and when?); that is the question

[Influence of underlying disease and immunosuppression on the immunocompetence in inflammatory rheumatic diseases]

Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have a higher risk of infections in comparison to the general population. For this patient group, in addition to cardiovascular diseases, infections play an important role with respect to morbidity and mortality. Even if it is difficult to make concrete statements with respect to individual diseases, it can be assumed that there is a lower risk of infections in inflammatory joint diseases in comparison to connective tissue diseases and vasculitides. The increased risk of infections is determined by multiple factors, whereby the underlying factors are classified into three main categories: patient-related factors (age, comorbidities, lifestyle), disease-related factors (immunological dysfunction as part of the disease pathophysiology) and drug-related factors (type and dosage of the immunosuppression and/or immunomodulation). An improved understanding of the complexity of these associations enables the optimization of treatment and disease control taking the individual risk factors into account, with the aim of a significant reduction in the risk of infections.

EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis: 2022 update

BACKGROUND

Since the publication of the EULAR recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) in 2016, several randomised clinical trials have been published that have the potential to change clinical care and support the need for an update.

METHODS

Using EULAR standardised operating procedures, the EULAR task force undertook a systematic literature review and sought opinion from 20 experts from 16 countries. We modified existing recommendations and created new recommendations.

RESULTS

Four overarching principles and 17 recommendations were formulated. We recommend biopsies and ANCA testing to assist in establishing a diagnosis of AAV. For remission induction in life-threatening or organ-threatening AAV, we recommend a combination of high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in combination with either rituximab or cyclophosphamide. We recommend tapering of the GC dose to a target of 5 mg prednisolone equivalent/day within 4-5 months. Avacopan may be considered as part of a strategy to reduce exposure to GC in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Plasma exchange may be considered in patients with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. For remission maintenance of GPA/MPA, we recommend rituximab. In patients with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic GPA, we recommend the use of mepolizumab. Azathioprine and methotrexate are alternatives to biologics for remission maintenance in AAV.

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of recent advancements, these recommendations provide updated guidance on AAV management. As substantial data gaps still exist, informed decision-making between physicians and patients remains of key relevance.

Risk-Benefit Analysis of Primary Prophylaxis Against Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Receiving Rituximab

OBJECTIVE

To identify a specific population of patients with rheumatic diseases receiving rituximab treatment for whom the benefit from primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) outweighs the risk of adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

This study included 818 patients treated with rituximab for rheumatic diseases, among whom 419 received prophylactic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) with rituximab, while the remainder did not. Differences in 1-year PJP incidence between the groups were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Risk-benefit assessment was performed in subgroups stratified according to risk factors based on the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent 1 case of PJP and the number needed to harm (NNH) due to severe AEs. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimize the confounding by indication.

RESULTS

During the 663.1 person-years, there were 11 PJP cases, with a mortality rate of 63.6%. Concomitant use of high-dose glucocorticoids (≥30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent during 4 weeks after rituximab administration) was the most important risk factor. The PJP incidence (per 100 person-years) was 7.93 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.91-17.25) in the subgroup receiving high-dose glucocorticoids compared with 0.40 (95% CI 0.01-2.25) in the subgroup without high-dose glucocorticoid use. Although prophylactic TMP/SMX significantly reduced the overall PJP incidence (HR 0.11 [95% CI 0.03-0.43]), the NNT to prevent 1 case of PJP (146) was higher than the NNH (86). In contrast, the NNT fell to 20 (95% CI 10.7-65.7) in patients receiving concomitant high-dose glucocorticoids.

CONCLUSION

The benefit associated with primary PJP prophylaxis outweighs the risk of severe AEs in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving rituximab and concomitant high-dose glucocorticoid treatment.

