OP0191 ASSOCIATION OF TRAMADOL WITH ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY, CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AND HIP FRACTURES AMONG PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS. A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Association of Tramadol Versus Codeine Prescriptions with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases among patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched population-based cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Today, the prescription of tramadol in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) has increased significantly, which can be associated with serious consequences. Contradictory results have been reported regarding the association of tramadol versus codeine with the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate, for the first time, the association of tramadol versus codeine with the risk of ACM and CVD in OA patients for the first time. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of sciences, and Google Scholar with specific keywords and mesh terms to find relevant studies until January 2024. Two independent researchers did the process of searching and screening articles. Cochran's Q and I2 tests evaluated the heterogeneity of the studies. Egger's test was used to evaluate the existence of publication bias.

RESULTS

Seven population-based cohort studies, matched by the propensity score method, including 1,939,293 participants, were reviewed. The study pooled results did not show a significant association between the prescriptions of tramadol versus codeine with increasing the risk of ACM in OA patients. (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.084, 95% confidence interval (95%) CI: 0.883, 1.286, P: 0.56) In addition, the prescription of tramadol versus codeine was not associated with an increased risk of CVD in OA. (HR: 1.025, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.16, P: 0.68, I2 = 37.8%) CONCLUSION: Our systematic review showed that tramadol prescription compared to codeine in OA patients was not associated with an increased risk of ACM and CVD.

The applicability of trabecular bone score for osteoporosis diagnosis in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients have a high risk of osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of trabecular bone score (TBS) in assessing fracture risk in patients with AS. 67 patients meeting the ASAS classification criteria were enrolled in the study. Fracture risk for each patient was assessed based on a lumbar spine exam encompassing bone mineral density (BMD), and TBS through a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) exam. In addition, each patient had an X-ray taken of their lumbar and thoracic spine to determine the presence of syndesmophytes and bony bridges, as well as spinous process and vertebral body fractures. Moreover, each patient's medical history was analyzed for other osteoporotic fractures. A major osteoporosis fracture (MOF) was found in 11 (16%) patients in total, of which 7 (10%) were vertebral body fractures. The mean TBS in patients with MOF and no MOF were, respectively, 1.12 and 1.29 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in BMD scores between the two groups. Syndesmophytes and bony bridges occurred more frequently in patients with MOF (p = 0.02). Age of 50 or more (RR = 9.86, p = 0.002), TBS score ≤ 1.31 (RR = 2.07, p < 0.0001), and presence of syndesmophytes and bony bridges (RR = 2.14, p = 0.04) were considered a relative risk (RR) increasing factors. TBS is a markedly more sensitive method of identifying patients with a high fracture risk compared to BMD measurement in a DXA exam in patients with AS.