Current status of paediatric and neonatal organ donation in the UK

Organ Donation in Canadian PICUs: A Cross-Sectional Survey, 2021-2022

OBJECTIVES

To understand contemporary pediatric organ donation programs in Canadian PICUs, including: policies and practices, data collection and reporting, and system and process barriers.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey carried out 2021-2022.

SETTING

Canadian PICUs affiliated with a donor physician network.

SUBJECTS

Pediatric intensivists identified as the donation program lead, or most knowledgeable about donation for their institution.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A 19-item survey was developed through collaboration with stakeholders from the organ donation and transplantation community within Canada. Domains and items were generated and reduced iteratively during an in-person workshop. Pretesting and pilot testing were completed to ensure readability, flow, clinical sensibility, and construct validity. Fifteen of 16 (94%) invited Canadian PICUs from seven provinces completed the survey representing 88% (15/18) of all noncardiac Canadian PICUs. Surveys were completed between June 2021 and September 2022. All units support donation after death by neurologic criteria (DNC); 14 of 15 indicated donation policies were in place and 1 of 15 indicated no policy but the ability to facilitate donation. Thirteen of 15 units (87%) support donation after death by circulatory criteria (DCC) with policies in place, with 11 of 13 of these indicating routine support of donation opportunities. The majority (13/15) of units identified a donation champion. Of the 16 identified champions across these centers, 13 were physicians and were registered nurses or nurse practitioners. Eight of 13 units (62%) with donation champions had positions supported financially, of which 5 units came from the Organ Donation Organization and the other 3 came from the provincial health authority. Finally, only 3 of 15 PICU donation programs have a pediatric donation committee with family involvement. Variability exists in identification (including determination of death practices), referral, and approach for donation between units.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all Canadian PICUs support donation after DNC donation, and most support donation after DCC, variability exists in the identification, referral, and approach of potential donors. There is a notable lack of family involvement in pediatric donation programs. There are many opportunities for standardization of PICU donation programs which may result in improved rates of pediatric organ donation in Canada.

The psychology, legality, ethics and medical aspects of organ donation by minors

Any individual who has not attained the chronological age of legal majority as per national law is termed a minor. The concept of living donation (LD) has always been a subject of ethical debate and further compounding the controversy is the question of LD by minors. The decision for a minor to donate poses a special challenge as it involves a close family unit of parent-child relationship. Such an emotionally loaded situation wherein questions of attachment, perceived duties, moral obligation are likely to cloud a truly informed consent on the part of the minor to donation, who may find themselves in a vulnerable position. Furthermore, a minor's cognitive ability to comprehend the gravity of LD and when required defy parental coercion need to be elucidates before a minor is accepted for LD. Experts have set out stringent conditions which need to be met prior to the exceptional circumstance that a minor is considered for organ donation. Such donations should require parental permission, child's assent and the involvement of a paediatric-trained donor advocacy team. This article debates the question of minors acting as live donors from ethical, medical, psychosocial and legal viewpoints with an aim to present internationally defined circumstances when a minor may morally participate as a LD, thereby laying the foundation for future deliberations in this regard using traditional metrics to juxtapose divergent courses of action.

Paediatric organ donation following neurological determinants of death in intensive care units in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the performance of paediatric organ donation in intensive care units following neurological determinants of death in Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Paediatric intensive care units at three tertiary centres over 5 years.

PARTICIPANTS

423 paediatric deaths (<14 years) from January 2017 to December 2021.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Patients were identified as either possible, potential, eligible, approached, consented or actual donors based on organ donation definitions from the WHO, Transplantation Society and UK potential donor audit.

SECONDARY OUTCOME

Secondary outcome was causative mechanisms of brain injury in possible donors. Demographics of the study cohort (age, sex, hospital length of stay (LOS), paediatric intensive care unit LOS, pre-existing comorbidities, admission type and diagnosis category) were compared between possible and non-possible donors. Demographics were also compared between patients who underwent neurological determination of death and patients who did not.

