Direct costs related to rheumatoid arthritis: the patient perspective

The financial burden of accessing care for people with scleroderma in Canada: a patient-oriented, cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Patients with scleroderma require a lifetime of treatment and frequent contacts with rheumatologists and other health care professionals. Although publicly funded health care systems in Canada cover many costs, patients may still face a substantial financial burden in accessing care. The purpose of this study was to quantify out-of-pocket costs borne by people with scleroderma in Canada and compare this burden for those living in large communities and smaller communities.

METHODS

We analyzed responses to a Web-based survey of people living in Canada with scleroderma. Respondents reported annual out-of-pocket medical, travel and accommodation and other nonmedical costs (2019 Canadian dollars). We used descriptive statistics to describe travel distance and out-of-pocket costs. We used a 2-part model to estimate the impact on out-of-pocket costs of living in a large urban centre (≥ 100 000 population), compared with smaller urban centres or rural areas (< 100 000 population). We generated combined mean estimates from the 2-part models using predictive margins.

RESULTS

The survey included 120 people in Canada with scleroderma. The mean, annual, total out-of-pocket costs were $3357 (standard deviation $5580). Respondents living in smaller urban centres and rural areas reported higher mean total costs ($4148, 95% confidence interval [CI] $3618-$4680) and travel or accommodation costs ($1084, 95% CI $804-$1364) than those in larger urban centres (total costs $2678, 95% CI $2252-$3104; travel or accommodation costs $332, 95% CI $207-$458).

INTERPRETATION

Many patients with scleroderma incur considerable out-of-pocket costs, and this burden is exacerbated for those living in smaller urban centres and rural areas. Health care systems and providers should consider ways to alleviate this burden and support equitable access to care.

Non-medical costs during the first year after diagnosis in two cohorts of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, enrolled 10 years apart

The aim of the present study was to calculate non-medical costs during year 1 after diagnosis in two cohorts of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis enrolled 1996-1998 and 2006-2009. Clinical data were collected regularly in both cohorts. Besides information about healthcare utilization and days lost from work, patients reported non-medical costs for aids/devices, transportation, formal and informal care. Formal care was valued as full labour cost for official home help (€42.80/h) and informal care from relatives and friends as opportunity cost of leisure time, corresponding to 35% of labour cost (€15/h). In both cohorts, only 2% used formal care, while more than 50% used informal care. Prescription of aids/devices was more frequent in cohort 2 and more women than men needed aids/devices. Help with transportation was also more common in cohort 2. Women in both cohorts needed more informal care than men, especially with personal care and household issues. Adjusting for covariates in regression models, female sex remained associated with higher costs in both cohorts. Non-medical costs in cohort 2 were €1892, €1575 constituting informal care, corresponding to 83% of non-medical costs. Total non-medical costs constituted 25% of total direct costs and 11% of total direct and indirect costs. Informal care accounted for the largest part of non-medical costs and women had higher costs than men. Despite established social welfare system, it is obvious that family and friends, to a large extent, are involved in informal care of patients with early RA, and this may underestimate the total burden of the disease.

The Cost of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the UK Using Linked Routine and Patient-Reported Survey Data

Background

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis which typically begins in early adulthood and impacts on healthcare resource utilisation and the ability to work. Previous studies examining the cost of AS have relied on patient-reported questionnaires based on recall. This study uses a combination of patient-reported and linked-routine data to examine the cost of AS in Wales, UK.

Methods

Participants in an existing AS cohort study (n = 570) completed questionnaires regarding work status, out-of-pocket expenses, visits to health professionals and disease severity. Participants gave consent for their data to be linked to routine primary and secondary care clinical datasets. Health resource costs were calculated using a bottom-up micro-costing approach. Human capital costs methods were used to estimate work productivity loss costs, particularly relating to work and early retirement. Regression analyses were used to account for age, gender, disease activity.

Results

The total cost of AS in the UK is estimated at £19016 per patient per year, calculated to include GP attendance, administration costs and hospital costs derived from routine data records, plus patient-reported non-NHS costs, out-of-pocket AS-related expenses, early retirement, absenteeism, presenteeism and unpaid assistance costs. The majority of the cost (>80%) was as a result of work-related costs.

Conclusion

The major cost of AS is as a result of loss of working hours, early retirement and unpaid carer’s time. Therefore, much of AS costs are hidden and not easy to quantify. Functional impairment is the main factor associated with increased cost of AS. Interventions which keep people in work to retirement age and reduce functional impairment would have the greatest impact on reducing costs of AS. The combination of patient-reported and linked routine data significantly enhanced the health economic analysis and this methodology that can be applied to other chronic conditions.

