Intermediate-term outcomes of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory paediatric glaucoma

Efficacy and Safety of Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant Compared With Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant for Refractory Glaucoma at One Year: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Glaucoma stands as a prominent contributor to irreversible vision impairment on a global scale. For decades, the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant (BGI) has been used to treat refractory glaucoma. Yet, the cost-effective Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) has gained clinical attention as a viable alternative for managing glaucoma. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of AADI and BGI in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search of multiple databases, identifying relevant comparative studies assessing AADI versus BGI in patients with refractory glaucoma. Key outcomes included postoperative IOP, surgical success rates, antiglaucoma medication reduction (AGMR), and complication rates. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: Three studies comprised a total of 176 individuals with refractory glaucoma, with 107 patients receiving the AADI and 69 patients receiving the BGI. The meta-analysis revealed a statistically borderline significant reduction in postoperative IOP favoring the AADI at 3 months (mean difference [MD] = -2.74, p=0.05). There was no significant difference in the MD of AGMR between the AADI and BGI groups. The rates of total complications and surgical success did not differ significantly between the AADI and BGI groups. Conclusion: AADI demonstrates promising results in reducing IOP at 3 months compared to BGI, with comparable surgical outcomes and complication rates over the long term. Further studies with larger samples are warranted to validate these findings and assess cost-effectiveness, particularly in developing countries.

Surgical Outcomes of Early Versus Late Onset Glaucoma Associated With Sturge-Weber Syndrome

PRCIS

Long-term intraocular pressure control can be difficult to achieve in eyes with Sturge-Weber syndrome glaucoma. The most commonly performed primary surgery was trabeculotomyin early onset disease and tube shunt implantation in late onset disease.

PURPOSE

To compare long-term surgical outcomes of glaucoma associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) in eyes with early and late-onset disease.

METHODS

Medical records of children with glaucoma associated with SWS who underwent surgical treatment between January 1990 and December 2018 were reviewed. Those diagnosed ≤2 years of age were categorized as early onset while those who were diagnosed >2 years of age were late onset. Failure was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg or reduced <20% below baseline on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, IOP ≤5 mm Hg on 2 consecutive follow-up visits, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception.

RESULTS

Forty-three eyes of 36 children were studied, including 26 eyes in the early-onset group and 17 eyes in the late-onset group. The early-onset group more frequently presented with buphthalmos, corneal edema, and Haab striae, while late-onset group had higher baseline IOP, larger cup-to-disc ratio, and longer axial length. The most commonly performed primary surgery was trabeculotomy (50%) in early-onset group and tube shunt implantation (71%) in late-onset group. The cumulative probability of failure after 5 years follow-up was 50.6% in early-onset group and 50.9% in the late-onset group ( P =0.56). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes (12%) in early-onset group and 11 eyes (65%) in late-onset group ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early and late-onset SWS glaucoma may represent 2 entities with different pathogenetic mechanisms, clinical presentations, primary surgical choices, and outcomes, though this needs corroboration in future studies.

Long-term surgical outcomes of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in pediatric eyes with primary congenital glaucoma versus aphakic glaucoma

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) placed in eyes with refractory primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) versus aphakic glaucoma (APG).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative interventional case series.

METHODS

Case files of consecutive eyes with PCG or APG that underwent AADI surgery between January 2013 and December 2016 and had a minimum 4 years follow-up were extracted from a computerised database. Failure was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP)>21 mm Hg or reduced<20% below baseline on two consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, IOP≤5 mm Hg on two consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine eyes underwent AADI placement, including 42 eyes (47%) with PCG and 47 eyes (53%) with APG. Both groups were comparable at baseline. At 1 year, the APG group had lower mean IOP (13.6±8.1 mm Hg vs 17.6±7.5 mm Hg, p=0.02) with use of fewer IOP-lowering medications (0.8±1.0 vs 1.5±1.0, p=0.01) than the PCG group. The cumulative failure rate at 4 years was 57% (95% CI 43% to 72%) in PCG versus 40% (95% CI 28% to 56%) in the APG eyes (p=0.11). Eyes with PCG had greater tube-related complications (48% vs 38%, p=0.07) and number of reoperations (40% vs 32%, p=0.02) compared with eyes with APG.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with APG had relatively better outcomes after AADI placement compared with PCG during 4 years of follow-up. Reoperations accounted for more than 70% of the failures.

The outcomes of a low-cost, non-valved glaucoma drainage device using mitomycin-C: 1-year results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the indications, outcomes, and complications of the usage of Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) using mitomycin-C.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of patients who underwent AADI placement using mitomycin-C between April 2018 and June 2020 at Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. The data was extracted from the records of the patients with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Complete success was defined as IOP ≥ 5 mmHg and ≤ 21 mmHg or reduction of IOP by ≥ 20% from baseline without antiglaucoma medications (AGMs). Qualified success was defined as reaching the same IOP range with the aid of AGM.

