Safety of 5914 intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections

Optical coherence tomography-derived texture-based radiomics features identify eyes with intraocular inflammation in the HAWK clinical trial

Background and objective

Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents is the first-line treatment for patients with neovascular-age related macular degeneration (nAMD). One unique serious adverse event that may be associated with these agents is intraocular inflammation (IOI). The main purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the potential presence of texture-based radiomics features characterizing heterogeneity within the vitreous compartment of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images that may precede or develop in association with IOI and might serve as OCT biomarkers for IOI.

Methods

This is a post-hoc analysis of a subset of cases (N = 67) involving IOI, endophthalmitis, and/or retinal vascular occlusion in the phase 3 HAWK trial. These were investigator determined diagnoses that were also confirmed by the safety review committee. Intraocular inflammation was any signs of inflammation within the eye, endophthalmitis was inflammation associated with presumed infection, and retinal vascular occlusions consisted of intraocular inflammation with concurrent vascular occlusions/vasculitis. Out of 67 eyes, 34 belonged to the Safety group with an IOI event and 33 were propensity-matched Controls. A total of 481 texture-based radiomics features were extracted from the vitreous compartment of the SD-OCT scans at pre-IOI time point (i.e., much earlier than the actual event). Most discriminating five features, selected by the Wilcoxon Rank Sum feature selection were evaluated using Random Forest (RF) classifier on the training set (S t r , N = 47) to differentiate between the two patient groups. Classifier performance was subsequently validated on the independent test set (S t , N = 20). Additionally, the classifier performance in discriminating the Control and Safety group was also validated onS t at the IOI event timepoint.

Results

The RF classifier yielded area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.76 and 0.81 onS t using texture-based radiomics features at pre-IOI and event time-point, respectively.

Conclusions

In this analysis, the presence of a pre-IOI safety signal was detected in the form of textural heterogeneity within the vitreous compartment even prior to the actual event being identified by the investigator. This finding may help the clinicians to assess for underlying posterior inflammation.

A combination of suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone using a custom-made needle and intravitreal Ziv-aflibercept every eight weeks to manage naïve/denovo central DME: a single-center retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown promising effects of combining intravitreal bevacizumab and suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in treating DME. However, further research is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of combining both intravitreal Ziv-aflibercept and suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone acetonide using a custom-made needle in naïve and de novo central diabetic macular edema (DME) patients every eight weeks for 24 weeks.

METHODS

Central macular thickness was measured via spectral domain-optical coherence tomography, and best-corrected visual acuity was measured via a Snellen chart at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks postinjection. Additionally, cataract progression, intraocular pressure (IOP), and ocular safety were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 eyes of 6 patients were treated with suprachoroidal injections of triamcinolone acteonid combined with an intravitreal injection of Ziv-aflibercept. Vision improved from 0.69 log minimum angle of resolution (MAR) at baseline to 0.39 log MAR after treatment. Central macular thickness significantly decreased from 462.3 ± 166 μm at baseline to 362.7 ± 77.6 μm at 24 weeks postinjection.

CONCLUSION

Suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone using a custom-made needle with the intravitreal agent Ziv-aflibercept to treat de novo/naïve central DME has favorable outcomes and adequate safety results. Moreover, this study demonstrated the benefit of adapting the previous treatment combination for extending the interval between anti-VEGF treatments from 4 to 8 weeks, which could prevent further expenses, especially in low-income countries.However, large multicenter randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to assess this treatment route, especially in low-income and resourced countries.

Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept versus Bevacizumab for Naïve Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema: An Interim Analysis of a Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) and bevacizumab (IVB) injections for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Methods

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 3 monthly IVZ (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) or IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) followed by the pro-re-nata protocol for persistent or recurrent macular edema. The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness. An interim analysis was planned when half of the participants completed the follow-up.