Position statement on infection screening, prophylaxis, and vaccination in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases and immunosuppressive therapies, part 2: infection prophylaxis

This study aims to provide practical recommendations on prophylaxis for infection in pediatric patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases receiving/scheduled to receive immunosuppressive therapy. A qualitative approach was applied. A narrative literature review was performed via Medline. Primary searches were conducted using MeSH terms and free text to identify articles that analyzed data on infections and vaccinations in pediatric patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases receiving immunosuppressive therapy. The results were presented and discussed in a nominal group meeting comprising a committee of 12 pediatric rheumatologists from the Prevention and Treatment of Infections Working Group of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Rheumatology. Several recommendations were generated. A consensus procedure was implemented via a Delphi process that was extended to members of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Rheumatology and the Vaccine Advisory Committee of the Spanish Association of Pediatrics. Participants produced a score ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 10 (completely agree). Agreement was considered to have been reached if at least 70% of participants voted ≥ 7. The literature review included more than 400 articles. Overall, 63 recommendations were generated (23 on infection prophylaxis) and voted by 59 pediatric rheumatologists and other pediatric specialists, all of whom achieved the pre-established level of agreement. The recommendations on prophylaxis of infection cover vaccination and prophylaxis against varicella zoster virus, tuberculosis, Pneumocystis jiroveccii, and invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases receiving/scheduled to receive immunosuppressive therapy.  Conclusion: Based on current evidence and a Delphi process, we provided consensus and updated recommendations on prophylaxis and treatment of infections to guide those caring for pediatric rheumatology patients. What is Known: •Data largely derived from adults find that infectious diseases and related complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. •It is crucial to be aware of the preventive measures that should be implemented to prevent these infections in children, although most guidelines are often extrapolated from adult cases. What is New: •In the absence of evidence, a literature review and a Delphi survey were conducted to establish a series of expert recommendations that could prove useful in clinical practice, providing a practical and simple day-to-day approach to be used by pediatric rheumatologists. •The recommendations focus on tuberculosis, herpes zoster virus, fungal infections, and Pneumocystis jirovecii.

Clinical characteristics of and risk factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (Anti-MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis patients: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a serious opportunistic infection mainly diagnosed in patients with rheumatic conditions. However, PJP in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM) patients remains poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the 6-month PJP risk in newly diagnosed MDA5 + DM patients.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of 105 inpatients with newly diagnosed MDA5 + DM was conducted at Renji Hospital from January 2018 to November 2019. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and treatment data were recorded. The primary outcome was PJP incidence within 6 months after a MDA5 + DM diagnosis.

RESULTS

The analysis included 105 patients, including 13 patients diagnosed with PJP during the observation period. The median time from the MDA5 + DM diagnosis to PJP was 89 ± 38 days. Compared with the PJP - patients, the PJP + patients had a significantly greater risk of mortality (69.2% vs. 13.0% P < 0.001). Regarding the baseline comorbidities, hypertension (P = 0.013) and cancer (P = 0.02) were more common in the PJP + group. Additionally, a larger proportion of the PJP + patients received prolonged high-dose steroid therapy (≥ 60 mg/day and ≥ 1 month) (P = 0.022) and double or triple immunosuppressant therapy (P = 0.013). The multivariate analysis showed that PJP was independently associated with lymphopenia (ALC < 500 cells/µl) (OR: 5.434, 95% CI: 2.074-55.155; P = 0.012) and the combined use of cyclophosphamide (CTX) and tacrolimus (TAC) (OR: 10.695, 95% CI: 1.440-20.508; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

There was a high incidence and mortality in the MDA5 + DM patients with PJP, with patients on combined immunosuppressive treatments, particularly CTX and TAC, being at a higher risk. Prolonged high-dose steroid therapy (≥ 60 mg/day and ≥ 1 month) was another risk factor for PJP. Key Points • There was a high incidence and mortality in the MDA5 + DM patients with PJP. • Most PJP cases occurred within 3 months after the MDA5 + DM diagnosis. • The 6-month infection risk of PJP increased with the administration of multiagent immunosuppression, especially the combination of CTX and TAC. • Prolonged high-dose steroid therapy (≥ 60 mg/day and ≥ 1 month) was another risk factor for PJP.

Is there a role for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis in giant cell arteritis or polymyalgia rheumatica?

