Predictors of radio-induced visual impairment after radiosurgery for uveal melanoma

Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma: A Review of Ocular Complications

Uveal melanoma represents the most prevalent form of primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Historically, enucleation was considered the gold-standard approach in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Currently, radiotherapy is the most commonly used therapy, aiming at a better quality of life. However, radiotherapy can result in several ocular complications, some of which may be vision-threatening. Radiation-induced dry eye, scleral necrosis, cataract, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy are the most common complications. This article aims to summarize the current literature regarding the ocular complications after radiotherapy, as well as their clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies. A thorough understanding of these issues is crucial for ophthalmologists and oncologists to provide optimal patient care, improve visual outcomes, and minimize long-term complications.

Visual outcomes of macular melanocytic lesions after early or delayed proton beam therapy

PURPOSE

During their initial management, some macular melanocytic lesions can be closely monitored to wait for a documented growth before advocating a treatment by irradiation. However, the visual outcomes of this strategy have not yet been assessed. This study compares the visual outcomes of macular melanocytic lesions that underwent delayed proton beam therapy (PBT) after an initial observation to those treated early.

METHODS

A total of 162 patients with suspicious melanocytic lesions whose margins were located within 3 mm of the fovea were recruited from two French ocular oncology centers.

RESULTS

Overall, 82 patients treated with PBT within 4 months after the initial visit (early PBT group) were compared to 24 patients treated with delayed PBT (delayed PBT group) and 56 patients not treated with PBT (observation group). Visual acuity was not significantly different between baseline and last visit in the observation group (p = 0.325). Between baseline and last visit, the median [IQR] loss in visual acuity was significant in both the early (0.7 [0.2; 1.8], p < 0.001) and the delayed (0.5 [0.2; 1.5], p < 0.001) PBT groups. After irradiation, there was no significant difference between the early and delayed PBT groups for visual loss (p = 0.575), diameter reduction (p = 0.190), and thickness lowering (p = 0.892). In multivariate analysis, history of diabetes mellitus and Bruch's membrane rupture remained significantly associated with greater visual loss (p = 0.036 and p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

For small lesions in which there is no clear diagnosis of malignant melanoma, an initial close monitoring to document tumor growth does not impact visual prognosis, despite the potential complications associated with the untreated tumor. However, the survival should remain the main outcome of the treatment of these lesions.

Ocular Complications of Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Radiation therapy has replaced enucleation and is now the preferred treatment in most cases. Nonetheless, around 70% of patients develop radiation-related complications, some of which are vision-threatening. The objective of this review is to present the most important complications associated with radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma and their pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, and available preventive and therapeutic measures. The most common complications are cataracts, with a reported incidence ranging from 4% to 69%, and radiation retinopathy, reported in 5-68% of cases. Radiation-related complications are responsible for approximately half of secondary enucleations, the leading cause being neovascular glaucoma. A poor visual outcome is mainly associated with the presence of radiation retinopathy and radiation optic neuropathy. Therapeutic options are available for the majority of complications with the notable exception of optic neuropathy. However, many studies report a final visual acuity of less than 20/200 in more than 60% of treated eyes. Reducing complication rates can be achieved by lowering the dose of radiation, with the use of eccentric, customized plaques and careful planning of the irradiation delivery in order to protect structures vital to vision and by associating radiation therapy with other methods with the aim of reducing tumor volume.

Every other day stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of uveal melanoma decreases toxicity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report the long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS/FSRT) in patients with uveal melanoma (UM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the results of patients treated between 2007 and 2019. The primary endpoints were local control (LC), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), enucleation-free survival (EFS) and treatment toxicity.

RESULTS

443 patients with 445 UMs were treated via CyberKnife®. According to the COMS classification, 70% of the tumors were small/medium and 30% were large. Median total RT dose was 54 Gy, median BED10 was 151 Gy. After a median 74-months follow-up, SRS/FSRT yielded an 83% overall LC rate. The 5- and 10-year LRFS rate was 74% and 56%, respectively. Patient age and the COMS size were prognostic for all survival endpoints. An increased SRS/FSRT dose was associated with higher LRFS and EFS rates. SRS/FSRT-related toxicity was observed in 49% of the eyes. Median visual acuity (VA) significantly deteriorated after SRS/FSRT in 76% of the treated eyes. The overall eye preservation rate was 62%, and the 5- and 10-year EFS rate was 64% and 36%, respectively. The delivery of FSRT every other day resulted in a significantly lower rate of toxicity and enucleation compared to FSRT on consecutive days.

CONCLUSION

A total dose of ≥45 Gy and BED_10Gy ≥ 112.5 SRS/FSRT is associated with a higher LC rate in patients with UM. Despite the favorable outcomes, treatment toxicity is the major limitation of this treatment. Toxicity and enucleation can be minimized by treating the eye every other day.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Indirect Dural Carotid-Cavernous Fistula: Long-Term Ophthalmological Outcome

Objective: The leading treatment option for dural carotid−cavernous sinus fistula is an endovascular approach with immediate improvement. Alternatively, radiosurgery is a slow response for obliterating the fistula and poses a radiation risk to the optic apparatus and the associated cranial nerves and blood vessels. In this study, we retrieved cases from a prospective database to assess the ophthalmological outcomes and complications in treating dural carotid cavernous sinus fistula with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). Material and Methods: We retrieved a total of 65 cases of carotid cavernous sinus fistula treated with GKRS with margin dose of 18−20 Gy from 2003 to 2018 and reviewed the ophthalmological records required for our assessment. Results: The mean target volume was 2 ± 1.43 cc. The onset of symptom alleviated after GKRS was 3.71 ± 7.68 months. There were two cases with residual chemosis, two with cataract, two with infarction, one with transient optic neuropathy, and four with residual cranial nerve palsy, but none with glaucoma or dry eyes. In MRA analysis, total obliteration of the fistula was noted in 64 cases with no detectable ICA stenosis nor cavernous sinus thrombosis. In the Cox regression analysis, post-GKRS residual cranial nerve palsy was highly correlated to targeted volume (p < 0.05) and age (p < 0.05). The occurrence of post-GKRS cataract was related to the initial symptom of chemosis (p < 0.05). Conclusion: GKRS for carotid cavernous sinus fistula offers a high obliteration rate and preserves the cavernous sinus vascular structure while conferring a low risk of treatment complications such as adverse radiation risk to the optic apparatus and adjacent cranial nerves.

Predictive factors of radio-induced complications in 194 eyes undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report the factors predictive of radio-induced complications (i.e. radiation retinopathy [RR], radiation papillopathy [RP] and neovascular glaucoma [NVG]) in uveal melanoma (UM) patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Longitudinal cohort study on patients with UM treated at the Ocular Oncology Service, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, between June 1994 and November 2018. Data were retrospectively reviewed. Rates of GKR-related complications were reported. Variables associated with each complication were investigated using multivariable Cox models and confirmed by logistic regression analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for significant associations.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients (99 males, 51%) were included, and 184 tumours were primarily located in the choroid (95%). Median follow-up was 57 months (range 6-286). Local control was achieved in 182 eyes (94%), and 152 eyes (78%) experienced at least one radiation-induced complication. Radiation retinopathy was documented in 67 eyes (35%) after a median of 23 months. Older age (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99, p = 0.02) had a protective effect for RR. Radiation papillopathy was diagnosed in 35 eyes (18%) after a median of 14 months after GKR. Macular or peripapillary location (HR = 3.06, 95% CI = 1.52-6.16, p = 0.002) was associated with increased risk of RP, while older age was protective (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.98, p = 0.001). New-onset NVG was found in 53 eyes (27%), and median onset was 28 months. Tumour thickness (HR = 4.41, 95% CI = 2.23-8.72, p < 0.001) and peripapillary location (HR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.46-5.27, p = 0.002) were the main risk factors associated with NVG.

CONCLUSION

Understanding factors predictive for radiation-related complications in patients undergoing GKR might help for better counselling and treatment planning.

Clinical outcomes and secondary glaucoma after gamma-knife radiosurgery and Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: a single institution experience

We retrospectively analyzed data from records of 48 patients (48 eyes) treated with gamma-knife (n = 18) or Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy (n = 30) for uveal melanoma, in our Ocular Oncology Unit between December 2013 and September 2019, with the aim to evaluate treatment outcomes, and incidence and risk factors for secondary glaucoma. Patients demographics and tumor characteristics at diagnosis were recorded. Follow-up data were collected regarding local tumor control, treatment complications, enucleation need, metastases occurrence and survival status. The median follow-up period was 33.7 months in the gamma-knife group and 26.2 months in the brachytherapy group. The mean tumor thickness, the largest basal diameter and the tumor volume were significantly higher in the gamma-knife group than in the brachytherapy group. The local tumor control rate was 100% in the brachytherapy group and 77.8% in the gamma-knife group. In the gamma-knife group, six patients were enucleated, no patient treated with brachytherapy underwent enucleation. The overall survival rate was 96.7% in the brachytherapy group and 94.44% in the gamma-knife group. Secondary glaucoma occurred in 10 patients after gamma-knife and in one patient after brachytherapy: it should be emphasized that larger lesions were treated with gamma-knife, whereas smaller tumors were selected for brachytherapy. We found a significative correlation of tumor thickness (P value = 0.043) and volume (P value = 0.040) with secondary glaucoma occurrence after gamma-knife treatment. Moreover, secondary glaucoma significantly correlated with radiation retinopathy in the gamma-knife group (P value = 0.009). This study shows preliminary clinical results that could be useful for further studies with more patients and longer follow-up.