Results

Twenty-four participants were recruited. At 6 months, mean best-corrected visual acuity in the IVB and IVZ groups improved from 1.23 ± 0.64 to 0.76 ± 0.56 logMAR (p = 0.003) and from 1.13 ± 0.59 to 0.53 ± 0.26 logMAR (p = 0.003), respectively. The percentage of visual improvement and reduction in central subfield thickness in the IVZ group were insignificantly better than those in the IVB group (44.41 ± 26.72 vs 39.64 ± 24.22%; p = 0.65) and (51.94 ± 20.35 vs 45.78 ± 24.71%; p = 0.51), respectively. Although the mean number of injections was lower in the IVZ group (4.55 ± 1.29 vs 4.82 ±1.33), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No ocular or systemic adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

The interim analysis demonstrated that the visual and anatomical results of IVZ were insignificantly better than those of IVB at 6 months of follow-up. The results also showed that IVZ was non-inferior to IVB for anatomical improvement but inconclusive for visual improvement.

Clinical Trial Registration

(identifier: TCTR20191205008).

Myopic macular diseases: A review

Recent evidence has demonstrated that the global public health burden of myopia is rising rapidly. Highly myopic eyes are associated with increased frequency of eye disorders that can lead to irreversible visual impairment. With recent technological advancement in ophthalmic imaging modalities, various macular complications associated with pathologic myopia are being elucidated. The development and progression of myopic chorioretinal atrophy, myopic macular neovascularization, myopic traction maculopathy and dome-shaped macula are vision-threatening myopic macular diseases. In order to overcome the challenges in managing patients with pathologic myopia, it is important to have a complete understanding in the natural course of these myopic macular diseases. Standardising the classification criteria of pathologic myopia is essential for enhancing clinical surveillance. Personalised pharmaceutical therapy and surgical interventions will help to optimise the treatment outcomes in patients suffering from these myopic macular diseases.

Effectiveness of the Use of Three-Dose Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in a Real-Life Setting

Purpose

It has been reported that intravitreal Ziv-aflibercept is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of diabetes macular edema (DME). The objective of this study was to evaluate in a real-life setting, the efficacy of intravitreal Ziv-aflibercept in the treatment of DME after the administration of three consecutive monthly doses.

Methods

A single arm, prospective cohort study. We included patients with DME who received three doses of intravitreal Ziv-aflibercept. Data such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and tomographic biomarkers before treatment and a month after the third dose were collected. DME was staged using the Panozzo classification.

Results

Thirty-eight patients participated for a total of 53 eyes. The mean age was 59 ± 8.1 years. We observed significant changes after the third dose in the parameters studied (BCVA in LogMAR pre-treatment (0.6 ± 0.33) and post-treatment (0.4 ± 0.29) [p<0.001], macular thickness pre-treatment (501 ± 167 µm) and post-treatment (324 ± 114 µm) [p<0.001], macular volume pre-treatment 10.8 (7.5-17.8) mm³ and post-treatment 9.3 (0-13.6) mm³ [p<0.005]). And 73.6% of the patients presented an advanced severe stage during their pre-treatment evaluation and after post-treatment, 64.2% of the patients no longer presented edema. No systemic or ocular adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

The use of three consecutive monthly doses of intravitreal Ziv-aflibercept in a real-life setting is effective and safe in the management of diabetic macular edema.

Switching to ziv-aflibercept in resistant diabetic macular edema non responsive to ranibizumab injection

Background

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of visual loss in diabetic patients and is managed using multiple anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents such as bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept. The present study evaluates effectiveness of intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept in resistant diabetic macular edema.

Methods

This is a prospective interventional study that was carried out on 59 eyes of 40 diabetic patients with diabetic macular edema resistant to three prior consecutive ranibizumab injections. On all patients, thorough ophthalmic evaluation including optical coherence tomography was performed. In patients with persistent intraretinal or subretinal fluid, ziv- aflibercept 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) was administered by intravitreal injection monthly during the 6 month study period from June to December 2019.

Results

The central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly from 395.08 ± 129.9 um at baseline to 282.39 ± 95.278, 245.36 ± 79.861 and 201.17 ± 54.042 after 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment respectively (p < 0.001). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in log MAR units was significantly improved from 0.95 ± 0.21 to 0.51 ± 0.23 after 6 months (p = 0.001). After treatment, negative correlations were detected between age, number of injections, duration of DM and level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and variation of both CMT and BCVA. The only significant predictor for low final CMT after 6 months of injection was the CMT after 3 months of injection (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Ziv-aflibercept is a highly effective and safe drug in cases of DME resistant to previous ranibizumab injections especially in low-income countries.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04290195) on 28-2-2020.

