Theoretical analyses of the refractive implications of transepithelial PRK ablations

A 6-Month Follow-Up Comparative Study of Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) Using the StreamLight Software with and without Epithelial Thickness Customization

Purpose

To compare corneal aberrometry, densitometry, and refractive outcomes of single-step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) with and without epithelial thickness customization.

Patients and Methods

This was a prospective, interventional, randomized controlled study. Patients undergoing Trans-PRK using the WaveLight EX500 laser with StreamLight software (Alcon Laboratories, Forth Worth, TX, USA) were randomly assigned to control (55 µm standard epithelial thickness) or customized (thinnest point of epithelial thickness for each patient) groups. MS-39 (CSO, Italy) anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to measure the epithelial thickness. Inclusion criteria were spherical equivalent <6 diopters (D), astigmatism <4D, and CDVA 20/25 or better. The assessments were at baseline and 6 months post-op: visual acuity, refraction, aberrometry, and corneal densitometry.

Results

108 eyes were enrolled, [control group (n=56) and customized group (n=52)]. Mean epithelial ablation thickness in the customized group was 54.81±3.56µm (p=0.470 vs control group). Both groups experienced significant postoperative increases in higher-order aberrations (HOA) and spherical aberrations, with no significant intergroup differences. Mean HOA RMS (µm) of the frontal cornea and total cornea increased by 0.27, and 0.29, respectively, in the control group, and 0.26 and 0.28, respectively, in the customized group (p<0.001 for all). Mean change in spherical aberrations in the frontal cornea and total cornea was 0.23µm (p<0.001) and 0.25µm (p<0.001), in the control group, and 0.19µm (p<0.001) and 0.20µm (p<0.001), in the customized group. Mean corneal densitometry in anterior cornea decreased by 0.63GSU (p=0.021) and 1.18GSU (p<0.001) in the control and customized groups. In the posterior cornea, it increased by 1.67GSU (p=0.004) and 0.38GSU (p=0.006).

Conclusion

No significant differences in refractive and aberrometry outcomes between control and customized Trans-PRK groups, with corneal densitometry changes not affecting visual acuity.

Comparative outcomes of mechanical and transepithelial PRK on the same excimer laser: A contralateral eye study

PURPOSE

Compare refractive results between mechanical PRK (mPRK) and transepithelial PRK (tPRK) with WaveLight Allegretto EX500 excimer laser system (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology of the Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

DESIGN

Prospective and randomized study.

METHODS

In 151 eyes of 73 patients with astigmatism and myopia, both eyes had similar refraction before surgery, with a maximum of 15-µm difference in ablation who underwent mPRK in one eye and tPRK in the contralateral eye. The mean age of the patients in this study was 31.45 ± 6.97 years (range, 22 to 54 years).

RESULTS

A comparison was made with all variables between the two groups, and we found that UDVA and SE were worse in the tPRK group at six months than in the mPRK group. In the mPRK group, there was a higher frequency in the +/- 0.50 range and a lower frequency in the +/- 1.50 range. In the tPRK group, however, there was a lower frequency in the +/- 0.50 range and a higher frequency in the +/- 1.50 range. Concerning gain or loss of lines of sight, there was no association between the two groups (chi-square test, p = 0.887).

CONCLUSION

Both mPRK and tPRK appear to have similar safety. However, mPRK was associated with significantly better UDVA and SE six months post-operatively.

Intraoperative variability of corneal epithelium thickness in photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intraoperative central corneal epithelial thickness (ET) as measured by optical coherence pachymetry (OCP) in myopic eyes undergoing alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent alcohol-assisted PRK was performed. Data were abstracted on age, gender, contact lens (CL) wear, preoperative refractive errors, keratometry, topographic and ultrasonic pachymetry, and intraoperative OCP measurements before and after epithelium removal. The central ET was calculated by subtracting OCP measurement after epithelium removal from the OCP measurement prior to epithelium removal.