RESULTS

A total of 50 eyes of 48 patients were included. Neovascular glaucoma represented the commonest indication (13 patients, 26%). The mean preoperative IOP was 34.0 ± 7.1 mmHg, with a median number of AGM of 3 (mean ± SD = 2.84 ± 1), while the mean IOP after 12 months was 14.3 ± 4 with a median number of AGM of 0. (mean ± SD = 0.52 ± 0.89) (p < 0.001). Complete success was achieved in 33 patients (66%). Qualified success was achieved in 14 patients (28%). Thirteen eyes (26%) had variable postoperative complications; none of them required explantation of the device or affected the visual acuity (except one patient).

CONCLUSION

AADI with using mitomycin-C and ripcord during the surgery is an effective and relatively safe method of control of IOP in refractory and advanced cases of glaucoma, with an overall success rate of 94%.

Intermediate-term outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of the non-valved Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients with NVG who underwent AADI and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative rate of surgical failure defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg or reduced <20% below baseline, IOP ≤5 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision.

RESULTS

We included 85 eyes of 85 patients with NVG, with a mean age of 61.2±9.3 years. The most common aetiologies were proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n=43) and central retinal vein occlusion (n=24). The mean IOP decreased from 36.8±12.5 mm Hg at baseline to 15.8±7.5 mm Hg at 2-year follow-up (p<0.001) and the number of IOP-lowering medications reduced from 3.4±0.8 to 1.5±1.1 (p<0.001). The cumulative rate of failure increased from 3.1% (95% CI 1.1% to 11.8%) at 1 year to 33.8% (95% CI 20.4% to 52.5%) at 2 years. Multivariable analysis showed that eyes with open angles had a lower risk of failure (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.03, p=0.09). The logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual acuity declined from 0.98±0.7 to 1.8±1.0 at 2 years (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of NVG eyes that received the AADI failed after 2 years of follow-up similar to other series. Early AADI implantation at the open angle stage of NVG may yield better results.

Safety and efficacy of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma: A prospective study

Purpose

This study was conducted to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) control and postoperative complications following a non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery in refractory glaucoma.

Methods

This was a prospective interventional study conducted on patients with glaucoma refractory to maximal medications or failed surgical treatment who underwent Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI; Aurolabs, India) surgery. Primary outcome measures were IOP control, postoperative complications, and reduction in the number of antiglaucoma medications (AGM).

Results

Thirty-four eyes were analyzed and the mean follow-up was 16.06 ± 5.63 months. The preoperative median (Q1, Q3) IOP was 31 mmHg (28, 36.5) which decreased to 12 mmHg (12, 14) at 6 months postoperatively. The median (Q1, Q3) number of AGMs decreased from 3 (3, 4) to 0 (0, 1). Significant complications like implant extrusion and tube exposure were noted in two eyes. The total success and failure rates at 6 months were 91.1% and 8.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

AADI is effective in achieving target IOP and significantly reduces the use of AGMs with good safety in the short term. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess long-term IOP control and cost-effectiveness.

Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI): Review of Indications, Mechanism, Surgical Technique, Outcomes, Impact and Limitations

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to place together all the knowledge available on aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in one place for the benefit of all glaucoma specialists who are interested in low-cost implants in developing world with desired results.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was done on AADI and its use in glaucoma management. 35 results were obtained from the literature search. Out of these 35, 2 were commentaries, 6 were case reports and rest 27 were studies (prospective and retrospective) discussing the surgical outcomes, modifications and comparison of AADI with other glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs). Out of these, 2 commentaries were excluded and rest 33 articles were included, cited and discussed appropriately in this review.

RESULTS

AADI resulted in a significant reduction in the intra ocular pressure (IOP) and also in the number of antiglaucoma medications. AADI can be implanted alone or combined with cataract surgery. It was found to be beneficial in both pediatric and adult refractory glaucoma. There was no significant difference seen in the pre and post operative visual acuity. But AADI was also associated with various hypotony related and tube related early and late onset complications. Some of these complications were managed conservatively and some needed surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

AADI is a low-cost non-valved GDD with successful results in both adult as well as pediatric refractory glaucomas. Early and late onset complications are common and can be managed with appropriate and timely medical or surgical intervention.

