Endothelial keratoplasty without stripping the Descemet's membrane

Graft rejection episodes after keratoplasty in Japanese eyes

We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors for graft rejection after keratoplasty in Japanese patients. We enrolled 730 cases (566 patients) of penetrating keratoplasty (PK, N = 198), Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK, N = 277), non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK, N = 138), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK, N = 117). The incidence, clinical characteristics, and possible risk factors for graft rejection were analyzed. Graft rejection occurred in 65 cases (56 patients, 8.9%). The incidence rate of rejection was highest with PK (3.45/100 person-years), followed by DSAEK (2.34), nDSAEK (1.55), and DMEK (0.24). Cox regression analysis revealed keratoplasty type, younger age, indications (such as failed keratoplasty and infection), and steroid eyedrop use as possible risk factors. In the multivariate model adjusting baseline characteristics, PK and DSAEK had significantly higher hazard ratios (HRs) than DMEK (HR = 13.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.83, 101] for PK, 7.77 [1.03, 58.6] for DSAEK). Although not statistically significant, the HR estimate of nDSAEK to DMEK (HR = 7.64, 95% CI [0.98, 59.6]) indicated higher HR in nDSAEK than in DMEK. DMEK is the favorable option among the four surgical procedures to avoid graft rejection after keratoplasty.

The challenging management of pediatric corneal transplantation: an overview of surgical and clinical experiences

PURPOSE

Pediatric keratoplasty is an immense challenge because of the technical complexity of the procedure and the high risk of rejection in young graft recipients. Our aim is to describe the major indications and appropriate timing of corneal transplantation intervention, including a report of our experience and surgical tips, in conjunction with the current literature.

METHODS

Review of the literature on indications for keratoplasty in pediatric patients classified as: congenital, traumatic and acquired non-traumatic opacities. We additionally explored the challenges corneal surgeons face in performing this type of surgery and review the most pressing transplant-related problems and their management.

RESULTS

Outcomes after pediatric keratoplasty, in terms of visual development, restoration and clarity of the graft, are influenced by peri-operative local and systemic conditions and factors, and by intraoperative management of the transplantation procedure itself.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric corneal transplantation is a critical tool for visual restoration and development in young patients with corneal opacities, particularly during the critical period of visual development. Successful management of the significant challenges associated with pediatric keratoplasty requires customized clinical and surgical management of each patient with particular attention paid to proper post-operative rehabilitation.

Outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in pseudophakic corneal oedema: with or without Descemet's membrane stripping

AIMS

To evaluate and compare outcomes of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with non-DSEK (nDSEK) in pseudophakic corneal oedema (PCE).

METHODS

The study was a prospective, non-consecutive, comparative, interventional case series. Twenty-six patients with PCE were randomised into two groups. Group 1 comprised of those cases that had undergone conventional DSEK, and group 2 consisted of those that had nDSEK for PCE between 2010 and 2012. The data on demographics and clinical characteristics were collected from all patients. Any intraoperative and early and late postoperative complications were also noted. The primary outcome measure was postoperative functional success. Graft survival and complications were analysed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The median best-corrected visual acuities at 6 months postoperatively in groups 1 and 2 were 0.18 (IQR 0.10-0.30) and 0.44 (IQR 0.18-0.51), respectively (p=0.11). Corneal oedema cleared in all patients. During the early postoperative period, a patient in group 2 had lenticule detachment managed by rebubbling.

CONCLUSIONS

nDSEK has outcomes similar to DSEK in PCE with advantages of decreased surgical time and avoidance of inadvertent pull on the posterior stromal fibres that may occur during Descemet's stripping.

Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts

Background

The purpose of this paper is to report our experience of Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK/nDSAEK) for microcorneas using 6.0 mm donor grafts.

Methods

Three eyes of two patients (a 56-year-old woman and a 59-year-old woman) with microcornea and suffering from bullous keratopathy were treated with either DSAEK or nDSAEK. A small donor graft (6.0 mm) was inserted into the anterior chamber using a double glide (Busin glide and intraocular lens sheet glide) donor insertion technique. Both patients were followed for at least 12 months. Clinical outcomes, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, visual acuity, and endothelial cell density were evaluated.

Results

In all three cases (100%), no intraoperative complications were noted. In one case with a flat keratometry value (32.13 D), a partial donor detachment was noted one day postoperatively, but it was reattached by rebubbling. In another case, rejection was noted 8 months postoperatively, but treatment with systemic corticosteroids was successful. A clear cornea remained in all three cases (100%), with best-corrected visual acuity greater than 20/100 (mean 20/50) at 12 months. Mean postoperative endothelial cell counts were 2,603 ± 18 cells/mm² at 6 months (7.4% decrease from preoperative donor cell counts) and 1,799 ± 556 cells/mm² at 12 months (36.5% decrease).

Conclusion

We report for the first time the successful use of a small donor graft (6.0 mm) for DSAEK/nDSAEK in cases of microcornea. Additional stud ies using a large number of patients are required to evaluate fully the potential advantages and drawbacks of small diameter donor grafts for microcornea.

Endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet's stripping in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of non-Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (nDSEK) with Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) for the surgical management of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED).

METHODS

Patients with CHED who were treated with DSEK or nDSEK were analyzed and compared with respect to graft adhesion, graft clarity, visual acuity, refraction, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 6 patients were included in the series. Of these, 3 (mean age, 5.6 ± 1.52 years; 1 male) underwent DSEK and 3 (mean age, 5.6 ± 0.57 years; 2 males) nDSEK. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of patients who underwent DSEK was 1.3 logMAR units compared with 1.13 logMAR units for nDSEK patients. There were no intraoperative complications. During the early postoperative period, 1 patient who had n DSEK had lenticule detachment and was successfully managed by repeat air injection. The average time for resolution of graft edema was 30 days. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 0.13 ± 0 .10 in DSEK patients and 0.13 ± 0 .10 in nDSEK patients (P = 1). Mean refraction was comparable in both groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of nDSEK were similar to DSEK in CHED in this small series. The specific advantage of nDSEK is the decreased surgical time and intraocular tissue manipulation.

Endothelial keratoplasty in the management of irido-corneal endothelial syndrome

PURPOSE

To describe the results of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) in the management of irido-corneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series.

METHODS

Eight eyes of seven patients underwent EK for corneal edema owing to ICE syndrome. Simultaneous cataract surgery was performed in five eyes. The charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical findings, and outcomes after EK.

RESULTS

Mean age was 50.4 years (range 35-59 years). Mean follow-up was 12.5 months (range 6-24 months). Corneal clarity was restored in all eyes and was maintained till the last follow-up. Four patients had acute rise in the intraocular pressure in the post-operative period, which was well controlled on medical treatment. One patient who was non-compliant with medications and regular follow-up advice had progression of glaucomatous disc changes and visual field loss. The best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/50-20/30.

CONCLUSIONS

EK is a viable option in ICE syndrome. Adequate control of glaucoma is the paramount factor in maintaining good visual acuity in these eyes.