Indications for gastrointestinal endoscopy in childhood

Saudi consensus guidance for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents

ABSTRACT

The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in children and adolescents is challenging. Clear evidence-based guidelines are required for this population. This article provides recommendations for managing IBD in Saudi children and adolescents aged 6-19 years, developed by the Saudi Ministry of Health in collaboration with the Saudi Society of Clinical Pharmacy and the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. All 57 guideline statements are based on the most up-to-date information for the diagnosis and management of pediatric IBD.

Paediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: Experience in Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

Background. Endoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic mode of management in children with gastrointestinal disorders. Objective. To determine the indications, endoscopic yields and impact of the service on the ongoing health and complications among children who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town. Methods. A 10-year (2007 - 2016) retrospective study of children <18 years old who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy was undertaken using relevant patients’ variables obtained from their hospital medical records. Data were analysed using Stata 13.1 (p<0.05). Results. A total of 402 children underwent a total of 695 gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: 592 (85.2%) were gastroscopies, 78 (11.2%) combined gastroscopies with colonoscopies and 25 (3.6%) colonoscopy-only procedures, respectively. The main diagnostic indications for gastroscopy, gastroscopy combined with colonoscopy and colonoscopy-only were chronic abdominal pain (n=49; 12.2%), suspected inflammatory bowel disease (n=30; 7.5%) and rectal bleeding (n=13; 52.0%) respectively. The most common therapeutic indication for gastroscopy was change of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (n=143; 35.6%) while for colonoscopy 6 (5.8%) had polypectomy. Abnormal histopathological results were made from both macroscopically normal- and abnormal-looking tissues, though with no statistically significant relationship. Conclusion. Endoscopy offers diagnostic and therapeutic options in children. Positive histological findings were obtained in some cases where gastrointestinal mucosae appeared normal. There is need to obtain biopsies from both macroscopically normal- and abnormallooking gastrointestinal mucosae as positive histological findings could be made from them and hence improve diagnostic yield.

Gastrointestinal disorders in children with autism: Could artificial intelligence help?

Autism is one of the pervasive neurodevelopmental disorders usually associated with many medical comorbidities. Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are pervasive in children, with a 46%-84% prevalence rate. Children with Autism have an increased frequency of diarrhea, nausea and/or vomiting, gastroesophageal reflux and/or disease, abdominal pain, chronic flatulence due to various factors as food allergies, gastrointestinal dysmotility, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). These GI disorders have a significant negative impact on both the child and his/her family. Artificial intelligence (AI) could help diagnose and manage Autism by improving children's communication, social, and emotional skills for a long time. AI is an effective method to enhance early detection of GI disorders, including GI bleeding, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Coeliac disease, food allergies, IBS, IBD, and rectal polyps. AI can also help personalize the diet for children with Autism by microbiome modification. It can help to provide modified gluten without initiating an immune response. However, AI has many obstacles in treating digestive diseases, especially in children with Autism. We need to do more studies and adopt specific algorithms for children with Autism. In this article, we will highlight the role of AI in helping children with gastrointestinal disorders, with particular emphasis on children with Autism.

Safety and Ethics in Endoscopic Studies in Children: Evidence From the BEECH Study in Zambia

BACKGROUND

Environmental enteropathy is an example of a poorly-understood intestinal disorder affecting millions of children worldwide, characterized by malabsorption and stunting. Although there is increasing interest in non-invasive means of assessing intestinal structure and function, the potential value of intestinal biopsy for histology, immunostaining, RNA sequencing and epigenetic work means that endoscopic biopsy remains extremely valuable. We here report our experience in the BEECH (Biomarkers of Environmental Enteropathy in CHildren) study of stunting in Zambia, in the belief that it may help address the knowledge gap regarding the safety of endoscopic biopsy in vulnerable young children.

METHODS

We report our experience of safety in 119 children undergoing endoscopic biopsy in the BEECH study in Lusaka Children's Hospital, Lusaka, and discuss ethical considerations in this light.

RESULTS

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed on children with stunting (length-for-age z score -2 or less) not responsive to nutritional interventions. Conscious sedation was provided by anaesthetists. Of 119 children, 5 (4%) developed transient desaturation, but no serious adverse events were experienced; no clinical, demographic or anaesthetic characteristics were identified as predictive of desaturation. Two children derived clinically useful information from the endoscopy, one life-saving. Of 105 lactase tests, 59 (54%) showed hypolactasia.

DISCUSSION

Children with stunting underwent endoscopy safely, and some derived clinical benefit. Safety and the possibility of clinical benefit are usually felt to be preconditions for the ethical justification for endoscopy for research in children, and we believe that these conditions were met in this study.

Oral Lorazepam is not Superior to Placebo for Lowering Stress in Children Before Digestive Endoscopy: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Digestive endoscopies must be performed within a safe and comfortable environment. We have previously shown that the quality of intravenous sedation is influenced by preoperative stress.

AIM

Our primary objective was to compare the effects of oral lorazepam and placebo on the salivary cortisol response of children undergoing a digestive endoscopy. Secondary objectives were the assessment of procedural pain and comfort as well as the occurrence of adverse events.