Safety review of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization

INTRODUCTION

Anti-angiogenesis therapy with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents is now the standard-of-care treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

AREAS COVERED

We provide a critical review of the safety of all the anti-VEGF agents currently used for treating myopic CNV including ranibizumab, aflibercept, conbercept, bevacizumab, and ziv-aflibercept.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-VEGF therapy for myopic CNV with the currently available anti-VEGF drugs generally have favorable safety outcomes in the short-term. Nonetheless, ocular adverse events following anti-VEGF therapy for myopic CNV may develop and these include worsening or new development of myopic traction maculopathy, increased risk of retinal detachment, and progression of chorioretinal atrophy. Clinicians should be aware of these potential complications and evaluate them before and after anti-VEGF therapy.

Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Intravitreal Bevacizumab

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) resistant to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in patients with persistent DME. Patients were switched to IVZ no longer than 6 weeks after the last three consecutive monthly IVB treatments and monitored over a course of 12 weeks. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and macular volume on optical coherence tomography were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 59 eyes (38 patients) were included. Mean BCVA improved from 0.84 to 0.71 logMAR (P = .001) after first IVZ treatment and remained significant. In a subgroup analysis, this significance was observed only in the group with baseline visual acuity of less than 20/50. Mean CMT decreased from 479 μm to 364 μm (P = .004) after the first IVZ injections and remained significant.

CONCLUSION

IVZ may be best reserved for patients with persistent DME after initial failure with bevacizumab, with less likelihood for anatomic or functional improvement in those with mild persistent DME. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:145-151.].

Efficacy of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in patients with macular edema following retinal vein occlusion in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana: a retrospective case series

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of ziv-aflibercept in Ghanaian patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODOLOGY

In this retrospective study, the medical records of patients with ME secondary to RVO who had been treated with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) (1.25 mg/0.05 ml), as part of routine clinical practice, on pro re nata basis with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were retrieved and analyzed. The main outcome measures are mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield foveal thickness (CSFT) measured on optical coherence tomography from baseline to 12 months post-IVZ, and ocular and systemic safety.

RESULTS

Forty-three eyes were included in this study. Their mean age was 62.8 ± 11.9 years, 67.4% had at least 12-month duration of follow-up, 50% had primary open-angle glaucoma and 38 (88.4%) eyes were treatment naive. There was significant improvement in mean BCVA in LogMAR at 1 month post-initiation of IVZ (0.8 ± 0.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.6), and visual improvement was maintained up to 12 months (p < 0.001). Eyes with ME following BRVO had better mean BCVA at baseline and on subsequent visits compared to eyes with CRVO/HRVO (p = 0.01). There was significant reduction in mean CSFT up to 12 months post-IVZ injection compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Ocular complications observed were consistent with complications associated with RVO.

CONCLUSION

We have observed significant improvement in functional and anatomic outcomes 12 months post-initiation of IVZ. There is the need to confirm long-term efficacy and safety of IVZ in a large prospective study.

Ziv-aflibercept for Better Regulating Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ZEBRA): A Prospective, Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine if ziv-aflibercept is a safe and effective maintenance drug for nAMD.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded trial. Inclusion criteria were active nAMD, prior anti-VEGF treatment, and BCVA ≤20/200. The treatment group received ziv-aflibercept. The control group continued their existing anti-VEGF regimen. The main outcome measures were BCVA, CFT, and safety.

RESULTS

Mean baseline BCVA was 1.58 ± 0.44 logMAR and 1.71 ± 0.39 logMAR in the control (n = 27) and treatment (n = 29) groups, respectively. After 24 months, the mean change in BCVA was 0.11 in the control group (equivalent to a loss of 5 ETDRS letters) and 0.01 logMAR in the treatment group (p = .48). Baseline CFT was 257 ± 33 μm and 247 ± 30 μm in the control and treatment groups, respectively, and after 24 months mean change in CFT was 26 μm and -5 μm (p = .24). There were no ocular or systemic adverse events during the study.

CONCLUSION

Ziv-aflibercept is a safe and effective as a maintenance drug for patients with nAMD. It may represent a cost-effective alternative to aflibercept and second-line therapy for eye resistant bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

Regression in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treated with ziv-aflibercept monotherapy – short term study

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) in the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and its efficacy in regard to polyp regression using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).

