Laboratory and febrile features after joint surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab

Impact of connective tissue diseases on complications following aesthetic surgery: A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The association between connective tissue diseases (CTDs), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and scleroderma, and complications following aesthetic surgery is under-investigated. We hypothesized that the risk of complications following aesthetic surgery was higher in patients with these connective tissue disorders compared to matched non-CTD patients.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with RA, SLE, and scleroderma who underwent aesthetic surgery at our institution from 2003-2022 were reviewed. Demographic data, comorbidities, medications, procedures, and postoperative complications were collected. Non-CTD controls were identified for each procedure and matched 1:1 based on propensity scores derived from race, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Six hundred 38 patients were included, comprising 319 (50%) patients diagnosed with CTD and 319 (50%) controls. The average age at surgery was 56.3 years. There were 129 complications. There were no differences between the CTD and non-CTD patients in number of total complications (69 versus 60, p = 0.38), major complications (23 versus 16, p = 0.25), or minor complications (46 versus 44, p = 0.73). Complications were not significantly different between CTD patients and controls who underwent blepharoplasty (p = 0.38), breast reduction (p = 0.91), abdominoplasty (p = 0.46), or rhytidectomy (p = 0.50). CTD patients who underwent breast augmentation had significantly more complications than matched non-CTD patients in bivariate analysis (7 versus 0, p = 0.018*) and multivariable logistic regression (OR: 10.2, 95% CI: 1.21 to 93.3, p = 0.039*).

CONCLUSIONS

Most aesthetic surgeries can safely be performed in patients with CTDs. Patients seeking breast augmentation should be counseled on a potentially increased risk of postoperative complications.

The impact of bDMARDs on postoperative complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not yet been clarified.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of ScienceTM, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies published up to August 2023. All studies comparing postoperative SSI or VTE rates in RA patients with or without bDMARD treatment were included. The protocol for this study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021246264) and is available on the University of York website.

RESULTS

Overall, 20 studies with 71,885 RA patients and 6 studies with 7918 RA patients were included for postoperative SSI and VTE comparisons, respectively. Patients treated with bDMARDs had significantly higher rates of postoperative SSI than those without treatment (odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.83, P < .0001). However, these significant differences disappeared in the analysis restricted to 9 studies involving non-tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors. The use of bDMARDs seemed to increase the rate of postoperative VTE (odds ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.30-3.72, P = .003). A subgroup analysis showed that postoperative osseous complications were significantly less frequent in RA patients with bDMARD treatment than in those without treatment.

CONCLUSION

RA patients treated with bDMARDs had an increased risk of not only postoperative SSI but also VTE. While bDMARD usage merits appropriate attention, there might be positive aspects as well. Further data will be needed to confirm the postoperative risks of bDMARD usage in RA patients.

Postoperative flares and peri-arthroscopic management of immunosuppressive medications in patients with rheumatic disease

PURPOSE

To determine the rate and characteristics of postoperative flares in rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery, and the role of perioperative immunosuppression (IS) management in preventing or provoking these exacerbations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of arthroscopic surgeries in patients with rheumatologic disease over 11 years. Patients taking IS at baseline and those without were matched 1:1 using propensity scores on age, sex, rheumatic disease type, and procedure complexity. Patients taking IS at baseline were sub-divided into those remaining on IS perioperatively versus those who held IS before surgery. Multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors for postoperative flares for the three IS groups, and survival analysis was used to compare the probability of remaining flare-free up to 12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

After matching, 428 patients (214 on various types of baseline IS, 214 not on baseline IS) were included, with 110 on baseline IS remaining on it perioperatively. Rates of postoperative flares were similar for those staying on vs holding their baseline IS (9.1% vs 9.6%) but flares were less frequent in patients not on baseline IS (1.9%). Patients who remained on perioperative IS did not have significantly less flares compared to patients taken off perioperative IS (OR 0.764 [0.267, 2.181]; p = 0.61). Patients not on baseline IS had a significantly higher probability ofremaining flare-free up to 12 weeks (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Rheumatic disease patients who hold IS medication before undergoing arthroscopy, out of concern for potential infection or complications, do not significantly increase their risk of flaring their autoimmune disease whether they had been taking csDMARDs or biologic agents. Those not taking any IS at baseline have a much lower risk of post-arthroscopic flaring, though as a group they likely harbor less of an autoimmune burden.

