Two-year observation of posterior corneal elevations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia higher than -10 dioptres

Regional analysis of posterior corneal elevation after laser refractive surgeries for correction of myopia of different degrees

PURPOSE

To evaluate regional changes in the posterior corneal elevation after three laser refractive surgeries for correction of myopia of different degrees.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative, and non-randomized study.

METHODS

Two hundred patients (200 eyes) who underwent laser epithelial keratoplasty (LASEK), femtosecond-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) were included in this study. According to preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), each surgical group was divided into two refractive subgroups: low-to-moderate myopia (LM group) and high myopia (H group). The posterior corneal elevation from Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography was analyzed preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Three subregions of the posterior cornea were divided in this study as the central, paracentral, and peripheral regions.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).

RESULTS

For all three surgical groups, similar changing trends were seen in the two refractive subgroups. H group presented a larger changing magnitude than the LM group in FS-LASIK over time ( P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was noted in the two refractive subgroups of LASEK or SMILE ( P > 0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the central posterior corneal elevation returned to the preoperative level in LASEK ( P > 0.05) but shifted forward significantly in FS-LASIK and SMILE ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Different posterior corneal regions respond differently to corneal refractive surgeries. LASEK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE demonstrate different trends in the regional changes in posterior corneal elevation. The corneal shape seems more stable in LASEK than in FS-LASIK and SMILE.

Comparison of different corneal residual bed thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the corneal biological parameters stability between the different corneal residual bed thickness (RBT) after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

In this prospective clinical trial, 127 eyes of 64 patients underwent SMILE. According to the corneal RBT, the patients were divided into the 250-270 µm, 270-290 µm and 290-310 µm groups. Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) measurements were performed preoperatively, 1 day, 1week, 1month and 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The keratometer values among the three groups were no significant differences in postoperative periods (each P > 0.05), except the corneal thickness values (each P < 0.05). In the 250-270 µm and 270-290 µm groups, the keratometer and corneal thickness values were decreased at postoperative 1 week and increased at 1 and 3 months. The 290-310 µm group significantly higher posterior maximum elevation (PME) than the 250-270 µm group at 1 and 3 months (P = 0.022, 0.022, respectively), and higher preoperative thinnest point (PTE) at 1 week and 1 month (P = 0.013, 0.035, respectively). The PME of the 290-310 µm group was higher than the 270-290 µm group at 3 months (P = 0.045), and higher PTE at 1 week and 3 months (P = 0.022, 0.02, respectively). In all three groups, the maximal deformation amplitude (DA) was significantly higher at 1 and 3 months compared to postoperative 1 day and 1 week, and the IOP was decreased at 1 month then recovered at 3 months (each P < 0.05).The DA of the 250-270 µm group was significantly higher than the 290-310 µm group at postoperative 1 week, 1 and 3 months (P = 0.001, 0.01, 0.02, respectively). The change of the posterior corneal elevation and biomechanical parameters values were no significant differences among the three groups in postoperative periods (each P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The range of 250-310 µm RBT was safe and stable at the early postoperative of SMILE. The RBT may be positively correlated with the posterior corneal elevation.

Long-Term Visual Quality and Pupil Changes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Eyes without Preoperative Cylinder Refraction

Purpose

To investigate the long-term changes in visual quality and pupil size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for eyes without preoperative cylinder refraction.

Methods

Thirty-three myopic eyes (33 patients) without preoperative cylinder refraction were corrected using SMILE. Refractive outcomes, corneal curvature, aberrations, contrast sensitivity (CS), and pupil diameter were evaluated preoperatively, and 30 months postoperatively.

Results

The 30-month postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, LogMAR) were -0.10 ± 0.09 and -0.14 ± 0.06, respectively, whereas the preoperative CDVA (LogMAR) was -0.07 ± 0.05. Cylinder refraction of -0.11 ± 0.21 D (ranging from -0.50 to 0.00) was observed at 30 months postoperatively, increasing from the preoperative cylinder refraction of 0.00 ± 0.00 D (P=0.004). Moreover, the centroid coordinates x, y of corneal anterior astigmatic vectors were -0.19 ± 0.22, 0.81 ± 0.33 at 30 months postoperatively, and 0.02 ± 0.28, 0.76 ± 0.51 preoperatively (Px < 0.001 and Py=0.810, respectively). Furthermore, a 15° axis change in the mean anterior corneal astigmatic vector was observed at 30 months postoperatively from the preoperative state, as measured by Pentacam. At 30 months postoperatively, the photopic Log CS reduced significantly with glare at three and six cycles/degrees (P < 0.001 and P=0.015, respectively), a decreased photopic pupil diameter (3.27 ± 0.55 mm vs. 3.10 ± 0.66 mm, P=0.030), and an increased Coma (Z31) and Trefoil (Z3-3) at 4 mm diameter area analysis. However, a significant linear regression relationship was only observed between changes in photopic pupil diameter and changes in photopic Log CS with glare at 12 cycles/degree (P=0.038 and β = 0.282).