METHODS:

This was a retrospective study of eight eyes of eight patients with treatment-naïve PCV. Patients received IVZ on pro re nata protocol. OCT and ICGA parameters were assessed at baseline and subsequent visits with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. ICGA was repeated at 3–6 months to determine the disease activity and quantify the changes in branching vascular network (BVN) polyps. Quantifiable OCT parameters included central macular thickness, pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height, and subfoveal choroidal thickness.

RESULTS:

The mean age of the study cohort was 62.3 ± 7.7 years, with a mean follow-up of 7.1 ± 1.2 months. The baseline best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.70 ± 0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen's equivalent 20/100) to 0.63 ± 0.34 (20/80) at last follow-up which was statistically insignificant (P = 0.5). Post IVZ injections (mean ± standard deviation: 2.6 ± 0.7), the total number of polyps reduced significantly from 3 ± 3.5 to 1 ± 1.7 (P = 0.03) along with a reduction in BVN size (3.9 ± 4.8 to 2.7 ± 3.8mm²; P = 0.07). OCT analysis revealed a significant reduction in PED height from 462.5 ± 353.8 μ to 169.9 ± 127.2 μ (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION:

IVZ leads to significant morphological changes on ICGA and OCT in terms of polyp regression and reduction of PED height, respectively, with a limited change in visual acuity. IVZ may serve as a cost-effective alternative to treat eyes with PCV.

Risk of Inflammation, Retinal Vasculitis, and Retinal Occlusion-Related Events with Brolucizumab: Post Hoc Review of HAWK and HARRIER

PURPOSE

An independent Safety Review Committee (SRC), supported by Novartis Pharma AG, analyzed investigator-reported cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI), endophthalmitis, and retinal arterial occlusion in the phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER trials of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

DESIGN

A post hoc analysis of a subset of data from two 2-year, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled randomized phase 3 trials (NCT02307682, NCT02434328).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N = 1817) with untreated, active choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye were randomized and treated in HAWK/HARRIER. The SRC reviewed data from cases of investigator-reported IOI (60/1088 brolucizumab-treated eyes; 8/729 aflibercept-treated eyes).

METHODS

The SRC received details and images (color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and OCT) for all investigator-determined cases of IOI, retinal arterial occlusion, and endophthalmitis. Cases were reviewed in detail by ≥2 readers, then adjudicated by the SRC as a group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Within this patient subset: incidence of IOI, signs and incidence of retinal vasculitis and/or retinal vascular occlusion, and visual acuity loss; time since first brolucizumab injection to IOI event onset; and frequency of visual acuity loss after brolucizumab injection by time of first IOI event onset.

RESULTS

Fifty brolucizumab-treated eyes were considered to have definite/probable drug-related events within the spectrum of IOI, retinal vasculitis, and/or vascular occlusion. On the basis of these cases, incidence of definite/probable IOI was 4.6% (IOI + vasculitis, 3.3%; IOI + vasculitis + occlusion, 2.1%). There were 8 cases (incidence 0.74%) of at least moderate visual acuity loss (≥15 ETDRS letters) in eyes with IOI (7 in eyes with IOI + vasculitis + occlusion). Of the 8 cases, 5 experienced their first IOI-related event within 3 months of the first brolucizumab injection (increasing to 7/8 within 6 months). Incidence of IOI in aflibercept-treated eyes was 1.1%, with at least moderate visual acuity loss in 0.14%.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of IOI cases after brolucizumab injection identified signs of retinal vasculitis with or without retinal vascular occlusion and an associated risk of visual acuity loss. The findings will help physicians to evaluate the risks and benefits of brolucizumab treatment for nAMD.

Ciliary body length revisited by anterior segment optical coherence tomography: implications for safe access to the pars plana for intravitreal injections

Purpose

To investigate the dependence of the ciliary body length (CBL) on the axial length (AL) and to draw conclusions on implications regarding safe pars plana access for intravitreal injections and vitreoretinal surgery.

Methods

A total of 200 individuals (mean age 42 years, SD ± 15.4) were enrolled in the study. Objective refraction and AL were obtained. Spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) was used to image and measure the CBL.