Perioperative management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Updated recommendations of the German Society for Rheumatology

BACKGROUND

Prior to surgical interventions physicians and patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain concerned about interrupting or continuing anti-inflammatory medication. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology has updated its recommendations from 2014.

METHODS

After a systematic literature search including publications up to 31 August 2021, the recommendations on the use of of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologics (bDMARDs) were revised and recommendations on newer drugs and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs were added.

RESULTS

The glucocorticoid dose should be reduced to as low as possible 2-3 months before elective surgery (in any case <10 mg/day) but should be kept stable 1-2 weeks before and on the day of surgery. In many cases csDMARDs can be continued, exceptions being a reduction of high methotrexate doses to ≤15 mg/week and wash-out of leflunomide if there is a high risk of infection. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and ciclosporin should be paused 1-2 days prior to surgery. Under bDMARDs surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. For major interventions Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be paused for 3-4 days. Apremilast can be continued. If interruption is necessary, treatment should be restarted as soon as possible for all substances, depending on wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Whether bDMARDs increase the perioperative risk of infection and the benefits and risks of discontinuation remain unclear based on the currently available evidence. To minimize the risk of a disease relapse under longer treatment pauses, in the updated recommendations the perioperative interruption of bDMARDs was reduced from at least two half-lives to one treatment interval.

Preoperative Management of Medications for Rheumatologic and HIV Diseases: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) Consensus Statement

Perioperative medical management is challenging because of the rising complexity of patients presenting for surgical procedures. A key part of preoperative optimization is appropriate management of long-term medications, yet guidelines and consensus statements for perioperative medication management are lacking. Available resources use recommendations derived from individual studies and do not include a multidisciplinary focus on formal consensus. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement identified a lack of authoritative clinical guidance as an opportunity to use its multidisciplinary membership to improve evidence-based perioperative care. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement seeks to provide guidance on perioperative medication management that synthesizes available literature with expert consensus. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide practical guidance on the preoperative management of immunosuppressive, biologic, antiretroviral, and anti-inflammatory medications. A panel of experts including hospitalists, anesthesiologists, internal medicine physicians, infectious disease specialists, and rheumatologists was appointed to identify the common medications in each of these categories. The authors then used a modified Delphi process to critically review the literature and to generate consensus recommendations.

Changes in perioperative C-reactive protein levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty in the biologic era

This study aimed to investigate changes in and factors associated with perioperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the biologic era. A total of 173 patients (228 knees) with RA underwent elective primary TKA at our institute between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2018. Of these, 214 cases among 161 patients were examined in this retrospective study after excluding 3cases among 3 patients who developed postoperative complications and 11 cases among 9 patients who were treated with tocilizumab. Factors associated with changes in CRP levels between baseline (preoperative) and day 7 after TKA [ΔCRP (0-7days)] were assessed by multiple regression analysis. Median (interquartile range) CRP levels were 0.69 (0.21, 1.82) mg/dl preoperatively, 5.66 (4.21, 7.61) mg/dl on postoperative day 1, 12.75 (9.79, 16.74) mg/dl on postoperative days 3-4, 3.26 (2.21, 4.85) mg/dl on postoperative day 7, and 0.87 (0.45, 1.81) mg/dl on postoperative day 14. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that body mass index ≥25 [partial regression coefficient (B)=1.03, P=0.012] and use of glucocorticoids (B=-0.86, P=0.017) were independently associated with ΔCRP (0-7days), whereas use of methotrexate and targeted drug modifying antirheumatic drugs and preoperative CRP levels (an objective biomarker of RA activity) were not. In conclusion, serum CRP levels increased rapidly after TKA and peaked on postoperative days 3-4, followed by a return to preoperative levels by postoperative day 14 in patients with RA. Obesity and the use of glucocorticoids were independently associated with changes in CRP levels.

