Piperacillin-tazobactam induced bicytopenia in low cumulative treatment doses

Piperacillin/tazobactam-induced sudden severe thrombocytopenia in a patient with a pressure ulcer: a case report

The standard treatment for an infected pressure ulcer (PU) with osteomyelitis is debridement, wound coverage and antibiotic administration. However, systemic administration of antibiotics in patients with osteomyelitis is controversial, and the optimal treatment duration for chronic osteomyelitis has not been standardised. We report a case of sudden severe thrombocytopenia induced by piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) in a patient with PU-related osteomyelitis. A 57-year-old male patient with paraplegia, using a wheelchair full-time, presented to our plastic surgery department with infection of a stage IV hard-to-heal ischial PU. We surgically debrided the necrotising tissue and raised an ipsilateral biceps femoris musculocutaneous propeller flap for wound coverage. Polymicrobial infections, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were detected in the bone biopsy sample; therefore, systemic PIPC/TAZ was administered for the osteomyelitis. Unexpectedly, during the next 12 days of antibiotic administration, the patient's platelet count acutely dropped to 1×103/μl over three days. Based on a series of examinations, PIPC/TAZ was suspected to be the most likely cause of the severe thrombocytopenia. After drug discontinuation, the thrombocytopenia gradually improved. PIPC/TAZ is one of the most widely used antibiotic combinations in the plastic surgery field; it is conventionally administered for hard-to-heal wounds such as PUs and diabetic foot. The present case suggests that surgeons must take special precautions for patients undergoing PIPC/TAZ treatment. In this report, PIPC/TAZ-induced thrombocytopenia and the efficacy of antibiotic treatment for PU-related osteomyelitis are discussed in light of the available literature.

A Review of β-Lactam-Associated Neutropenia and Implications for Cross-reactivity

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, management, and current understanding of the pathophysiology of β-lactam-induced neutropenia and to critically evaluate the practicality and safety of direct substitution to an alternative β-lactam in the setting of this reaction.

DATA SOURCES

A literature analysis using the PubMed and Ovid search engines (July 1968 to October 2020) was performed using the search terms neutropenia, leukopenia, β-lactam, nonchemotherapy, agranulocytosis, and G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The included English-language studies evaluated the incidence, mechanism, and/or management of β-lactam-induced neutropenia in pediatric or adult patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Drug-induced neutropenia is a well-documented adverse reaction of β-lactam antibiotics, with an incidence of approximately 10% following at least 2 weeks of intravenous therapy. However, multiple gaps in knowledge remain in the mechanism of pathophysiology and optimal management of this reaction. Both direct toxic and immune-mediated mechanisms have been implicated. Although the cornerstone of management includes cessation of the offending agent, controversy exists on the appropriateness of direct substitution or future use of an alternative β-lactam.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Given the frequency of use and superiority of β-lactams over alternative therapy for several infectious disease states, practical recommendations are needed on the management and safe use of β-lactams following β-lactam-induced neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Future use of β-lactams with differing R1 side chains, particularly those from a separate class, should not be deemed contraindicated following β-lactam-induced neutropenia and may be considered when indicated, with close laboratory monitoring.