Role of ANA testing in the classification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?

The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test has high sensitivity in diagnosing and classifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

OBJECTIVES

To describe the immunological pattern of SLE patients through investigating specific antinuclear autoantibodies by enzyme dot immunoassay and studying their frequency in both positive and negative ANA indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIF) cases.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, blood samples from 393 newly diagnosed SLE patients were analyzed using (IIF) on HEp-2 cells and ANA dot immunoassay by automated enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect 19 antibodies.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of the patients are females; their mean age was 37 ± 12.28. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was detected by IIF in 82.4% of cases, with 181 (46.1%) speckled and 167 (42.4%) homogeneous ANA patterns. The majority of patients (96%) demonstrated autoantibodies via EIA. Among the ANA-IIF-negative patients, 97.2% demonstrated autoantibodies. There was a significant difference in the frequency of certain autoantibodies between SLE patients with negative and positive ANA-IIF (1.44 0.73, 3.12 2.09, p = 0.00) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of analyzing 19 autoantibodies with the ANA staining pattern increased the significance of analyzing the immune profile even if IIF is negative when clinical symptoms strongly suggest SLE diagnosis. Certain autoantibodies may evade staining by the IFA approach while they are present in the patient's serum, and they may not be detected by the ANA EIA profile if it does not contain that antigenic substrate. Key Points • Indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 is the conventional method for ANA detection and is regarded as the "gold standard" for testing in clinical practice for SLE. • In our study, ANA profile dot enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-based test was performed to evaluate 19 autoantibodies in SLE patients either positive or negative for ANA-IIF. • The presence of anti-dsDNA with ANA-IIF-negative serum in 32.4% of SLE patients provides evidence that not all anti-dsDNA antibodies are identified on standard HEp-2 substrates. • certain autoantibodies can evade staining by the ANA-IIF method despite being present in the SLE patient's blood; this supports the ANA profile enzyme dot immunoassay as a more sensitive test.

Emerging Molecular Markers Towards Potential Diagnostic Panels for Lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifactorial autoimmune disease which can affect various tissues and organs, posing significant challenges for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The etiology of SLE is highly complex with contributions from environmental factors, stochastic factors as well as genetic susceptibility. The current criteria for diagnosing SLE is based primarily on a combination of clinical presentations and traditional lab testing. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. They are unable to indicate disease cause or guide physicians in decision-making for treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a more accurate and robust tool for effective clinical management and drug development in lupus patients. It is fortunate that the emerging Omics have empowered scientists in the discovery and identification of potential novel biomarkers of SLE, especially the markers from blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluids (CSF), and other bodily fluids. However, many of these markers have not been carefully validated for clinical use. In addition, it is apparent that individual biomarkers lack sensitivity or specificity. This review summarizes the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic value of emerging biomarkers from recent studies, and discusses the potential of these markers in the development of biomarker panel based diagnostics or disease monitoring system in SLE.

Anti-Nuclear Antibody-Negative Lupus Nephritis or Post-Infectious Glomerulonephritis: Diagnostic Dilemma in a Young Male

Proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is histologically characterized by endocapillary hypercellularity and large immune deposits on light microscopy. Immunofluorescence shows almost all immunoglobulins and complement staining. The presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is important for diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Absence of ANA rules out the possibility of SLE according to the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE. We report a young boy with fever, nephrotic-nephritic syndrome and pancytopenia consistent with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Renal biopsy was consistent with LN; however, his initial ANA was negative. In view of pathological features of LN and persistent pancytopenia, high dose steroid therapy was started. Repeat ANA, done during the illness, turned positive. In this report, we describe the relevance of pathological patterns and the uncertainties of ANA positivity in making a diagnosis of SLE.

Current Status of the Evaluation and Management of Lupus Patients and Future Prospects

The vastly diverse nature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) poses great challenges to clinicians and patients, as well as to research and drug development efforts. Precise management of lupus patients would be advanced by the ability to identify specific abnormalities operative in individual patients at the time of encounter with the clinician. Advances in new technologies and bioinformatics have greatly improved the understanding of the pathophysiology of SLE. Recent research has focused on the discovery and classification of sensitive and specific markers that could aid early accurate diagnosis, better monitoring of disease and identification of appropriate therapy choices based on specific dysregulated molecular pathways. Here, we summarize some of the advances and discuss the challenges in moving toward precise patient-centric management modalities in SLE.

Understanding and interpreting antinuclear antibody tests in systemic rheumatic diseases

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are valuable laboratory markers to screen for and support the diagnosis of various rheumatic diseases (known as ANA-associated rheumatic diseases). The importance of ANA testing has been reinforced by the inclusion of ANA positivity as an entry criterion in the 2019 systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria. In addition, specific ANAs (such as antibodies to Sm, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), SSA/Ro60, U1RNP, topoisomerase I, centromere protein B (CENPB), RNA polymerase III and Jo1) are included in classification criteria for other rheumatic diseases. A number of techniques are available for detecting antibodies to a selection of clinically relevant antigens (such as indirect immunofluorescence and solid phase assays). In this Review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques, as well as the clinical relevance of the differences between the techniques, to provide guidance in understanding and interpreting ANA test results. Such understanding not only necessitates insight into the sensitivity and specificity of each assay, but also into the importance of the disease context and antibody level. We also highlight the value of titre-specific information (such as likelihood ratios).

Progression of Discoid Lupus to Lupus Panniculitis: An Unexplained and Likely Underreported Phenomenon

Lupus erythematosus is a multiorgan disorder with a wide variance of clinical presentations. Disease processes are generally divided into systemic or cutaneous categories, with cutaneous findings being further subdivided into acute, subacute, and chronic variants. The chronic form of cutaneous lupus itself has multiple subsets. We present the case of a young woman who developed two forms of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE) and, eventually, progressive systemic symptoms.

TJ-M2010-5, a novel MyD88 inhibitor, corrects R848-induced lupus-like immune disorders of B cells in vitro

B cell hyperactivities are involved in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) in the B cells plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of SLE. Previous studies have focused on the intrinsic role of B cells in TLR7/MyD88 signaling and consequently on immune activation, autoantibody production, and systemic inflammation. However, a feasible treatment for this immune disorder remains to be discovered. The in vitro cellular response that have been studied likely plays a central role in the production of some important autoantibodies in SLE. We successfully used R848 to build a lupus-like B cell model in vitro; these B cells were overactivated, differentiated into plasma cells, escaped apoptosis, massively proliferated, and produced large amounts of autoantibodies and cytokines. In the present study, we found that TJ-M2010-5, a novel MyD88 inhibitor previously synthesized in our lab, seemed to inhibit the lupus-like condition of B cells, including overactivation, massive proliferation, differentiation into plasma cells, and overproduction of autoantibodies and cytokines. TJ-M2010-5 also induce B cells apoptosis. Furthermore, TJ-M2010-5 was found to remarkably inhibit NF-κB and MAPK signaling. In summary, TJ-M2010-5 might correct R848-induced lupus-like immune disorders of B cells by blocking the TLR7/MyD88/NF-κB and TLR7/MyD88/MAPK signaling pathways.