Hypofractionated stereotactic photon radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma: 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term results after hypofractionated stereotactic photon radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with choroidal melanoma treated between 1997 and 2016.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 335 patients (183 male and 152 female) with choroidal melanoma unsuitable for ruthenium-106 brachytherapy or local resection were treated with linear accelerator-based SRT at the Medical University of Vienna. All patients received five fractions with either 10, 12 or 14 Gy per fraction. A complete ophthalmic examination including visual acuity and measurement of the tumor base and height using standardized A- and B-scan ultrasonography was performed every 3 months in the first 2 years, every 6 months until 5 years and yearly thereafter. Early and late adverse side effects were assessed at every follow-up visit.

RESULTS

The median overall follow-up was 78.6 months (39.1 to 113.7 months). Local tumor control was 95.4% after 10 and 12 years, respectively. Fifty-four patients developed metastatic disease, and 31 died during the follow-up. Mean visual acuity decreased from 0.55 Snellen at baseline to 0.05 Snellen at the last individual follow-up. Ischemic retinopathy (192/335cases) and optic neuropathy (174/335cases) were the most common radiogenic side effects, followed by radiogenic cataract (n = 127), neovascular glaucoma (n = 71) and corneal epithelium defects (n = 49). Enucleation was performed in 54 patients mostly due to neovascular glaucoma (n = 41) or tumor recurrence (n = 10) during the study period. The eye retention rate was 79.7% after 10 and 12 years.

CONCLUSION

Hypofractionated stereotactic photon radiotherapy showed a high rate of local tumor control for choroidal melanoma and an acceptable rate of radiogenic side effects.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanomas and metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gamma knife radiosurgery is regarded as the gold-standard stereotactic radiosurgery modality for the treatment of intracranial tumours, and its use has been expanded for the treatment of intraocular malignancies. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy, outcomes, and complications of gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanomas and metastases.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to aggregate the clinical outcomes of patients with uveal melanomas or intraocular metastases treated primarily with gamma knife radiosurgery. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies published between Sept 1, 1960, and Feb 1, 2020, reporting the use of gamma knife radiosurgery as primary treatment for uveal melanoma or uveal metastases. The search was restricted to clinical studies and relevant grey literature published in English. Studies reporting treatment of benign tumours, extraocular tumours, or other forms of stereotactic radiosurgery were excluded to reduce heterogeneity. No restrictions were placed on participant criteria. Local tumour control and tumour regression were extracted as the primary outcomes and analysed via a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions using the DerSimonian and Laird method with a Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019148165.

FINDINGS

Our search returned 454 studies, of which 109 were assessed for full-text eligibility. 52 studies, reporting on 1010 patients with uveal melanoma and 34 intraocular metastases, were eligible for systematic review. 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 840 of 898 patients (0·96, 95% CI 0·94-0·97; I²=16%) from 19 studies had local control, and 378 of 478 patients (0·81, 0·70-0·90; I²=83%) from 16 studies experienced tumour regression.

INTERPRETATION

Gamma knife radiosurgery is an efficacious primary method of treating uveal melanomas and intraocular metastases, with reliable tumour control rates. Randomised controlled trials should further evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery in this setting.

FUNDING

The Rhodes Trust and the Howard Brain Sciences Foundation.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Uveal Melanoma: A Retrospective Review of Clinical Complications in a Tertiary Referral Center

Introduction

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) has shown promising results in the treatment of intraocular uveal melanoma (UM) in terms of local tumor control. However, GKR is not free from potentially sight-threatening side effects, including cataract, dry eye disease, vitreous hemorrhage, radiation retinopathy (RR), radiation maculopathy (RM), optic neuropathy, and neovascular glaucoma. The aim of this paper is to report our 20-year experience in UM management with GKR focusing on the rate of clinical treatment-induced complications.