Conclusion

Slight cylinder regression was observed with thicker corneal lenticular extraction after SMILE correction of nonastigmatic eyes 30 months postoperatively. This regression was mainly because of the axis changes in anterior corneal astigmatism power. Therefore, a cylinder nomogram modification of 0.25 to 0.50 D is considerable for correcting nonastigmatic myopic eyes with a predicted spherical lenticular thickness over 100 µm.

Correlation between the ablation ratio and posterior corneal stability after small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate changes in posterior corneal elevation and their correlations with the ablation ratio 3 years after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia.

METHODS

Eighty eyes underwent SMILE were enrolled in this study. Eyes were classified into two groups based on the ablation ratio (AR, lenticule thickness from SMILE machine/thinnest corneal thickness): group A (< 25%, 40 eyes) and group B (≥ 25%, 40 eyes). Pentacam was used to measure the posterior corneal elevation at the central point, thinnest point, and posterior maximum elevation (PME) and the mean posterior elevation in the central 2-mm area (MPE-2 mm), 4-mm area, and 6-mm area at the 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

More than 85% of the eyes had an AR of less than 27%, and no cases of iatrogenic keratectasia developed. In both groups, for central region, posterior elevation decreased implying backward displacement; for peripheral region, it increased indicating forward trend. There was no significant difference in changes in all determined parameters between the two groups (P ≥ 0.07). Moreover, no significant correlation was noted between AR and posterior elevation changes. In group A, decreasing changes in PME (r =  - 0.42, P = 0.01) and MPE-2 mm (r = 0.40, P = 0.01) demonstrated negative correlations with residual bed thickness.

CONCLUSION

Region-dependent changes were demonstrated in the eyes that underwent SMILE. The central area showed a subtly declining posterior elevation, and the peripheral area showed a slightly increasing elevation. The limited ablation ratio had no impact on the changes in posterior corneal elevation.

Predictive factors of posterior corneal shift after small incision lenticule extraction: a 5-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine risk factors affecting changes in posterior corneal elevation (PCE) and predict the 5-year stability after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

This retrospective, longitudinal study enrolled 161 patients post-SMILE. The PCE values were measured at the apex, thinnest, maximal and 24 other prespecified preoperative points and at 6 months, 1 year and 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Posterior corneas exhibited time-dependent, region-dependent and angle-dependent changes. For every dioptre increase in the absolute preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), 10-μm decrease in the central corneal thickness (CCT), 10-μm increase in the maximum lenticule thickness (MLT), 10-μm decrease in the residual bed thickness (RBT), 10% increase in the percentage ablation depth (PAD, MLT divided by CCT) and 10% decrease in the percentage stromal bed thickness (PSBT, RBT divided by CCT), PCE exhibited average forward displacements of 0.2-0.4, 0.2-0.7, 0.1-0.2, 0.1-0.3, 0.6-1.0 and 0.5-1.1 μm, respectively (p < 0.05). PSBT was the variable with the highest accuracy in predicting 5-year stability of posterior corneas (area under curve = 0.75). The cut-off values of SE, CCT, MLT, RBT, PAD and PSBT for increased PCE were -8.00 to -8.31 D, 481.0-498.5 μm, 139.5-144.5 μm, 255.5-263.5 μm, 26.9-28.3% and 48.9-52.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Eyes with thinner corneas, higher myopia requiring greater MLT and lower RBT exhibited greater predispositions towards posterior protrusion. The thresholds for preventing forward posterior corneal displacement were 26.9-28.3% for PAD and 48.9-52.6% for PSBT. Prediction of posterior corneal stability is useful for assessing surgical risks post-SMILE.