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection that affects immunocompromised patients. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of PJP among patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) or polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of incident cases of GCA and PMR was conducted using claims data from the TriNetX database to describe the incidence of PJP during the first 6 months of therapy. Additionally, a systematic review was performed to identify other publications describing PJP among patients with GCA or PMR.

RESULTS

During 547 patient-years of follow-up time, no cases of PJP were identified among 1,168 cases of GCA (incident rate 0 per 1,000 person-years); during 7,446 patient-years of follow up time, one case of PJP was identified out of 15,575 cases of PMR (incident rate 0.07 cases per 1,000 patient-years). This patient was alive at last follow up. Our systematic review identified 1 case-control study, 4 cohort studies, and 18 case series / case reports of PJP among patients with GCA or PMR. The incident rate of PJP was reported from one additional study for GCA and was estimated at 0.08 cases per 1,000 person years; no additional cohort studies were identified for patients with PMR. Over the entirety of the published literature, the total number of cases identified among case series and case reports was 33, from which 4 total deaths were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with newly diagnosed GCA or PMR rarely develop PJP. Existing data does not support routine prescribing of PJP prophylaxis for either group of patients.

Rates of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and prophylaxis prescribing patterns in a large electronic health record cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective No guidelines exist for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Limited data are available on incidence of PJP infection and use of PJP prophylaxis. Using a real-world, electronic health record (EHR) cohort, we investigated the frequency of PJP infections as well as patient and provider factors that impacted use and type of PJP prophylaxis. Methods  In a large, de-identified EHR, we identified possible SLE patients using a previously validated algorithm. PJP ICD-9 or ICD-10-CM billing codes and PJP keywords were used to identify possible PJP cases within this SLE cohort. We assessed for PJP prophylaxis prescribing in all SLE patients using keywords and reviewing medication lists for prophylactic agents. Chart review was used to confirm cases of SLE, PJP, and PJP prophylaxis and to obtain data on demographics, comorbidities, and immunosuppressants. Results Of 977 SLE patients, there were only four with confirmed PJP infection. Two of these patients had concurrent Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, and none were on prophylaxis. Of 977 SLE patients, 132 (14%) were prescribed PJP prophylaxis. Of 617 SLE patients ever prescribed immunosuppressants, 128 (21%) were prescribed PJP prophylaxis. Sulfonamides were the most common prophylaxis prescribed (69%), and possible adverse events were documented in 22 out of 117 instances of being placed on a sulfonamide. Patients of younger age, Black race, nephritis, and renal transplant, and on chronic glucocorticoids were all more likely to have PJP prophylaxis prescribed. Patients who were on transplant induction medications, calcineurin/mTOR inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate mofetil all were more likely to be prescribed PJP prophylaxis compared to other immunosuppressants. Conclusion PJP is a rare diagnosis among SLE patients, and prior studies may even overestimate its prevalence. PJP prophylaxis was less common in our cohort than previously described. Adverse events related to sulfonamides used for PJP prophylaxis were relatively rare with lower rates than previously reported. Our study demonstrates real-world PJP prophylaxis prescribing patterns in a large cohort of SLE patients.

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

Content available: Author Interview and Audio Recording.

Duration of prednisone treatment before development of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with vasculitis: A case series

BACKGROUND

Optimal timing for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis among patients with vasculitis is not clear. We set out to characterize the clinical presentation and duration of prednisone use before the development of PCP among these patients.

METHODS

All patients with PCP at The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) between 2006 and 2017 were identified. Using TOH data repositories, the following data were extracted: prednisone dosage, treatment duration, other immunosuppressive medications, PCP prophylaxis, PCP treatment, and death. Data were reported as median and range or as mean and standard deviation.

RESULTS

We identified seven patients (5 men, 2 women) with biopsy-proven vasculitis who developed PCP: six with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and one with giant cell arteritis. None of the patients were on PCP prophylaxis. The most common symptoms on presentation were cough and dyspnea. At diagnosis, the median lymphocyte count was 0.30 × 10⁹/L (range 0.03-2.10), creatinine was 186 µmol/L (range 78-359), and lactate dehydrogenase was 471 U/L (range 301-1032). All patients were on prednisone at time of PCP diagnosis, with six on doses of ≥20 mg/day for at least 12 weeks. All but one patient were on additional immunosuppressants, with cyclophosphamide being the most common agent for five of the seven patients. Four (57%) required intensive care unit admission, and two (29%) died secondary to complications of PCP.