RESULTS

The study comprised of 162 consecutive eyes from 81 patients. Mean age was 26.73 ± 6.47 years, 50.6% were males. CL was used in 92 eyes (56.8%). The mean sphere and spherical equivalent were -3.60 ± 1.84 D and -3.26 ± 1.85D, respectively. The mean intraoperative ET was 58.22 ± 17.53 µm (range, 15-121µm). Fifty-five percent of the eyes had an ET measurement above or below the range of 40-60µm. ET was significantly higher in the second operated eye compared to the first operated eye (p = 0.006), and an association was found to CL-wear (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in thickness between genders (p = 0.62), and no correlation to patient age (p = 0.45, rp = 0.06), refractive errors (p > 0.30,rp=-0.07-0.08), nor keratometry(p > 0.80, rp=-0.01- (-0.02)).

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative assessment of ET in alcohol-assisted PRK showed a high variability of the central corneal epithelium, with a significant difference between the first and second operated eyes. This difference may have implications when the epithelium is not included in the surgical planning in surface ablation.

Epithelial thickness map-adjusted transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for treatment of myopic astigmatism: 12-month results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the refractive results of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (t-PRK) with the Technolas Teneo2 Excimer laser platform.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative interventional case series, a total of 199 patients with myopia ranging from - 1 to - 7 diopters were enrolled and separated into three groups based on their target refraction of zero (group 1), - 0.25 (group 2), and - 0.5 diopters (group 3), respectively. The main outcome measure was post-operative cycloplegic refraction. Trans-PRK was performed using the Technolas Teneo2 Excimer laser. To prevent any remaining epithelium during stromal ablation, we adopted the thickest epithelial point in the 7 mm central map as the reference for Phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) depth. Patients were examined three and twelve months after the procedure, and the results were analyzed.

RESULTS

At the 12-month follow-up, uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 in all patients. However, there was a significant difference in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction between the three groups. The 12-month post-operative spherical equivalent refraction was 0.90 ± 0.33 D, 0.79 ± 0.26 D, and 0.60 ± 0.19 D in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.001; Kruskal-Wallis test). The rates of spherical equivalent refraction of more than 0.75 D were 58.3%, 39.1%, and 9.1% in the 0 D, - 0.25 D, and -0.50 D groups, respectively (P < 0.001; Chi-squared test).

CONCLUSIONS

The t-PRK with Technolas Teneo2 Excimer laser and epithelial thickness map adjustment of PTK induce a significant amount of residual hyperopia (> 0.75 D) in a large proportion of eyes with a target refraction of 0 or - 0.25, which is significantly reduced by using a target refraction of - 0.5.

Comparison of myopic astigmatic correction after cross-assisted SMILE, FS-LASIK, and transPRK

PURPOSE

To compare astigmatic correction among cross-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK).

SETTING

The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.

DESIGN

Prospective comparison study.

METHODS

154 right eyes of 154 patients with astigmatism of -1.00 to -2.75 diopters (D) were included in this study. 64 eyes, 42 eyes, and 48 eyes were receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, and transPRK, respectively. The SMILE group used cross-axial alignment for head positioning for astigmatism correction. In the FS-LASIK and transPRK groups, static and dynamic cyclotorsion control were used. Changes in ocular parameters and vector analysis were assessed at 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The safety and efficacy indices were comparable among the 3 groups at 6 months postoperatively. Residual astigmatism was smallest in the SMILE group (-0.23 ± 0.25 D) compared with that in FS-LASIK (-0.40 ± 0.28 D, P = .009) and transPRK groups (-0.42 ± 0.32 D, P = .001). 53 (82.8%), 36 (85.7%), and 37 (77.1%) eyes achieved an angle of error within ±5 degrees, respectively ( P = .55). Notably, vector analysis showed that the difference vector, the magnitude of the error, and its absolute value were significantly smaller in the SMILE group than those in the other groups ( P < .05). In addition, the higher-order aberrations, especially coma, were significantly induced postoperatively in each group ( P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Residual astigmatism magnitude was smallest by cross-assisted SMILE, followed by FS-LASIK and transPRK, and the astigmatism axial correction was comparable among groups.

SmartSurfACE transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction

Background

To evaluate predictability, stability, efficacy, and safety of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) using smart pulse technology (SPT) (SmartSurface procedure) of Schwind Amaris with mitomycin C for correction of post small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) myopic residual refractive errors.

Method

This study is a prospective, non-comparative case series conducted at a private eye centre in Ismailia, Egypt, on eyes with post-SMILE myopic residual refractive errors because of undercorrection or suction loss (suction loss occurred after the posterior lenticular cut and the creation of side-cuts; redocking was attempted, and the treatment was completed in the same session with the same parameters) with myopia or myopic astigmatism. The patients were followed up post-SMILE for six months before the SmartSurface procedure, and then they were followed up for one year after that. TPRK were performed using Amaris excimer laser at 500 kHz. The main outcomes included refractive predictability, stability, efficacy, safety and any reported complications.

Results

This study included 68 eyes of 40 patients out of 1920 total eyes (3.5%) with post-SMILE technique myopic residual refractive errors. The average duration between the SMILE surgery and TPRK was 6.7 ± 0.4 months (range 6 to 8 months). The mean refractive spherical equivalent (SE) was within ± 0.50 D of plano correction in 100% of the eyes at 12 months post-TPRK. Astigmatism of < 0.50 D was achieved in 100% of the eyes. The mean of the residual SE error showed statistically significant improvement from preoperative − 1.42 ± 0.52 D to 0.23 ± 0.10 D (P < 0.0001). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (measured by Snellen's chart and averaged in logMAR units) was improved significantly to 0.1 ± 0.07 (P < 0.0001). UDVA was 0.2 logMAR or better in 100% of the eyes, 0.1 logMAR or better in 91.2% of the eyes, and 0.0 logMAR in 20.6% of the eyes. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained unchanged in 79.4% of eyes. 14.7% of eyes gained one line of CDVA (Snellen). 5.9% of eyes gained two lines of CDVA (Snellen).

Conclusion

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy using smart pulse technology with mitomycin C enhancement after SMILE is a safe, predictable, stable, and effective technique.

Surface ablation outcomes in high myopia with different epithelium removal techniques

PURPOSE

To study the outcomes of alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) when compared with transepithelial PRK (TransPRK) using 2 software programs, with or without SmartPulse Technology (SmartSurfACE), in high myopia.

SETTING

Vissum Miranza, University Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive, case series.

METHODS

High myopic eyes undergoing surface ablation were included. The main inclusion criteria were preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) above -5.50 diopters (D) and no other ocular surgeries. Mitomycin-C was used in all the surgeries. The outcomes were analyzed using the 6-month follow-up visit data.

RESULTS

135 eyes were included. Alcohol-assisted PRK was performed in 65 eyes, transepithelial PRK (TransPRK1) in 32 eyes, and TransPRK2 in 38 eyes. The mean all groups preoperative sphere, cylinder, and SE were -6.00 ± 0.87 D, -1.13 ± 1.03 D, and -6.57 ± 0.69 D, respectively. The mean efficacy index in the alcohol-assisted PRK group was 0.91 ± 0.18 compared with 0.98 ± 0.1 and 0.98 ± 0.12 in the TransPRK1 and TransPRK2, respectively (P = .027). The mean safety index in alcohol-assisted PRK was 0.99 ± 0.05, whereas it was 1 ± 0.06 in the TransPRK1 and 0.99 ± 0.08 in the TransPRK2 (P = .780). A final SE of ± 0.50 D was achieved in 96.9% of eyes in the TransPRK1 group and in 100% eyes in the TransPRK2 group compared with 73.8% in the alcohol-assisted PRK group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surface ablation with the Amaris 500 excimer laser with flying spot pattern and mitomycin C use showed adequate refractive outcomes in high myopia correction in the 3 groups. TransPRK with or without SmartPulse Technology achieved statistically significant better outcomes than alcohol-assisted PRK in refractive predictability and efficacy.