Three-Year Follow-Up of Posterior Corneal Elevation in Thin Corneas After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in posterior corneal elevation in thin corneas after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

In this prospective study, 97 eyes of 97 patients undergoing SMILE were recruited. Eyes were categorized into the following groups based on the preoperative minimum central corneal thickness (CCT): group A (37 eyes, 480–499 μm), group B (30 eyes, 500–529 μm), and group C (30 eyes, 530–560 μm). The posterior corneal surface was measured with a Pentacam over a 3-year follow-up period. Changes in the posterior corneal elevation at the central point (PCE), thinnest point (PTE), and predetermined area were measured.

Results

No iatrogenic keratectasia was observed during the follow-up period. The mean changes in PCE, PTE, and the inferior area in group A were 1.14 ± 3.40 μm, −0.11 ± 3.20 μm, and −0.26 ± 1.23 μm, respectively (P ≥ 0.125). Although statistically significant change in the central-4 mm area was noted, the value was quite small (0.98 ± 1.67 μm) and was not higher than that in the other two groups (P = 0.003). For all three groups, the elevation remained stable or showed a backward change in the central annulus, while there was a small forward displacement in the 6-mm optical zone. In group A, changes in elevation values yielded negative statistical correlations with residual bed thickness and CCT (P ≤ 0.006) (except for the inferior area, the 4-mm and 6-mm optical zone).

Conclusions

With a strict preoperative assessment, SMILE achieved good safety and efficacy in correcting myopia in thin corneas and enabled a stable posterior corneal surface over a 3-year follow-up period.

Synopsis

Careful preoperative assessment and suitable surgical design should be taken to ensure posterior corneal stability after SMILE in thin corneas.

Bilateral Corneal Ectasia 3 Years After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in a Borderline Case

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report a case of bilateral ectasia 3 years after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in a patient with normal preoperative topography of the right eye and abnormal topography of the left eye.

METHODS

This study was a case report.

RESULTS

A 22-year-old man developed bilateral corneal ectasia after SMILE. The preoperative corneal topography of the right eye was unremarkable, with a minimum corneal thickness of 511 μm in the right eye, and the abnormal corneal topography of the left eye revealed a risk factor for developing ectasia, with a minimum corneal thickness of 514 μm in the left eye. The refractive error was -4.50 to 3.50 × 10 degrees in his right eye and -4.25 to 3.50 × 0 degrees in his left eye with a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20. An uncomplicated SMILE was performed; after his last follow-up visit at 1 month, the patient was lost to follow-up for 3 years. After that time, he presented with visual loss with left predominance. Bilateral ectasia was diagnosed through corneal topography, and crosslinking was performed in both eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a very few reports of corneal ectasia after SMILE with normal preoperative topography.

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes and Posterior Corneal Elevation Change After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Suspicious Corneas

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term clinical outcomes and change in posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with suspicious tomographic features.

SETTING

Hospital clinic.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case-controlled, observational.

METHODS

This study included 43 patients with suspicious corneas (group A), defined by corneal morphology and a final D score from a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), and 43 patients with normal corneal topography (group B). Refraction, visual acuity, and posterior corneal elevation over a 6-mm central diameter, including posterior central elevation (PCE), posterior elevation at the thinnest point (PTE) and posterior maximal elevation (PME), were measured preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 36 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The preoperative spherical equivalent was -5.51±1.33 D in group A and -5.41±1.19 D in group B. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 39/43 eyes (91%) in group A and 41/43 eyes (95%) in group B (P=0.160); all eyes in both groups remained stable or had gained corrected distance visual acuity. The mean change in PCE, PTE and PME at 3 years was -1.22±2.65 μm, -1.21±2.70 μm and -1.00±5.09 μm, respectively, in group A and -1.76±3.25 μm, -1.60±3.33 μm and -1.56±5.01 μm in Group B, indicating a tendency for backward displacement of the posterior surface while the between-group difference was not statistically significant (P=0.154, P=0.547, P=0.319).

CONCLUSIONS

Refraction, visual outcomes, and posterior corneal shift seem comparable between corneas with normal and suspicious tomographic features three years after SMILE. More long-term studies are warranted to corroborate the findings of this study.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Pediatric Unilateral Anisometropic Myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on treating unilateral myopic anisometropia in children with spectacles or contact lens intolerance.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included children with unilateral myopic anisometropic amblyopia who underwent a SMILE procedure at Alpha Vision Center, Zagazig, Egypt, from January 2014 to December 2016.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four eyes of 124 patients were included in this study. The postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at the 3-month and 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year follow-up visits improved significantly (P < .05) compared to the preoperative CDVA, indicating the safety of the procedure. At the 3-month postoperative visit, 23% of cases showed improvement of one or more lines of CDVA, whereas only 2% of cases showed a decline of only one line. Moreover, the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity compared favorably to the preoperative CDVA, denoting the efficacy of the refractive correction. The spherical equivalent was within ±0.50 diopters of the intended correction in 75% of the cases and within ±1.00 diopters in 89% of the cases. The intraoperative complications were scarce and relatively innocuous.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE is a safe and effective alternative method for correcting myopic anisometropic amblyopia in children with spectacles or contact lens intolerance with good refractive results. A larger study with longer follow-up periods is necessary to determine the long-term effects of SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(8):510-515.].