CONCLUSIONS

PCP is a severe and often fatal opportunistic infection among immunocompromised patients with vasculitis. Frequent evaluation of the need for prophylaxis is required for patients who remain on high-dose steroids and concomitant immunosuppressants.

Estimation of treatment and prognostic factors of pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with connective tissue diseases

Objectives

To investigate short-term prognosis and prognostic factors for connective tissue disease-associated pneumocystis pneumonia (CTD-PCP) using the Japanese nationwide diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) inpatient database.

Methods

The present retrospective cohort study from April 2014 to March 2016 included data of patients with CTD-PCP extracted from the DPC database using the 10^th revision of International Classification of Diseases and Injuries codes.

Results

In 15 901 766 cases registered from 1329 hospitals, 333 of 67 890 patients who were admitted with PCP were diagnosed with CTD-PCP and included in the study. The median age was 71.0 years, and 214 (64.3%), 80 (24.0%), and 29 (8.7%) patients received sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (ST) monotherapy and pentamidine-containing and atovaquone-containing therapy, respectively. There were 114 (34.2%) in-hospital deaths, and the 30-day and 60-day in-hospital survival rates after PCP treatment initiation were 66.0% and 53.7%, respectively. Older age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.08) and concomitant interstitial lung disease (ILD) (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.42) were poor prognostic factors. Patients who completed PCP treatment with ST monotherapy had a significantly higher survival rate than those treated with those not treated with ST monotherapy (p=0.015; log-rank test). Pentamidine versus atovaquone as second-line therapy was significantly higher with atovaquone (p=0.012; log-rank test).

Conclusion

Older age and concomitant ILD were poor prognostic factors for CTD-PCP. ST was a reasonable first-line therapy in patients with CTD-PCP, and patients with inadequate response to ST treated with atovaquone tended to have a better prognosis than those treated with pentamidine.

[Infection prophylaxis in rheumatic diseases]

Infektionen spielen für die Morbidität und Mortalität von Patienten mit rheumatologischen Erkrankungen eine wichtige Rolle. Das Infektionsrisiko wird zum einen durch allgemeine Faktoren wie das Alter des Patienten und vorhandene Komorbiditäten, zum anderen krankheitsbezogen durch die Aktivität der Grunderkrankung selbst und durch die laufende – insbesondere immunsuppressive – Therapie bestimmt. Dementsprechend zählen zu wichtigsten risikoverringernden Maßnahmen eine optimale Kontrolle über die Krankheitsaktivität und die Erfassung und optimale Behandlung eventuell vorhandener Komorbiditäten. Notwendig ist außerdem die Erkennung und besondere Überwachung von Patienten mit erhöhtem Infektionsrisiko, wie z. B. schweren Infektionen in der Anamnese. Weiterhin kann die Wahl der antirheumatischen Therapie das Risiko beeinflussen: risikosteigernd wirken besonders Glucocorticoide (GC), eher risikosenkend bei guter Krankheitskontrolle und optimiertem Einsatz DMARDs („disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs“). Schließlich sorgen prophylaktische Maßnahmen wie Schutztherapien und optimierter Impfstatus für eine Verringerung des Infektionsrisikos.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To compare Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) risk between patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) and the general population METHODS: We identified patients with ARD recorded in the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan from 2002 to 2015 and randomly selected a comparison cohort from the general population matched for age and sex. We analyzed PJP risk stratified by sex, age, comorbidities, and medications using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