Methods

Single-center, retrospective, observational study, including all patients with UM treated at the Ocular Oncology and Uveitis Service, in the Department of Ophthalmology of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan from September 1993 to September 2018. Clinical charts comprised complete ophthalmological examination with measurement of best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, gonioscopy, and indirect ophthalmoscopy at each visit. B-scan ultrasound (Aviso S, 10 MHz probe; Paris, France), optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), retinography, and fundus fluorescein angiography (standard or ultra-widefield [UWF; California, Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK]) were performed aiding in the diagnosis of complications.

Results

Overall, 194 patients (100 males, 51.6%) were reviewed. The median age at the time of the treatment was 65 years (range 27-89) and all participants were Caucasian. In 185 eyes (95.4%), the tumor was primarily located at the choroid. The median follow-up was 57.6 months; radiation-induced complications were found in 145 eyes (74.7%). Radiation-induced cataract and RR were the most frequent events, with a relative incidence of 41.2 and 34.5%, respectively, followed by neovascular glaucoma (27.3%), optic neuropathy (18.6%), RM (11.4%), vitreous hemorrhage (14.4%), phthisis bulbi (7.7%), hyphema (0.5%), and corneal melting (0.5%). The shorter onset of side effects involved the optic nerve (median 14.9 months) and the macula (median 13.7 months).

Conclusion

Despite modern and advanced strategies introduced to limit GKR side effects, cataract and RR still represent a serious limitation of this treatment. Incidence of RR was higher in our cohort compared to other reports, probably due to increased diagnosis rate permitted by UWF retinal imaging.

3D WrapTM Ultra-Widefield Reconstruction in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Choroidal Melanoma

Choroidal melanoma (CM) is the most commonly diagnosed primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) has demonstrated reliable results in the treatment of CM, but it is limited by the risk of radiation-induced ocular complications. To optimize the dose of radiation focused on the tumor, and limit side effects, the eye should be properly immobilized before treatment. A recently released ultra-widefield imaging instrument (Optomap California; Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK) allows for an interactive three-dimensional (3D) virtual reconstruction of the globe, called 3D Wrap^TM. The authors share their experience with this rapid, reliable, and relatively easy support in planning globe positioning before GKR treatment.

Glaucomagenesis following ionizing radiation exposure

Glaucoma is a group of optic neuropathies causing optic nerve damage and visual field defects, and is one of the leading causes of blindness. Nearly a century has passed since the first report of glaucoma manifested following ionizing radiation therapy of cancers. Nevertheless, associations between glaucoma and radiation exposures, a dose response relationship, and the mechanistic underpinnings remain incompletely understood. Here we review the current knowledge on manifestations and mechanisms of radiogenic glaucoma. There is some evidence that neovascular glaucoma is manifest relatively quickly, within a few years after high-dose and high dose-rate radiotherapeutic exposure, but little evidence of excess risks of glaucoma after exposure to much lower doses or dose rates. As such, glaucoma appears to have some of the characteristics of a tissue reaction effect, with a threshold of at least 5 Gy but possibly much higher.

Optimizing radiosurgery with photons for ocular melanoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Photon radiotherapy has been established for the treatment of ocular melanoma (OM). Here we investigate the planning qualities of two different planning approaches, a combination of dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) complemented with multiple non-coplanar static intensity-modulated (IMRT) fields (DCA-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in combination with automated planning (AP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients treated for ocular melanoma with curative intent on a Linac-based radiosurgery system were analyzed. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) was applied using 50 Gy in 5 fractions using the combination of DCA-IMRT. Plans were reviewed and the thirteen cases were compared to plans obtained with optimized automated VMAT based on a set of 28 distinct patients treated with DCA-IMRT who were selected to generate the AP model for the prediction of dose volume constraints.

RESULTS

Overall, plan quality of DCA-IMRT was superior to AP with VMAT. PTV coverage did not exceed 107% in any case treated with DCA-IMRT, compared to seven patients with VMAT. The median PTV covered by >95% was 98.3% (91.9%-99.7%) with DCA-IMRT, compared to 95.1% (91.5%-97.9%) (p < 0.01) with VMAT. The median mean dose delivered to the treated eye was 22.4 Gy (12.3 Gy-33.3 Gy) with DCA-IMRT compared to 27.2 Gy (15.5 Gy-33.7 Gy) (p < 0.01). Dose to the ipsilateral lacrimal gland and the ipsilateral optic nerve were comparable for DCA-IMRT and VMAT, however, the dose to the lens was lower with DCA-IMRT compared to VMAT.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of multiple arcs complemented with multiple IMRT fields sets the gold standard for fSRS of ocular melanoma for photon therapy.