Clinical outcomes of transepithelial PRK using SCHWIND AMARIS laser platform with actual versus default epithelial thickness values

PURPOSE

to investigate the clinical outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) with actual epithelial thickness versus default software values.

METHODS

eighty-three patients with refractive spherical error of -1.50 to -7.00 diopters (D), and refractive astigmatism up to 4.00 D were consecutively enrolled and divided into two groups: group 1 undergone tPRK with actual central and peripheral epithelial thickness input in right eyes, group 2 undergone tPRK with actual central and 10 μm higher peripheral epithelial thickness in right eyes, left eyes underwent tPRK with default protocol in both groups. Outcome measures were induced refractive error, achieved optical zone (OZ), and wasted stromal tissue.

SETTING

Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDesign: prospective controlled study.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD of induced spherical equivalent (SE) was +0.15 ± 0.39 D and +0.01 ± 0.35 D in right and left eyes of group 1 (p=0.01), and +0.04 ± 0.22 D and +0.03 ± 0.23 D in right and left eyes of group 2 (p=0.75), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between wasted tissue between right and left eyes in group 1 and group 2 (p=0.77 and p=0.49, respectively). OZ contraction was significantly higher in right compared to left eyes in group 1 (p=0.05), but not in group 2 (p=0.95).

CONCLUSION

In tPRK, refractive outcomes, wasted tissue, and OZ contraction depend little on pre-existing corneal epithelial thickness in corneas with normal range epithelial thickness. However, OZ contraction may be a concern in lower amount of ablations.

Comparison of Refractive and Visual Outcomes after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) in Low versus Moderate Myopia

Is it possible to obtain good results in myopia of 2 or fewer diopters (D) with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) changing the optical zone and epithelium thickness? We retrospectively analyzed two groups of 296 eyes with a minimum follow-up of 4 months. Group A had 2 or less D, treated with an optical zone (OZ) 0.2 mm bigger than recommended, and a central epithelium thickness of 60 microns, and group B had 2 D to 5 D, with the recommended optical zone, and a 55-micron epithelium ablation at the center. The outcomes were not different between the two myopic ranges; the postop uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 ± 4 in both groups (p = 0.2), which was −0.3 ± 0.8 lines worse than the preoperative corrected distance visual acuity in both groups (p = 0.5). The safety of the treatments resulted in a change of 0.0 ± 0.7 lines in the low myopia group, versus a gain of +0.1 ± 0.8 lines in the moderate myopia group (p = 0.1). The deviation from the intended target was −0.04 ± 0.33 D in the low myopia group and +0.07 ± 0.32 D in the moderate myopia group (p < 0.0001); the postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.00 ± 0.33 D in the low myopia group and +0.10 ± 0.31 D in the moderate myopia group (p < 0.0001). The postop refractive astigmatism was 0.32 ± 0.16 D in both groups (p = 0.5). In conclusion, the refractive and visual outcomes after TransPRK are comparable in low myopia changing the optical zone and epithelium thickness versus moderate myopia with standard optical zone and epithelium thickness.

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratektomy after a Clear Lens Exchange

PURPOSE

We evaluated the refractive visual outcomes and efficacy of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) using Smart Pulse Technology with static and dynamic cyclotorsion and the AMARIS 1050 Hz RS laser platform from Schwind in the eyes after a refractive lens exchange. Setting/Venue: Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum, Recklinghausen.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the data of 552 consecutive eyes treated with refractive lens exchange between 2016 and 2019. A total of 47 eyes (8.5%) required a touch up after the clear lens exchange. From 43 eyes of 43 patients, we obtained a minimum follow up of 3 months. In all cases, we performed a TransPRK with a minimum optical zone of 7.2 mm, centering the ablation on the vertex of the cornea.

