Acute, non-obstructive, sterile cholecystitis associated with etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of juvenile polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis

Acute acalculous cholecystitis in child with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, unreported manifestation

Acute acalculous cholecystitis is a gallbladder wall inflammation without gallstones. It was not reported before as a manifestation of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Here, we describe a 13-month-old boy presented with prolonged intermittent fever, skin rash, arthritis, serositis, and hepatomegaly. After workup, he was diagnosed with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and acute acalculous cholecystitis based on an ultrasound abdomen showing thick gallbladder wall with free fluid. After treatment with three days of intravenous pulse methylprednisolone, he improved dramatically, and repeated ultrasounds showed normal gallbladder. This suggests that Acute acalculous cholecystitis can be a part of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and hypothesised that surgical intervention can be avoided with the use of corticosteroids.

Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction therapy.

METHODS

Patients in six Australian tertiary centers treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 and May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD and pharmacy databases. Patients were followed up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months.

RESULTS

Forty one patients were identified. Five of the 41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Six of 35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. Maintenance therapy: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) versus IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. Two of 15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (P = 0.610). Monitoring during maintenance: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); fecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); and serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). Twenty of 32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to first endoscopy of 109 days (interquartile range 113-230).

CONCLUSION

Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort and strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance and monitoring strategy post-IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined.

Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents prescribed to patients with diffuse interstitial and inflammatory lung disease and lung transplant recipients are associated with potential risks for adverse reactions. Strategies for minimizing such risks include administering these drugs according to established, safe protocols; monitoring to detect manifestations of toxicity; and patient education. Hence, an evidence-based guideline for physicians can improve safety and optimize the likelihood of a successful outcome. To maximize the likelihood that these agents will be used safely, the American College of Chest Physicians established a committee to examine the clinical evidence for the administration and monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (with the exception of corticosteroids) to identify associated toxicities associated with each drug and appropriate protocols for monitoring these agents.

METHODS

Committee members developed and refined a series of questions about toxicities of immunosuppressives and current approaches to administration and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out by the American College of Chest Physicians. Committee members were supplied with this information and created this evidence-based guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that these guidelines will improve patient safety when immunosuppressive drugs are given to lung transplant recipients and to patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.

Safety of infliximab and other biologic agents in the inflammatory bowel diseases

In many ways, infliximab has drastically altered expectations for medical therapy in IBD, and it is expected that adalimumab and certolizumab pegol with ultimately have a similar role. Patients initiating such therapy should be made cognizant of the potential risks of serious infection including opportunistic ones, such as TB and histoplasmosis; demyelinating disorders; CHF; and lymphoma. Proper selection of candidates for anti-TNF-alpha therapy is critical in maintaining a proper benefit-to-risk ratio.

Serious liver disease induced by infliximab

Infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Crohn's disease (CD). Previous cases of significant secondary liver disease associated with infliximab treatment have been reported in patients with RA, CD, and psoriatic arthritis. Two additional patients with RA who developed a serious liver disease associated with infliximab treatment are reported here. A 39-year old RA patient was admitted with cholestatic liver disease after 8 months of treatment with infliximab. She had no history of hepatic diseases, exposure to hepatotoxic or illicit drugs, or alcohol abuse. A liver biopsy showed severe ductal proliferation with collapse and enucleation of the hepatocytes. Despite aggressive treatment with oral prednisolone, she developed hepatic failure. On the 45th day, a liver transplant was performed. The second patient, a 54-year old RA patient, was diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis after 12 infliximab infusions. She fulfilled autoimmune hepatitis type 1 criteria. A liver biopsy disclosed an altered lobulillar structure with chronic inflammation and the formation of collagen bands. She was treated with prednisolone and azatioprine and a complete recovery was noted 1 month later. These cases should alert rheumatologists to the possibility of new adverse reactions (liver injury) associated with the use of TNFalpha blockers in an autoimmune setting.

Pediatric Rheumatology for the Adult Rheumatologist I

Treatment of children with rheumatic diseases has advanced with novel therapeutics and the use of early aggressive treatment to achieve better long-term functional outcome. Many of the current treatments in pediatric rheumatology are based on studies in adults on medications without U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling for pediatric use. This is not ideal because the pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) of many medications when used in children vary according to age, somatic growth, sexual maturity, and ontogeny of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Special dosing, administration considerations, and toxicity screening are reviewed for the more commonly used medications. Vaccinations for children on antirheumatic drugs are also discussed. Continued study of the long-term impact of medications and biologic treatments on children is necessary, but given the paucity of children with rheumatic diseases, this will require multicentered trials and collaborations. Lastly, this article reviews recent regulatory and legislative action on pediatric drug testing. Passage of the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, which requires testing of pharmaceuticals in children, will facilitate more rational use of drugs in pediatric rheumatic diseases in the future.

Adverse reactions to biological modifiers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Newer biologic immunomodulators such as interferons, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies have been introduced into the management of various inflammatory conditions. This review addresses adverse responses to these agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both interferon-alpha and interferon-beta have been associated with autoimmune phenomena. The ability of TNFalpha antagonists to cause significant adverse reactions appears to be substantial. These are either related to interference with TNFalpha activity or as consequence of the agents, either immunoglobulin or fusion protein, being recognized as foreign proteins, becoming themselves targets of an immune response.

SUMMARY

Although advancing the management of inflammatory conditions, biologic modifiers are attended by significant concerns. Identification of at risk groups and careful selection of appropriate patients will minimize occurrence of adverse events.