Rare case of renal Ewing sarcoma presenting as ectopic Cushing syndrome in a 12-year-old girl

Cushing's syndrome caused by giant Ewing's sarcoma of the kidney: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Primary renal Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is extremely rare, and only two cases causing Cushing's syndrome (CS) have been reported to date. We report that the case of an 18-year-old patient is diagnosed primary renal ES with typical CS characterized by purple stripes, weight gain, and hypertension.

CASE SUMMARY

CS was first diagnosed by laboratory testing. A huge tumor was revealed in the kidney following an imaging examination. Moreover, brain and bone metastases were observed. After comprehensive treatment, primarily based on surgery, primary renal ES was pathologically diagnosed with a typical EWSR1-FLI1 genetic mutation through genetic testing. Furthermore, the glucocorticoid level returned to normal. By the ninth postoperative month of follow-up, the patient was recovering well. Cushing-related symptoms had improved, and a satisfactory curative effect was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Primary renal ES, a rare adult malignant tumor, can cause CS and a poor prognosis.

Diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in localizing ectopic ACTH syndrome: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the role of various imaging modalities for tumor localization in ectopic ACTH Cushing's syndrome (EAS).

DESIGN AND METHOD

Systematic review of the literature published between January 2015-2024 was performed. Patients (290 EAS patients, 23.8% Occult) who underwent contrast enhanced CT (CECT) and at least one PET/CT-scan (68Ga-SSTR, FDG and/or F-DOPA) were included.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for identifying EAS tumor was comparable across CECT (63.1%, n=290), SSTR-PET/CT (58.2%, n=187), and FDG-PET/CT (57.6%, n=191), but was poor for DOPA-PET/CT (30.8%, n=26). Sensitivity for detecting metastasis was also comparable across CECT (78%, n=73), SSTR-PET/CT (85.3%, n=41), and FDG-PET (73.7%, n=38). For localised lesions, sensitivity as per etiology and grade of NET were similar for three scans, with exception of Thymic NET and grade 1 NET where CECT was better than FDG PET/CT. In patients not localised on CECT, sensitivity of SSTR PET/CT was 33.3% (vs. 18.9% FDG-PET/CT) whereas for patients negative on CECT and FDG-PET, sensitivity of SSTR-PET/CT was 15%. In cases where CECT and SSTR-PET/CT failed to localize, the sensitivities of FDG-PET/CT and DOPA-PET/CT were only 5.7% (2/35) and 0% (0/9), respectively. SSTR-PET/CT has a distinct advantage with significantly lesser false positive (FP) lesions (2.6%, mostly in thyroid/or pancreas). In comparison, CECT and FDG-PET/CT had FP ∼11% (mostly in lung and/or mediastinum), most of which were negative on SSTR-PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

As per the current evidence, SSTR-PET/CT can be considered as the scan of choice in EAS evaluation, and further research is needed as one-fourth of the lesions remain occult.

Paediatric and adolescent ectopic Cushing's syndrome: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The data on clinical, biochemical, radiological characteristics, and outcomes in paediatric ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS) are limited owing to rarity of the condition. We report three new cases and perform a systematic review of paediatric EAS.

DESIGN AND METHOD

Case records of paediatric and adolescent EAS patient's ≤20 years presenting at our centre between 1997 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, and a systematic review of the literature published between January 1970 and December 2022 was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients including 3 new patients from our centre were identified. Bronchial neuroendocrine tumours (NET) (28.5%), thymic NET (22.9%), primitive cell-derived tumours (18.6%), and gastro-entero-pancreatic-NET (13.7%) were the common causes. Primitive cell-derived tumours were the most common in the first decade (24/45, 53.4%) and were the largest (82 [60-100] mm), whereas bronchial NETs predominated during the second decade (42/116, 36.2%) and were the smallest (15 [10-25] mm). Computed tomography localized 92.9% (118/127) of paediatric EAS patients. Immediate postoperative remission was attained in 77.9% (88/113) patients, whereas 30.4% (24/79) relapsed over a median (IQR) period of 13 (8-36) months. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 2 (0.6-4.6) years, 31.4% of patients died. The median survival was higher in bronchial NET than in other tumour groups. Distant metastasis and tumour size were independent negative predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Aetiological profile of paediatric and adolescent EAS is distinct from that of adults. Bronchial NETs have the best long-term survival, whereas distant metastasis and tumour size predict poor survival.

Pearls and updates: cutaneous signs of systemic malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Children with systemic malignancies can present with concomitant dermatological manifestations. Cutaneous findings can occur before, during or after diagnosis. Recognizing these features can aid in diagnosis, inform prognosis, and help determine appropriate treatment. Following a review of the literature published over the past two years, we provide an update on cutaneous signs of pediatric systemic malignancies, concentrating on; leukemia cutis, lymphoma cutis, neuroblastoma, sarcomas, Langerhans cell histiocytosis and paraneoplastic syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Authors highlight the persistently heterogeneous features of cutaneous manifestations of systemic malignancy. Findings are often nonspecific, and a definitive diagnosis requires skin biopsy with immunophenotyping. Several studies describe dermoscopy features, demonstrating this as a useful tool in clinical evaluation. Genetic mutations underlying the pathogenesis of disease continue to be elucidated. Further, advances in medical treatment led to improved prognosis in many systemic malignancies, with early and aggressive treatment heralding better outcomes.

SUMMARY

Comprehensive cutaneous evaluation alongside thorough clinical history and review of systems remains of paramount importance as dermatological manifestations of systemic malignancy are notoriously variable with a shared feature of often appearing benign but persisting despite usual treatment. Urgent referral to dermatology is recommended when suspicion for any cutaneous presentation of malignancy arises.