Surgical and visual outcomes following exchange of opacified Hydroview intraocular lenses

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of an explanted opacified hydrophilic IOL after over two years from cataract surgery

Opacification of hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) is an uncommon complication, that can appear after uneventful cataract surgery. We report a case of opacified Hydroview® IOL in a 76-year-old woman, with a previous history of pars plana vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade in her right eye for a proliferative diabetic retinopathy, who developed an opacification of the IOL after over two years from a silicon oil/BSS exchange in combination with an uneventful phacoemulsification. The patient complained about a progressive decrease in her visual acuity. The slit-lamp examination confirmed the opacification of the IOL. Therefore, because of blurred vision, a combined procedure of explant and exchange of the IOL was performed in the same eye. Qualitative (Optic microscope, X-Ray powder Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)) and quantitative (Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA)) analysis of the IOL material were performed. Here, our aim is to report the acquired data of the explanted Hydroview® H60M IOL.

Comparison of Primary Duet Lens Procedures: In-The-Bag Monofocal with Sulcus Multifocal, and Standard Single Multifocal Lens for Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To assess the safety and efficacy of primary duet intraocular lens (IOL) procedure using an in-The-bag monofocal IOL and a sulcus-based multifocal reversible platform for cataract surgery. The visual outcomes were compared with a single in-The-bag multifocal IOL.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients who underwent primary duet IOL procedures were compared with consecutive patients who underwent single multifocal IOL surgery. Primary outcomes were uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (UDVA and UNVA), refraction and spherical equivalent data. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications.

Results

The study group consisted of 32 eyes (22 toric IOLs) whilst the control group had 57 eyes (29 toric IOLs). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on post-operative 1-month and 1-year UDVA (p=0.1522 and 0.4926, respectively) and UNVA (p=0.1248 and 0.2738, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative 1-month spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 diopter (p=0.1891). Postoperative intraocular pressure spikes were observed on day-1 in both groups, with most returned to their baseline at 1-month and all were normal at 1-year post surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in intraocular pressure between the two groups on day-1, 1-month and 1-year after surgery (p=0.6421). There were no statistically significant differences in the IOL axis deviation from the intended axis in the toric subgroup analysis (p=0.5843).

Conclusion

Primary duet IOL procedure is equally effective and safe in correcting distance and near vision when compared with single multifocal IOL in the capsular bag.

Fifteen years of IOL exchange: indications, outcomes, and complications

PURPOSE

To report the indications, frequency, and outcomes regarding intraocular lens (IOL) exchange in 2 university hospital tertiary referral settings over a period of 15 years.

SETTING

Ophthalmology departments of the University Hospital Antwerp and the University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, included were patients who underwent an IOL exchange between 2002 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical indication, comorbidities, visual outcomes, and complications were reported. Patients who underwent IOL repositioning or add-on IOL implantation or extraction, and patients who were left aphakic, were excluded.

RESULTS

Included in the study were 492 eyes. The mean age was 66.0 ± 13.3 years (range 19-91 years). The mean time between primary surgery and IOL exchange was 54.61 ± 67.07 months (range 0-343 months). Primary indication for explantation was IOL opacification, and the most common ophthalmic comorbidity was a previous history of vitreoretinal surgery. Preoperatively, the mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were 0.47 ± 0.27 (range 0-1) and 0.61 ± 0.32 (range 0-1.2), respectively. Postoperative UCVA and CDVA was 0.7 ± 0.3 (range 0-1.2) and 0.8 ± 0.28 (range 0.05-1.6), respectively. The increase in both CDVA and UCVA was statistically significant (P < .001, paired t test). The most common complication perioperatively was vitreous prolapse, which occurred in 61 eyes (16%).

CONCLUSIONS

IOL exchange is a challenging yet valuable treatment option for a wide spectrum of problematic IOL outcomes. The most common indication remains IOL opacification, although IOL dislocation and patient dissatisfaction are increasing as indications.