We enrolled 103,117 patients with ARD. PJP risk significantly increased in patients with any ARD and with each individual ARD like rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjogren's syndrome (SjS), polymyositis and dermatomyositis (PM/DM), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and systemic vasculitis. Patients with PM/DM showed prominent risk with incidence rate of 12.47/100,000 patient year (95% confidence interval (CI), 32.16-86.70). In a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model with comorbidities and medications as covariates, PM/DM, SSc, SLE, and SjS significantly increased adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of 5.40, 5.12, 4.09, and 3.64, respectively (95% CI of 2.82-10.35, 2.16-12.13, 2.41-6.95, and 2.06-6.42, respectively). AHR after adjusting for male sex, cancer, human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV), and interstitial lung disease also significantly increased. Use of daily oral steroid dose of >10 mg conferred the highest risk followed by mycophenolate. Use of injected steroids, cyclophosphamide, biological agents, methotrexate, and cyclosporine conferred a significantly higher risk.

CONCLUSION

Underlying ARD significantly predisposes patients to PJP, with PM/DM posing the highest threat. In addition to underlying disease, comorbidities and concomitant immunosuppressants are major risks. The strongest risk is recent daily steroid dose of >10 mg. Mycophenolate seems to be a more prominent risk factor than cyclophosphamide. Key Points • Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) significantly increased the overall risk of PJP, and so did each individual ARD. • Use of steroids, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, biological agents, methotrexate, and cyclosporine all significantly increased risk of PJP. • Male, elderly, malignancy, HIV, and interstitial lung disease are also related to increased risk of PJP. • Underlying ARD, comorbidities, and use of immunosuppressant should all be considered in determining the overall risk of PJP.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and risk of infection

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder that affects almost every organ system and it is treated with immunomodulation and immunosuppression. SLE patients have an intrinsically dysfunctional immune system which is exacerbated by disease activity and leaves them vulnerable to infection. Treatment with immunosuppression increases susceptibility to infection, while hydroxychloroquine use decreases this risk. Infectious diseases are a leading cause of hospitalization and death.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review provides an overview of recent epidemiology and predictors of infections in SLE, delineates the risk of infection by therapeutic agent, and provides suggestions for risk mitigation. Articles were selected from Pubmed searches conducted between September 2019 and January 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the large burden of infection, effective and safe preventative care such as universal hydroxychloroquine use and vaccination are underutilized. Future efforts should be directed to quality improvement, glucocorticoid reduction, and validation of risk indices that identify patients at the highest risk of infection.

ANCA associated vasculitis

Vasculitis is characterized by inflammation of the vascular wall. It reaches vessels of different sizes and locations, conditioning multisystem and complex manifestations that require a holistic approach. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis has an annual incidence rate of 20 per million inhabitants. It is the result of the interaction of infectious, genetic and environmental factors and manifest itself with varied and unspecific symptoms, often reaching the general state, respiratory and renal systems. The combination of clinical, laboratory, imaging and fundamentally histological changes allows the diagnosis and classification of the extent / severity of the disease necessary for the decision of the therapeutics to be taken. Glucocorticoids are generally used; with methotrexate being considered when localized disease and cyclophosphamide, rituximab or azathioprine when generalized disease. A systematized approach can increase survival rates from 12% to 70% over a 5-year span.

Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Burden Associated With Delayed Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have evaluated the impact of delayed diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) on the overall burden of disease. The objective of this review was to evaluate the available literature on the clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of delayed diagnosis in patients with axSpA.

METHODS

This systematic literature review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for English-language publications of original research articles (up to July 12, 2018) and conference abstracts (January 1, 2014, to July 12, 2018) reporting studies of adult patients with delayed diagnosis of axSpA associated with clinical, economic, or humanistic burden. Retrieved publications were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second independent reviewer.

RESULTS

A total of 1391 publications were retrieved, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Of these, 15 reported data on clinical burden, nine on economic burden, and six on humanistic burden, with eight studies reporting a combination of clinical, economic, and/or humanistic burden. Patients with a delayed diagnosis of axSpA generally had higher disease activity, worse physical function, and more structural damage than those who received an earlier diagnosis. Patients with a delayed diagnosis also had a greater likelihood of work disability and higher direct and indirect healthcare costs than those who received an earlier diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis was associated with a greater likelihood for depression, negative psychological impacts, and worse quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed axSpA diagnosis was associated with more functional impairment, higher healthcare costs, and worse quality of life, highlighting the importance of early recognition of axSpA to reduce extensive burden on patients and society. Plain language summary available for this article.