Results

The mean SE was − 1.64 diopters (SD ± 3.15, range − 14.5 to + 9 diopters) and the mean AL was 24.19 mm (SD ± 1.65, range 19.8–32.2 mm). There was a significant correlation between SE and AL (r² = 0.62, p < 0.0001). Mean CBL correlated significantly with age (r² = 0.11, p < 0.0001), AL (r² = 0.23, p < 0.0001) and SE (r² = 0.25, p < 0.0001). The mean CBL was 3351 μm (SD ± 459, range 2184–4451 μm). Three separate groups were defined by their AL with a normal AL group (AL 22.5 to 25 mm), a short AL group (AL < 22.5 mm) and a long AL group (AL > 25 mm). The mean CBL in the normal AL group was 3311 μm (SD ± 427), in the short AL group 2936 μm (SD ± 335) and in the long AL group 3715 μm (SD ± 365), and differed significantly (p < 0.0001) when compared.

Conclusion

For interventions requiring pars plana access (as an intravitreal injection or vitreoretinal surgery), an incision distance of 3.5–4.0 mm posterior to the limbus is recommended. In our research, however, a difference of 0.77 mm in mean CBL between the group with short AL and the group with long AL is demonstrated, implying that the mean CBL in very short and very long eyes differs significantly. These findings suggest that the AL should be taken into account for pars plana access and that it would be advisable to prefer the shorter or longer recommended distance (3.5 and 4.0 mm, respectively) from the limbus, which correlates with the AL. If AL is > 25 mm, a distance of 4.0 mm from the limbus should be chosen; and if AL is < 22.5 mm, a distance of 3.5 mm seems adequate.

Trial registration number and date

NCT00564291, 27 Nov 2007

Pilot study of ziv-aflibercept in myopic choroidal neovascularisation patients

Background

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the most common sight-threatening complication associated with high myopia. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept in patients with myopic CNV.

Methods

This prospective interventional study was conducted on 20 eyes of 20 patients with active myopic CNV. Twelve patients were 40 years or older. This study was performed in the Ophthalmology Department of Tanta University Eye Hospital, Tanta University, Egypt. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed for all patients at baseline and monthly after injection during the 6-month follow up period. The main outcome measures were changes in BCVA and CMT. The exploratory outcome measures were CNV size, IOP and the number of injections needed in each age group during the study period.

Results

Patients with myopic CNV younger than 40 years needed fewer injections (2.00 ± 0.76) than patients older than 40 years (2.50 ± 1.00), with no statistical significance detected between the two groups (p-value 0.246). CNV was smaller in the younger age group (p-value 0.209), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly in the younger and older age groups (p-values 0.001 and 0.028, respectively), and central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly after 6 months, from 242.88 ± 23.83 μm to 191.13 ± 13.83 μm in the younger age group and from 251.33 ± 26.60 μm to 197.08 ± 17.64 μm in the older age group (p = 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the final BCVA and either the spherical equivalent or central macular thickness after 6 months, with p-values of 0.135 and 0.145, respectively. No significant changes in IOP were detected in either group after the intravitreal injection.

Conclusion

Ziv-aflibercept is a highly effective and safe drug in cases of active myopic CNV; however, a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period are needed to confirm our results.

This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04290195) on 26-2-2020.

Ziv-aflibercept: A cost-effective, off-label, highly potent antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor

Ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap^® ), a recombinant fusion protein that binds diffusible vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Its molecular structure is the same as aflibercept (Eylea^® ), thus making it an attractive option for the off-label treatment of chorioretinal vascular conditions. Ziv-aflibercept is distributed in 4 and 8 ml vials for intravenous use, and its cost after compounding is similar to bevacizumab. Studies with retinal pigment epithelium cytotoxicity, animal histologic sections and electroretinography have demonstrated its safety, and mathematical modelling combined with over four dozen clinical publications from different ophthalmic centres throughout the world attest to its efficacy. No appreciable differences in visual or anatomic outcomes between 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) and 2.5 mg (1.0 ml) doses have been noted. The long duration of action combined with the low cost make ziv-aflibercept an attractive anti-VEGF treatment option, especially in low- and middle-income countries where its popularity is increasing.