Intraocular Lens Calcification: Clinico-pathological Report of Two Cases and Literature Review

Purpose:

We report the clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes of two cases of intraocular lens (IOL) calcification along with a review of the current literature.

Case Report:

The first patient was a 53-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus (type 2) who underwent phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL insertion (PCIOL), and pars plana vitrectomy. Significant clouding of the IOL was first noted after 1.5 years, and the IOL was replaced with an Artisan lens. The second patient was a 22-year-old woman with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome; she underwent a lensectomy, PCIOL, and pars plana vitrectomy. IOL opacification was first noted 4.5 years after the initial surgery and the IOL was extracted.

Conclusion:

The calcification of each IOL was confirmed by a pathologist. Further studies are required to determine the primary causes and mechanisms of the calcification of biomaterials including IOLs.

Assessment of a new hydrophilic acrylic supplementary IOL for sulcus fixation in pseudophakic cadaver eyes

PurposeManagement of refractive errors after cataract surgery includes spectacles or contact lens, secondary laser vision correction, intraocular lens (IOL) exchange, or piggyback lens implantation. We evaluated for the first time a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL designed for supplementary sulcus fixation in postmortem pseudophakic human eyes.MethodsPseudophakic human cadaver eyes were imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to assess position of the primary IOL. Eyes were prepared as per the Miyake-Apple technique. The supplementary IOL (Medicontur A4 Addon IOL family) was then inserted into the ciliary sulcus. AS-OCT and photographs from anterior and posterior views were used to assess IOL centration, tilt, and interlenticular distance from the primary IOL.ResultsData were obtained from 12 eyes having primary IOLs of varying materials and designs in the bag and representing different sizes of eyes and severity of Soemmering's ring formation. The A4 Addon IOL was successfully inserted into the ciliary sulcus and was well centered in all cases. Four cases of tilt were observed on AS-OCT: three with mild tilt due to pre-existing zonular dehiscence, and one due to a localized area of Soemmering's ring formation. Interlenticular distance ranged from 0.34 to 1.24 mm and was not dependent on severity of Soemmering's ring or type of primary IOL.ConclusionsThe A4 Addon IOL was designed for sulcus fixation as a supplementary lens, with a large diameter, a square-shaped optic, four smooth loop haptics, and a convex-concave optical surface. It exhibited appropriate centration and interlenticular distance with different primary in-the-bag IOLs.

Calcification of Hydroview H60M intraocular lenses: aqueous humor analysis and comparisons with other intraocular lens materials

PURPOSE

To compare the level of calcification on Hydroview H60M hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Bausch & Lomb) and other IOL materials.

SETTING

Omori Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.

METHODS

The levels of calcification on Hydroview H60M hydrophilic acrylic IOLs, AcrySof SA60AT hydrophobic acrylic IOLs (Alcon Surgical, Inc.), Sensar AR40e hydrophobic acrylic IOLs (Advanced Medical Optics), ClariFlex (Advanced Medical Optics) silicone IOLs, and the MeniFlex ENV13 (Menicon) poly(methyl methacrylate) IOLs were compared in a calcium phosphate solution containing albumin. In a concentration-change experiment, the calcium and phosphate concentration levels were changed and the results observed by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

The Hydroview H60M IOL had the largest amount of deposits. Small amounts of deposits were found on the other IOLs in the following decreasing order: AcrySof SA60AT, Sensar AR40e, ClariFlex, and MeniFlex ENV13. The amount of deposits on the Hydroview H60M IOLs was statistically significantly greater than the amount on the other IOLs (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (Hydroview H60M) had significantly higher amounts of calcified deposits than IOLs of other materials, indicating that hydrophilic acrylic IOLs easily accumulate calcified deposits in the body when the concentrations of calcium, phosphate, and albumin in the aqueous humor fluctuate as a result of a blood-aqueous barrier breakdown.