Comprehensive risk analysis of postoperative complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To examine the risk factors of surgical site infection (SSI), delayed wound healing, and death after orthopedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We identified articles indexed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina Web published from 2013 to 2019 and other articles. Articles fulfilling the predefined inclusion criteria were reviewed systematically and their quality was appraised according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system with some modifications.

RESULTS

After inclusion and exclusion by full-text review, 29 articles were analyzed. Use of biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs was a risk factor of SSI (risk ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.19), but not of delayed wound healing. RA itself was a risk factor of SSI, and oral glucocorticoid use was a risk factor of SSI in three of the four studies analyzed and of postoperative death. Age, male sex, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, surgical factors such as foot/ankle and spine surgery and longer operative time were risk factors of those postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients with those factors should be dealt with appropriate cautions to strike a risk-benefit balance of orthopedic surgeries.

[Perioperative management of treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Updated recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

Prior to surgical interventions physicians and patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain concerned about interrupting or continuing anti-inflammatory medication. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology has updated its recommendations from 2014.

METHODS

After a systematic literature search including publications up to 31 August 2021, the recommendations on the use of of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologics (bDMARDs) were revised and recommendations on newer drugs and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs were added.

RESULTS

The glucocorticoid dose should be reduced to as low as possible 2-3 months before elective surgery (in any case <10 mg/day) but should be kept stable 1-2 weeks before and on the day of surgery. In many cases csDMARDs can be continued, exceptions being a reduction of high methotrexate doses to ≤15 mg/week and wash-out of leflunomide if there is a high risk of infection. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and ciclosporin should be paused 1-2 days prior to surgery. Under bDMARDs surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. For major interventions Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be paused for 3-4 days. Apremilast can be continued. If interruption is necessary, treatment should be restarted as soon as possible for all substances, depending on wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Whether bDMARDs increase the perioperative risk of infection and the benefits and risks of discontinuation remain unclear based on the currently available evidence. To minimize the risk of a disease relapse under longer treatment pauses, in the updated recommendations the perioperative interruption of bDMARDs was reduced from at least two half-lives to one treatment interval.

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis

The pharmacotherapy of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is an evolving area. A systematic review of Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed Central, clinical trial databases and recent international rheumatology conferences for interventional and observational studies reporting the effectiveness of DMARDs in TAK identified four randomized controlled trials (RCTs, with another longer-term follow-up of one RCT) and 63 observational studies. The identified trials had some concern or high risk of bias. Most observational studies were downgraded on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale due to lack of appropriate comparator groups. Studies used heterogenous outcomes of clinical responses, angiographic stabilization, normalization of inflammatory markers, reduction in vascular uptake on positron emission tomography, reduction in prednisolone doses and relapses. Tocilizumab showed benefit in a RCT compared to placebo in a secondary per-protocol analysis but not the primary intention-to-treat analysis. Abatacept failed to demonstrate benefit compared to placebo for preventing relapses in another RCT. Pooled data from uncontrolled observational studies demonstrated beneficial clinical responses and angiographic stabilization in nearly 80% patients treated with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, tocilizumab or leflunomide. Certainty of evidence for outcomes from RCTs ranged from moderate to very low and was low to very low for all observational studies. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide the pharmacotherapy of TAK. Future observational studies should attempt to include appropriate comparator arms. Multicentric, adequately powered RCTs assessing both clinical and angiographic responses are necessary in TAK.

Systemic effects of IL-6 blockade in rheumatoid arthritis beyond the joints

Interleukin (IL)-6 is produced locally in response to an inflammatory stimulus, and is able to induce systemic manifestations at distance from the site of inflammation. Its unique signaling mechanism, including classical and trans-signaling pathways, leads to a major expansion in the number of cell types responding to IL-6. This pleiotropic cytokine is a key factor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is involved in many extra-articular manifestations that accompany the disease. Thus, IL-6 blockade is associated with various biological effects beyond the joints. In this review, the systemic effects of IL-6 in RA comorbidities and the consequences of its blockade will be discussed, including anemia of chronic disease, cardiovascular risks, bone and muscle functions, and neuro-psychological manifestations.