Use of Anti-VEGF Drugs in Retinal Vein Occlusions

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is one of the most prevalent causes of visual loss in the Western World. Its pathogenesis is still not completely known. Chronic macular edema and ischemia compromise the functional and anatomical status of the retina. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have demonstrated better results than other previous options, including observation or laser therapy. This narrative review aims to analyze the current aspects related to these drugs.

Comparison of Loading Doses of Ziv-Aflibercept and Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of 3 loading doses of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept in treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review which included cases with treatment-naïve nAMD. The patients were divided into 2 groups (group 1, ziv-aflibercept; group 2, aflibercept). Groups 1 and 2 received 1.25 mg/0.05 mL of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and 2 mg/0.05 mL aflibercept, respectively every month for 3 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Snellen and logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), central subfoveal thickness (CSFT), subretinal hyperreflective material height, neurosensory detachment height, and pigment epithelial detachment height were recorded at baseline and 3 monthly follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-three eyes of 23 patients were included (males 14, females 9). Twelve and 11 eyes were included in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Group 1 showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA (P < 0.001) and CSFT (P=0.007) through 3 months compared with baseline. There was significant change in BCVA from baseline at 1st month (P = 0.007), 2nd month (P = 0.002) and 3rd month (P = 0.008). In group 2, there was no significant improvement in BCVA, CSFT, subretinal hyperreflective material height, neurosensory detachment, and pigment epithelial detachment height from baseline through 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

After 3 loading doses, ziv-aflibercept showed efficacy in terms of improved BCVA and reduction of CSFT from baseline whereas aflibercept did not show such improvement. Considering the cost- effectiveness and the proven safety of ziv-aflibercept, it is a viable option for the crucial, initial 3 doses in the treatment of nAMD.

Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept : Safety Analysis in Eyes Receiving More Than Ten Intravitreal Injections

Purpose: To report the ocular and systemic adverse events in eyes receiving ≥10 intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) injections.Methods: Medical records of patients who received ≥10 IVZ for various chorioretinal conditions with minimum follow up period of 12 months were retrospectively analysed. These eyes received standard dose of IVZ (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) on pro-re-nata (PRN) or treat and extend (T&E) protocol. The primary study outcome was ocular and systemic adverse events related to IVZ injections whereas secondary outcomes were change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) at last visit compared to baseline. Comparison of BCVA and CMT at baseline and final visit was done using paired t-test.Results: A total of 94 eyes which received a mean ± standard deviation (mean±SD = 14.4 ± 4.6) IVZ injections were studied. A total of 41 eyes were treatment naïve whereas 53 eyes received intravitreal injections in the past with last injection at least 3 months prior. Mean (±SD) follow up period was 26.7 ± 8.7 months. Ocular adverse events were limited with a case each of acute iridocyclitis, endophthalmitis, cataract progression and early epiretinal membrane formation. No systemic events were recorded within a month of IVZ injection. There was a significant improvement in BCVA (p = 0.001) and change in CMT (p = 0.001) at last visit.Conclusion: Ocular use of ziv-aflibercept is safe with limited ocular and systemic side effects. Multiple injections of IVZ can be used in various chorioretinal diseases over the long term.

Correlation of Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity in DME Treated by Two Doses of Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept Versus Bevacizumab: Analysis of a Randomized, Three-Armed Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To report the correlation of central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 1-year treatment by two doses (2.5 mg or 1.25 mg) of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) versus bevacizumab (IVB) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, the correlation of CMT and BCVA changes of the eyes enrolled in a previous clinical trial of 123 eyes were re-evaluated. The correlation of BCVA and CMT changes at each visit was evaluated in the three study arms individually. Then, the eyes in each of the arms were classified at each follow-up visit into three subgroups based on their CMT changes related to the baseline CMT: CMT decrease of 30% or more of baseline CMT, between 10% to 29% of baseline CMT, and less than 9% of baseline CMT or CMT increase.

RESULTS

BCVA and CMT changes were correlated significantly (P < .05) in all and in half of the follow-up visits, respectively, in the eyes treated by IVZ 1.25 mg and IVB (r = 0.554 and r = 0.617 at 1 year, respectively). Nevertheless, such a significant correlation was not detected in the eyes treated by IVZ 2.5 mg in any of the follow-up visits (r = 0.202 at 1 year; P = .259). In the IVZ 2.5 mg group, BCVA improvement was observed in all subgroups with each level of CMT reductions.

