Jack in the box: inguinal endometriosis

Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis of the round ligament: A case of a patient with right-sided inguinal pain

Round ligament endometriosis is a rare phenomenon reported in approximately 0.3% to 0.6% of endometriosis cases. Presurgical diagnosis is carried out for about 50% of the cases. The association of the right-sided inguinal hernia, nonspecific pain in the organs, and no history of surgery or labor make the diagnosis intricate. We report a case of endometriosis of the round ligament in a 39-year-old woman who complained of intense pain in the right groin during the menstrual period for about 4 years, with no complaints of bulging or change in the size of the mentioned area. The clinical suspicion of inguinal endometriosis, supported by sonography and magnetic resonance imaging, was confirmed by histological examination of the surgical specimen after laparoscopic surgery, which included the mass and the extraperitoneal segment of the round ligament. After surgery, the patient's pain disappeared completely. The round ligament endometriosis or endometriosis of the inguinal region could be considered an important differential diagnosis in women of reproductive age without a history of surgery who presented with inguinal region pain during menstruation but no clear mass was palpable in the physical exam.

Inguinal endometriosis: A systematic review

Inguinal endometriosis is a very rare entity with uncertain pathophysiology, that poses several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aimed to summarize published literature on the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. Thus, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. An effort was made to numerically analyze all parameters included in case reports and retrospective analyses, as well. The typical and atypical features of this condition, investigations used, type of treatment and histopathology were recorded. More specifications about the surgical treatment, such as operations previously performed, type of surgery and treatment after surgery have been acknowledged. Other sites of endometriosis, the presence of pelvic endometriosis and the follow-up and recurrence have been also documented. Overall, the search yielded 61 eligible studies including 133 cases of inguinal endometriosis. The typical clinical presentation includes a unilateral inguinal mass, with or without catamenial pain. Transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasound was typically used as the first line method of diagnosis. Groin incision and exploratory surgery was the treatment indicated by the majority of the authors, while excision of part of the round ligament was reported in about half of the cases. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were initiated in cases of coexisting endometriosis-related neoplasia. Inguinal recurrence or malignant transformation was rarely reported. The treatment of inguinal endometriosis is surgical and a long-term follow-up is needed. More research is needed on the effectiveness of suppressive hormonal therapy, recurrence rate and its relationship with endometriosis-associated malignancies.

Inguinal endometriosis: Ten case reports and review of literature

BACKGROUND

To describe the characteristics, diagnosis and surgical treatment of inguinal endometriosis (IEM).

CASE SUMMARY

We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients diagnosed with IEM at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from 2011 to 2019. Relevant features, symptoms, images, surgical treatment, hormonal therapy and follow-up were collected and discussed. A total of 10 cases of IEM diagnosed by surgery and pathology were characterized by a lesion on the right side (9/11); five patients had symptoms related to the menstrual cycle, and only 3 patients were clearly diagnosed before surgery. Ultrasonography was of little assistance in confirming the diagnosis, but magnetic resonance imaging showed specific, high-intensity patterns. Anatomically, most of the IEM lesions were located in the extraperitoneal ligament (10/11); nine patients had inguinal hernias (IH), five had concurrent or prior pelvic endometriosis, and four had infertility. The clinical results from extensive resection were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

IEM is an extremely rare condition that can easily be misdiagnosed prior to surgery. A right IH may contribute to the formation of right-sided IEM, and extensive resection involving the round ligament and hernia sac is essential to prevent recurrence.

Inguinal Endometriosis in a Nulliparous Woman Mimicking an Inguinal Hernia: A Case Report with Literature Review

BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a common gynecological disorder occurring in around 10% of women of reproductive age. Inguinal endometriosis is a rare condition; however, it should be considered in the differential for inguinal masses in women of reproductive age. Usually, it occurs after implantation of endometrial tissue during previous surgical procedures. Patients with inguinal endometriosis are often multiparous women with a history of previous gynecological or obstetric surgery. It represents a diagnostic dilemma, as it is often misdiagnosed as other inguinal pathologies. CASE REPORT Herein, we report a case of a 33-year-old nulliparous woman with left groin pain for 2 years increasing in the severity during menstruation. A physical examination revealed a 1.5-cm left inguinal mass. Ultrasound showed an ill-defined speculated solid hypoechoic left inguinal mass measuring 1.6×1.4 cm. Computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis revealed a left inguinal mass measuring 1.7×1.2 cm, demonstrating central hypo-attenuation with thickening of the round ligament. Exploration of the inguinal region revealed an adherent mass to the round ligament and floor of the canal, which was excised completely with a safety margin. The inguinal canal floor was strengthened using proline mesh. Histopathological examination of the mass confirmed the diagnosis of left inguinal endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS Inguinal endometriosis is a rare clinical entity mimicking other common inguinal conditions. A high index of suspicion is crucial for its preoperative diagnosis, especially in the presence of an inguinal mass associated with cyclic changes in size and pain severity. Its standard management is surgical excision.

Endometriosis of the sciatic nerve masquerading as lumbar spondylosis in a 40-year-old Chinese woman

A 40-year-old Chinese woman presented with a 4-year history of lower back pain and left lower leg sciatica. The patient had previously tried different modalities of treatments, including massage, acupuncture, ultrasound, alternative Bowen therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), all of which only provided temporary relief. On presentation to a tertiary hospital, careful and comprehensive history taking found that the sciatica pattern of pain always coincided with menstruation. An MRI identified a thickened left sciatic nerve, with surgery confirming sciatic nerve endometriosis. The case highlights the importance of comprehensive history taking in accurately diagnosing a rare aetiology of sciatica with subsequent prompt surgical intervention to avoid severe disability as well as follow-up treatment to prevent recurrence.

Inguinal endometriosis, a rare entity of which surgeons should be aware: clinical aspects and long-term follow-up of nine cases

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal endometriosis is a rare disease and often misdiagnosed for other, more common groin pathology. We present nine cases of women with inguinal endometriosis with long-term follow-up.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, the Dutch PALGA system was searched for all patients diagnosed with extrapelvic endometriosis located in the groin in the OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, between 2000 and 2016. Relevant information regarding pre- and postoperative characteristics and symptoms was collected. Follow-up consisted of a telephone call from the attending surgeon.

RESULTS

None of the patients had a history of pelvic endometriosis. Typically, they presented with a right-sided swelling in the groin. Preoperative ultrasound and MRI were in most cases inconclusive. In one of two patients fna indicated endometriosis. In only three patients the surgeon considered the diagnosis endometriosis preoperatively. Surgical removal was effective with no reported complications. A coexisting hernia sac was resected in four cases, and there was a suspicion of a persistent processus vaginalis (canal of Nuck) in three, suggesting that a persistent processus vaginalis is possibly an important key to the pathogenesis. In none of the cases there was an indication for mesh implantation. One patient was later diagnosed with pelvic endometriosis.

CONCLUSION

Follow-up by a gynecologist is advised to check for intra-abdominal disease and inform patients on fertility perspective. Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of inguinal endometriosis in fertile women with a lump in the groin.