RESULTS

The average age of the treated eyes was 57 years old, with a range between 48 and 68 years. The mean treated sphere was 0.42 diopters (D), with a range between -1.0 and +1.75 D. The mean astigmatism was 1.06 D. Postoperatively, after laser vision correction, we reduced the sphere to a mean of 0.11 D (range -0.5 to +0.75 D), and, postoperatively, the mean astigmatism was 0.25 D (range -0.75 to 0 D). The predictability for a spheric equivalent (SEQ) of 0.5 D was 91%, and for 1 D it was 100% of the cases. No eye lost more than one Snellen line.

CONCLUSIONS

TransPRK with smart pulse was predictable for correcting ametropia after Clear Lens Surgery.

Comparison of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and conventional photorefractive keratectomy in low to high myopic eyes

Purpose

To compare the visual outcome, safety, safety index, efficacy, efficacy index and corneal transparency between single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with manual debridement of epithelium in eyes with low to high simple myopia and compound myopic astigmatism.

Methods

In this retrospective ,case control study, we analysed and compared the postoperative uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) , safety, safety index,efficacy,efficacy index and the corneal transparency between t-PRK and PRK with 6^th-generation Amaris excimer 500E laser (Schwind eye-tech-solutions) in 115 eyes of 59 patients.

Results

Preoperative Mean Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) was - 3.88 + 0.23 Diopters(D) and -4.73 + 0.23D in PRK and t-PRK group respectively(p=0.09). In both the groups , none of the eyes lost postoperative BCVA at the end of mean follow-up period of 3.5 months . All the eyes achieved post operative UCVA of 20/40 or better in both the groups. Incidence of trace corneal haze was high in t-PRK group at the end of 3.5 months (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

Single-step t-PRK and PRK provide similar results at the end of mean follow-up period of 3.5 months postoperatively with regards to post-operative UCVA, post operative BCVA, safety, safety index, efficacy and efficacy index. There was high incidence of trace haze in t- PRK eyes. Both the procedures are predictable, effective, and safe for correction of low to high myopia.

Wavefront properties of the anterior and posterior corneal surface after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in myopia

The present study aimed to evaluate the changes of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) in patients with myopia. A total of 80 eyes of 80 patients with myopia with or without astigmatism were evaluated. Prior to and 1 year after the surgery, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity in logMAR were assessed. Wavefront aberrations on the anterior surface of the cornea, as well as the posterior and total cornea, were measured via Pentacam. The HOA of the anterior surface and total values of spherical and coma aberrations increased significantly (P<0.001). However, HOAs of the anterior surface, and posterior and total values of the trefoil were not significantly changed (P=0.442, 0.805 and 0.936, respectively). A significant correlation of the pre-operative mean spherical equivalent refraction (MSER), astigmatism and central corneal ablation depth (CCAD) with the changes in coma aberration (r=0.268, P=0.016; r=0.260, P=0.020; r=0.323, P=0.004, respectively) and HOA (r=0.554, P<0.001; r=0.312, P=0.005; r=0.583, P<0.001, respectively) of the anterior surface of the cornea was determined. Furthermore, a significant correlation of the pre-operative MSER and CCAD with the changes in spherical aberration of the anterior corneal surface (r=0.462, P<0.001; r=0.510, P<0.001, respectively) was obtained. In conclusion, TransPRK offers an effective option for improving visual function in patients with myopia. The anterior corneal HOA, as well as spherical and coma aberrations, were significantly increased post-operatively. The HOA of the posterior cornea was not significantly changed. The change in the trefoil aberration was significantly correlated with pre-operative astigmatism, but the pre- and post-operative values were not significantly different.

[Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy : Results and clinical experiences]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and assess the refractive outcome after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The treatment was performed with the AMARIS 1050RS laser (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany). The method used an aspheric, aberration-neutral ablation profile and a standardized epithelial tissue removal of 55 µm in the center and 65 µm at a radius of 4 mm as well as SmartPulse technology. Only spherical and/or cylindrical refraction values were treated. Only untreated eyes with preoperative best corrected visual acuity equal to or better than 0.8 were included in the cohort. Follow-up examinations were performed after 1 and 4 days, after 1 and 3 months and after 1 year RESULTS: A total of 939 consecutive TransPRK laser treatments performed in the period from December 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The preoperative sphere had a range of -7.75 D up to +3.00 D and cylinders up to 5.00 D. The 3‑month follow-up control was performed in 728 eyes (77.5%). The predictability showed 89% of eyes within the target correction of less than 0.50 D and 99% of eyes less than 1.00 D. The astigmatic correction showed 91% of eyes with less than 0.50 D. In the safety 1% of eyes showed a visual loss of 2 Snellen lines because of haze. In 26 eyes (2.7%) follow-up treatment was performed with renewed TransPRK laser treatment, in the myopic cohort in 1.8% and in the hyperopic cohort in 13.0%. A residual refraction occurred in 20 eyes without haze and 6 eyes showed a residual refraction with signs of haze.

CONCLUSION

The TransPRK led to similar results to intrastromal refractive surgery techniques but with fewer clinical complications.

Efficacy and safety of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was introduced to prevent complications from conventional PRK and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). In the 2-step platform, phototherapeutic keratectomy is followed by PRK. It did not show notable safety or efficacy superiorities over conventional PRK. In the conventional single-step transepithelial PRK, ablation of epithelium and stroma occurs in a single continuous session by an Amaris laser. It showed better comparative safety results. Reverse single-step transepithelial PRK and the platform using smart-pulse technology were recent improvements in the single-step Amaris laser. They provide a smoother postablative stromal bed counter. In the refined single-step platform, a modified nomogram is used for determination of ablation parameters, along with modifications in postablative measures. It yielded better comparative results in hyperopia. Controlled trials comparing reverse, smart-pulse technology-equipped, or refined platforms of single-step transepithelial PRK with other modern laser-assisted methods could provide more robust evidence on the topic. Some key elements with significant roles in post-transepithelial PRK outcomes are discussed.

Clinical outcomes of Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy to treat low to moderate myopic astigmatism

Background

To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes of Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) in the treatment of low to moderate myopic astigmatism.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled a total of 47 eyes that had undergone Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. Preoperative cylinder diopters ranged from − 0.75D to − 2.25D (mean − 1.11 ± 0.40D), and the sphere was between − 1.50D to − 5.75D. Visual outcomes and vector analysis of astigmatism that included error ratio (ER), correction ratio (CR), error of magnitude (EM) and error of angle (EA) were evaluated.

Results

At 6 months after TransPRK, all eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better, no eyes lost ≥2 lines of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), and 93.6% had residual refractive cylinder within ±0.50D of intended correction. On vector analysis, the mean correction ratio for refractive cylinder was 1.03 ± 0.30. The mean error magnitude was − 0.04 ± 0.36. The mean error of angle was 0.44° ± 7.42°and 80.9% of eyes had axis shift within ±10°. The absolute astigmatic error of magnitude was statistically significantly correlated with the intended cylinder correction (r = 0.48, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

TransPRK showed safe, effective and predictable results in the correction of low to moderate astigmatism and myopia.

Detailed Distribution of Corneal Epithelial Thickness and Correlated Characteristics Measured with SD-OCT in Myopic Eyes

Purpose

To investigate the detailed distribution of corneal epithelial thickness in single sectors and its correlated characteristics in myopic eyes.

Methods

SD-OCT was used to measure the corneal epithelial thickness distribution profile. Differences of corneal epithelial thickness between different parameters and some correlations of characteristics were calculated.

