1
|
Kapadia VS, Kawakami MD, Strand ML, Gately C, Spencer A, Schmölzer GM, Rabi Y, Wylie J, Weiner G, Liley HG, Wyckoff MH. Newborn heart rate monitoring methods at birth and clinical outcomes: A systematic review. Resusc Plus 2024; 19:100665. [PMID: 38974929 PMCID: PMC11225902 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim Compare heart rate assessment methods in the delivery room on newborn clinical outcomes. Methods A search of Medline, SCOPUS, CINAHL and Cochrane was conducted between January 1, 1946, to until August 16, 2023. (CRD 42021283438) Study Selection was based on predetermined criteria. Reviewers independently extracted data, appraised risk of bias and assessed certainty of evidence. Results Two randomized controlled trials involving 91 newborns and 1 nonrandomized study involving 632 newborns comparing electrocardiogram (ECG) to auscultation plus pulse oximetry were included. No studies were found that compared any other heart rate measurement methods and reported clinical outcomes. There was no difference between the ECG and control group for duration of positive pressure ventilation, time to heart rate ≥ 100 beats per minute, epinephrine use or death before discharge. In the randomized studies, there was no difference in rate of tracheal intubation [RR 1.34, 95% CI (0.69-2.59)]. No participants received chest compressions. In the nonrandomized study, fewer infants were intubated in the ECG group [RR 0.75, 95% CI (0.62-0.90)]; however, for chest compressions, benefit or harm could not be excluded. [RR 2.14, 95% (CI 0.98-4.70)]. Conclusion There is insufficient evidence to ascertain clinical benefits or harms associated with the use of ECG versus pulse oximetry plus auscultation for heart rate assessment in newborns in the delivery room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal S. Kapadia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yacov Rabi
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Johnathan Wylie
- James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Weiner
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | | | - Myra H. Wyckoff
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Neonatal Life Support Task Force
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
- Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron, OH, United States
- University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
- Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
- University of Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kapadia VS, Kawakami MD, Strand ML, Hurst CP, Spencer A, Schmölzer GM, Rabi Y, Wyllie J, Weiner G, Liley HG, Wyckoff MH. Fast and accurate newborn heart rate monitoring at birth: A systematic review. Resusc Plus 2024; 19:100668. [PMID: 38912532 PMCID: PMC11190559 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim To examine speed and accuracy of newborn heart rate measurement by various assessment methods employed at birth. Methods A search of Medline, SCOPUS, CINAHL and Cochrane was conducted between January 1, 1946, to until August 16, 2023. (CRD 42021283364) Study selection was based on predetermined criteria. Reviewers independently extracted data, appraised risk of bias and assessed certainty of evidence. Results Pulse oximetry is slower and less precise than ECG for heart rate assessment. Both auscultation and palpation are imprecise for heart rate assessment. Other devices such as digital stethoscope, Doppler ultrasound, an ECG device using dry electrodes incorporated in a belt, photoplethysmography and electromyography are studied in small numbers of newborns and data are not available for extremely preterm or bradycardic newborns receiving resuscitation. Digital stethoscope is fast and accurate. Doppler ultrasound and dry electrode ECG in a belt are fast, accurate and precise when compared to conventional ECG with gel adhesive electrodes. Limitations Certainty of evidence was low or very low for most comparisons. Conclusion If resources permit, ECG should be used for fast and accurate heart rate assessment at birth. Pulse oximetry and auscultation may be reasonable alternatives but have limitations. Digital stethoscope, doppler ultrasound and dry electrode ECG show promise but need further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal S. Kapadia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | | | | | | | - Angela Spencer
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | | | - Yacov Rabi
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jonathan Wyllie
- James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Weiner
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Helen G. Liley
- University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Myra H. Wyckoff
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Neonatal Life Support Task Force1
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
- Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron, OH, United States
- Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland Australia
