Maternal complications of fetal triploidy: a case report

Selective fetal termination for preeclampsia treatment in a dichorionic gestation with a triploid fetus: A case report

Background

Triploidy is commonly associated with the development of early-onset preeclampsia. While previable preeclampsia is often a contraindication to prolonging pregnancy, there may be rare circumstances in which an alternative approach may be offered.

Case

A nulliparous patient with a dichorionic twin gestation, recently diagnosed triploidy in one twin, and history of chronic hypertension presented at 18 weeks of gestation with signs and symptoms suggestive of preeclampsia. After symptomatic therapy and laboratory evaluations, selective fetal termination of the affected twin was elected and performed without complications. The patient subsequently delivered a healthy newborn at 37 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion

Selective fetal termination may be considered a management option for previable preeclampsia in a dichorionic gestation with triploid fetus and was associated with a favorable outcome in this case.

•

Triploidy is associated with the development of early-onset preeclampsia.

•

Selective fetal termination as a treatment for multiple gestations complicated by early onset preeclampsia has been described.

•

Selective fetal termination may be considered for previable preeclampsia in a dichorionic gestation with triploid fetus.

Integrating Combined First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia into Routine Ultrasound Examination

Introduction The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) London has developed a first trimester screening algorithm for preeclampsia (PE), based on maternal characteristics and past risk factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), and placental growth factor (PlGF). The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of integrating PE screening into routine practice.

Material and Methods All pregnancies with a fetal crown-rump length of 45 – 84 mm presenting to our ultrasound department between January 2014 and September 2020 were included in this analysis. Screening for PE was offered to singleton pregnancies only. The number of screening tests performed in the eligible population was assessed and the reasons for missed screenings identified with the help of the electronic clinical database. SPSS Statistics 25 and GraphPad version 8.0 for Windows were used for statistical analysis.

Results 6535 pregnancies were included, 4510 (69.0%) of which were screened for PE. The percentage of patients being offered PE screening increased over the years from 63.1 to 96.7% (r _s  = 0.96; p = 0.003), while the rate of screenings performed in eligible patients remained stable at a median [range] of 86.2% [78.0 – 91.8%] (p = ns). 2025 (31.0%) pregnancies were not screened for PE, 1306 (64.5%) because they were not eligible for screening. 145 (2.2%) women explicitly declined PE screening; their background risk was lower than that of women who accepted screening.

Conclusion Our study shows that integration of PE screening into the routine first trimester ultrasound scan is feasible and widely accepted by pregnant women and health care providers.