Systemic inflammatory responses after orthopedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the acute phase response to surgical stress in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.

METHODS

A retrospective matched pair analysis of 34 patients treated with tofacitinib and 34 patients treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was performed. Patients were matched for age, sex, and type of surgery; body temperature, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count were compared between the tofacitinib and csDMARDs groups within 2 weeks after orthopedic surgery. Postoperative complications within 90 days were also assessed.

RESULTS

No surgical site infection or delayed wound healing was observed in the tofacitinib group; whereas, one case of superficial infection was noted in the csDMARDs group. A similar postoperative increase in body temperature and CRP level was observed in both the groups. Postoperatively, the tofacitinib group showed an increase in WBC and neutrophils counts and a decrease in lymphocyte count, unlike the csDMARDs group. In contrast to two patients (2.6%) in the csDMARDs group, seven patients (20.6%) in the tofacitinib group had lymphocyte counts below 500 cells/μL within 2 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib did not suppress postoperative increase in body temperature and CRP level. Because of the postoperative decrease in lymphocyte count in patients treated with tofacitinib, the timing for resuming tofacitinib treatment after surgery should be carefully considered. Key Points • This study is the first to report the complications and systemic inflammatory responses after orthopedic surgery in patients treated with tofacitinib in comparison with matched pairs treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) • While tofacitinib does not suppress postoperative increase in body temperature and CRP level, the postoperative decrease in lymphocyte count in patients treated with tofacitinib is significant compared with patients treated with csDMARDs • Attention should be paid to a reduced lymphocyte count when to resume tofacitinib after surgery.

'Should we stop or continue conventional synthetic (including glucocorticoids) and targeted DMARDs before surgery in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases?'

Total hip and total knee arthroplasty) remain important interventions to treat symptomatic knee and hip damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with little change in utilisation rates despite the increasingly widespread use of potent conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and targeted DMARDs including Janus kinase inhibitors and biologics. The majority of patients are receiving these immunosuppressing medications and glucocorticoids at the time they present for arthroplasty. There is minimal randomised controlled trial data addressing the use of DMARDs in the perioperative period, yet patients and their physicians face these decisions daily. This paper reviews what is known regarding perioperative management of targeted and csDMARDs and glucocorticoids.

Implant-based oral rehabilitation in systemic sclerosis patients: a systematic review

Systemic sclerosis is a rare multisystem autoimmune disorder that significantly impacts the orofacial region. Several oral features including microstomia and increased tooth loss contribute to the mouth-related disability. Prosthetic rehabilitation is very challenging in these patients. As the spectrum of dental implants indications has been recently extended to patients with various systemic disorders, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcome of dental implants in patients with systemic sclerosis. A literature search was conducted in Medline/PubMed database to identify eligible case-reports. 10 publications were included in qualitative synthesis. A total of 71 implants have been reported in 10 patients with systemic sclerosis with a mean of 7.1 +/- 3.8 implants per patient. Pre-implant surgeries have been described for 3 patients. Implant survival rates were higher than 98% but the mean follow-up time was only 28.3 +/- 18.6 months. Complications have been observed in 3 patients with 1 implant failure and peri-implant bone resorption in 2 patients. Although implant survival rates were high, an individualized assessment of risk-benefit balance is mandatory before indicating implant-based rehabilitation in patients suffering from systemic sclerosis and a scrupulous maintenance program has to be implemented. Further studies are strongly required to establish clinical guidelines.

IL-6 inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A comprehensive review

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is an interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It was developed in 2008, and its effectiveness is supported by evidence from all over the world based on its first decade of use. Although the overall efficacy and safety profiles of TCZ are similar to those of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, TCZ displays certain differences. The most notable advantage of TCZ is its usefulness as a monotherapy. Additionally, TCZ is favorable in the improvement of systemic inflammatory symptoms such as anemia and fatigue. The low immunogenicity of TCZ contributes favorably to long-term drug retention. Due to frequent relapse after TCZ cessation, TCZ use should be tapered beyond remission. During TCZ therapy, C-reactive protein (CRP) is unable to recognize disease activity and the severity of infection. The most common adverse events (AEs) are infection and abnormalities in laboratory findings including dyslipidemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and abnormality of liver enzymes. TCZ obscures the symptoms of infection. Therefore, stealth infections without obvious CRP elevation can sometimes cause severe damage to patients. Lower intestinal perforation is an uncommon but serious AE in TCZ therapy. Further clinical investigations will continue to refine the IL-6 inhibitory strategy.

