Sustained release oral morphine as an alternative to methadone for the treatment of opioid-use disorder post Torsades de Pointes cardiac arrest

Effects of opioid receptor agonist and antagonist medications on electrocardiogram changes and presentation of cardiac arrhythmia: review article

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Mortality associated with prescription opioids has significantly increased over the past few decades and is considered a global pandemic. Prescribed opioids can cause cardiac arrhythmias, leading to fatal outcomes and unexpected death, even in the absence of structural cardiac disease. Despite the extent of cardiac toxicity and death associated with these medications, there is limited data to suggest their influences on cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, with the exception of methadone. The goal of our review is to describe the possible mechanisms and to review the different ECG changes and arrhythmias that have been reported.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Google Scholar, PubMed, Springer, Ovid, and Science Direct to identify studies that demonstrated the use of prescription opioids leading to electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and cardiac arrhythmias.

RESULTS

Many of the commonly prescribed opioid medications can uniquely effect the ECG, and can lead to the development of various cardiac arrhythmias. One of the most significant side effects of these drugs is QTc interval prolongation, especially when administered to patients with a baseline risk for QTc prolongation. A prolonged QTc interval can cause lethal torsades de pointes and ventricular fibrillation. Obtaining an ECG at baseline, following a dosage increase, or after switching an opioid medication, is appropriate in patients taking certain prescribed opioids. Opioids are often used first line for the treatment of acute and chronic pain, procedural sedation, medication opioid use disorders, and maintenance therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the risk of cardiac arrhythmias and to improve patient outcomes, consideration of accurate patient selection, concomitant medications, electrolyte monitoring, and vigilant ECG monitoring should be considered.

Opium-associated QT Interval Prolongation: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study

Background

Toxicity and side effects of long-term use of opioids are well studied, but little information exists regarding electrophysiological disturbances of opium consumption. While natural opium has been regarded safe to a great extent among traditional communities, concerns are emerging owing to the available evidence of QT prolongation that have been exposed during recent outcome surveillance of patients under opioid use. Potential QT prolonging interactions would raise a higher level of such concern in opium users during COVID pandemic and warrant attention.

Materials and methods

This study was designed to detect the prevalence of QTc prolongation among opium users and nonusers. Two groups were compared with regard to gender, age, and median QTc interval. Normal and prolonged QTc intervals of user group were compared with respect to age, sex, dose of opium consumption, and duration of opium consumption.

Results

123 opium users and 39 controls were investigated. Median QTc interval in opium user and non-user group was 460 vs 386 milliseconds, respectively (p value < 0.001). In all, 59.3%, (95% CI: 50.51–67.62%) of cases and none of non-user had prolonged QTc interval (p value < 0.001). There was no significance between normal and prolonged QTc intervals with respect to dose and duration of opium use.

Conclusion

This study indicated that opium consumption is associated with QTc prolongation. This prolongation does not relate to dose and duration of opium use. Further study is propounded to assess the clinical significance of these results and to determine risk rating of opium compared to other opioids in this regard.

How to cite this article

Javadi HR, Mirakbari SM, Allami A, Yazdi Z, Katebi K. Opium-associated QT Interval Prolongation: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):43–47.

Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Associated with High-Dose Methadone Use

Methadone is a well-tolerated drug that has been used for pain control and the treatment of opioid addiction. However, some fatal cardiac side effects have been reported previously, including ventricular arrhythmia, stress cardiomyopathy, and coronary artery disease. We reported a middle-aged woman receiving high-dose methadone whom was presented with QT prolongation and torsade de pointes. We replaced the methadone with benzodiazepine and gave lidocaine use simultaneously. Thus, QT interval was shortened within the normal limit. Methadone-induced torsade de pointes is a rare but serious event, and QT interval should be monitored periodically to prevent this fatal adverse event, especially some patients with high-dose methadone use.

Dose-dependent naloxone-induced morphine withdrawal symptoms in opioid-dependent males-a double-blinded, randomized study

Aims

Oral opioid preparations combined with naloxone are intended to induce a transient acute withdrawal syndrome to avoid intravenous misuse. This trial aimed to establish an appropriate morphine–naloxone dose ratio for an abuse‐deterrent oral opioid formulation.

Methods

In a randomized, double‐blinded, 2 × 2 cross‐over trial, 43 patients with opioid use disorder were challenged with intravenous morphine HCl Ph.Eur. (75 mg; [morphine mono]) or morphine HCl Ph.Eur. and naloxone HCl Ph.Eur. at ratios of 100:1 (75 mg: 0.75 mg; [morphine–naloxone 100:1]) or 200:1 (75 mg: 0.375 mg; [morphine–naloxone 200:1]). Acute naloxone‐induced opioid withdrawal was evaluated using subjective (Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale–German [SOWS‐G]) and observer‐rated (Objective Opiate Withdrawal Scale [OOWS], Wang scale) questionnaires, and physiological parameters. For statistical analysis, the area under the curve between baseline and 20 minutes after drug administration of the outcome variables was calculated.

Results

Intravenous morphine–naloxone caused rapid withdrawal symptoms. Coadministration of naloxone dose‐dependently (morphine–naloxone 100:1 > morphine–naloxone 200:1) increased SOWS‐G, OOWS and Wang Scale area under the curve when compared to morphine mono, respectively (all P < .0001). A similar response was detectable for changes of pupil diameter. Blood pressure and respiratory rate changed heterogeneously, and heart rate was unaltered by morphine without or with naloxone.

Conclusion

Morphine–naloxone 100:1 effectively suppresses the pleasurable effects of intravenous morphine and results in an aversive withdrawal reaction. A lower naloxone concentration as used in morphine–naloxone 200:1 does not appear to be appropriate to prevent intravenous morphine misuse.