Nanocolloid scintigraphy for rheumatic diseases of the hands

99m Tc-HMPAO labelled leukocyte scintigraphy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with disease activity

The aim of this study was to test the applicability of 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) labelled leukocyte joint scintigraphy in the assessment of disease activity in 21 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and to compare leukocyte scintigraphy with the Disease Activity Score (DAS), a validated activity index developed by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Twenty-one patients with rheumatoid arthritis were investigated by using 99mTc-HMPAO labelled leukocyte joint scintigraphy. The clinical and laboratory data were recorded, and the DAS was calculated and compared with the scintigraphic results in each case. A relatively high DAS score (4.71+/-1.07) was found in the majority of patients. The degree of accumulation of 99mTc-HMPAO leukocytes showed no correlation with a patient's age, gender, duration of disease, use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), visual analogue scale (VAS), Richie index, DAS, or any laboratory parameters. In contrast, a significant correlation was found between the global regional accumulation of the labelled leukocytes of the hands and feet, and the swollen-joint count. It is concluded that radiolabelled leukocyte scintigraphy could become one of the promising methods in the assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The evaluation of sacroiliitis using 99mTc-nanocolloid and 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy

The role of imaging studies in the evaluation of patients with sacroiliitis is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the role of nanocolloid and bone scintigraphy in patients with sacroiliitis and to investigate the clinical relevance of imaging findings. Thirty-two patients with clinically sacroiliac disease (nine females, 23 males, aged 22-47 years) underwent scintigraphic and radiographic examinations and all imaging studies were performed within 2 weeks. Twenty-five subjects were also included as a control group (10 females, 15 males, aged 20-51 years) for quantitative analysis of the bone scan. The quantitative analysis was done by using regions of interest drawn over the right and left sacroiliac (SI) joint and sacrum (S) and SI/S ratios were calculated. Abnormal uptake was defined as an uptake higher than the mean +/- 2 SD of the control SI/S values. Bone scintigraphy was performed using a three-phase technique and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Nanocolloid scintigraphy (NS) was performed 1 h later, after administration of 370 MBq 99mTc-nanocolloid, and evaluated visually. Each of the scintigraphic examinations was performed on separate days within the same week. Sensitivity values were 25%, 47%, 69% and 97%, and specificity values were 80%, 90%, 95% and 90% in quantitative bone scanning (QBS), 99mTc-NS, planar and SPECT bone imaging, respectively, when the clinical findings were considered as the 'gold standard'. Our results showed that bone SPECT scanning was more sensitive than planar imaging, but planar imaging was the most specific method. SPECT was also the most associated technique with clinical findings. 99mTc-NS was neither specific nor sensitive enough in the detection of sacroiliitis although it could be helpful for the confirmation of inflammation.