Contact frequency, travel time, and travel costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives. To investigate travel time, and travel cost related to contacts with health care providers for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during a three-month period. Methods. Patient-reported travel time and travel cost were obtained from 2847 patients with RA. Eleven outpatient clinics across Denmark recruited patients to the study. Data collected included frequency, travel time and travel costs for contacts at rheumatology outpatient clinics, other outpatient clinics, general practitioners, privately practicing medical specialists, inpatient hospitals and accident and emergency departments. Results. Over a 3-month period, patients with RA had on average 4.4 (sd 5.7) contacts with health care providers, of which 2.8 (sd 4.0) contacts were with rheumatology outpatient clinics. Private car and public travel were the most frequent modes of travel. The average patient spent 63 minutes and 13 € on travelling per contact, corresponding to a total of 4.6 hours and 56 € during the 3-month period. There was great variation in patient travel time and costs, but no statistically significant associations were found with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusion. The results show that patients with RA spend private time and costs on travelling when they seek treatment. These findings are particularly important when analyzing social costs associated with RA.

[Health economic aspects of a stratified medicine for rheumatoid arthritis]

Up to now stratified therapy concepts have not played an important role in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, a high heterogeneity regarding the effectiveness of therapies and occurrence of side effects in patients with the same indications provokes research efforts aiming at identifying and developing diagnostic biomarkers. Comprehensive diagnostics could lead to improved patient-oriented therapy algorithms and hence, a higher patient-relevant benefit could be achieved. Furthermore, costs for non-effective therapy options could be reduced, which might improve the cost-effectiveness of single active agents, especially biologicals. For the pharmaceutical industry an enhanced stratification of pharmaceuticals leads to smaller patient target groups and smaller markets on the one hand but on the other hand it may result in higher chances of receiving approval as well as higher reimbursement prices.

Use of general practice and rheumatology outpatient services in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be treated in close cooperation between GPs and rheumatologists and following treatment guidelines. In this study, we analyse the utilization of health care among patients with RA and explain the determinants of the frequency of use of GP and rheumatologist services.

METHODS

A random sample (n = 1259) of adult Estonian patients with RA was investigated in 2007. A pre-structured questionnaire included questions regarding respondents' socio-economic status, quality of life, self-reported use of health care, time, distance and financial aspects of access to health care. The impact of the variables on the frequency of use of health care was analysed with regression analysis.

RESULTS

Use of GP services was higher among people who lived outside the capital, had more health problems and experienced disability due to their RA. Time and distance limits had an effect on the frequency of use of both primary and specialist care. A shorter waiting time to the GP and a longer waiting time to the rheumatologist were associated with more frequent use of GP services, but a shorter waiting time to the rheumatologist was related to more frequent visits to the rheumatologist. Patient's costs were not associated with the frequency of health care use.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of health care among people with RA depends primarily upon doctors' waiting times, patients' place of residence and their health status. The GP has a significant role in the management of RA patients, especially for those who have multiple health problems and those living in rural areas.

Cost of illness for patients with arthritis receiving multidisciplinary rehabilitation care

Purpose. To describe healthcare consumption and costs prior to, during, and after multidisciplinary rehabilitation due to arthritis. Methods. 306 patients (age 18-75 years) with arthritis scheduled for multidisciplinary rehabilitation care in 9 rehabilitation centres and 4 rheumatology hospital departments were included and followed for 6 months. Costs were estimated in Euros (€) for the total sample and five clinical subgroups. Results. Healthcare costs ranged from €3,033 to €91,336 and were significantly higher at hospital departments compared to rehabilitation centres: €9,722 (SD 5,406) and €4,250 (SD 1,040). While total costs prior to and after rehabilitation were stable for those receiving rehabilitation at a hospital, there was a significant increase in costs for those being at a rehabilitation centre. Total mean costs were more than doubled when including social costs: from €32,410 (95% CI 20,074-37,017) to €51,491 (95% CI 49,055-61,657). Conclusions. Healthcare and social costs for arthritis rehabilitation were substantial both before and after a rehabilitation stay. It is important to explore methods to reduce the length of rehabilitation stay and production loss connected to rehabilitation of patients with rheumatic disease.

