Knee arthroplasty with hardware removal: complication cascade. Is it preventable?

Multiple trauma-induced, secondary osteoarthritis, knee Arthroplasty and technology: Conventional approach to an unconventional scenario

A 49-year-old man was involved in a high-energy motor vehicle accident. Haemodynamic instability with multiple long bone fractures of lower limbs was the hallmarks of the injury. Closed fragmented fracture of left femur shaft and open displaced supracondylar fracture of the contralateral femur. Closed comminuted high-grade fracture of the Tibia plateau (Schatzker VI) was diagnosed bilaterally. 'Orthopaedic damage control' was initiated with bilateral 'cross knee' external fixation, followed by conversion to open reduction internal fixation of all fracture sits at 8 days later. The patient underwent nine subsequent hospitalisations, of which eight involved operative treatment. The interval from admission to last documented surgery was 7 years. The endpoint was total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with mega prosthesis of the left knee and a primary-type TKA in the right knee. Both arthroplasties were non-assisted, conventional procedures. Postoperative Western Onterio and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score was 85 at 9-year follow-up from the injury incurred.

Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models

BACKGROUND

Acetabular fractures pose diagnostic and surgical challenges. They are classified using the Judet-Letournel system, which is based solely on X-ray. However, computed tomography (CT) imaging is now more widely utilized in diagnosing these injuries. The emergence of 3-dimensional (3-D) printing technology in varying orthopedic fields has provided surgeons a solid model that improves their spatial understanding of complex fractures and ability to plan pre-operatively.

AIM

To evaluate the reliability of the Judet-Letournel classification system of acetabular fractures, when using either CT imaging or 3-D printed models.

METHODS

Seven patients with acetabular fractures underwent pelvic CT imaging, which was then used to create solid, 3-D printed models. Eighteen orthopaedic trauma surgeons responded to questionnaires regarding fracture classification and preferred surgical approach. The same questionnaire was completed using only CT imaging, and two weeks later, using only 3-D printed models. The inter- and intra-observer agreement rates were then analyzed.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement rates based on CT imaging or 3-D printed models were moderate for fracture classification: κ = 0.44, κ = 0.55, respectively (P < 0.001) and fair for preferred surgical approach: κ = 0.34, κ = 0.29, respectively (P < 0.005). Intra-observer agreement rates for fracture classification and preferred surgical approach comparing CT imaging or 3-D printed models were moderate: κ = 0.48, κ = 0.41, respectively. No significant difference in intra-observer agreement was detected when comparing orthopedic pelvic specialists to general orthopedic traumatologists.

CONCLUSION

The Judet-Letournel classification demonstrated only moderate rates of agreement. The use of 3-D printed models increased the inter-observer agreement rates with respect to fracture classification, but decreased it with respect to the preferred surgical approach. This study highlights the role of 3-D printed models in acetabular fractures by improving spatial understanding of these complex injuries, thus providing more reliable fracture diagnoses and alternative viewpoints for pre-operative planning.