Clinical outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia: A meta-analysis

AIM

To compare postoperative clinical outcomes of high myopia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

From March 2018 to July 2020, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and several Chinese databases were comprehensively searched. The studies meeting the criteria were selected and included; the data were extracted by 2 independent authors. The clinical outcome parameters were analyzed with RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included twelve studies involving 766 patients (1400 eyes: 748 receiving SMILE and 652 receiving FS-LASIK). Pooled results revealed no significant differences in the following outcomes: the logarithm of the mean angle of resolution (logMAR) of postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.02 to 0.00, I2 = 0%, P = 0.07 at 1 mo; WMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.01, I2 = 0%, P = 0.83 at 3 mo; WMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.00, I2 = 32%, P = 0.33 in the long term), and the postoperative mean refractive spherical equivalent (WMD = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.03, I2 = 13%, P = 0.30). However, the SMILE group had significantly better postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) than the FS-LASIK group (WMD = -0.04, 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.02, I2 = 0%, P<0.00001). In the long term, postoperative total higher-order aberration (WMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.07, I2 = 7%, P<0.00001) and postoperative spherical aberration (WMD = -0.15, 95% CI: -0.19 to -0.11, I2 = 29%, P<0.00001) were lower in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group; a significant difference was also found in postoperative coma (WMD = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.06 to -0.03, I2 = 30%, P<0.00001).

CONCLUSION

For patients with high myopia, both SMILE and FS-LASIK are safe, efficacious and predictable. However, the SMILE group demonstrated advantages over the FS-LASIK group in terms of postoperative CDVA, while SMILE induced less aberration than FS-LASIK. It remains to be seen whether SMILE can provide better visual quality than FS-LASIK; further comparative studies focused on high myopia are necessary.

Four-Year Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Extreme High Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the treatment of high myopia and myopic astigmatism >−10.0 D.

Methods: This was a prospective study that incorporated 35 consecutive patients (35 eyes) undergoing SMILE from September 2015 to March 2016. These patients had a mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of −10.06 ± 0.64 D. Patients were followed over a 4-year period and assessed for outcomes including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, and corneal topography.

Results: At 4 years post-SMILE, respective efficacy and safety indices were 1.01 ± 0.19 and 1.07 ± 0.15. In total, 97% of operated eyes achieved an UDVA of 20/25 or better. ≥1 line was gained for 9 eyes (26%), with 25 eyes (71%) remaining stable. Twenty-four (69%) and 33 (94%) eyes, respectively, were within ±0.50 D and ±1.0 D of target refraction. From 3 months to 4 years postoperatively, a mean refractive regression of −0.22 D (−0.06 D per year) was detected, whereas no significant changes in mean corneal back curvature or posterior central elevation were detected (P = 0.617 and 0.754, respectively). We detected significant increases in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of the anterior and total cornea (all P < 0.001), with spherical aberrations and vertical coma being particularly common, whereas posterior corneal HOA remained fairly stable (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: SMILE is a safe, effective, predictable, and stable means of correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism over a 4-year postoperative period.

Impact of ablation ratio on 5-year postoperative posterior corneal stability after refractive surgery: SMILE and FS-LASIK

BACKGROUND

To investigate the impact of the ablation ratio on 5-year postoperative posterior corneal stability in myopic eyes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study: 80 eyes of 43 patients underwent SMILE surgery and 63 eyes of 32 patients underwent FS-LASIK surgery at the EYE & ENT Hospital, Fudan University. Ablation ratio was defined as lenticule thickness (SMILE cases) or ablation depth (FS-LASIK cases) divided by central corneal thickness (CCT). Posterior corneal elevation changes were recorded as posterior central elevation (PCE), posterior corneal surface at thinnest point (PTE) and posterior corneal mean elevation (PME). Patients were followed up at 6-month and 5-year interval to investigate the impact of the ablation ratio on posterior corneal elevation after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery.