Societal cost of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the US

OBJECTIVE

To estimate comprehensive cost of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to society and individual stakeholders, including patients/employees, employers, family members/caregivers, and government.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Administrative claims databases covering privately insured and Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in the US were used to compute the excess payer and beneficiary-paid costs per patient with RA compared with matched controls. Similarly, per-person excess costs for caregivers and uninsured patients with RA were estimated. Costs were estimated for other burdens, including costs of work-loss to employers, adaptations to home and work environments, lost on-the-job productivity, informal and hired care/household help, and job turnover costs. Intangible costs associated with quality-of-life deterioration were estimated based on legal system jury awards, whereas costs for premature mortality were based on lifetime earnings data. Per-capita cost estimates were weighted by the relevant population to estimate societal costs. Because data were incomplete, several assumptions were required; these assumptions could lead to an over- or under-estimation of cost burdens.

RESULTS

Annual excess health care costs of RA patients were $8.4 billion, and costs of other RA consequences were $10.9 billion. These costs translate to a total annual cost of $19.3 billion. From a stakeholder perspective, 33% of the total cost was allocated to employers, 28% to patients, 20% to the government, and 19% to caregivers. Adding intangible costs of quality-of-life deterioration ($10.3 billion) and premature mortality ($9.6 billion), total annual societal costs of RA (direct, indirect, and intangible) increased to $39.2 billion.

CONCLUSIONS

Societal costs of RA in the US are $19.3 billion and $39.2 billion (in 2005 dollars) without and with intangible costs, respectively. This study was one of the first to attempt to quantify the comprehensive burdens of RA. Despite several assumptions made in areas in which few data exist, the findings generate useful insights into the full burden of RA.

Review on use of German health insurance medication claims data for epidemiological research

PURPOSE

The objective was to evaluate the use of German health insurance claims data on medications over the last 10 years by a review of published studies.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched for relevant studies published in 1998 through 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies were included. Use of these data increased from 32 reports (45.7%) between 1998 and 2005 to 38 (54.3%) over the last 2 years (2006-2007). Over half of the studies (57.1%; n = 40) were written in English and the most frequent research types were health service utilization (51.4%; n = 36) and cost analyses (18.6%; n = 13). In most of the studies (65.7%; n = 46), medication data were linked with other health care utilization claims (e.g. hospitalization data and physicians' outpatient services). Data validity was not taken into consideration in 40.6% (n = 13) of the 32 studies that also analysed hospitalization or physicians' outpatient diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

German health insurance medication claims data were increasingly used for research purposes over the last 10 years. Especially methodological and validation studies are clearly needed.

Exploring the healthcare journey of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a mapping project - implications for practice

OBJECTIVE

Consumers of healthcare can reveal important insights into the personal challenges they experience when negotiating their health needs. The National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS) wanted to explore the experiences of those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in order to understand the impact on the individual and on healthcare resources and benchmark care against published standards and guidelines.

METHODS

A project was designed to explore the experiences of individuals with sero-positive RA who had been diagnosed for three years or less. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used and combined with process mapping to explore the experiences of a purposeful sample of individuals with RA. The information generated was mapped and variances explored. Ethical approval was not required as the data were collected outside the National Health Service.

RESULTS

Twenty-two participants' stories were mapped. Fifty per cent of participants sought a medical opinion within three weeks of symptom onset and the majority received a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug within six months from first presenting symptoms. Work-related issues were highlighted by 13 participants, and seven of these experienced job losses directly attributed to their diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This unique mapping approach used qualitative research and process mapping to compare patient experiences against recognized standards and guidelines. These twenty-two stories reveal important insights into the challenges experienced in negotiating these healthcare journeys and the impact upon the individual as a result of variances in standards of care received. The participants in this study were chiefly self-motivated, informed and articulate, and did not reflect the broad ethnic, social or cultural diversity in the UK. Limitations must also be considered in relation to perceptions and recall of participants over a three-year period, as these may have altered over time and illness experience.

Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven der ambulanten rheumatologischen Versorgung in Deutschland

AIM

To gather information about current structures in rheumatologic ambulatory health care in Germany. Based on the results recommendations on future structures will be evaluated.

METHODS

Data collection and statistical analysis via a structured 10-page questionnaire answered by members of the German Association of Rheumatologists. Questions in this second part of the study related to two topics: economic factors and a subjective assessment of the health care structures by the participants.

