Pars plana vitrectomy to repair retinal detachment following brachytherapy for uveal melanoma

Managing vitreoretinal complications in uveal melanoma: Surgical treatment and practical considerations

BACKGROUND

In the past few decades, the primary management for uveal melanoma has evolved from enucleation to eye-preserving treatments. However, despite achieving a high rate of local tumour control, complications following eye-preserving treatments still occur and are partly responsible for functional loss and secondary enucleation.

METHODS

A literature review by a broad international panel.

RESULTS

We summarised the current literature on utilizing vitreoretinal (VR) surgery for managing the complications of uveal melanoma. We also provided insights from the authors' personal experience and practical recommendations for clinical care.

CONCLUSIONS

With the advancement of VR instruments and surgical techniques and the combination of VR and ocular oncology knowledge ("Onco-VR"), it is now possible to manage or even prevent complications such as vitreous haemorrhage, retinal detachment, and toxic tumour syndrome.

Treatment-Related Complications and Functional Results after Ruthenium-106 Brachytherapy in Small to Medium Size Uveal Melanomas (Part 2)

PURPOSE

To analyze the treatment-related complications after ruthenium-106 brachytherapy in patients with uveal melanoma in terms of radiation-induced optic neuropathy, maculopathy and retinopathy, radiation-related vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment, as well as secondary glaucoma and radiogenic cataract. In addition, the course of visual acuity was analyzed.

PATIENTS/METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included 608 patients treated with ruthenium-106 brachytherapy between January 2008 and December 2010 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen. The follow-up time was 11 years. The occurrence of the radiation-induced complications was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for univariate and multivariate risk factor analyses. Hazard ratios were calculated for each variable.

RESULTS

Regarding the complications, 34% (N = 207) of the patients had no reported side effects or complications during follow-up. Radiation optic neuropathy was observed in 18.8% (N = 114) of the patients, with a median time to onset of 16 months (range: 3 - 78 months). Radiation maculopathy occurred in 8.2% (N = 50) after a median time of 17 months (range: 3 - 67 months). Radiation retinopathy was observed in 20.1% (N = 122), with a median time to onset of 21 months (range: 6 - 67 months). Secondary glaucoma developed in 9.7% of the patients (N = 53) and radiogenic cataract in 46.8% (N = 227). Vitreous hemorrhage (11.8%, N = 72) and scleral necrosis (2.1%, N = 13) occurred relatively rarely.

CONCLUSION

The observed radiogenic complication rate is comparable with that reported in previous studies.

Current and Emerging Radiotherapy Options for Uveal Melanoma

What treatment options are there for patients having uveal melanoma? A randomized, prospective, multi-institutional clinical trial (COMS) showed no difference in survival between brachytherapy and enucleation for medium-sized lesions. With the obvious benefit of retaining the eye, brachytherapy has flourished and many different approaches have been developed such as low-dose-rate sources using alternate low-energy photon-emitting radionuclides, different plaque designs and seed-loading techniques, high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources and applicators, and low- and high-dose-rate beta-emitting sources and applicators. There also have been developments of other radiation modalities like external-beam radiotherapy using linear accelerators with high-energy photons, particle accelerators for protons, and gamma stereotactic radiosurgery. This article examines the dosimetric properties, targeting capabilities, and outcomes of these approaches. The several modalities examined herein have differing attributes and it may be that no single approach would be considered optimal for all patients and all lesion characteristics.

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in choroidal melanoma: clinical features and surgical outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical features, prognostic factors, safety and rate of success of surgery and visual outcomes in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and choroidal melanoma (CM).

METHODS

A retrospective, observational case-series of 21 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or combined tractional-rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in patients with choroidal melanoma over a period of 20 years.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in the final analysis. The mean elevation of CM was 4.0 mm and the mean largest diameter was 11.0 mm. RRD occurred after the CM treatment in 14 eyes at a mean interval of 44.2 months. The RRD was macula-on RRD in 6 eyes, there was posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in 15 and PVR in 7 eyes. BCVA at presentation was 0.71 logMAR and final was 1.5 logMAR (p = 0.01). The primary surgical success rate was 59%. No intraocular or extraocular tumour dissemination occurred. Mean follow-up was 66 months.

