Surgical bypass in malignant afferent loop syndrome

The Role of Endoscopic Management in Afferent Loop Syndrome

Afferent loop syndrome (ALS) is a morbid complication that may occur after gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy reconstruction. The aim of this article is to review the different endoscopic treatment options of ALS. We describe the evolution of the endoscopic treatment of ALS and its limitations despite the overall propitious profile. We analyze the advantages of endoscopic ultrasound-guided entero-enterostomy (EUS EE) over enteroscopy-guided intervention, and the clinical outcomes of EUS EE. We expound on pre-procedural considerations, intra-procedural techniques and post-procedural care following EUS EE. We conclude that given the simplification of the technique and the ability to place a stent away from the tumor, EUS EE is a promising technique that will likely be established as the treatment of choice for ALS.

Covered vs. uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of malignant afferent loop obstruction: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic stent placement is a palliative therapy for malignant digestive tract obstruction. However, its use for malignant afferent loop obstruction (mALO) has not been adequately investigated.

METHODS

From March 2009 to December 2020, 137 patients with mALO who underwent endoscopic stent placement at three tertiary care centers were retrospectively enrolled. The primary aim of this study was to compare stent dysfunction (SD) between the covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) and uncovered self-expandable metal stent (UCSEMS) groups, with subgroup analysis among patients with extrinsic and intrinsic tumors separately.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients developed SD in the CSEMS group and 29 patients in the UCSEMS group (log-rank p = .974). The primary contributors to SD included a higher risk of stent migration in the CSEMS group and stent ingrowth in the UCSEMS group (p = .003; p < .001). Among patients with extrinsic tumors, the CSEMS group showed a significantly higher probability of overall SD (p = .008) and stent migration (p = .001) with a shorter time to SD (log-rank p = .006) than the UCSEMS group. Among patients with intrinsic tumors, the CSEMS group showed a significantly lower incidence of overall SD (p < .001) and stent ingrowth (p < .001) with a longer time to SD (log-rank p = .011) than the UCSEMS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed no significant difference in SD between the CSEMS and UCSEMS groups for palliation of mALO. Furthermore, subgroup analysis suggested using CSEMSs for patients with intrinsic tumors, and UCSEMSs for those with extrinsic tumors.