Flares in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Rates, Characteristics, and Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE

Rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain high for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who are at risk of flaring after surgery. We aimed to describe rates, characteristics, and risk factors of RA flare within 6 weeks of THA and TKA.

METHODS

Patients with RA were recruited prior to elective THA and TKA surgery and prospectively followed. Clinicians evaluated RA clinical characteristics 0-2 weeks before and 6 weeks after surgery. Patients answered questions regarding disease activity including self-reported joint counts and flare status weekly for 6 weeks. Per standard of care, biologics were stopped before surgery, while glucocorticoids and methotrexate (MTX) were typically continued. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with postsurgical RA flares.

RESULTS

Of 120 patients, the mean age was 62 years and the median RA duration 14.8 years. Ninety-eight (82%) met 2010/1987 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria, 53 (44%) underwent THA (and the rest TKA), and 61 (51%) were taking biologics. By 6 weeks, 75 (63%) had flared. At baseline, flarers had significantly higher disease activity (as measured by the 28-joint Disease Activity Score), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and pain. Numerically more flarers used biologics, but stopping biologics did not predict flares, and continuing MTX was not protective. A higher baseline disease activity predicted flaring by 6 weeks (OR 2.12, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Flares are frequent in patients with RA undergoing arthroplasty. Higher baseline disease activity significantly increases the risk. Although more patients stopping biologics flared, this did not independently predict flaring. The effect of early postsurgery flares requires further study.

[Erysipelas without fever or biologic inflammation during tocilizumab therapy]

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the interleukin 6 (IL-6) signalling pathway. This treatment is extremely effective in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which may well be accompanied by serious infections presenting misleading clinical pictures. Herein we report a case of a typical bacterial dermo-hypodermitis in a female patient treated with TCZ.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An 80-year-old woman treated with methotrexate (MTX) and TCZ for RA presented dermo-hypodermitis on her left leg 8 days after receiving her 13th infusion of TCZ. She exhibited neither fever nor biological inflammatory syndrome. Oral amoxicillin (3g/d) was initiated on an outpatient basis. Two weeks later, the patient was apyretic and her laboratory results were normal, although local inflammatory signs persisted. TCZ infusion was postponed and she was given intravenous amoxicillin (4g/d) for 2days, followed by oral amoxicillin, resulting in rapid recovery. Subsequent courses of TCZ were administered without incident.

DISCUSSION

During the course of treatment with TCZ, this patient presented delineated bacterial cellulitis in the form of erysipelas, which was noteworthy on account of the absence of fever and of biological inflammatory syndrome. While there have been reports of severe cases of cellulitis during TCZ treatment, to our knowledge, there have been none of erysipelas. Attenuation of local and systemic inflammatory symptoms is widely reported, and is directly associated with the anti-IL-6 action of TCZ. Patients with RA are especially susceptible to opportunistic or severe infections as a result of the disease itself and of associated treatments, and increased vigilance is called for with regard to infections that may be transformed and potentially more severe as a result of TCZ.

The implications of biologic therapy for elective foot and ankle surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of a number of inflammatory arthropathies resulting in foot pain and deformity. Patients with this disease may require surgical intervention as part of their management. Many of these patients are now taking biologic agents which pose several risks to patients in the perioperative phase. The surgical team therefore need to be aware of these associated complications and how to manage these cases.

AIM

This paper aims to review the current literature about perioperative needs (foot and ankle surgery) associated with patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving biologic therapy.

