Subhepatic appendicitis: a diagnostic dilemma

Appendicitis – Is a Clinical Diagnosis Enough?

Appendicitis has always been considered a clinical diagnosis wherein the surgeon’s clinical acumen and laboratory investigations take priority over the radiological imaging. However, an atypical presentation of appendicitis can occur due to the varying location of the appendix which may result in delayed diagnosis and complications. In such cases radiological imaging such as contrast enhanced computerized tomography helps in the diagnosis. We report two cases of subhepatic appendicitis with different clinical findings.

Subhepatic Appendicitis Presenting With Recurrent Abdominal Pain

Gut malrotation may result in failure of descent of the cecum to the right iliac fossa, resulting in the anomaly where the cecum and appendix are situated in the subhepatic/gallbladder region. Although the true incidence of subhepatic cecum or appendix is not known, there is a handful of case reports in the literature describing the diagnosis and management of subhepatic appendicitis and associated challenges. Some case reports describe subhepatic appendicitis, where the cecum is in a normal position, but the subhepatic tip of the long appendix gets perforated or inflamed, resulting in the process being in the subhepatic region. We report a patient with subhepatic appendicitis, who had multiple episodes of abdominal pain for almost one year, treated with antibiotics, but was never diagnosed properly. The case was diagnosed by abdominal sonography and was managed successfully in our institution.

Hidden appendix: A case report and literature review of perforated acute appendicitis masquerading as acute cholecystitis

Introduction

Acute appendicitis of the subhepatic appendix is uncommon, and a preoperative diagnosis is difficult without a thorough understanding of the various anatomical locations. Cross-sectional imaging is indispensable for prompt diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Surgery is the standard treatment for perforated appendicitis in the subhepatic region. In this study, we present a case of subhepatic appendicitis with an unusual presentation.

Case presentation

A 28-year-old man presented to our emergency department with a 3-day history of diffuse right abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Physical examination revealed rebound soreness and guarding in the right upper and lower quadrants. Laboratory tests revealed high levels of C-reactive protein and serum bilirubin and neutrophilic leukocytosis. Abdominal computed tomography revealed an undescended cecum and a subhepatic appendix with an intraluminal appendicolith, fat stranding, and peri-appendiceal fluid. The patient underwent open exploration and appendicectomy, during which the subhepatic perforated appendix was excised. The patient's recovery was uneventful.

Discussion

Atypical presentations may indicate an unusual anatomical placement of the appendix. Preoperative diagnosis using cross-sectional computed tomography imaging and a thorough understanding of these situations frequently result in early diagnosis and expeditious surgical care.

Conclusion

Surgical crises resulting from aberrant anatomical variations of the appendix constitute a distinct diagnostic challenge. A strong index of suspicion for this uncommon presentation permits early surgical intervention and prevents delay-induced morbidity/mortality.

•

Appendicitis classically presents with right iliac fossa pain.

•

Anomalous positions of the appendix can give rise to clinical challenges.

•

Perforation in subhepatic appendicitis masquerades as acute cholecystitis.

•

Undescended cecum could give rise to the rare anatomical position of the appendix.

Subhepatic perforated acute appendicitis in a patient with midgut malrotation: A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Subhepatic acute appendicitis (SHAA) is a very rare cause of acute abdomen, developing in association with two types of congenital anomalies like as midgut malrotation (MM) and maldescent of the caecum. Preoperative diagnosis of SHAA is a challenge because of its rarity and atypical presentation. Imaging may be helpful for determining the correct diagnosis. Surgery represents the standard treatment of SHAA.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 25-year-old Caucasian male presented to the Emergency Department with a one-day history of right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. Physical examination revealed RLQ abdominal rebound tenderness with guarding. Laboratory tests reported high levels of C-reactive protein and neutrophilic leukocytosis. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a SHAA with intraluminal appendicolith, fat infiltration and pelvic fluid collection in a patient with MM. The patient underwent laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrocaecal subhepatic phlegmonous and perforated appendicitis was sectioned and removed with drainage of pelvic abscess. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

SHAA is characterized by anatomical variation of appendix and atypical presentation. Preoperative clinical diagnosis of SHAA is very difficult and imaging may be helpful for determining the correct diagnosis, as well as confirming MM or maldescent of the caecum. Laparoscopic appendectomy represents the correct treatment of SHAA.

CONCLUSION

SHAA is a rare surgical emergency that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with RLQ abdominal pain. Preoperative diagnosis needs a high index of suspicion and is facilitated by imaging. Surgery represents the appropriate treatment of SHAA.

Rare appendiceal escapades in childhood: the Grande experience!

Acute appendicitis in children is known to present in two broad forms: (1) uncomplicated and (2) complicated. Apart from this, a variety of atypical presentations can occur that may pose difficulty in diagnosis or treatment approach. We hereby present a series of such rare experiences namely appendiceal oxyuriasis, sub-hepatic appendicitis and appendiceal mucocele that were encountered and managed accordingly.