RESULTS

Data from 197 ambulatory rheumatologists who participated in health care could be included in the analyses. Extensive and detailed data on economic issues surrounding ambulatory patient treatment and practice management from the perspective of ambulatory rheumatologists are presented (e.g., revenue, income, income differences between regions or practice size). In addition, perceptions of participating rheumatologists on future perspectives of patient treatment, health policy, and their own economical survival are reported.

CONCLUSIONS

As in other specialties there is a significant difference not only between the eastern and western regions in Germany but also between the north and the south looking at e.g., revenue, income, with rheumatologists in the east treating significantly more patients. Reasons for those differences are not only related to regional remuneration schemes or the number of patients with a private but statutory health insurance, but are also driven by the number of different services provided (e.g., own laboratory). Physicians perceptions towards their own future in rheumatology are generally positive. Scepticism was reported for the individual economic survival in ambulatory treatment and future changes in health policy.

Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups

Functioning is recognized as an important study outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA is an application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) of the World Health Organisation with the purpose of representing the typical spectrum of functioning of patients with RA. To strengthen the patient perspective, persons with RA were explicitly involved in the validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA using qualitative methodology. The objective of the study was twofold: to come forward with a proposal for the most appropriate methodology to validate Comprehensive ICF Core Sets from the patient perspective; and to add evidence to the validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA from the perspective of patients. The specific aims were to explore the aspects of functioning and health important to patients with RA using two different focus group approaches (open approach and ICF-based approach) and to examine to what extent these aspects are represented by the current version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA. The sampling of patients followed the maximum variation strategy. Sample size was determined by saturation. The focus groups were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. The meaning condensation procedure was used for the data analysis. After qualitative data analysis, the resulting concepts were linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules. Forty-nine patients participated in ten focus groups (five in each approach). Of the 76 ICF categories contained in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA, 65 were reported by the patients based on the open approach and 71 based on the ICF-based approach. Sixty-six additional categories (open approach, 41; ICF-based approach, 57) that are not covered in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA were raised. The existing version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA could be confirmed almost entirely by the two different focus group approaches applied. Focus groups are a highly useful qualitative method to validate the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA from the patient perspective. The ICF-based approach seems to be the most appropriate technique.

[Health economic research in rheumatic diseases]

Thorough health economic research of budget-relevant diseases should be one of the major tasks in the German health care system. Up to now cost studies were only performed for special research questions and/or with very limited focuses, e.g. the patients' view. Hence, federal programmes, like competence networks for certain diseases, which were introduced by the German Ministry for Research and Education in the late 1990s, should give a broader focus on health services research. With such an approach health politicians may obtain a deeper insight into areas of the health care sector which are likely to be more efficient after reorganisation. The process of a structured analysis of certain diseases will be demonstrated using the example of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To this end, the results of a research programme sponsored within the Competence Network for Musculoskeletal Diseases will be presented. Direct costs, indirect costs as well as values for health-related quality of life of German RA patients in routine care by generalists and specialists will be discussed.

Costs in rheumatology: results and lessons learned from the ‘Hannover Costing Study’

The objective of this study is to review the concept of the 'Hannover Costing Study' and to present and discuss the major insights generated during the course of the project. The costing study was performed in conjunction with a randomized controlled prospective trial assessing the effectiveness of a disease management module in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A full set of clinical and cost data both from patient-reported and payer-derived cost data was developed. In particular the study included (1) the development of a matrix of cost domains which might be used as a common taxonomy in costing studies, (2) the descriptive analysis of payer derived cost data, (3) the analysis of cost data in patients with uncertain diagnosis; (4) the development and validation of a patient-reported costing instrument, and (5) an assessment of productivity costs. The following are the results (1) the developed matrix of cost domains included 16 separate cost domains: 7 outpatient, 3 inpatient, 4 other disease related, and 2 productivity domains; (2) the micro-costing analysis showed total direct costs of <euro> 3,815 per patient-year (standard error of mean, SEM: <euro>267) and RA-related direct costs were <euro>2,312 per patient-year; (3) in patients with uncertain diagnosis of RA and no treatment with 'Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs' (DMARD) costs were significantly lower; (4) the comparison of patient-reported with payer-reported cost data generally supports the use of highly aggregated items to assess health care utilization in RA; (5) productivity costs in patients that are gainfully employed and in patients who receive RA-related retirement payments exceed RA-related direct costs. Furthermore, RA-patients reported their productivity losses adequately. The study added some additional insights to the following questions: What costs should be collected, what level of detail is required for that task, what patients should by analyzed, and what data sources should be used in further studies in RA.