CONCLUSION

Ziv-aflibercept 2.5 mg might have a beneficial effect on DME beyond thickness reduction. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:684-690.].

Safety of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in choroido-retinal vascular diseases: A randomised double-blind intervention study

AIM

To evaluate the safety of 1.25mg and 2mg intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) in Ghanaian eyes with choroido-retinal vascular diseases.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, double blind, interventional study.

METHODS

Twenty patients with centre involving macular oedema in diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and neovascular age-related macular degeneration were assigned to 2 groups receiving 3 doses of 1.25mg/0.05ml (group 1) and 2mg/0.08ml IVZ (Group 2) at 4 weekly intervals. Safety data was collected after 30 minutes, 1 and 7 days, and 4, 8 and 12 weeks after injection. Changes in continuous variables were compared using paired t-test and categorical variables were compared using chi-square test of proportions. Repeated-Measures ANOVA with nesting test was used to compare variations in continuous variables by IVZ dose over time. Primary outcome measures were ocular and systemic adverse events at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Eleven females and nine males, with mean age of 63.2± 7.3 years were included. Ocular adverse events included subconjunctival haemorrhage in 1 eye, intraocular pressure (IOP) >21mmHg at 30 minutes in 6 eyes and mild pain in 3 eyes at 1-day. There was no significant difference in IOP rise between the 2 groups at 30 minutes (p = 0.21). No other ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. There was significant improvement in the best corrected visual acuity (LogMAR) from 0.95±0.6 to 0.6±0.4 (p<0.01) and 0.47±0.3 (p<0.01), reduction in central subfield foveal thickness from 405.9±140 um at baseline to 255.6±75 um (p<0.01) and 238±88 um (p<0.01) at 4 and 12 weeks respectively, although no difference was observed between the 2 groups (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

IVZ at 1.25mg and 2mg had similar safety profiles, and did not have any major unexpected adverse events. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to confirm efficacy.

Bevacizumab versus ziv-aflibercept in branch retinal vein occlusion

Purpose:

To compare the effectiveness of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) in patients with macular edema (ME) post-branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods:

Patients with treatment naïve ME post-BRVO were included retrospectively if they received either IVB (0.05 ml/1.25 mg) or IVZ (0.05 ml/1.25 mg) monotherapy with a follow up of 12 months.

Results:

Thirty-two and 17 eyes received IVB and IVZ, respectively. The mean improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.36 ± 0.3 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the IVB group and 0.27 ± 0.3 in the IVZ group (P = 0.35). The mean change in central macular thickness was 178.9 ± 180.9 and 173.5 ± 344.4 μm in IVB and IVZ groups, respectively (P = 0.94). The mean number of injections was higher in the IVB group (4.0 ± 1.8) compared with 1.82 ± 0.8 in the IVZ group (P < 0.0001). The IVZ group had significantly fewer number of visits (P < 0.0001) and longer maximum treatment-free intervals (P = 0.0081).

Conclusion:

IVZ appears to be cost-effective with the similar visual outcome and less number of visits in comparison to IVB.

Correlation analysis of fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and visual function in patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between fundus autofluorescence and morphologic parameters as well as visual function in patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept.

METHODS

A total of 34 eyes of 20 patients with untreated diabetic macular oedema received an intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept at baseline, and 1 and 2 months later. The baseline, 1-month, and two-month best corrected visual acuity determination, contrast sensitivity, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, mean central macular thickness, mean macular cube volume, mean macular cube average thickness, and fundus autofluorescence (decreased, normal, or increased; and single or multiple spots) were measured. Correlation analysis with a determination of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, regression analysis, agreement between investigators, and Friedman's test were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A direct correlation was observed between baseline fundus autofluorescence and macular cube average thickness at 1 month (r = 0.51, p = 0.020) and between fundus autofluorescence at 1 month and baseline macular cube average thickness (r = 0.50, p = 0.021). Regression analysis showed a coefficient of determination of 0.29 (p = 0.016) between baseline fundus autofluorescence and macular cube average thickness at 1 month.

CONCLUSION

In patients with diabetic macular oedema, the pretreatment baseline degree of foveal fundus autofluorescence might be helpful in predicting macular cube average thickness in patients undergoing treatment with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in the short term.