MAIN FINDINGS

The majority of the literature discusses the perioperative complications associated with patients on anti-TNFα therapy with few studies investigating the other biologics in common use. There is conflicting evidence as to the safety of continuing or stopping biologic drug therapy prior to orthopaedic procedures. The British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) have produced guidelines for the management of patients on anti-TNFα therapy or the biologic agent Tocilizumab. These recommendations suggest the risks of post-operative infection need to be balanced against the risk of a post-operative disease flare. In essence, it is suggested anti-TNFα therapy is stopped 3-5 times the half-life of the drug whilst Tocilizumab is stopped 4 weeks prior to surgery.

CONCLUSION

Good communication is needed between the surgical team and the local Rheumatology department managing the patient's disease in order to optimise perioperative care. Local pathways may vary from the BSR recommendations to determine the most suitable course of action with regards to continuing or stopping biologic therapy prior to foot and ankle surgery.

[Recommendations of the German Society for Rheumatology on the perioperative approach under therapy with DMARDs and biologicals in inflammatory rheumatic diseases]

BACKGROUND

The perioperative administration of antirheumatic medication can lead to an increased risk of infection and to a malfunction in wound healing up to a manifest infection; however, the termination of antirheumatic therapy can result in a flare up of the disease. Both situations can endanger the success of the operation, particularly in arthroplasty.

METHOD

The recommendations have been developed and approved by the Pharmacotherapy Commission of the German Society for Rheumatology following a systematic literature search (as of 30 April 2013) and a consensus process.

RESULTS

As very little data with sufficiently high evidence are available, the present recommendations should be considered as having an advisory quality and an individual risk assessment should always be carried out. Classical disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), such as methotrexate can be continued in normal cases but whether this is also true for leflunomide is still undecided. For biologicals a break of two half-life periods before the operation is recommended. The therapy can be continued after wound healing has been completed and when there are no signs of infection.

Perioperative management of the patient with rheumatoid arthritis

A multidisciplinary approach is required to care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the perioperative period. In preparation for surgery, patients must have a cardiovascular risk assessment performed due to the high risk of heart disease in patients with RA. Treatment of RA is with immunomodulatory medications, which present unique challenges for the perioperative period. Currently, there is no consensus on how to manage disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in the perioperative setting. Much of the data to guide therapy is based on retrospective cohort data. Choices regarding DMARDs require an individualized approach with collaboration between surgeons and rheumatologists. Consensus regarding biologic therapy is to hold the therapy in the perioperative period with the length of time dictated by the half-life of the medication. Special attention is required at the time of surgery for potential need for stress dose steroids. Further, there must be close communication with anesthesiologists in terms of airway management particularly in light of the risk for cervical spine disease. There are no consensus guidelines regarding the requirement for cervical spine radiographs prior to surgery. However, history and exam alone cannot be relied upon to identify cervical spine disease. Patients with RA who undergo joint replacement arthroplasty are at higher risk for infection and dislocation compared to patients with osteoarthritis, necessitating particular vigilance in postoperative follow up. This review summarizes available evidence regarding perioperative management of patients with RA.

Perioperative infection in the patient with rheumatic disease

The risk of infection accompanies the benefits of surgery. Immunomodulatory chronic illnesses may increase the risk of surgical infections. Surgical patients with rheumatologic illness need close preoperative assessment regarding their infection risks (fixed and modifiable), which vary on the basis of the proposed procedure, specific rheumatologic illness, and underlying comorbidities. Modification of the medication regimens in the preoperative period may decrease risk and enhance healing. Intraoperative antisepsis and antibiotic prophylaxis remain critical in this patient population. Postoperative fevers within 3 days of surgery are usually noninfectious but require vigilance and attention. The principles of surgical infection reduction are not different in the rheumatologic and general patient populations, but best practice depends on expertise in caring for patients with these illnesses.

[Periprosthetic infections in systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease. Review article on diagnostics and therapy]

BACKGROUND

Patients with an inflammatory disease have an elevated risk for periprosthetic joint infections due to impairment of the immune system caused by the disease itself in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). These infections can cause life-threatening sepsis. Unfortunately recommendations on the diagnostics and treatment are mostly based on studies with a level of evidence grade IV or V.