RESULTS

Among the 423 paediatric deaths, 125 (29.6%) were identified as possible donors by neurological criteria (devastating brain insult with likelihood of brain death, Glasgow Coma Score of 3 and ≥2 absent brainstem reflexes). Of them, 41 (32.8%) patients were identified as potential donors (neurological determination of death examinations initiated by the treating team), while only two became actual donors. The eligible death conversion rate was 6.9%. The reporting rate to organ procurement organisation was 70.7% with a consent rate of 8.3%. The most common causes of brain insult causing death were cardiac arrest (44 of 125 patients, 35.2%), followed by traumatic brain injury and drowning (31 of 125 patients, 24.8%), and intracranial bleeding (13 of 125 patients, 11.4%).

CONCLUSION

Major contributors to low actual donation rate were consent, donor identification and donor referral.

Fifteen-minute consultation: How to approach the withdrawal of neonatal intensive care

Withdrawal of life-sustaining support on the neonatal unit presents a set of unique challenges specific in this age group of patients. This article aims to provide an overview of the key factors that should be considered during this process. It explores the practicalities of care delivery that reflects the psychological impact of undergoing end-of-life care on parents and team members. It will also highlight the role of clinical genetics that can be used to understand the underlying disease pathology and therefore can be a valuable tool in the difficult decision-making process.

Decision Making in the Context of Paediatric Solid Organ Transplantation Medicine

This manuscript aims to outline ethical, legal, and psychosocial key situations in the context of transplantation under special consideration of children. Besides being particularly vulnerable, children as minors by law are not meant to consent to whatever medical procedure is applied to them. Rather their next-of-kin and medical staff are to decide. In the context of transplantation thus it needs to be reflected under which circumstances a child can become an organ donor or receive an organ. This essay will not provide answers to current questions in transplantation medicine but provide an overview of present European practices and juxtapose divergent courses of action which are based on an assumed similar social-cultural background. Data are drawn from a systematic comparison of the various national organ transplantation laws and tissue acts. Ethical reflections are based on a thematically targeted literature search using PubMed Central and PhilPapers databases.

The Gift of Life: Interprofessional Organ Donation Curriculum in Pediatric Critical Care

Background

The number of patients awaiting organ transplantation is high, particularly in Pediatrics, in which available organs are scarce. To maximize organ donation opportunities and to provide quality end-of-life care, clinicians from all professions must be familiar with the process. There continues to be important gaps in core competencies regarding organ donation, including donor criteria and eligibility, timing of referral to organ procurement organizations, neurological determination of death, donation after cardiocirculatory death, and donor management. These gaps affect healthcare providers across multiple professions and are significant barriers to donation.

Objective

We describe an interprofessional curriculum that is designed to teach Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) clinicians about the process of organ donation and supporting the families through that process. The approach of families is the purview of organ procurement organization, and the support of the families through the process remains with PCCM clinicians.

Methods

Kern’s six-step approach to curriculum development was used to develop, implement, and evaluate an interprofessional curriculum on organ donation in PCCM for physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists.

Results

Problem formulation and both general and targeted needs assessments were performed through a comprehensive literature review, including review of national guidelines and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada training objectives. Learning objectives and educational strategies were then outlined using two educational frameworks. After implementation, the curriculum was evaluated using learner self-assessments with a retrospective pre–post design.

Conclusion

After identifying educational gaps contributing to barriers to organ donation, an interprofessional curriculum was developed to increase competency in multiple aspects of organ donation, including team communication and collaboration, with the ultimate goal of promoting a culture of donation while ensuring it is part of quality end-of-life care.

Organ Donation Authorization After Brain Death Among Patients Admitted to PICUs in the United States, 2009-2018

OBJECTIVES

To identify trends in and factors associated with pediatric organ donation authorization after brain death.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of data from Virtual Pediatric Systems, LLC (Los Angeles, CA).

SETTING

Data from 123 PICUs reporting to Virtual Pediatric Systems from 2009 to 2018.