METHODS

Participants were randomized and received either lorazepam, placebo, or no premedication. Saliva was collected upon arrival at the hospital and 1 h following randomization. The sedation protocol included midazolam and fentanyl ± ketamine. Procedural pain was evaluated with the Nurse Assessed Patient Comfort Score (NAPCOMS). Patients completed a postoperative questionnaire. The primary outcome was defined as the proportion of children having a cortisol decrease ≥ 15 nmol/L.

RESULTS

101 participants (54 females) were included. The rate of children having a cortisol decrease ≥ 15 nmol/L was 27.3%, 35.3%, and 19.4% for lorazepam, placebo, and no premedication, respectively (p = 0.356). The median (IQR) NAPCOMS pain score was 3.0 (0-6) for lorazepam, 4.4 (0-6) for placebo, and 3.4 (3-4) for no premedication (p = 0.428). With lorazepam, 75.9% of children reported experiencing a comfortable procedure, compared with 41.9% taking placebo and 34.5% with no premedication (p = 0.013). Transient tachycardia was the most frequent intraoperative adverse event, particularly with lorazepam (62.5%, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral lorazepam had no effect on patients' preoperative stress, as measured by salivary cortisol, but was associated with a higher rate of comfortable procedures.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier NCT03180632.

Sub-10-minute High-quality Diagnostic Colonoscopy With Terminal Ileum Intubation in Children Is Feasible and Safe

OBJECTIVES

To critically appraise ileocolonoscopy (IC) practice in a large tertiary center, where IC is exclusively performed by experienced pediatric colonoscopists, particularly focusing on indications for the procedure; bowel preparation efficacy; IC completion rates and timings; diagnostic yield; and complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated all patients referred to our clinic between July 2015 and June 2016. Data on age, height and weight, sex, surgical history, indications for colonoscopy, bowel preparation given, and bowel cleansing efficacy were collected. The following were calculated: percentage of terminal ileal (TI) intubation; time to terminal ileum; total duration of each procedure. In addition, we evaluated the number and the type of complications encountered and the number of patients readmitted within 30 days from the elective procedure. Endoscopic diagnostic yield, stratified for indication, was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 1392 patients were referred; 181 required an endoscopic evaluation of the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract (Outpatient Department conversion rate: 13%). Main indications for IC were: recurrent abdominal pain 38.1%; unexplained chronic diarrhea 16%; suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) 24.9%; isolated rectal bleeding 13.2%; occult GI bleeding 1.6%; unexplained faltering growth 1.6%; IBD restaging 2.6%; and miscellaneous 1.6%. Terminal ileum was reached in all the patients (TI intubation rate = 100%). Median time to TI was 9.8 minutes (1-50 minutes). Time to TI was lower in younger patients compared to older ones (P = 0.005). Bowel cleansing was judged as grade 1 in 49.2%; grade 2 in 33.7%; grade 3 in 13.3%; and grade 4 in 3.9%. A significant statistical correlation was recorded between bowel cleansing and time to TI. The positive diagnostic yield was: 11.6% in patients with abdominal pain; 37.9% in patients with chronic diarrhea; 51.1% in patients with suspected IBD; 29.2% in patients with isolated rectal bleeding; 33.3% in patients with occult GI bleeding; 0% in patients with faltering growth; and 33% in the miscellaneous group.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, appropriately targeted IC in the management of children with GI symptoms is a safe, fast, and useful investigation. TI intubation rates of 100% are achievable and desirable and can be conducted quickly. Poor bowel preparation impacts negatively on this and IC duration may be faster in younger children. High diagnostic yields have been recorded in patients with a clinical suspicion of IBD. Diagnostic yield in isolated recurrent abdominal pain is low. Training to excellence in pediatric IC should be a persistent goal.

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Diagnostic Endoscopy in Newly Presenting Children With Gastrointestinal Symptoms

OBJECTIVES

Paediatric endoscopy is an important diagnostic tool; however, there is little published data to guide clinicians in selecting patients for endoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate a single centre's experience of newly presenting children focusing on presenting symptoms, investigations, and diagnostic yield.

METHODS

Clinical factors and endoscopic plus histological findings over a 6-month period were assessed. Only first diagnostic endoscopies were included. All biopsies were reviewed in a weekly histopathology multidisciplinary team meeting with a final agreed outcome. Abnormal histology was used as the criterion standard for reporting abnormality.

RESULTS

A total of 218 endoscopies were reviewed in 164 children. Approximately 65% were histologically normal (49% of children had macroscopically and histologically normal findings). Macroscopic and histological abnormalities (respectively) were 44% and 28% of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) patients, 25% and 25% of colonoscopy alone, and 53% and 53% of those undergoing both OGD and colonoscopy (OGD&Col). For OGD-only patients, excluding those with raised anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, vomiting led to the highest rate of abnormal histology (22%). For colonoscopy-only and OGD&Col patients, per rectum bleeding led to the highest rates of abnormal histology (14% and 29%, respectively), after excluding those with laboratory abnormalities (anaemia and raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate) suggestive of inflammatory bowel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that half of all first diagnostic endoscopies in our unit had neither macroscopic nor histological abnormalities. There was discrepancy between macroscopic abnormalities and histological findings in OGD. Prospective studies are needed to develop guidelines in appropriately predicting abnormality and selecting patients for endoscopy.