OBJECTIVES

This article gives an overview of recent publications evaluating the level of evidence of recommendations on diagnostics and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections in patients with inflammatory diseases.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the Medline database in January and February 2014. The search included all articles on diagnostic and/or treatment of periprosthetic joint infections in patients with inflammatory diseases. Articles in languages other than English or German were excluded, as well as case reports, studies with less than 20 patients and articles only referring to patients with inflammatory diseases without periprosthetic infections.

RESULTS

Nearly all recommendations are based on retrospective studies or expert opinions (level of evidence IV or V). Conflicting results are common but there is good evidence on preoperative aspiration of joint fluid (level of evidence I) and a doubled risk of joint infections under treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (level of evidence II). An increased mortality has been reported in multiple studies. Two-stage revision seems to have a slightly better outcome than retention of prosthesis or one-stage revision. Generally, therapeutic recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections lack a good level of evidence. Future studies are urgently needed.

Severe Pulmonary Suppuration with Infection-Induced Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome following Tongue Cancer Surgery in a Patient Undergoing Tocilizumab Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis

A 65-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis treated by tocilizumab (TCZ) presented with tongue squamous cell carcinoma. While surgery was performed without any complications the aspiration pneumonia rapidly worsened by postoperative day 2 and severe pulmonary suppuration in the right lung field with infection-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was diagnosed. Antibiotic and respirator treatment improved her condition. The anti-inflammatory effect of TCZ may mask the symptoms and signs of severe infection with SIRS.

Does use of a biologic agent increase the incidence of postoperative infection in surgery for rheumatoid arthritis after total joint arthroplasty?

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the study was to examine the influence of biological agents on postoperative infections such as surgical site infection (SSI) and late infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after total joint arthroplasty at our hospital between January 2006 and December 2011.

METHODS

The patients were divided into groups with (Bio group, 267 joints) and without (Non-Bio group, 300 joints) treatment with biological agents. We examined the incidence of postoperative infection in Bio group and Non-Bio group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factor of postoperative infection.

RESULTS

The incidences of superficial and deep SSI were 0.37% and 1.0%, respectively, in the Bio group, and 0.67% and 0%, respectively, in the Non-Bio group, with no significant difference between the two groups. The incidences of late infection were 1.0% and 0% in the Bio and Non-Bio groups, respectively, again with no significant difference between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following values for the surgery of the foot and ankle region [P = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 19.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.67-79.45]. The use of biological agents was not a risk factor for postoperative infection.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the use of biological agents does not significantly increase the incidences of SSI and late infection after orthopedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after total joint arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with inflammatory joint disease: a review of risk factors and current approaches to diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Prevention, early identification, and effective management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with inflammatory joint disease (IJD) present unique challenges for physicians. Discontinuing disease-modifying anti-rheumatoid drugs (DMARDs) perioperatively may reduce immunosuppression and infection risk at the expense of increasing disease flares. Interpreting traditional diagnostic markers of PJI can be difficult due to disease-related inflammation.

PURPOSES

This review is designed to answer how to (1) manage immunosuppressive/DMARD therapy perioperatively, (2) diagnose PJI in patients with IJD, and (3) treat PJI in this population.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles with subsequent review by independent authors.

RESULTS

While there is evidence to support the use of methotrexate perioperatively in RA patients, it remains unclear whether using anti-tumor necrosis factor medications perioperatively increases the risk of surgical site infections. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein can be useful for diagnosis of PJI in this population, but only as part of comprehensive workup that ultimately relies upon sampling of joint fluid. Management of PJI depends on several clinical factors including duration of infection and the likelihood of biofilm presence, the infecting organism, sensitivity to antibiotic therapy, and host immune status. The evidence suggests that two-stage revision or resection arthroplasty is more likely to eradicate infection, particularly when MRSA is the pathogen.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppression and baseline inflammatory changes in the IJD population can complicate the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PJI. Understanding the increase in risk associated with IJD and its treatment is essential for proper management when patients undergo lower extremity arthroplasty.