PATIENTS

Patients less than 19 years old eligible for organ donation after brain death.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 2,777 eligible patients, 1,935 (70%) were authorized for organ donation; the authorization rate remained unchanged over time (ptrend = 0.22). In a multivariable logistic regression model, hospitalizations lasting greater than 7 days had lower odds of authorization (adjusted odds ratio, 0.5; p < 0.001 vs ≤ 1 d) and White patients had higher odds than other race/ethnicity groups. Authorization was higher for trauma-related encounters (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; p < 0.001) and when donation was discussed with an organ procurement organization coordinator (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; p < 0.001). Of 123 hospitals, 35 (28%) met or exceeded a 75% organ donation authorization target threshold; these hospitals more often had an organ procurement organization coordinator discussing organ donation (85% vs 72% of encounters; p < 0.001), but no difference was observed by PICU bed size.

CONCLUSIONS

Organ donation authorization after brain death among PICU patients was associated with length of stay, race/ethnicity, and trauma-related encounter, and authorization rates were higher when an organ procurement organization coordinator was involved in the donation discussion. This study identified factors that could inform initiatives to improve the authorization process and increase pediatric organ donation rates.

Neonatal donation: are newborns too young to be recognized?

Neonatal organ and tissue donation is not common practice in the Netherlands. At the same time, there is a transplant waiting list for small size-matched organs and tissues. Multiple factors may contribute to low neonatal donation rates, including a lack of awareness of this option. This study provides insight into potential neonatal organ and tissue donors and reports on how many donors were actually reported to the procurement organization. We performed a retrospective analysis of the mortality database and medical records of two largest neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Netherlands. This study reviewed records of neonates with a gestational age >37 weeks and weight >3000g who died in the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2016. During the study period, 259 term-born neonates died in the two NICUs. In total, 132 neonates with general contra-indications for donation were excluded. The medical records of 127 neonates were examined for donation suitability. We identified five neonates with documented brain death who were not recognized as potential organ and/or tissue donors. Of the remaining neonates, 27 were found suitable for tissue donation. One potential tissue donor had been reported to the procurement organization. In three cases, the possibility of donation was brought up by parents.Conclusion: A low proportion (2%) of neonates who died in the NICUs were found suitable for organ donation, and a higher proportion (12%) were found suitable for tissue donation. We suggest that increased awareness concerning the possibility of neonatal donation would likely increase the identification of potential neonatal donors. What is Known: • There is an urgent need for very small organs and tissues from neonatal donors What is New: • A number of neonates who died in the NICU were suitable organ or/and tissue donors but were not recognized as donors. • Knowledge on neonatal donation possibilities is also important for proper counseling of parents who sometimes inquire for the possibility of organ and tissue donation.

Parents' experiences of requests for organ and tissue donation: the value of asking

OBJECTIVE

A proportion of children die, making them potentially eligible to be organ/tissue donors. Not all are approached for donation, and experiences of those parents are not well understood. The objective was to investigate to what extent organ and tissue donation (OTD) is discussed as part of end-of-life care and to explore parents' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences.

DESIGN

A retrospective qualitative study.

SETTING

Multicentre study with participants recruited through two neonatal intensive care units (ICUs), two paediatric ICUs, a cardiac ICU and a children's hospice.

PATIENTS

Bereaved parents, parents of a child with a long-term condition (LTC) and HCPs.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Parents' and HCPs' views and experiences of discussions about OTD.

RESULTS

24 parents of 20 children were interviewed: 21 bereaved parents and 3 parents of a child with a LTC. Seven parents were asked about donation (13 not asked), four agreed and two donated. 41 HCPs were interviewed. Themes: complexity of donation process, OTD as a coping strategy, the importance of asking, difficulty of raising the topic,\ and parents' assumptions about health of organs (when donation is not discussed).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings add new knowledge about parents' assumptions about the value of their child's organs when discussions about OTD are not raised, and that HCPs do not routinely ask, are sometimes hesitant to ask in fear of damaging relationships, and the reality of the complexity of the donation process. Given the current levels of awareness around OTD, the topic should be raised.