CONCLUSION

RRD in patients with CM is uncommon but requires multidisciplinary management. Anatomical results are favourable but visual outcomes are poor due to a combination of factors related to melanoma treatment, macular retinal detachment and PVR. Vitrectomy as a surgical intervention for RRD in treated CM appears to be safe in terms tumour dissemination.

Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma: A Review of Ocular Complications

Uveal melanoma represents the most prevalent form of primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Historically, enucleation was considered the gold-standard approach in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Currently, radiotherapy is the most commonly used therapy, aiming at a better quality of life. However, radiotherapy can result in several ocular complications, some of which may be vision-threatening. Radiation-induced dry eye, scleral necrosis, cataract, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy are the most common complications. This article aims to summarize the current literature regarding the ocular complications after radiotherapy, as well as their clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies. A thorough understanding of these issues is crucial for ophthalmologists and oncologists to provide optimal patient care, improve visual outcomes, and minimize long-term complications.

Ocular Complications of Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Radiation therapy has replaced enucleation and is now the preferred treatment in most cases. Nonetheless, around 70% of patients develop radiation-related complications, some of which are vision-threatening. The objective of this review is to present the most important complications associated with radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma and their pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, and available preventive and therapeutic measures. The most common complications are cataracts, with a reported incidence ranging from 4% to 69%, and radiation retinopathy, reported in 5-68% of cases. Radiation-related complications are responsible for approximately half of secondary enucleations, the leading cause being neovascular glaucoma. A poor visual outcome is mainly associated with the presence of radiation retinopathy and radiation optic neuropathy. Therapeutic options are available for the majority of complications with the notable exception of optic neuropathy. However, many studies report a final visual acuity of less than 20/200 in more than 60% of treated eyes. Reducing complication rates can be achieved by lowering the dose of radiation, with the use of eccentric, customized plaques and careful planning of the irradiation delivery in order to protect structures vital to vision and by associating radiation therapy with other methods with the aim of reducing tumor volume.

Macular hole and vitreous hemorrhage subsequent to stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma: A case report and review of the literature

Choroidal melanoma is the leading primary intraocular tumor with potentially fatal outcomes in adults. The coexistence of choroidal melanoma and a macular hole is extremely rare, and treatment strategies and information on the prognosis of associated complications are currently lacking. We report the first case of choroidal melanoma complicated with a macular hole and vitreous hemorrhage after stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy in Japan, and review the relevant literature in relation to the possible mechanisms, treatment strategies, and outcomes. An 83-year-old male with choroidal melanoma was treated with stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy in January 2021. Five months later, a full-thickness macular hole developed, followed by an acute massive vitreous hemorrhage about 2 weeks later. Following confirmation of tumor regression, the patient underwent a pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. The macular hole was closed postoperatively and the patient’s best-corrected visual acuity improved to 20/125. There was no evidence of intraocular tumor dissemination or distant metastases during follow-up. A systematic literature search only identified 10 previous cases of choroidal melanoma with a macular hole in eight reports worldwide, mainly in females. Macular edema may be the primary cause of macular hole formation in these cases. Most patients who underwent vitrectomy for complications after tumor regression achieved a good prognosis. The development of a macular hole is a rare complication associated with choroidal melanoma. Anterior-posterior traction of posterior vitreous detachment and secondary macular edema may have contributed to the formation of the macular hole in the current case.

Complications and adverse events of plaque brachytherapy for ocular melanoma

Plaque brachytherapy is a well-accepted modality to manage selected cases of ocular melanoma. Although this modality provides validated oncologic and quality of life benefits, severe complications and adverse events can occur. This article reviews complications and adverse events of plaque brachytherapy, including scleral necrosis, strabismus, cataract, glaucoma, and retinopathies as well as management of these conditions. For practicing oncologists and ophthalmologists, these complications are important to understand, identify, and treat. Additionally, an understanding of common complications of brachytherapy should influence the decision of pursuing it as a treatment option.

