Neonates with mild hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy receiving supportive care versus therapeutic hypothermia in California

Regional variability in therapeutic hypothermia eligibility criteria for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

Early induced therapeutic hypothermia represents the cornerstone treatment in neonates with probable hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The selection of patients for treatment usually involves meeting criteria indicating evidence of perinatal hypoxia-ischemia and the presence of moderate or severe encephalopathy. In this review, we highlight the variability that exists between some of the different regional and national eligibility guidelines. Determining the potential presence of perinatal hypoxia-ischemia may require either one, two or three signs amongst history of acute perinatal event, prolonged resuscitation at delivery, abnormal blood gases and low Apgar score, with a range of cutoff values. Clinical neurological exams often define the severity of encephalopathy differently, with varying number of domains required for determining eligibility and blurred interpretation of findings assigned to different severity grades in different systems. The role of early electrophysiological assessment is weighted differently. A clinical implication is that infants may receive different care depending on the location in which they are born. This could also impact epidemiological data, as inference of rates of moderate-severe encephalopathy based on therapeutic hypothermia rates are misleading and influenced by different eligibility methods used. We would advocate that a universally endorsed single severity staging of encephalopathy is vital for standardizing management and neonatal outcome. IMPACT: Variability exists between regional and national therapeutic hypothermia eligibility guidelines for neonates with probable hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Differences are common in both criteria indicating perinatal hypoxia-ischemia and criteria defining moderate or severe encephalopathy. The role of early electrophysiological assessment is also weighted unequally. This reflects in different individual care and impacts research data. A universally endorsed single severity staging of encephalopathy would be crucial for standardizing management.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is the most common cause of neonatal encephalopathy and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Long-term outcomes of the condition encompass impairments across all developmental domains. While therapeutic hypothermia (TH) has improved outcomes for term and late preterm infants with moderate to severe HIE, trials are ongoing to investigate the use of TH for infants with mild or preterm HIE. There is no evidence that adjuvant therapies in combination with TH improve long-term outcomes. Numerous trials of various adjuvant therapies are underway in the quest to further improve outcomes for infants with HIE.

[Efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia on mild neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a prospective randomized controlled study]

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia on mild neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

METHODS

A prospective study was performed on 153 neonates with mild HIE who were born from September 2019 to September 2023. These neonates were randomly divided into two groups: therapeutic hypothermia (n=77) and non-therapeutic hypothermia group (n=76). The short-term clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared. Barkovich scoring system was used to analyze the severity of brain injury shown on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in gestational age, gender, birth weight, mode of birth, and Apgar score between the therapeutic hypothermia and non-therapeutic hypothermia groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of sepsis, arrhythmia, persistent pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary hemorrhage and the duration of mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours after birth between the two groups. The therapeutic hypothermia group had longer prothrombin time within the first 72 hours after birth and a longer hospital stay (P<0.05). Compared with the non-therapeutic hypothermia group, the therapeutic hypothermia group had lower incidence rates of MRI abnormalities (30% vs 57%), moderate to severe brain injury on MRI (5% vs 28%), and watershed injury (27% vs 51%) (P<0.05), as well as lower medium watershed injury score (0 vs 1) (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic hypothermia can reduce the incidence rates of MRI abnormalities and watershed injury, without obvious adverse effects, in neonates with mild HIE, suggesting that therapeutic hypothermia may be beneficial in neuroprotection in these neonates.

Growth trajectories and need for oral feeding support among infants with neonatal encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia

OBJECTIVE

Identify feeding supports required among infants with neonatal encephalopathy and determine growth trajectories to 3 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective cohort study of 120 infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. Logistic regression and stratified analyses identified whether clinical factors, EEG-determined encephalopathy severity, and MRI-based brain injury predict feeding supports (nasogastric tube, oral feeding compensations) and growth.

RESULTS

50.8% of infants required feeding supports in the hospital, decreasing to 14% at discharge. Moderate-to-severe encephalopathy and basal ganglia injury predicted feeding support needs. Yet, 35% of mildly encephalopathic infants required gavage tubes. Growth trajectories approximated expected growth of healthy infants.

CONCLUSION

Infants with neonatal encephalopathy-even if mild-frequently experience feeding difficulties during initial hospitalization. With support, most achieve full oral feeds by discharge and adequate early childhood growth. Clinical factors may help identify infants requiring feeding support, but do not detect all at-risk infants, supporting routine screening of this high-risk population.

Whole-body hypothermia in mild neonatal encephalopathy: protocol for a multicentre phase III randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Mild hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is associated with sub optimal cognition and learning difficulties at school age. Although whole-body hypothermia reduces death and disability after moderate or severe encephalopathy in high-income countries, the safety and efficacy of hypothermia in mild encephalopathy is not known. The cooling in mild encephalopathy (COMET) trial will examine if whole-body hypothermia improves cognitive development of neonates with mild encephalopathy.

METHODS

The COMET trial is a phase III multicentre open label two-arm randomised controlled trial with masked outcome assessments. A total of 426 neonates with mild encephalopathy will be recruited from 50 to 60 NHS hospitals over 2 ½ years following parental consent. The neonates will be randomised to 72 h of whole-body hypothermia (33.5 ± 0.5 C) or normothermia (37.0 ± 0.5 C) within six hours or age. Prior to the recruitment front line clinical staff will be trained and certified on expanded modified Sarnat staging for encephalopathy. The neurological assessment of all screened and recruited cases will be video recorded and centrally assessed for quality assurance. If recruitment occurs at a non-cooling centre, neonates in both arms will be transferred to a cooling centre for continued care, after randomisation. All neonates will have continuous amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) at least for the first 48 h to monitor for seizures. Predefined safety outcomes will be documented, and data collected to assess resource utilization of health care. A central team masked to trial group allocation will assess neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. The primary outcome is mean difference in composite cognitive scores on Bayley scales of Infant and Toddler development 4th Edition.

DISCUSSION

The COMET trial will establish the safety and efficacy of whole-body hypothermia for mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and inform national and international guidelines in high income countries. It will also provide an economic assessment of whole-body hypothermia therapy for mild encephalopathy in the NHS on cost-effectiveness grounds.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05889507 June 5, 2023.

Whole-Body Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia for Neonates With Mild Encephalopathy: A Multicenter Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Although whole-body hypothermia is widely used after mild neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), safety and efficacy have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), to our knowledge.

Objective

To examine the effect of 48 and 72 hours of whole-body hypothermia after mild HIE on cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) biomarkers.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, 3-arm RCT was conducted between October 31, 2019, and April 28, 2023, with masked outcome analysis. Participants were neonates at 6 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in the UK and Italy born at or after 36 weeks' gestation with severe birth acidosis, requiring continued resuscitation, or with an Apgar score less than 6 at 10 minutes after birth and with evidence of mild HIE on modified Sarnat staging. Statistical analysis was per intention to treat.

Interventions

Random allocation to 1 of 3 groups (1:1:1) based on age: neonates younger than 6 hours were randomized to normothermia or 72-hour hypothermia (33.5 °C), and those 6 hours or older and already receiving whole-body hypothermia were randomized to rewarming after 48 or 72 hours of hypothermia.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) concentration (mmol/kg wet weight), assessed by cerebral MR imaging and thalamic spectroscopy between 4 and 7 days after birth using harmonized sequences.

Results

Of 225 eligible neonates, 101 were recruited (54 males [53.5%]); 48 (47.5%) were younger than 6 hours and 53 (52.5%) were 6 hours or older at randomization. Mean (SD) gestational age and birth weight were 39.5 (1.1) weeks and 3378 (380) grams in the normothermia group (n = 34), 38.7 (0.5) weeks and 3017 (338) grams in the 48-hour hypothermia group (n = 31), and 39.0 (1.1) weeks and 3293 (252) grams in the 72-hour hypothermia group (n = 36). More neonates in the 48-hour (14 of 31 [45.2%]) and 72-hour (13 of 36 [36.1%]) groups required intubation at birth than in the normothermic group (3 of 34 [8.8%]). Ninety-nine neonates (98.0%) had MR imaging data and 87 (86.1%), NAA data. Injury scores on conventional MR biomarkers were similar across groups. The mean (SD) NAA level in the normothermia group was 10.98 (0.92) mmol/kg wet weight vs 8.36 (1.23) mmol/kg wet weight (mean difference [MD], -2.62 [95% CI, -3.34 to -1.89] mmol/kg wet weight) in the 48-hour and 9.02 (1.79) mmol/kg wet weight (MD, -1.96 [95% CI, -2.66 to -1.26] mmol/kg wet weight) in the 72-hour hypothermia group. Seizures occurred beyond 6 hours after birth in 4 neonates: 1 (2.9%) in the normothermia group, 1 (3.2%) in the 48-hour hypothermia group, and 2 (5.6%) in the 72-hour hypothermia group.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this pilot RCT, whole-body hypothermia did not improve cerebral MR biomarkers after mild HIE, although neonates in the hypothermia groups were sicker at baseline. Safety and efficacy of whole-body hypothermia should be evaluated in RCTs.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03409770.

Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Hypothermia Treatment

Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is an important clinical entity because it is associated with death and long-term disability, including cognitive impairment, cerebral palsy, seizures, and neurosensory deficits. Over the past 40 years, there has been an intensive search to identify therapies to improve the prognosis of neonates with HIE. Hypothermia treatment represents the culmination of laboratory investigations including small and large animal studies, followed by pilot human studies, and, finally, randomized controlled trials to establish efficacy and safety. Clinical trials have demonstrated that hypothermia treatment reduces mortality and improves early childhood outcome among survivors. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is a multi-system disease process that requires intensive medical support for brain monitoring and monitoring of non-central nervous system organ dysfunction. Treatment must be conducted in a level III or IV neonatal intensive care unit with infrastructure for an integrated approach to care for critically ill neonates. Hypothermia treatment is the first and currently the only therapy to improve outcomes for neonates with HIE and indicates that HIE is modifiable. However, outcomes likely can be improved further. Hypothermia treatment has accelerated investigation of other therapies to combine with hypothermia. It has also stimulated a more intensive approach to brain monitoring, which allows earlier intervention for complications. Finally, HIE and hypothermia treatment negatively influences the psychological state of affected families, and there is growing recognition of the importance of trauma-informed principles to guide medical professionals.