RESULTS

PCE dropped at the 6-month follow-up for both SMILE (decreased by -1.11 ± 2.93 μm, P < 0.05) and FS-LASIK groups (decreased by -0.46 ± 3.72 μm, P < 0.05). PTE also dropped in SMILE (reduced by -2.04 ± 3.02 μm, P < 0.05) and FS-LASIK group (reduced by -1.28 ± 4.21 μm, P < 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Stable PCE (elevation change: SMILE -0.28 ± 4.03 μm; FS-LASIK 0.79 ± 4.13 μm, P > 0.05) and PTE (elevation change: SMILE -0.08 ± 4.28 μm; FS-LASIK 1.42 ± 3.85 μm, P > 0.05) for both groups were recorded at the 5-year follow-up compared to the 6-month visit. Ablation ratio was strongly correlated with 5-year postoperative PCE (β = 2.68 ± 1.05, P < 0.01) and PTE (β = 2.35 ± 1.17, P < 0.05). Cut-off value for 5-year postoperative raised PCE and PTE was 27.3 and 27.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation ratio was strongly correlated with postoperative posterior corneal elevation in a 5-year follow-up in both SMILE and FS-LASIK groups. PCE and PTE underwent slight backward displacement 6-month postoperatively and remain stable at the 5-year follow-up. Threshold of the ablation ratio for resisting forward displacement of posterior corneal surface was 27.3 and 27.1% for SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively.

Short-term changes in the anterior segment and retina after small incision lenticule extraction

Background

To analyse short-term changes in the anterior segment and retina after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Patients with myopia scheduled for SMILE were recruited from Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. Basic patient information such as age, sex, and refractive errors was recorded. Ocular measurements were taken before surgery, and 1 day and 1 week after surgery; they included axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), white to white (WTW), pupil diameter (PD), macular thickness (MT), ganglion cell layer thickness (GCL), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL), choroidal thickness (CT), macular vessel density, and optic disc vessel density.

Results

Sixty-one eyes of 31 patients were selected for this study. AL, CCT, ACD, and postoperative PD were significantly reduced (p < 0.05), while LT was thickened after surgery (p < 0.05). MT at the fovea decreased 1 day and 1 week after surgery (p < 0.05). GCL showed no significant changes after surgery. RNFL was unchanged 1 day after surgery, but the inferior sector was thickened 1 week after surgery. CT was thicker at the fovea 1 day after surgery and 1.0 mm from the fovea in the nasal sector 1 week after surgery. Macular vessel density was significantly decreased 1 day after surgery and most recovered in 1 week. Optic disc vessel density decreased at the peripapillary part 1 day after surgery and recovered after 1 week. ΔACD and ΔLT showed no significant correlation 1 day after surgery. ΔACD was negatively correlated with ΔLT and sphere 1 week after surgery (r = − 0.847, p < 0.000; r = − 0.398, p = 0.002). ΔLT was positively correlated with the sphere 1 week after surgery (r = 0.256, p = 0.048).

Conclusion

The anterior segment was the most affected, while the retina also underwent changes with regard to MT, RNFL, CT, macular vessel density, and peripapillary vessel density.

Longitudinal evaluation of posterior corneal power by anterior segment optical coherence tomography 18 months following photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the change in anterior, posterior, and net corneal power more than 18 months after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) by RTVue anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).

SETTING

Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

PRK was performed using Technolas TENEO 317 laser platform. Anterior, posterior, and net corneal power was measured by the RTVue-XR anterior segment OCT system with the Pachymetry + Cpwr scan pattern at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and more than 18 (up to 27) after PRK.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-six eyes of 163 patients (61 men [37.4%], 102 women [62.6%]; mean age 29.71 years; range 18.5 to 46.5 years) were enrolled in this study. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -3.15 ± 1.50 diopter (D) (range -8.37 to -0.62 D). The mean change in net corneal power was 3.052 D, 3.281 D, 3.324 D, 3.114 D, 3.446 D, and 3.972 D at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and more than 18 postoperatively compared with baseline, respectively (P < .001 for all comparisons). The mean change in posterior corneal power at postoperative visits compared with baseline was not statistically significant (P > .1) except for 1 month postoperatively, which increased by 0.13 D (P < .001). Changes in posterior corneal power were not correlated with any of the preoperative clinical and Scheimpflug variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior corneal power did not change for more than 18 months after PRK, except for an early small increase at 1 month postoperatively.