Combination chemotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis

The use of antimalarials in combination with other disease modifying agents in RA – the British experience

Antimalarial drugs are effective disease modifying agents in RA with a low incidence of serious toxic effects. Recently, combinations of second-line agents have been used in RA in attempts to treat patients with no response to a number of single agents, or suboptimal response to a single agent.

Combinations of drugs have been selected for maximum efficacy and minimum toxicity, but clinical trials are difficult to design and interpret. In particular, ensuring adequate power to detect small differences in response poses a major problem. Antimalarials are an attractive choice for combination therapy due to their efficacy, mechanisms of action and toxicity profile.

In this review, the evidence for the use of antimalarials in combination in RA is examined. No advantage has been shown in combining antimalarials with gold, penicillamine or sulphasalazine compared with monotherapeutic regimens. There is some evidence to suggest a beneficial combination of antimalarials with methotrexate, but this is as yet inconclusive. Open non-randomised uncontrolled studies have shown that antimalarials combined with cytotoxic agents are effective but highly toxic.

The authors conclude that there is little good evidence to support the introduction of combination second-line drug therapy for RA into widespread therapeutic use.

Inverting the therapeutic pyramid: observations and recommendations on new directions in rheumatoid arthritis therapy based on the author's experience

In evaluating current therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), it is increasingly being recognized that sequential single-drug treatment, as exemplified by the traditional therapeutic pyramid, is often too little, too late, and ineffective in preventing disease progression or joint damage in patients with "at-risk," aggressive synovitis or what might be called type 2 RA. Designation of drugs as either antiinflammatory or disease-modifying is not supported by the author's experience. Evidence exists that prevention of joint damage correlates best with control of clinical and laboratory measures of inflammation, regardless of the medication used. The earlier and more effective the control of the inflammation, the better the patient response. Until a major breakthrough occurs, the author recommends that patients with aggressive RA be treated with a combination of fast-acting and slow-acting medications to achieve early control and then "bridge down" to a simplified maintenance program. Retrospective observation by the author of 54 patients with early, intermediate, and late disease treated with combinations of prednisone, methotrexate, auranofin, hydroxychloroquine, and azathioprine showed maximum response in patients with disease duration of less than 2 years, minimal toxicity, and lack of erosions in patients with control of inflammation. Twelve patients with inflammation not initially suppressed by prednisone and methotrexate had improved control with additional drugs in combination, including auranofin, hydroxychloroquine, and azathioprine. After inflammation was controlled, reduction of prednisone and methotrexate doses was possible in 60% of patients, primarily those with early disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)