Intraocular Pressure Control Following Phacoemulsification in Eyes With Pre-existing Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate intraocular pressure (IOP) control after phacoemulsification in adult glaucomatous eyes with a functioning nonvalved Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) compared with eyes that did not have cataract extraction post-AADI.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed records of 47 patients (47 eyes) who had a clear corneal phacoemulsification after AADI placement with a minimum of 2 years of follow up. The control group included 89 patients (89 eyes) who had a functional AADI at 1 year, minimum of 3 years of follow up post-AADI implantation, and no cataract extraction. The main outcome measure was failure (IOP >21 mm Hg or increased by >20% from prephacoemulsification level requiring at least 1 additional glaucoma medication, IOP ≤5 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision).

RESULTS

The median interval between AADI and phacoemulsification was 11.5 months (range: 4 to 68 mo), and the mean follow-up time after phacoemulsification was 35.6±6.4 months. The cumulative probability of failure was 14% (95% confidence interval=6%-31%) in the phaco group and 6% (95% confidence interval=3%-13%) in the control group at 2 years (P=0.11). Mean IOP was reduced from 16.5±4.5 mm Hg preoperatively to 15.4±4.7 mm Hg at 2 years after phacoemulsification (P=0.10). Mean LogMAR visual acuity improved from 1.1±0.6 preoperatively to 0.6±0.7 at 2 years after phacoemulsification (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In eyes with a pre-existing AADI, phacoemulsification resulted in visual improvement without a significant rise in IOP or increased risk of AADI failure after 2 years follow up.

Management of a recurrent encapsulated bleb with a cost-effective non-valved glaucoma drainage device

Despite the advancements in the surgical management of glaucoma, childhood glaucoma remains a challenging surgical disease worldwide. An early adolescent boy with primary congenital glaucoma, status after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation, on maximum medical therapy, was presented with a swelling in the superotemporal orbital region. The patient had undergone an uneventful GDD implantation 2 years prior to presentation. A similar swelling, which was diagnosed to be a Tenon's cyst, had been excised on three earlier occasions. Given that the repeat capsular excision would also have the same likelihood of failure, and poor intraocular pressure control, a non-valved, cost-effective Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI, Aurolab, Madurai, India) implantation was done inferonasally. In this patient, AADI proved to be a safe and effective alternative for the known GDDs.

Pars plana Aurolab aqueous drainage implantation for refractory glaucoma: Outcome of a new modified technique

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of pars plana insertion of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in adults with refractory glaucoma by the novel technique of making scleral tunnel instead of patch graft to cover the tube to prevent its migration.

METHODS

A retrospective study was done between April 2016 and April 2018 on patients with ≥12 months of follow-up. The main outcome measure was a surgical failure at 12 months. The failure was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >18 mmHg or IOP ≤5 mmHg on two consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, reoperation for glaucoma, loss of light perception vision, or implant explantation. Alternate definitions of failure including IOP >21 and IOP >15 mmHg were also considered.

RESULTS

: The study included 32 eyes of 32 patients. The mean age was 46.2 ± 17.5 years. The most common etiology is traumatic glaucoma (12 eyes, 37.5%). The mean preoperative IOP and anti-glaucoma medications were 43.3 ± 10.3 and 3.4 ± 0.5 mmHg, respectively; both the parameters at the final follow-up were reduced to 15.2 ± 8.1 and 1.6 ± 0.5 mmHg. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates demonstrated that the cumulative probability of failure was 15.6% (95% CI; 6.8-33.5%) at 3 months, 18.7% (95% CI; 8.9-37.0%) at 6 months, and 25.0% (95% CI; 13.4-43.8%) at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Pars plana AADI implantation with a newer modification technique is a useful procedure in reducing IOP and the number of anti-glaucoma medications in the eyes with refractory glaucoma. The visual acuity may be stabilized with the concurrent treatment of posterior segment pathology.

Surgical outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) versus the Ahmed glaucoma valve for refractory paediatric glaucoma in Middle Eastern children

Objective

The Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) has the potential advantages of less encapsulation and greater cost-effectiveness than the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV). The aim of this study was to compare the surgical success and outcomes of the AADI compared to the AGV in Middle-Eastern children.

Methods

A comparative retrospective study of consecutive paediatric patients in a tertiary eye hospital was undertaken. Data collected included demographics, type of glaucoma, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications (AGMs) and any subsequent complications or further surgeries.

Analysis

The mean IOP, number of AGMs, surgical success and number of reoperations was compared for the two groups. Surgical success at each visit was defined as IOP of ≥6 mm Hg and ≤21 mm Hg or if the reduction of IOP was ≥20% reduced from baseline.