The role of tocilizumab in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of biological treatments has improved the outlook for patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. There are now a range of different agents, targeting various pathways involved in the inflammatory process. Tocilizumab , a fully humanised anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody is licensed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews and appraises the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis, as identified in PubMed and Embase searches.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trial data suggest that tocilizumab has similar efficacy both clinically and in reducing structural progression to that seen with the TNF inhibitors. Patients who might be particularly suitable for tocilizumab are those who have failed multiple TNF inhibitors, those with a high inflammatory response as part of their disease and those unable to tolerate methotrexate, given the good responses seen with monotherapy.

[Peri-operative management of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: recommendations based on a meta-analysis]

The objective of this paper is make recommendations for the perioperative management of antirheumatic treatment based on the best available evidence. A systematic review was performed including studies in which patients with rheumatic diseases treated with biological and non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) had undergone surgery. A total of 5,285 studies were recorded, of which 27 were finally included. These contained information on 5,268 patients and 7,933 surgeries. The majority were women (mean age 55 years) were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, and the most studied drug was methotrexate (MTX). The final recommendations include: maintaining treatment with MTX or leflunomide in the perioperative period in the absence of other risk factors for postoperative complications (Level of Evidence 1c, Grade D recommendation). Biological DMARDs should be temporarily suspended, or the surgery scheduled as far as possible from the last dose, and, if there were other risk factors a space at least two doses (Level of Evidence 2c; Grade D recommendation).

Analysis of perioperative clinical features and complications after orthopaedic surgery in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab in a real-world setting: results from the multicentre TOcilizumab in Perioperative Period (TOPP) study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab.

METHODS

We collected RA cases with tocilizumab and orthopaedic surgery from 1999 to 2010. Incidences of postoperative infections, delayed wound healing, and RA symptom flare-ups were extracted from the data for comparison with patients without these postoperative events. We also evaluated the changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) and body temperature in patients without postoperative complications with normal CRP before surgery, i.e., patients without postoperative events in whom the tocilizumab level was maintained, for each duration to discontinuation before surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 161 cases (n = 122) were collected. The patients had mean age of 56.9 years, and mean disease duration of 12.8 years at operation. Joint replacement surgery was performed in 89 cases. Three patients had postoperative infections (two superficial and one organ/space surgical-site infection), 20 had delayed wound healing, and 36 had RA symptom flare-ups. Delayed wound healing occurred most commonly in patients who underwent spinal surgery (P = 0.0061, versus patients without delayed wound healing). CRP levels were high when tocilizumab was restarted in patients with RA symptom flare-ups (P = 0.0010, versus patients without RA symptom flare-ups). Increased postoperative CRP was observed in patients without postoperative events when the duration from final tocilizumab infusion to surgery was long. The changes in body temperature showed a similar trend to CRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it has been demonstrated that infection rates in patients treated with tocilizumab are by no means high, incidence of delayed wound healing was significantly higher in cases with surgical interventions such as foot and spinal surgeries. Many patients treated with tocilizumab remained in a normal range of CRP even during the perioperative period. For prevention of perioperative complications, observation of postoperative conditions and surgical wounds, and subjective symptoms of patients are considered important.

Safety and efficacy of tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Because of the pathological role of IL-6 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, was expected to improve inflammation and joint destruction of RA. Indeed, randomized clinical trials demonstrated the clinical efficacy of TCZ as monotherapy or combined with methotrexate (MTX) for RA patients with inadequate responses to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, MTX or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. Although long-term tolerability for TCZ is superior to that for TNF inhibitors, information regarding the potency of drug free remission of TCZ is limited at present. In terms of its safety profile, the general risk of infection when using TCZ is comparable to that of TNF inhibitors. TCZ has some advantage in RA patients who can not use MTX and are non-responders to TNF inhibitors. In conclusion, TCZ is one of the most prospective next generation biologics for the treatment of RA.

Rheumatoid arthritis and the era of biologic therapy

Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have transformed the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since their introduction into clinical practice over a decade ago. Following large-scale clinical trials, a number of biologics, with different mechanisms of action, have been licensed for the condition. In this review, we will summarise the current evidence for biologic use in RA with an emphasis on their efficacy and tolerability. In addition, we will provide a commentary on the current limitations and unmet needs in this area and discuss the future of biologic intervention.