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berg KM, Bray JE, Ng KC, Liley HG, Greif R, Carlson JN, Morley PT, Drennan IR, Smyth M, Scholefield BR, Weiner GM, Cheng A, Djärv T, Abelairas-Gómez C, Acworth J, Andersen LW, Atkins DL, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Bierens J, Bittencourt Couto T, Borra V, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Breckwoldt J, Cassan P, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Chung SP, Considine J, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Dainty KN, Dassanayake V, Davis PG, Dawson JA, Fernanda de Almeida M, De Caen AR, Deakin CD, Dicker B, Douma MJ, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Fabres JG, Fawke J, Fijacko N, Finn JC, Flores GE, Foglia EE, Folke F, Gilfoyle E, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Hatanaka T, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hosono S, Hsieh MJ, Hsu CH, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Kapadia VS, Daripa Kawakami M, Kim HS, Kleinman ME, Kloeck DA, Kudenchuk P, Kule A, Kurosawa H, Lagina AT, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Lin Y, Lockey AS, Macneil F, Maconochie IK, John Madar R, Malta Hansen C, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Monnelly V, Nadkarni V, Nakwa FL, Nation KJ, Nehme Z, Nemeth M, Neumar RW, Nicholson T, Nikolaou N, Nishiyama C, Norii T, Nuthall GA, Ohshimo S, Olasveengen TM, Gene Ong YK, Orkin AM, Parr MJ, Patocka C, Perkins GD, Perlman JM, Rabi Y, Raitt J, Ramachandran S, Ramaswamy VV, Raymond TT, Reis AG, Reynolds JC, Ristagno G, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Roehr CC, Rüdiger M, Sakamoto T, Sandroni C, Sawyer TL, Schexnayder SM, Schmölzer GM, Schnaubelt S, Semeraro F, Singletary EM, Skrifvars MB, Smith CM, Soar J, Stassen W, Sugiura T, Tijssen JA, Topjian AA, Trevisanuto D, Vaillancourt C, Wyckoff MH, Wyllie JP, Yang CW, Yeung J, Zelop CM, Zideman DA, Nolan JP. 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Resuscitation 2024; 195:109992. [PMID: 37937881 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation engages in a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid science. Draft Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations are posted online throughout the year, and this annual summary provides more concise versions of the final Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations from all task forces for the year. Topics addressed by systematic reviews this year include resuscitation of cardiac arrest from drowning, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults and children, calcium during cardiac arrest, double sequential defibrillation, neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest for adults and children, maintaining normal temperature after preterm birth, heart rate monitoring methods for diagnostics in neonates, detection of exhaled carbon dioxide in neonates, family presence during resuscitation of adults, and a stepwise approach to resuscitation skills training. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research. Additional topics are addressed with scoping reviews and evidence updates.
Collapse
|
4
|
Berg KM, Bray JE, Ng KC, Liley HG, Greif R, Carlson JN, Morley PT, Drennan IR, Smyth M, Scholefield BR, Weiner GM, Cheng A, Djärv T, Abelairas-Gómez C, Acworth J, Andersen LW, Atkins DL, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Bierens J, Bittencourt Couto T, Borra V, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Breckwoldt J, Cassan P, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Chung SP, Considine J, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Dainty KN, Dassanayake V, Davis PG, Dawson JA, de Almeida MF, De Caen AR, Deakin CD, Dicker B, Douma MJ, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Fabres JG, Fawke J, Fijacko N, Finn JC, Flores GE, Foglia EE, Folke F, Gilfoyle E, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Hatanaka T, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hosono S, Hsieh MJ, Hsu CH, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Kapadia VS, Kawakami MD, Kim HS, Kleinman ME, Kloeck DA, Kudenchuk P, Kule A, Kurosawa H, Lagina AT, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Lin Y, Lockey AS, Macneil F, Maconochie IK, Madar RJ, Malta Hansen C, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Monnelly V, Nadkarni V, Nakwa FL, Nation KJ, Nehme Z, Nemeth M, Neumar RW, Nicholson T, Nikolaou N, Nishiyama C, Norii T, Nuthall GA, Ohshimo S, Olasveengen TM, Ong YKG, Orkin AM, Parr MJ, Patocka C, Perkins GD, Perlman JM, Rabi Y, Raitt J, Ramachandran S, Ramaswamy VV, Raymond TT, Reis AG, Reynolds JC, Ristagno G, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Roehr CC, Rüdiger M, Sakamoto T, Sandroni C, Sawyer TL, Schexnayder SM, Schmölzer GM, Schnaubelt S, Semeraro F, Singletary EM, Skrifvars MB, Smith CM, Soar J, Stassen W, Sugiura T, Tijssen JA, Topjian AA, Trevisanuto D, Vaillancourt C, Wyckoff MH, Wyllie JP, Yang CW, Yeung J, Zelop CM, Zideman DA, Nolan JP. 