Results

The thickest and thinnest part of epithelium were found at the nasal-inferior sector (P < 0.05) and at the superior side (P < 0.05). respectively. Subjects in the low and moderate myopia groups have thicker epithelial thickness than those in the high myopia group (P < 0.05). Epithelial thickness was 1.39 μm thicker in male subjects than in female subjects (P < 0.001). There was a slight negative correlation between corneal epithelial thickness and age (r = −0.13, P = 0.042). Weak positive correlations were found between corneal epithelial thickness and corneal thickness (r = 0.148, P = 0.031). No correlations were found between corneal epithelial thickness, astigmatism axis, corneal front curvature, and IOP.

Conclusions

The epithelial thickness is not evenly distributed across the cornea. The thickest location of the corneal epithelium is at the nasal-inferior sector. People with high myopia tend to have thinner corneal epithelium than low–moderate myopic patients. The corneal epithelial thickness is likely to be affected by some parameters, such as age, gender, and corneal thickness.

Single-step transepithelial versus alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy in the treatment of high myopia: a comparative evaluation over 12 months

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate refractive outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) versus alcohol-assisted PRK (EtOH-PRK) for the correction of high myopia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective non-randomised comparative study conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. Eyes with myopia (spherical equivalent (SE) larger than -6.00 D) that had undergone EtOH-PRK treatment combined with mitomycin C and TransPRK (SE: -7.53±0.90 D and -7.24±0.77 D, p=0.062), using the Schwind Amaris excimer laser, were included. 59 eyes (37 patients) that had single-step TransPRK were compared with 59 eyes (36 patients) that had EtOH-PRK. Visual and refractive outcomes, including analysis of astigmatism, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) at 6.0 mm optical zone, were compared for 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p>0.05). The SE deviation from target (SEDT) at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up visits were similar between groups (p=0.428). At 12 months, 81.3% and 73.3% of eyes that had undergone TransPRK and EtOH-PRK, respectively, were between ±0.50 D SEDT (p=0.381). Mean cylinder power was 0.33±0.26 D versus 0.41±0.30 D at 12 months follow-up (p=0.140). The mean success index was 0.50±0.50 for the TransPRK group and 0.49±0.52 for the EtOH-PRK group (p=0.939), while the absolute mean angle of error was 7.81°±61.98° vs 13.12°±71.86° (p=0.667), respectively. The change in total, spherical and comatic corneal HOAs were similar in both groups at 12 months (p>0.05). Haze was similar between both groups; two eyes had +1 haze at 12 months in the TransPRK group versus zero eyes among the EtOH-PRK group (p=0.154).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-step TransPRK for high myopia with or without astigmatism appears to yield similar visual, refractive and safety results as EtOH-PRK.

Corneal Epithelial Thickness Measured by Manual Electronic Caliper Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Distributions and Demographic Correlations in Preoperative Refractive Surgery Patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report the distributions and demographic correlations of corneal epithelial thickness measured by manual electronic caliper spectral domain optical coherence tomography in preoperative refractive surgery patients.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review.

METHODS

The charts of 218 consecutive patients (413 eyes) who presented for refractive surgery evaluation from April 2013 through September 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean corneal epithelial thickness was 51.0 μm with a range of 43 to 61 μm. Corneal epithelial thickness was significantly correlated with sex (P < 0.0001), corneal keratometry (P = 0.01), and underlying corneal thickness excluding the epithelium (P = 0.0268). No significant associations were identified in which corneal epithelial thickness correlated with either age (P = 0.0760) or existing refractive status of the eye (P = 0.5135).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal epithelial thickness measured by manual electronic caliper optical coherence tomography in preoperative refractive surgery patients is comparable with the findings for the general population using other measurement techniques, the awareness of which may be useful in the preoperative assessment of these patients.