Subhepatic Appendicitis in an 11-year-old Boy: A Case Report

Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. When present in an abnormal subhepatic location, it can pose a challenge in its diagnosis and management. Subhepatic appendicitis is a rare phenomenon, especially in the pediatric age group. Herein, we present a rare case of subhepatic appendicitis in an 11-year-old boy with delayed presentation but managed successfully.

Classical Presentation of Acute Appendicitis in the Case of a Subhepatic Appendix

Acute appendicitis is a very common surgical emergency diagnosed by combining the history, examination, and investigations to build a clinical picture. This presentation can become more complex with abnormal anatomical variations of the appendix. This case describes the rare clinical finding of a subhepatically located appendix and caecum in a 24-year-old female presenting with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. Examination findings were consistent with acute appendicitis. Ultrasonography identified the appendix as being located in the subhepatic region with laparoscopy confirming this finding and the presence of a malrotated caecal pole due to congenital adhesions. Laparoscopic appendectomy was subsequently performed therapeutically with no complications. This case focuses on the typical presentation of appendicitis and RLQ pain in a patient with an atypical anatomical structure. It aims to depict the importance of a widened knowledge of the aberrantly located appendix and how this can impact clinical presentation.

Pediatric subhepatic appendicitis with elevated lipase

Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children, of which most are located in the retrocecal space or pelvis. Appendicitis occurring in the subhepatic space is uncommon and may present with atypical features such as right upper quadrant pain, leading to delayed diagnosis and complications. We present a rare case of subhepatic appendicitis in an 11-year-old female, who presented with a three-day history of both right upper quadrant (RUQ) and right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain and serum lipase elevated four times the upper normal limit. The abdominal ultrasound was normal, except for prominent RLQ abdominal lymph nodes. Hours later, a computed tomography scan revealed a non-ruptured subhepatic appendicitis and normal pancreas. Our patient encounter demonstrates the need to be aware of the atypical presentations of pediatric appendicitis in general and subhepatic appendicitis in particular. Moreover, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of elevated lipase (with a radiographically normal pancreas) in association with subhepatic appendicitis. Providers should be aware elevated serum lipase levels may be due to conditions other than pancreatitis and further evaluation should be considered if the elements of the clinical picture are incongruent.

Accuracy and reliability of tablet computer as an imaging console for detection of radiological signs of acute appendicitis using PACS workstation as reference standard

PURPOSE

To ascertain the accuracy and reliability of tablet as an imaging console for detection of radiological signs of acute appendicitis [on focused appendiceal computed tomography (FACT)] using Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) workstation as reference standard.

METHODS

From January, 2014 to June, 2015, 225 patients underwent FACT at our institution. These scans were blindly re-interpreted by an independent consultant radiologist, first on PACS workstation and, two weeks later, on tablet. Scans were interpreted for the presence of radiological signs of acute appendicitis. Accuracy of tablet was calculated using PACS as reference standard. Kappa (κ) statistics were calculated as a measure of reliability.

RESULTS

Of 225 patients, 99 had radiological evidence of acute appendicitis on PACS workstation. Tablet was 100% accurate in detecting radiological signs of acute appendicitis. Appendicoliths, free fluid, lymphadenopathy, phlegmon/abscess, and perforation were identified on PACS in 90, 43, 39, 10, and 12 scans, respectively. There was excellent agreement between tablet and PACS for detection of appendicolith (к = 0.924), phlegmon/abscess (к = 0.904), free fluid (к = 0.863), lymphadenopathy (к = 0.879), and perforation (к = 0.904).

CONCLUSIONS

Tablet computer, as an imaging console, was highly reliable and was as accurate as PACS workstation for the radiological diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

A case of right upper abdominal pain misdiagnosed on computerized tomography

Right upper abdominal pain is a common symptom in patients presenting to surgery emergency. Most of these cases can be diagnosed accurately on clinical evaluation or imaging. We report an unusual case of right upper abdominal pain, which could not be diagnosed correctly pre-operatively despite using various imaging modalities.

Variations in the position and length of the vermiform appendix in a black kenyan population

Background. Topography of the appendix influences its mobility, degree of mobilization of the cecum, and need for additional muscle splitting during appendectomy. Although appendectomy is a common surgical procedure, there is a paucity of data on its topography in black Africans. Methods. The position and length of the appendix and relation of the appendicular base with spinoumbilical line were determined in 48 cadavers obtained from the Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Results. The commonest appendicular types in males were retrocecal 10 (27%) while in females was subileal 4 (36.4%). The average length of the appendix was 76.5 ± 23.6 mm. The base of the appendix was located along, below, and above the spinoumbilical line in 25 (52.1%), 9 (18.8%), and 14 (29.2%) cases, respectively. Conclusion. The topography of appendix in Kenyans shows variations from other populations. Knowledge of these variations is important during appendicectomy.