Plaque brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma in 2018: improved techniques and expanded indications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Plaque brachytherapy remains the dominant globe-sparing therapy of uveal melanoma. This report highlights recent advances, which have expanded plaque brachytherapy's uses as well as improved the surgical technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

Plaque brachytherapy is effective for tumors that may previously have demanded enucleation. Plaque brachytherapy can be used to control large melanomas as well as melanomas touching the optic nerve. Improvements in planning and design have made plaque therapy simpler for the surgical operator and may reduce collateral radiation damage to normal ocular structures. The COMS implies a required dose of 85 Gy to the tumor apex for treatment of uveal melanoma. However, multiple reports indicate that lower doses may be equally effective for tumor control while reducing radiation dose to uninvolved structures. Vitreoretinal surgeons can be called upon safely to treat long-term side effects of radiation or tumor death such as intractable vitreous hemorrhage or inflammation. Further, vitreoretinal surgeons have employed tumor endoresection as primary local tumor control or in combination with plaque brachytherapy.

SUMMARY

Plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma remains highly effective for local tumor control and prevention of metastasis. Indications for plaque brachytherapy have expanded, and the technique has improved.

Incidence and indications for pars plana vitrectomy following the treatment of posterior uveal melanomas in Scotland

BACKGROUND

Globe-sparing treatments such as plaque brachytherapy, local or endoresection, and proton beam therapy (PBT) are the treatments of choice for posterior uveal melanoma. However, both early and late complications can arise from these techniques, including vitreous haemorrhage (VH) and retinal detachment (RD). Choroidal melanomas in Scotland are managed by a single unit, the Scottish Ocular Oncology Service (SOOS).

METHODS

Indications and outcomes from surgery were analysed for patients undergoing vitrectomy following treatment for uveal melanoma in the SOOS between 1998 and 2013.

RESULTS

Seventeen from 715 cases (2.4%) required vitrectomy, of which 8/445 (1.8%) followed plaque brachytherapy, 7/43 (16.3%) combined local resection and brachytherapy, and 2/227 (0.9%) PBT. Case notes were reviewed for 16/17 cases, with surgery indicated for VH in 10 (63%), RD in 5 (31%), and combined VH/RD in 1 (6%). The median interval from initial tumour treatment to vitrectomy was 5.8 months (range 10 days to 8.8 years). Ten (63%) required early vitrectomy (within 6 months), of which the majority (70%) followed combined resection/brachytherapy. Six (37%) required late vitrectomy (after 6 months), of which all were non-clearing VH following plaque brachytherapy, with proliferative retinopathy in 4/6 (67%), and tumour recurrence in 2/6 (33%). Overall vision improved in 8 eyes (50%), remained the same in 2 (12.5%), and deteriorated in 6 (37.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Early vitrectomy was most commonly indicated for RD following local resection, and late vitrectomy for VH due to radiation retinopathy. The majority of patients undergoing vitrectomy gained or maintained vision.

Update on Ophthalmic Oncology 2013: Retinoblastoma and Uveal Melanoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to discuss the clinical and translational content of the literature as well as advancement in our knowledge pertaining to retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma that were published from January to December 2013.

DESIGN

This study is a literature review.

METHODS

The search terms retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma were used in a MEDLINE literature search. Abstracts were studied, and the most relevant articles were selected for inclusion and further in-depth review.

RESULTS

In retinoblastoma, fewer eyes are lost because of the expanded use of ophthalmic artery chemosurgery and intravitreal melphalan, and the past year marks a deepening in our understanding of these modalities. Knowledge on the genetic underpinnings of uveal melanoma has broadened to include genes associated with a favorable prognosis. This is accompanied by promising results in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This past year, there were important advancements in our knowledge of retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma.