Long-term azathioprine in rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind study

Disease Modifying Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: New Rays of Hope to Combat Disability?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most prevalent chronic autoimmune inflammatory- demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). It usually begins in young adulthood, mainly between the second and fourth decades of life. Usually, the clinical course is characterized by the involvement of multiple CNS functional systems and by different, often overlapping phenotypes. In the last decades, remarkable results have been achieved in the treatment of MS, particularly in the relapsing- remitting (RRMS) form, thus improving the long-term outcome for many patients. As deeper knowledge of MS pathogenesis and respective molecular targets keeps growing, nowadays, several lines of disease-modifying treatments (DMT) are available, an impressive change compared to the relative poverty of options available in the past. Current MS management by DMTs is aimed at reducing relapse frequency, ameliorating symptoms, and preventing clinical disability and progression. Notwithstanding the relevant increase in pharmacological options for the management of RRMS, research is now increasingly pointing to identify new molecules with high efficacy, particularly in progressive forms. Hence, future efforts should be concentrated on achieving a more extensive, if not exhaustive, understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this phase of the disease in order to characterize novel molecules for therapeutic intervention. The purpose of this review is to provide a compact overview of the numerous currently approved treatments and future innovative approaches, including neuroprotective treatments as anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody and cell therapies, for effective and safe management of MS, potentially leading to a cure for this disease.

Defining the Optimal Strategies for Achieving Drug-Free Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review

Background: It is now accepted that the optimum treatment goal for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is sustained remission, as this has been shown to be associated with the best patient outcomes. There is little guidance on how to manage patients once remission is achieved; however, it is recommended that patients can taper therapy, with a view to discontinuing and achieving drug-free remission if treatment goals are maintained. This narrative review aims to present the current literature on drug-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis, with a view to identifying which strategies are best for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) tapering and to highlight areas of unmet clinical need. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the literature, which included research articles, meta-analyses and review papers. The key search terms included were rheumatoid arthritis, remission, drug-free remission, b-DMARDS/biologics, cs-DMARDS and tapering. The databases that were searched included PubMed and Google Scholar. For each article, the reference section of the paper was reviewed to find additional relevant articles. Results: It has been demonstrated that DFR is possible in a proportion of RA patients achieving clinically defined remission (both on cs and b-DMARDS). Immunological, imaging and clinical associations with/predictors of DFR have all been identified, including the presence of autoantibodies, absence of Power Doppler (PD) signal on ultrasound (US), lower disease activity according to composite scores of disease activity and lower patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) at treatment cessation. Conclusions: DFR in RA may be an achievable goal in certain patients. This carries importance in reducing medication-induced side-effects and potential toxicity, the burden of taking treatment if not required and cost effectiveness, specifically for biologic therapy. Prospective studies of objective biomarkers will help facilitate the prediction of successful treatment discontinuation.

Relapse rates after elective discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are current mainstay of therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The decision when to withdraw TNF-α inhibitors after achieving remission and the incidence of relapse rates with elective discontinuation are both important questions that demand intense survey in these patients. In this meta-analysis we aimed to estimate the magnitude of relapse rate after elective TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation in RA patients with remission.

METHODS

Systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library databases, grey literature (unpublished and ongoing trials) from the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the US National Institutes of Health were performed for studies reporting the outcomes of elective discontinuation of TNF-α inhibitor in RA patients after remission. Random-effects models for meta-analyses were conducted on extracted data.

RESULTS

Out of 390 references screened, 16 RCTs were included. Meta-analysis of 1264 patient data revealed a relapse rate of 0.47 (95% CI 0.41-0.54). Sensitivity analysis showed that none of the studies had higher influence on the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half of all the RA patients in remission relapse after elective TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation. This information might be useful when considering this management option with individual patients.

Can rheumatoid arthritis ever cease to exist: a review of various therapeutic modalities to maintain drug-free remission?

Therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were mostly aimed at reducing the pain, stiffness and further progression of joint destruction. However, with the advent of biologic agents that act against specific inflammatory cytokines contributing to RA pathogenesis (treat-to-target strategy), the degree of remission achieved has been remarkably impressive. In particular, inhibition of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukins-1 and -6 and receptor-activator of nuclear kappa B ligand by neutralizing antibodies in early diagnosed RA patients has resulted in lowering of disease activity to levels that enable them to function as in the pre-disease stage. There are other biologic approaches such as depletion of B cells and blocking T-cell co-stimulators that have been included successfully in RA therapy under the class of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). Given the excellent clinical outcomes of biologic DMARDs when initiated early in RA, discontinuation or dose tapering is practised. Because biologic DMARDs are expensive and also known to make users vulnerable to viral infections, dose reduction and drug holiday are reasonable steps when sustained good clinical response has been achieved. Majority clinical studies have been done with TNF inhibitors and data suggest that sustained remission of RA is achieved in several multi-centric studies carried out worldwide. However, high flare rate and reappearance of disease has been reported in several cases. This review critically discusses response predictors of biologic DMARDs, the case for treatment relaxation, strategizing drug tapering considering patient eligibility and timing in light of available clinical practice guidelines of RA.

Drug-free remission: is it already possible?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview of recently published articles covering drug-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies covering drug-free remission showed differences in numbers studied, remission definition, disease duration and medication used. Drug-free remission was reported in 9-29%. Only two out of four studies reported on patients who restarted medication due to a disease flare or loss of remission, which occurred in 45-46%. In the BeSt study, remission or low disease activity was achieved again after retreatment within 6 months in 96%. In the Finnish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis study, none of the patients achieved remission after retreatment; their mean Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was 3.68. Joint damage progression was not higher in patients who restarted medication when compared to patients in sustained drug-free remission or patients with continued treatment. Anticitrullinated protein antibody, rheumatoid factor or shared epitope negativity and short symptom duration were independent predictors of successful drug-free remission in more than one cohort.

SUMMARY

Drug-free remission can be achieved and sustained in a small group of RA patients. In early RA, retreatment is successful in the majority of patients. Disease flare after cessation of medication does not seem to increase joint damage progression. Sustained drug-free remission is predicted by autoantibody and shared epitope negativity and short disease duration before treatment initiation.

Modulating dendritic cells (DC) from immunogenic to tolerogenic responses: a novel mechanism of AZA/6-MP

Azathioprine (Aza), 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) and 6-Thioguanine (6-TG) are thiopurine drugs widely used as immunosuppressants/anti-inflammatory agents in organ transplantation and chemotherapy. Aza is well tolerated and effective in modifying the course of MS. Here we investigated the action of 6-MP on human dendritic cells (DCs). We described for the first time that 6-MP impairs in vitro differentiation of DCs, has an inhibitory effect during DC activation processes inducing a functionally less immunogenic phenotype. Moreover, 6-MP significantly reduces DC IL-23 production and CCR7 expression, at the same time induces IL-10 augmentation. All these findings add a novel action mechanism in Aza immune modulation.

CD28-dependent Rac1 activation is the molecular target of azathioprine in primary human CD4+ T lymphocytes

Azathioprine and its metabolite 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) are immunosuppressive drugs that are used in organ transplantation and autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases such as Crohn disease. However, their molecular mechanism of action is unknown. In the present study, we have identified a unique and unexpected role for azathioprine and its metabolites in the control of T cell apoptosis by modulation of Rac1 activation upon CD28 costimulation. We found that azathioprine and its metabolites induced apoptosis of T cells from patients with Crohn disease and control patients. Apoptosis induction required costimulation with CD28 and was mediated by specific blockade of Rac1 activation through binding of azathioprine-generated 6-thioguanine triphosphate (6-Thio-GTP) to Rac1 instead of GTP. The activation of Rac1 target genes such as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), NF-kappaB, and bcl-x(L) was suppressed by azathioprine, leading to a mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. Azathioprine thus converts a costimulatory signal into an apoptotic signal by modulating Rac1 activity. These findings explain the immunosuppressive effects of azathioprine and suggest that 6-Thio-GTP derivates may be useful as potent immunosuppressive agents in autoimmune diseases and organ transplantation.

A clinical and economic review of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

Rheumatoid arthritis is one of the most common chronic systemic inflammatory diseases, affecting approximately 1% of the adult population. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been the mainstay of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis when combined with physical therapy and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recently, a number of new biological therapies have been introduced for the treatment of this condition and will have a major impact on the future management of this disabling disease. In this review, we summarise data on the efficacy and tolerability of the currently available DMARDs, including gold compounds, antimalarials, penicillamine, cytotoxic drugs (azathioprine and cyclophosphamide), sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclosporin, anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, combination therapy and apheresis. A literature review and quality assessment of economic evaluations of DMARDs is presented, illustrating that there has been a paucity of economic evaluations on these agents and showing the variable quality of those studies that are available. The manuscript also addresses the pharmacoeconomic implications of the new agents for rheumatoid arthritis; the need for formal long term economic evaluations in order to determine the cost effectiveness of these costly, but highly effective, new treatments is emphasised.

Azathioprine for rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the short-term effects of azathioprine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline up to and including July 1998 and Embase from 1988-1998. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing azathioprine against placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted independently by two reviewers (CS, EB); disagreements were resolved by discussion or third party adjudication (MS). The same reviewers (CS, EB) assessed the methodological quality of the trials using a validated quality assessment tool. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for the six-month endpoint. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences for joint counts, pain and functional status assessments. Weighted mean differences were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals and for adverse reactions. The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are presented. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout, since no statistical heterogeneity was found.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials with a total of 81 patients were included in the analysis. Forty patients were randomized to azathioprine and forty-one to placebo. A pooled estimate was calculated for two outcomes. A statistically significant benefit was observed for azathioprine when compared to placebo for tender joint scores. The standardized weighted mean difference between treatment and placebo was -0.98 (95% CI -1.45, -0.50). Withdrawals from adverse reactions were significantly higher in the azathioprine group OR=4.56 (95% CI 1.16, 17.85).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine appears to have a statistically significant benefit on the disease activity in joints of patients with RA. This evidence however is based on a small number of patients, included in older trials. Its effects on long-term functional status and radiological progression were not assessed due to lack of data. Toxicity is shown to be higher and more serious than that observed with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Given this high risk to benefit ratio, there is no evidence to recommend the use of azathioprine over other DMARDs.

Effect of resumption of second line drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that flared up after treatment discontinuation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of resumption of second line drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that flared after treatment discontinuation.

METHODS

RA patients were studied whose RA flared up after discontinuation of second line treatment while being in remission and who received a second course of the drug. Disease activity parameters were prospectively assessed at the time of treatment discontinuation, during the period when the disease flared up, and three months thereafter. Furthermore the medical charts were reviewed at 12 months after treatment resumption.

RESULTS

There were 51 patients included in the study: 25 patients treated with antimalarial drugs, 10 with parenteral gold, four with d-penicillamine, eight with sulphasalazine, two with azathioprine, and two with methotrexate. Disease activity parameters showed significant improvement within three months of treatment resumption, but remained significantly worse when compared with that measured before treatment discontinuation. Within three months 47% of the patients fulfilled 20% response criteria. Disease activity 12 months after treatment resumption was considered to be absent in 35%, mild in 43%, and moderate or active in 22% of the patients. In four (8%) patients the resumed treatment was stopped because of lack of efficacy. Side effects were recorded in four patients, which did not result in treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Resumption of second line drugs in RA patients whose disease flared up after discontinuation of treatment is effective and safe in most patients. Half of the patients responded within three months after resumption of the second line drug.

Assessing the relative sensitivity to change of rheumatoid arthritis activity measures: is the type of treatment an important third variable?

Observational studies and meta-analyses of controlled clinical trials have been used to identify which measures of rheumatoid arthritis activity are most sensitive to change. These analyses often pool studies of different drugs, although it is not known if arthritis activity measures are differentially responsive to different drugs. In meta-analyses, estimates of the relative sensitivity to change of different measures may also be confounded by differences in drug efficacy, if studies of different drugs contribute different measures to the meta-analysis. To determine if the type of treatment acts as an important effect modifier or confounder in studies of the relative sensitivity to change of arthritis activity measures, we computed effect sizes for four measures (weighted tender joint count, grip strength, duration of morning stiffness, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) used in each of 16 trials of five different disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, cyclosporin A, intramuscular gold, and D-penicillamine) in rheumatoid arthritis. In a complete factorial analysis of variance, effect sizes differed significantly among drugs (p = 0.0006), but differed only marginally among measures (p = 0.08). No interaction was detectable between drugs and measures. These results suggested that effect modification by drugs was not present, but that pooled estimates of the sensitivity to change of different measures may be confounded in meta-analyses, if trials of more efficacious drugs contribute different measures than trials of less efficacious drugs. In a similar analysis of 26 trials of nine nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, we found significant differences in effect sizes among measures (p < 0.0001), but no differences among drugs (p = 0.96), and no interaction between drugs and measures. This study suggests that pooled analyses of the relative sensitivity to change of arthritis activity measures based on trials of different disease-modifying drugs may be confounded by drug effects, but confounding by drug effects is unlikely if these meta-analyses are based on trials of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Although the power of these analyses to detect small interaction effects was limited, effect modification by drugs was not observed, indicating that the measures we examined were not strongly differentially responsive to different drugs.

Randomised placebo-controlled study of stopping second-line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

A favourable benefit/risk ratio for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with second-line drugs has been established only in short-term studies. The present investigation addresses the question of whether RA patients with a good response to long-term treatment with second-line drugs benefit from continuation of such treatment.

METHODS

A 52-week randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study was conducted to assess the effect of stopping second-line therapy in 285 RA patients with a good long-term therapeutic response. The patients either continued the second-line drug (n = 142) or received a placebo (n = 143). The endpoint was a flare, defined as recurrence of synovitis.

FINDINGS

At entry into the study median duration of second-line drug therapy was 5 years (range 2-33). At 52 weeks the cumulative incidence of a flare was 38% for the placebo group and 22% for the continued therapy group (p = 0.002). The risk of a flare was 2.0 times higher for patients receiving placebo than for those continuing the second-line drug (95% CI 1.27 to 3.17). The same trend was found for each second-line drug separately, with the exception of d-penicillamine. Side-effects that necessitated dose reduction or discontinuation occurred in 2 patients in each group.

INTERPRETATION

Second-line drugs continue to be effective in RA patients who have responded well to initial treatment.

Azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil

Immunosuppressive agents serve a major role in the management of once-fatal conditions such as the systemic necrotizing vasculitides, but they are also being used in more common, chronic inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. The drugs are all capable of reducing cell division but they differ in their modes of action. This is in keeping with their differing rates of action, and different indications. Azathioprine is a valuable alternative to slow-acting antirheumatic drugs in older patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Cyclophosphamide has transformed the outlook of many forms of vasculitis. Chlorambucil is particularly useful in improving the prognosis for children with amyloidosis secondary to juvenile chronic arthritis. We have tried to highlight the role of these drugs in a number of rheumatic diseases. We have emphasized their clinical applications, with some laboratory evidence for their effects. The major side-effects are reviewed. Finally, we have discussed their possible mechanisms of action.

Rational use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

The currently available, most frequently used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) include auranofin, azathioprine, D-penicillamine, gold sodium thiomalate, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate (amethopterin) and sulphasalazine. Controlled trials of these agents are reviewed to compare their relative efficacy and tolerability. Tender joint counts decreased with all drugs, as did joint swelling (measured as the percentage of patients with greater than or equal to 50% improvement in joint swelling). Tender joint count decreased by 8 to 57% in drug-treated patients, compared with 3 to 30% (1 study exceeded this degree of placebo response) in the placebo groups. The ratio of drug to placebo improvement usually averaged greater than 2. A 50% improvement in joint swelling occurred in between 15 and 65% of drug-treated patients. Time to onset of response varied from 6 weeks (with methotrexate) to as long as 18 months (some patients on hydroxychloroquine). The remission rate was inconsistent and unusual in controlled studies (5 to 7%), but very high in some open studies (e.g. 43%). While up to 8% of patients on DMARDs stopped therapy secondary to unsatisfactory therapeutic response (with 1 exception) up to 43% of placebo patients discontinued therapy for this reason. The ratio of dropouts for unsatisfactory therapeutic response for DMARD compared to placebo was less than 1 in 16 of 22 studies, and it was usually less than 0.5. Laboratory data examined include ESR, rheumatoid factor (RF), immunoglobulins and radiographic data. Ratios of decreases in ESR, comparing drug and placebo, were usually greater than 2. ESRs decreased from 3.6 to 27 mm/h, with gold sodium thiomalate, auranofin and methotrexate being most effective relative to placebo. RF decreased by greater than or equal to 2 tube dilutions in 15 to 53% of the DMARD groups but also decreased in up to 26% of placebo patients, with ratios of drug: placebo usually greater than 2. Immunoglobulins tended to decrease with DMARDs but the data are fragmentary. Radiographic evidence that a drug slows the rate of bony damage is strong evidence that it is a DMARD. These data, however, are not easily available because measurements of bony damage is insensitive and difficult. The best evidence of radiographic efficacy exists for gold, although the data are not uniform even here. Studies with other DMARDs suffer from lack of convincing control populations, methodological failures or small numbers, although trends exist showing that azathioprine and D-penicillamine (and perhaps sulphasalazine and methotrexate) may also slow bony deterioration. The other side of efficacy, of course, is tolerability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

New perspectives of secondary and tertiary therapy for rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis continues to be recognised as a disorder with a variable prognosis, but recent studies have emphasised its potential for shortening life span. Epidemiological, genetic, and natural history studies have helped to identify patients who are at risk for the development of more aggressive disease earlier in their clinical course, and rheumatologists are willing to be more aggressive in their treatment now as their armamentarium expands. Earlier separation of drugs into anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory agents becomes irrelevant as these concepts change and drugs fulfil both definitions. Sequences of therapy continue to be dictated by the potential of toxicity and generally follow rather than precede disease progression. The addition of several new agents to the algorithms of therapy against rheumatoid arthritis raises questions about their effects and place in therapeutic regimens, especially as concerns auranofin, sulphasalazine, methotrexate and cyclosporin. Combination therapy is currently at the end of the drug line, but the therapeutic horizon beckons with the potential of biological agents aimed at the restoration of immune balance.

Role of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs versus cytotoxic agents in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are used to modify or alter the rheumatoid arthritis disease process. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs do not demonstrate the characteristic analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory actions of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, since weeks or months of treatment are required before clinical benefit is observed. Although they have not been proved to delay, prevent, or reverse articular damage, therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, when successful, is associated with decreased pain and joint swelling and improved function. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and cytotoxic agents should not be considered as routine treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Before disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy is implemented, an optimal basic program of physical therapy, rest, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be implemented, and it must be documented that the patient still has sufficient disease to justify the costs, risks, and benefits of these treatments. Drugs that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are preferred over nonapproved drugs. Hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold salts, oral gold, D-penicillamine, and the cytotoxic drug azathioprine are the FDA-approved disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for use in rheumatoid arthritis. Many, not all, rheumatologists would employ hydroxychloroquine as the first-choice disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients who have early, mild, and nonerosive disease; treatment should be continued for six months before being abandoned for lack of efficacy, and appropriate ophthalmologic examination every four to six months is indicated. An alternative would be auranofin, whose efficacy approaches that of parenteral gold, yet may be safer. For patients who have severe active rheumatoid arthritis, especially with erosive changes, parenteral gold salts are usually a first choice. D-penicillamine is also effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, but serious toxicity may occur. Azathioprine might be considered a competitor to D-penicillamine, although the FDA approval restricts its use to patients who have failed gold therapy. Two cytotoxic drugs that are not FDA approved are methotrexate and cyclophosphamide. Methotrexate can be very effective, but its side effects, particularly pulmonary and hepatic, must be carefully monitored. Cyclophosphamide is generally considered too toxic for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, although it may be helpful in patients with systemic rheumatoid vasculitis or patients who have failed all other therapies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common form of severe inflammatory arthropathy affecting patients at a relatively early age. Although there are a number of drugs which significantly reduce pain and swelling, few alter the development of erosions and progression of joint destruction. A significant number of patients with rheumatoid arthritis develop this progressive disability and will require treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. In this article the use of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids in the treatment of aggressive rheumatoid arthritis is reviewed. Controlled clinical trials have shown that a number of these drugs can play a significant role in reducing pain and swelling and might possibly alter the disease course in rheumatoid arthritis. Side effects of these agents, including the potential for oncogenesis, still pose major problems in their long term use. The risks and benefits of immunosuppressive and corticosteroid drug therapy must be balanced in each patient to whom they are prescribed and reviewed at frequent intervals.

Low-dose methotrexate compared with azathioprine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A twenty-four-week controlled clinical trial

Forty-two patients with definite or classic rheumatoid arthritis entered a prospective 24-week, double-blind, parallel clinical trial, followed by an 18-month open phase. All subjects had active synovitis that was unresponsive to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications and conventional slow-acting antirheumatic drugs. Initial treatment with azathioprine (AZA), 100 mg/day, or methotrexate (MTX), 10 mg/week, orally, was adjusted at predefined intervals. Both treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement at week 24, compared with baseline status, in all 9 clinical outcome variables. There were no apparent statistically significant differences in these outcome variables between the 2 treatment groups. There was a trend toward a more marked and rapid improvement in the MTX-treated group. Radiologic evidence of progression of joint damage was similar in both treatment groups at 24 and 52 weeks. Four of the 42 patients (2 receiving MTX and 2 receiving AZA) discontinued the study because of side effects, and 1 MTX-treated patient withdrew because of personal reasons. Outcome measures at week 52 (open phase) were not statistically different from those at week 24. Twenty-three patients were still taking the medication at week 104. We found that AZA and MTX were similarly effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and that this beneficial effect was maintained for up to 2 years in most patients.

Azathioprine in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind study

The ability of azathioprine to reduce the maintenance prednisolone requirement of 31 patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or giant cell arteritis (GCA), or both, was tested in a double-blind placebo controlled study over one year. Clinical and laboratory assessments were made at four-weekly intervals over a period of 52 weeks. A statistically significant difference (p less than 0.05) in mean prednisolone dose was noted between the two groups at the end of 52 weeks, there being a fall in steroid requirement in the azathioprine treated group.

Lymphoid irradiation in intractable rheumatoid arthritis. A double-blind, randomized study comparing 750-rad treatment with 2,000-rad treatment

Twenty patients with intractable rheumatoid arthritis were treated with 750-rad or 2,000-rad lymphoid irradiation in a randomized double-blind comparative study. Over a 12-month followup period, there was a significant improvement in 4 of 7 and 6 of 7 standard parameters of disease activity following treatment with 750 rads and 2,000 rads, respectively. Transient, short-term toxicity was less frequent with the lower dose. In both groups, there was a sustained peripheral blood lymphopenia, a selective depletion of T helper (Leu-3a+) lymphocytes, and reduced in vitro mitogen responses. These changes did not occur, however, in synovial fluid. These results suggest that 750-rad lymphoid irradiation is as effective as, but less toxic than, that with 2,000 rads in the management of patients with intractable rheumatoid arthritis.

Mechanisms of action and clinical applications of cytotoxic drugs in rheumatic disorders

Failure to suppress disease activity in certain rheumatic disorders such as systemic lupus, polyarteritis nodosa, or Wegener's granulomatosis may significantly heighten the probability of a fatal outcome. In other rheumatic disorders (for example, rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis) the disease left unchecked may indeed be severely crippling but rarely is it fatal. Thus the decision on whether to add a cytotoxic drug often evolves into a benefit-to-risk analysis, a decision in which the patient must also be intimately involved. There are two few well-controlled studies of the use of cytotoxic agents to make dogmatic statements regarding their use in the treatment of rheumatic disorders. Nevertheless, a review of the literature, some of which has been cited above, does permit one to make some reasoned judgments in choosing a drug for a particular disease (Table 2).

Clinical trials: proposal for an international coding system (ICS)

The basic design, measurement and analytical components of clinical trials are frequently difficult to extract from published reports. Precedent indicates that this type of information is amenable to codification. An alphabetical international coding system (ICS) is proposed and its advantages discussed and illustrated.

Sustained improvement of intractable rheumatoid arthritis after total lymphoid irradiation

Total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) was administered to 11 patients who had intractable rheumatoid arthritis that was unresponsive to conventional medical therapy, including aspirin, multiple nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, gold salts, and D-penicillamine. Total lymphoid irradiation was given as an alternative to cytotoxic drugs such as azathioprine and cyclophosphamide. After radiotherapy, 9 of the 11 patients showed a marked improvement in clinical disease activity as measured by morning stiffness, joint tenderness, joint swelling, and overall functional abilities. The mean improvement of disease activity in all patients ranged from 40-70 percent and has persisted throughout a 13-28 month followup period. This improvement permitted the mean daily steroid dose to be reduced by 54%. Complications included severe fatigue and other constitutional symptoms during radiotherapy, development of Felty's syndrome in 1 patient, and an exacerbation of rheumatoid lung disease in another. After therapy, all patients exhibited a profound T lymphocytopenia, and a reversal in their T suppressor/cytotoxic cell to helper cell ratio. The proliferative responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A, and allogeneic leukocytes (mixed leukocyte reaction) were markedly reduced, as was in vitro immunoglobulin synthesis after stimulation with pokeweed mitogen. Alterations in T cell numbers and function persisted during the entire followup period, except that the mixed leukocyte reaction showed a tendency to return to normal values.

Immunological studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving azathioprine and myocrisin in combination

Thirty-one patients with classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis (RA), on treatment with azathioprine and sodium aurothiomalate in combination were studied. Absolute lymphocyte counts and IgA levels were reduced but this did not reach statistical significance. Lymphocyte transformation with phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) showed no significant difference from a control group. However, antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity was significantly impaired compared to rheumatoid controls (p less than 0.001). There was no relation to the degree of impairment of ADCC and the current dose of azathioprine nor to the total dose or duration of therapy. Inhibiting material to cell-mediated cytotoxicity was present in the sera of 23 patients but its presence showed no relation to the degree of cytotoxicity exhibited by cells in the same patient. Our studies of cellular cytotoxicity have revealed alterations in cellular function possibly attributable to azathioprine.