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation 2023; 148:e187-e280. [PMID: 37942682 PMCID: PMC10713008 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation engages in a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid science. Draft Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations are posted online throughout the year, and this annual summary provides more concise versions of the final Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations from all task forces for the year. Topics addressed by systematic reviews this year include resuscitation of cardiac arrest from drowning, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults and children, calcium during cardiac arrest, double sequential defibrillation, neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest for adults and children, maintaining normal temperature after preterm birth, heart rate monitoring methods for diagnostics in neonates, detection of exhaled carbon dioxide in neonates, family presence during resuscitation of adults, and a stepwise approach to resuscitation skills training. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research. Additional topics are addressed with scoping reviews and evidence updates.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gulati R, Sayegh L, McCurley C, Eyal F, Zayek M. Back vs. chest ECG electrode placement in neonatal resuscitation: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation 2023; 192:109961. [PMID: 37678627 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent Neonatal Resuscitation Program advises the early utilization of an electrocardiogram (ECG) for non-vigorous newborns in the delivery room. However, placing ECG electrodes on the chest may delay obtaining a reliable heart rate (HR) and could interfere with chest compressions. Our previous study showed that preset ECG electrodes, attached to the back of the newborn, are quicker than a pulse oximeter (POX) for detecting HR. AIM To compare time to detect a reliable HR using back-placed ECG electrodes versus standard front placement. METHODS Infants were randomly assigned to back (n = 85) or chest (n = 89) electrode placement. Time measurement began upon placing infants on a Panda warmer ResusView. Failure was defined as no HR detected within 5 minutes. Intention-to-treat analysis compared HR signal acquisition time between groups. RESULTS Both groups showed similar proportions of detectable HR within the first minute. Median (IQR) time to obtain HR was 26 (13,38) seconds for the chest group and 21 (12,54) seconds for the back group (p = 0.91). A large number of vigorous infants were included. In the chest group, these vigorous infants had shorter HR acquisition times than non-vigorous infants (Mean ± SD of 34 ± 48 seconds vs. 50 ± 44 seconds respectively; p = 0.049). Failure rates and time to acquire a HR for infants who were non-vigorous and required advanced resuscitation were similar between the back and chest groups (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION Preset back ECG electrodes have shown encouraging results in neonates requiring advanced resuscitation. Further studies are needed to enhance guidance during neonatal resuscitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashmi Gulati
- University of South Alabama Children's and Women's Hospital, 1700 Center Street, Mobile, AL 36604, USA.
| | - Lameace Sayegh
- University of South Alabama College of Medicine, 1700 Center Street, Mobile, AL 36604, USA
| | - Cathy McCurley
- University of South Alabama Children's and Women's Hospital, 1700 Center Street, Mobile, AL 36604, USA
| | - Fabien Eyal
- University of South Alabama Children's and Women's Hospital, 1700 Center Street, Mobile, AL 36604, USA
| | - Michael Zayek
- University of South Alabama Children's and Women's Hospital, 1700 Center Street, Mobile, AL 36604, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murphy MC, McCarthy LK, O'Donnell CPF. Research in the Delivery Room: Can You Tell Me It's Evolution? Neoreviews 2022; 23:e229-e237. [PMID: 35362035 DOI: 10.1542/neo.23-4-e229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Many of the recommendations for newborn care in the delivery room (DR) are based on retrospective observational studies, preclinical studies of mannequins or animal models, and expert opinion. Conducting DR research is challenging. Many deliveries occur in fraught circumstances with little prior warning, making it difficult to get prospective consent from parents and buy-in from clinicians. Many DR interventions are difficult to mask for the purpose of a clinical trial and it is not easy to identify appropriate outcomes for studies that are sufficiently "short-term" that they are likely to be influenced by the intervention, yet sufficiently "long-term" to be considered clinically important. However, despite these challenges, much information has been accrued from clinical studies in recent years. In this article, we outline our experience of conducting clinical research in the DR. In our initial studies almost 20 years ago, we found wide variation in the equipment used both nationally and internationally, reflecting the paucity of evidence to support practice. This started a journey that has included many observational studies and randomized controlled trials that have attempted to refine how we care for newborn infants in the DR. Each has given further information and, inevitably, raised many more questions about the approach to caring for newborns in the DR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine C Murphy
- National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa K McCarthy
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Colm P F O'Donnell
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|