Experience with misoprostol therapy for NSAID gastropathy in children

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A survey of practices and concerns of pediatric medical and surgical specialists and a summary of available safety data

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prescribing habits of NSAIDs among pediatric medical and surgical practitioners, and to examine concerns and barriers to their use.

METHODS

A sample of 1289 pediatricians, pediatric rheumatologists, sports medicine physicians, pediatric surgeons and pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the United States and Canada were sent an email link to a 22-question web-based survey.

RESULTS

338 surveys (28%) were completed, 84 were undeliverable. Of all respondents, 164 (50%) had never prescribed a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) NSAID. The most common reasons for ever prescribing an NSAID were musculoskeletal pain, soft-tissue injury, fever, arthritis, fracture, and headache. Compared to traditional NSAIDs, selective COX-2 NSAIDs were believed to be as safe (42%) or safer (24%); have equal (52%) to greater efficacy (20%) for pain; have equal (59%) to greater efficacy (15%) for inflammation; and have equal (39%) to improved (44%) tolerability. Pediatric rheumatologists reported significantly more frequent abdominal pain (81% vs. 23%), epistaxis (13% vs. 2%), easy bruising (64% vs. 8%), headaches (21% vs. 1%) and fatigue (12% vs. 1%) for traditional NSAIDs than for selective COX-2 NSAIDs. Prescribing habits of NSAIDs have changed since the voluntary withdrawal of rofecoxib and valdecoxib; 3% of pediatric rheumatologists reported giving fewer traditional NSAID prescriptions, and while 57% reported giving fewer selective COX-2 NSAIDs, 26% reported that they no longer prescribed these medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional and selective COX-2 NSAIDs were perceived as safe by pediatric specialists. The data were compared to the published pediatric safety literature.

Comparative tolerability of treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) includes several forms of chronic arthritis in children. Treatments are chosen according to the type and severity of the disease. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids remain the mainstays of therapy. Traditional slower acting anti-rheumatic drugs, such as gold therapy, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, tiopronin and hydroxychloroquine, are usually poorly active in children. In addition, adverse effects are common, including severe macrophage activation syndrome with gold therapy or sulfasalazine. Low dose, once weekly methotrexate has emerged as the therapeutic agent of choice for children who fail to respond adequately to the administration of an NSAID, especially in those with the extended oligoarticular subtype of the disease. Other immunosuppressive agents, such as cyclosporin, are sometimes combined with methotrexate. In recent years, novel treatments have been developed. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is effective in a number of children with severe JIA, whose disease has been refractory to conventional therapy. However, only short term follow-up data are currently available for this novel therapy. In addition, severe infections complicated by macrophage activation syndrome and death have been reported. Finally, anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha therapy has shown efficacy in more than two-thirds of children with JIA and polyarthritis, and other cytokine inhibitors may be soon available.

Review of medications used in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic condition. The goal of therapy is to control pain, preserve joint range of motion and function, minimize systemic complications, and assist in normal growth and development. Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of arthritis have expanded the treatment of this chronic condition. Many medications including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, and cytotoxic agents are available for treating juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Emergency medicine physicians should be familiar with the different classes and adverse effects of these drugs.

Pediatric gastritis and peptic ulcer disease

Inflammation of the gastric and duodenal mucosa is the end result of an imbalance between mucosal defensive and aggressive factors. The degree of inflammation and imbalance between defensive and aggressive factors can then result in varying degrees of gastritis and/or mucosal ulceration. Gastritis and ulcers of the duodenum or stomach can be classified as primary or secondary. The majority of children with chronic gastritis and ulcers in the stomach or duodenum have secondary inflammation or mucosal ulceration. These secondary ulcers generally occur due to a systemic condition like head trauma or overwhelming sepsis, or as sequelae to drug ingestion (i.e. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents), but secondary gastroduodenal ulcers can also occur in specific disease conditions such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or Crohn's disease. In almost all children with primary duodenal or gastric ulcers mucosal inflammation and, less frequently, ulceration is caused by a spiral shaped, gram-negative, microaerobic rod Helicobacter pylori. Recent epidemiological evidence has linked chronic H. pylori infection with the development of gastric carcinomas.

The future potential of eicosanoids and their inhibitors in paediatric practice

Eicosanoids may have many potential uses in paediatric practice. Since E-type prostaglandins were first applied to treat ductus-dependent congenital heart diseases in paediatric practice, many eicosanoid-related drugs have been examined for the treatment of pathophysiological conditions in children. Prostaglandins (PG), thromboxane (TX) and leukotrienes (LT), produced from arachidonic acid in the phospholipids of cell membranes, are considered to be biologically active eicosanoids. Corticosteroids reduce eicosanoid production by impairing phospholipase A2 activation, while cyclo-oxygenase inhibiting drugs such as the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) suppress PG and TX production. PGE1 (alprostadil) and PGE2 (dinoprostone) therapy has been shown to improve oxygenation in neonates whose pulmonary and systemic blood flow are dependent on a patent ductus arteriosus, while epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI2) and beraprost (beraprost sodium), another PGI2 analogue, are often effective as acute vasodilators in paediatric pulmonary hypertension. Synthetic PGE analogues such as misoprostol have gastric antisecretory and cytoprotective effects, and are effective in both prophylaxis and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal mucosal lesions. Both alprostadil and epoprostenol have been shown to be effective in treating peripheral vascular and skin diseases. Since TX, a platelet aggregator and vasoconstrictor, has been implicated as a potential mediator of asthma, its inhibition by agents such as seratrodast (AA-2414) and ozagrel (OKY-046) has proven effective in the treatment of adult patients with asthma; studies of these agents in paediatric patients is awaited with interest. Developing the clinical use of eicosanoid-related drugs and assessing the potential use of these drugs requires a 3-phase approach: reducing the complications in the treatment of neonates with ductus-dependent congenital heart diseases and primary pulmonary hypertension requiring PGE1, PGE2 and PGI2 therapy; conducting clinical trials of the synthesis inhibitors and receptor antagonists of TXA2 and LT that have already been used in the treatment of adult patients with bronchial asthma; and evaluating the efficacy of new modulators of eicosanoid biosynthesis, such as eicosapentaenoic acid and antiallergy drugs, in the treatment of eicosanoid-related diseases in children.