Abnormal gas pattern under diaphragm

A Rare Presentation of Pseudo-Pneumoperitoneum Secondary to Chilaiditi Sign and Chilaiditi Syndrome in Two Pre-adolescent Females: A Case Series

Chilaiditi sign is defined as the interposition of the colon or small intestine between the liver and the right diaphragm in the absence of symptoms. Chilaiditi syndrome refers to the condition where the Chilaiditi sign is associated with symptoms including abdominal pain. In this series, we present the cases of two pre-pubescent patients with these rare conditions.  A 10-year-old female with a history of autism, IgA deficiency, and constipation presented for gastrointestinal studies due to weight loss and constipation. An abdominal X-ray revealed bowel gas under the right hemidiaphragm and colonic interposition between the diaphragm and the liver, raising concerns for the Chilaiditi sign. She underwent a bowel cleanout, with studies revealing colonic dysmotility and compartmentalization of the sigmoid colon and rectum with the absence of coloanal reflex. A nine-year-old female with a history of constipation, developmental delay, and hypotonia presented with abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, and decreased appetite. She also manifested tachypnea, abdominal distension, and abdominal tenderness, with an abdominal X-ray revealing a dilated colon interposed between the liver and diaphragm, confirming Chilaiditi syndrome. Prior gastrointestinal studies showed dilated and redundant sigmoid colon and dyssynergia. The treatment entailed rectal irrigations and catheter decompression, which led to the improvement of symptoms. Conservative treatment is the treatment of choice for patients with Chilaiditi sign or Chilaiditi syndrome. It is important to distinguish Chilaiditi syndrome, a common cause of pseudo-pneumoperitoneum, from true pneumoperitoneum, as this diagnosis warrants immediate surgical intervention. Surgical treatment is indicated when there are signs of bowel obstruction or ischemia and for cases with recurrent Chilaiditi syndrome. Raising awareness about this condition is important to reduce the incidence of misdiagnosed surgical emergencies and resulting exploratory surgeries, as well as to avoid high-risk colonoscopies. Chilaiditi sign and Chilaiditi syndrome are relatively uncommon entities, and their prevalence is very rare in the pediatric population. Hence, we believe this case series will contribute to providing clinical awareness of these major complications and avoiding invasive interventions due to the inaccurate diagnosis of these conditions as pneumoperitoneum.

Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?

Aim

The goal of the work was comparing gas ultrasound images below the right diaphragm in two groups: in people with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm and ones with pneumoperitoneum and extracting the traits differentiating these two conditions.

Material and methods

Retrospectively, the documentation of 22 patients with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm (group 1) was utilized. Clinical material was used for comparison, previously published, composed of 15 cases of pneumoperitoneum following laparotomy and of 14 cases following that symptom as a result of ulcer perforation – group 2 (in total n = 29). Moreover, the distance in millimeters of the gas surface reflecting ultrasounds from the parietal peritoneum was measured, the smoothness of the surface, parietal peritoneum enhancement at the place of gas adherence, gas continuity below the diaphragm with gas in the intestine located below the liver.

Results

Direct adherence of the gas surface to the diaphragm was observed in 100% of the cases of emphysema, but in no cases of intestinal interposition. Yet, in the group of patients with colonic interposition (n = 21) there was always a small gap (2–3 mm) and the gas surface among those patients in 100% of the cases was uneven.

Conclusions

In differentiation between pneumoperitoneum and liver-diaphragm interposition of the intestine one should take into account – apart from gas movement below the diaphragm at body position changing – the presence of protrusion and section enhancement of the diaphragmatic peritoneum as well as the distance of the gas from the diaphragm, the smoothness of its surface and the continuity with the intestine below the liver. Interpositions of small diaphragm-liver penetration may subside in erect position.