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia and Other Infections in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis

Purpose of Review

The management of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) can be complex and challenging due to the myriad of complications they can experience. The continued use of corticosteroids, in addition to the rise of combination immunosuppressive therapy, has contributed to the ongoing concern for infection. Perhaps the most feared infection in IIM patients is Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) given its infrequent occurrence yet high mortality. The field has been, and continues to be, without evidence-based guidelines to help clinicians determine which patients with IIM to prescribe prophylaxis. Herein, we review this literature to provide the clinician with an up-to-date view of infections in IIM.

Recent Findings

In the past 5 years, a number of studies have been reported highlighting various infectious complications, which help us better understand their frequency and associated risk factors. In addition, data has been published on the potential harms of PJP prophylaxis, to better inform the risk/benefit of our decision-making.

Summary

Infection remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in IIM. A better understanding of which patient subgroups are at risk for particular infections will inform optimal management strategies.

Patient perspectives on the pathway to psoriatic arthritis diagnosis: results from a web-based survey of patients in the United States

BACKGROUND

There are limited real-world data on the diagnostic experiences of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), including medical care sought and potential barriers to diagnosis. We aim to describe patient experiences related to receiving a PsA diagnosis.

METHODS

Ours was a mixed-method, 2-phase study. Phase 1 comprised concept elicitation and cognitive interviews with clinical experts and adults diagnosed with PsA to develop a cross sectional, web-based survey. US adults with a self-reported PsA diagnosis were recruited through a patient support community (CreakyJoints), an online patient research registry (ArthritisPower), and social media outreach. In Phase 2, the online survey collected data on sociodemographics, clinical symptoms, disease burden, and diagnosis history of survey respondents with PsA.

RESULTS

Of the 203 respondents included, 172 (84.7%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 51.6 (10.8) years. The time between seeking medical attention and receiving a diagnosis was < 6 months for 69 respondents, 6 months to 4 years for 68 respondents, and ≥ 5 years for 66 respondents. Most respondents sought care from general practitioners (79.8%) and rheumatologists (66.5%). Common initial symptoms that led respondents to seek medical attention were joint pain (70.0%) and stiffness (53.7%). Among the initial symptoms that led respondents to seek care, joint pain, swollen joints, and sausage-like fingers or toes (indicating dactylitis) were more common among respondents with shorter time to diagnosis, whereas stiffness, fatigue, enthesitis (indicated by foot problems, tendon and ligament pain), and back pain were more common among respondents with longer time to diagnosis. Common misdiagnoses were psychosomatic issues (26.6%) and osteoarthritis (21.7%). Respondents with shorter times to diagnosis had lower frequencies of misdiagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents with PsA reported delays in diagnosis and misdiagnoses on their journey to a PsA diagnosis. Symptom differences, such as enthesitis and stiffness, were noted among respondents with shorter vs longer time to diagnosis. Increased understanding of diagnostic barriers may lead to earlier diagnosis and appropriate management to improve outcomes.

[Infections]

The individual risk assessment concerning infections in patients with rheumatic diseases is based on the detailed personalized documentation of relevant risk factors, such as the underlying disease itself, the intensity of immunosuppressive therapy and the severity of any comorbidities. From the perspective of infectiology, the history of repeated and severe infections as well as previous illnesses, such as (latent) tuberculosis and chronic hepatitis B or C need to be considered. In some instances prophylactic antibiotic therapy might be required, which should otherwise be avoided in order to prevent selection of resistant pathogens. Furthermore, vaccinations are particularly suitable to specifically minimize the risk for frequent infectious diseases.

Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia after Initiation of Tofacitinib Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Case-Based Review

The use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) in rheumatic diseases is constantly increasing during the last decade. Tofacitinib is a new oral Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor, approved for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Safety data of tofacitinib derived from randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies has demonstrated a moderate increase in the risk for common serious infections. We describe a case of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in a woman on tofacitinib therapy for RA. Although tofacitinib use has been associated with the development of opportunistic infections, PJP has been rarely reported. PJP should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with autoimmune disorders under newer oral JAK inhibitors therapy who present with fever, hypoxia and pulmonary infiltrates.

Practice Patterns of Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Connective Tissue Diseases: A Survey of Infectious Disease Physicians

Background

Immunosuppressive therapy for connective tissue diseases (CTDs) increases risk for opportunistic infections including Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). High mortality rates are reported in CTD patients with PCP, which suggests a potential need for prophylaxis, but indications remain poorly defined. Wide variations in the use of PCP prophylaxis among rheumatologists have been documented. This study evaluated PCP prophylaxis patterns for CTD patients among infectious disease (ID) physicians.

Methods

An electronic survey was emailed to 1264 adult ID physicians who are members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network.

Results

Six hundred thirty-one physicians responded to the survey. Respondents to the survey were more likely to work in academics (P = .02) and be early (<5 years) or late (≥25 years) in their careers (P = .0002). Forty-three percent (n = 269) made no recommendations for PCP prophylaxis in non-HIV patients. Of the 362 respondents who did make such recommendations, the greatest consensus for disease-based prophylaxis was for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (53%). For therapy-based prophylaxis, corticosteroids ≥20 mg/d was the most frequently cited indication (87%). Surrogate laboratory markers to aid in decisions about prophylaxis were not routinely used (21%). Although the majority recommended discontinuation of PCP prophylaxis with tapering of corticosteroids (65%), there was variability in the specific dose. Eighty-nine percent of respondents felt that guidelines about PCP prophylaxis would be helpful.

Conclusions

There is little consensus about PCP prophylaxis in CTDs among ID physicians. Guidelines for PCP prophylaxis would be helpful when caring for these complex patients.

Use of machine learning techniques in the development and refinement of a predictive model for early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a predictive mathematical model for the early identification of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) based on the medical and pharmacy claims history of patients with and without AS.

METHODS

This retrospective study used claims data from Truven databases from January 2006 to September 2015 (Segment 1) and October 2015 to February 2018 (Segment 2). Machine learning identified features differentiating patients with AS from matched controls; selected features were used as inputs in developing Model A/B to identify patients likely to have AS. Model A/B was trained and developed in Segment 1, and patients predicted to have AS in Segment 1 were followed up in Segment 2 to evaluate the predictive capability of Model A/B.

RESULTS

Of 228,471 patients in Segment 1 without any history of AS, Model A/B predicted 1923 patients to have AS. Ultimately, 1242 patients received an AS diagnosis in Segment 2; 120 of these were correctly predicted by Model A/B, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 6.24%. The diagnostic accuracy of Model A/B compared favorably with that of a clinical model (PPV, 1.29%) that predicted AS based on spondyloarthritis features described in the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria. A simplified linear regression model created to test the operability of Model A/B yielded a lower PPV (2.55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Model A/B performed better than a clinically based model in predicting a diagnosis of AS among patients in a large claims database; its use may contribute to early recognition of AS and a timely diagnosis.

Atypical presentation of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib: a case presentation

Background

We report the case of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib who developed severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) with an atypical clinical presentation.

Case presentation

A 78-year old male patient with RA treated with tofacitinib, methotrexate (MTX) and low dose corticosteroids was admitted to the hospital with arthralgia and nausea. Laboratory findings revealed hypercalcemia with normal levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and elevated 1,25-(OH)₂ vitamin D levels. A lung CT scan showed bilateral interstitial pneumonic infiltrates. PCR from bronchoalveloar lavage was positive for Pneumocystis jirovecii. Hypercalcemia resolved under PJP treatment and was – after exclusion of other possible causes – probably fungal associated.

Conclusion

Due to the increased risk of opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients, the finding of hypercalcemia in conjunction with a pulmonary infection should raise high clinical suspicion of PJP.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-018-0042-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.