Single-Step Transepithelial PRK vs Alcohol-Assisted PRK in Myopia and Compound Myopic Astigmatism Correction

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), where both the epithelium and stroma are removed in a single-step, is a relatively new procedure of laser refractive error correction. This study compares the 3-month results of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism correction by tPRK or conventional alcohol-assisted PRK (aaPRK).This prospective, nonrandomized, case-control study recruited 148 consecutive patients; 93 underwent tPRK (173 eyes) and 55 aaPRK (103 eyes). Refractive results, predictability, safety, and efficacy were evaluated during the 3-month follow-up. The main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE).Mean preoperative MRSE was -4.30 ± 1.72 D and -4.33 ± 1.96 D, respectively (P = 0.87). The 3-month follow-up rate was 82.1% in the tPRK group (n = 145) and 86.4% in aaPRK group (n = 90), P = 0.81. Postoperative UDVA was 20/20 or better in 97% and 94% of eyes, respectively (P = 0.45). In the tPRK and aaPRK groups, respectively, 13% and 21% of eyes lost 1 line of CDVA, and 30% and 31% gained 1 or 2 lines (P = 0.48). Mean postoperative MRSE was -0.14 ± 0.26 D in the tPRK group and -0.12 ± 0.20 D in the aaPRK group (P = 0.9). The correlation between attempted versus achieved MRSE was equally high in both groups.Single-step transepithelial PRK and conventional PRK provide very similar results 3 months postoperatively. These procedures are predictable, effective, and safe for correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism.

Early Changes in Corneal Epithelial Thickness after Cataract Surgery--Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To assess early variations in central and paracentral corneal epithelial and non-epithelial thicknesses after uneventful clear corneal incision phacoemulsification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with a senile cataract underwent coaxial phacoemulsification through a 2.75-mm-wide corneal incision created at 180° in a prospective cohort pilot study. Corneal sublayer thickness measurements were obtained with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) before and after 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. Central measurements were performed in the middle of the FD-OCT scan and in the 3-mm corneal diameter (paracentral 180° and 0° locations). Epithelial, non-epithelial and total corneal pachymetry were measured at the central and paracentral locations.

RESULTS

No significant changes in epithelial thickness were seen 1 week postoperatively. However, 1 month postoperatively, the central, 180°, and 0° paracentral epithelial thicknesses (52.7 ± 3.8, 53.1 ± 5.4, and 52.7 ± 5.3 µm, respectively) decreased significantly (p < 0.01) compared to preoperatively (57.2 ± 4.8, 58.0 ± 5.7, 56.6 ± 5.3 µm, respectively). The 1-week central, 180°, and 0° paracentral non-epithelial corneal thicknesses (515.5 ± 39.6, 534.3 ± 45.6, and 521.3 ± 36.9 µm) were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than preoperatively (486.2 ± 34.7, 498.2 ± 33.8, 497.5 ± 32.3 µm, respectively). The non-epithelial corneal thickness increase was significantly (p = 0.02) greater after 1 week in the central (29.3 ± 17.2 µm) and the 180° paracentral (36.1 ± 28.7 µm) locations than at the 0° paracentral location (23.8 ± 16.5 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate postoperative corneal edema following phacoemulsification irregularly affects the cornea at the sublayer level. The initial central and paracentral non-epithelial thickening is compensated by subsequent central and paracentral epithelial thinning. These initial changes occurred more markedly closest to the main incision over the entrance pupil, which may have visual implications.

One-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C as an early treatment for LASIK flap buttonhole formation

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of early one-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with mitomycin C as treatment for buttonhole formation during LASIK.

METHODS

Eight patients who developed a buttonhole during LASIK with mechanical or femtosecond flap creation underwent one-step transepithelial PRK a few days after the formation of the buttonhole. The re-treatment procedure was performed after complete epithelial healing and smooth epithelial fluorescein profile were ensured. Postoperative manifest refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, and haze formation were assessed during 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean duration of the re-treatment procedure after buttonhole formation was 5 days (range: 4 to 7 days). Mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent and cylinder refraction were -0.05 ± 0.18 and -0.18 ± 0.22 diopters, respectively, at 6 months postoperatively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 in all patients after 3 months of follow-up. No haze formation was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Early one-step transepithelial PRK with mitomycin C seems to be a safe and effective treatment for LASIK buttonhole complication.