Increase in Standardized Management of Neonates with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Since Implementation of a Patient Register

The Swiss National Asphyxia and Cooling Register was implemented in 2011. This study assessed quality indicators of the cooling process and (short-term) outcomes of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving therapeutic hypothermia (TH) longitudinally over time in Switzerland. This is a multicenter national retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected register data. Quality indicators were defined for longitudinal comparison (2011-2014 vs. 2015-2018) of processes of TH and (short-term) outcomes of neonates with moderate-to-severe HIE. Five hundred seventy neonates receiving TH in 10 Swiss cooling centers were included (2011-2018). Four hundred forty-nine (449/570; 78.8%) neonates with moderate-to-severe HIE received TH according to the Swiss National Asphyxia and Cooling Register Protocol. Quality indicators of processes of TH improved in 2015-2018 (compared with 2011-2014): less passive cooling (p = 0.013), shorter time to reach target temperature (p = 0.002), and less over- or undercooling (p < 0.001). In 2015-2018, adherence to performing a cranial magnetic resonance imaging after rewarming improved (p < 0.001), whereas less cranial ultrasounds were performed on admission (p = 0.012). With regard to quality indicators of short-term outcomes, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate was reduced (p = 0.003), and there was a trend toward less coagulopathy (p = 0.063) in 2015-2018. There was no statistically significant change in the remaining processes and outcomes. The Swiss National Asphyxia and Cooling Register is well implemented with good overall adherence to the treatment protocol. Management of TH improved longitudinally. Continuous reevaluation of register data is desirable for quality assessment, benchmarking, and maintaining international evidence-based quality standards.

Brain Injury in Infants Evaluated for, But Not Treated with, Therapeutic Hypothermia

Defining neonatal encephalopathy clinically to qualify for therapeutic hypothermia is challenging. This study examines magnetic resonance imaging outcomes of 39 infants who were evaluated and not cooled using criteria inclusive of mild encephalopathy. Infants evaluated for therapeutic hypothermia are at risk for brain injury and may benefit from neuroimaging and follow-up.

Differences in standardized neonatal encephalopathy exam criteria may impact therapeutic hypothermia eligibility

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is routinely provided to those with moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy (NE). Subtle differences exist in the standardized exams used to define NE severity. We aimed to assess if an infant's TH eligibility status differed if they were evaluated using either the NICHD/Neonatal Research Network's (NICHD-NRN) or TOBY/British Association of Perinatal Medicine's (TOBY-BAPM) neurological exam.

METHODS

Encephalopathic infants ≥36 weeks with evidence of perinatal asphyxia and complete documentation of the neurological exam &lt;6 h of age were included. TH eligibility using the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM criteria was determined based upon the documented exams.

RESULTS

Ninety-one encephalopathic infants were included. Despite good agreement between the two exams (κ = 0.715, p &lt; 0.001), TH eligibility differed between them (p &lt; 0.001). A total of 47 infants were deemed eligible by at least one method-46 using NICHD-NRN and 35 using TOBY-BAPM. Of the 12 infants eligible per NICHD-NRN, but ineligible per TOBY-BAPM, two developed electrographic seizures and seven demonstrated hypoxic-ischemic cerebral injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM exams are evidence-based. Despite this, there is a significant difference in the number of infants eligible for TH depending on which exam is used. The NICHD-NRN exam identifies a greater proportion as eligible.

IMPACT

There are subtle differences in the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM's encephalopathy exams used to determine eligibility for TH. This results in a significant difference in the proportion of infants determined to be eligible for TH depending on which encephalopathy exam is used. The NICHD-NRN encephalopathy exam identifies more infants as being eligible for TH than the TOBY-BAPM encephalopathy exam. This may result in different rates of cooling depending on which evidence-based neurological exam for evaluation of encephalopathy a center uses.

Variations in practices and outcomes of neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia across tertiary NICUs in Canada

OBJECTIVE

To characterize variations in practices and outcomes for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) across Canadian tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of neonates admitted for HIE and treated with TH in 24 tertiary NICUs from the Canadian Neonatal Network, 2010-2020. The two primary outcomes of mortality before discharge and MRI-detected brain injury were compared across NICUs using adjusted standardized ratios (SR) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Of the 3261 neonates that received TH, 367 (11%) died and 1033 (37%) of the 2822 with MRI results had brain injury. Overall, rates varied significantly across NICUs for mortality (range 5-17%) and brain injury (range 28-51%). Significant variations in use of inotropes, inhaled nitric oxide, blood products, and feeding during TH were identified (p values < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Significant variations exist in practices and outcomes of HIE neonates treated with hypothermia across Canada.