Results

A total of 126 tube surgeries (56 eyes in AADI and 70 eyes in AGV) were performed in patients aged ≤18 years from 2014 to 2019. No difference was observed in the mean IOP between the two groups except at the first month post-operative visit. After six months, the AADI group had a consistently significant lower mean number of AGMs. At last follow-up, 21 (37.5%) eyes in the AADI group were glaucoma medication-free vs 15 (21.4%) eyes in the AGV group (pp=0.047). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed equivalent cumulative probability of success at two years of 69.9% [(45.9%–84.9%)] for AADI vs 66.8% [(53.4%–77.1%])) for the AGV, respectively. Twenty-four eyes in the AGV group needed one or more subsequent surgeries, whereas 13 eyes needed one or more surgery in the AADI group.

Conclusions

This study shows an acceptable safety profile for the AADI in children, with a rate of failure that is comparable to the AGV, but less need for glaucoma re-operation or glaucoma medication in the first post-postoperative year.

Incidence and Outcomes of Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage Following Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant in Adult and Pediatric Glaucoma

PRCIS

Postoperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage (PSCH) is an infrequent but devastating complication after nonvalved aqueous drainage implant surgery and demonstrated a bimodal distribution. The final outcomes of either conservative management or surgical drainage of the hemorrhage remained poor.

PURPOSE

The aim was to report the incidence and outcomes of eyes developing PSCH after undergoing Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) surgery for adult and pediatric refractory glaucomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective series, case files of all patients who underwent AADI between May 2012 and December 2019 were retrieved from an electronic database. A PSCH was defined as the presence of hemorrhagic choroidal detachment, confirmed by ultrasound B scan, occurring in a closed system in the postoperative period.

RESULTS

Of the 986 eyes that underwent AADI during the study period, 7 (0.7%), developed PSCH (95% confidence interval=0.3-1.6%). There were no differences in the preoperative parameters between those with and without PSCH. Of these, 4 were seen in pediatric eyes (4/288, 1.4%) and 3 in adult eyes (3/698, 0.4%) (P<0.01). Four eyes (57%) had PSCH in the immediate postoperative period (ie, between 24 and 48 h of AADI surgery), while the remaining 3 had onset ranging from 6 to 7 weeks after surgery. Anatomic risk factors were present in all eyes including hypotony (n=4), myopia (n=3), microcornea (n=2), microphthalmos (n=1), postvitrectomy (n=1), and staphyloma (n=1). Visual acuity improved in only 1 (14%) eye while 3 (43%) eyes developed phthisis bulbi, all in the pediatric age group.

CONCLUSIONS

PSCH is a rare complication following AADI and is seen in <1% eyes. The incidence is higher in the pediatric age group. Visual and anatomic outcomes are dismal following PSCH with globe salvage possible in only about half these eyes.

Surgical Outcomes of Superotemporal Versus Inferonasal Placement of Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant in Refractory Pediatric Glaucoma

PURPOSE

We sought to describe the outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) placed in the superotemporal (ST) versus the inferonasal (IN) quadrant in pediatric eyes with refractory glaucoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative interventional case series.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients ≤18 years of age who underwent AADI implantation and completed a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The choice of the quadrant depended upon the amount of scarring and conjunctival mobility. Cumulative success at 2 years was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mm Hg or reduced by ≥20% below baseline on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, IOP ≤5 mm Hg on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients (144 eyes) underwent AADI placement, including 48 eyes (33%) in the IN and 96 eyes (67%) in the ST quadrants. The IOP was significantly higher in the IN group (17.5 ± 7.4 mm Hg vs 13.7 ± 6.2 mm Hg, P = .005) with a greater number of medications (1.5 ± 1.0 vs 0.8 ± 0.9, P = .001) after 2 years of follow-up. Cumulative success rates at 2 years were 50.7% (95% confidence interval 35.4%-63.9%) in the IN group and 65.6% (95% confidence interval 56.5%-75.7%) in the ST group (P = .15). Complications occurred more frequently in the IN group, with significantly more tube exposure (12% vs 0%, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of the AADI in the ST quadrant has better IOP-related outcomes and is a safer surgical option in pediatric eyes compared with the IN quadrant. It may be prudent to avoid AADI in the IN quadrant in children unless the ST location is not a viable option.

Incidence and Outcomes of Hypertensive Phase Following Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant Surgery in Adults with Refractory Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To report the incidence and outcomes of hypertensive phase (HP) following Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) (Aurolab) surgery in adults with refractory glaucoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.

METHODS

All eyes that received the AADI and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified, and data of patients who had intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mm Hg at 6 weeks (ie, the time at which the tube-ligature suture dissolves) were used for statistical analysis. HP was defined as IOP >21 mm Hg during the first 3 months after the release of the tube ligating suture (with or without medications) in the absence of tube obstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 200 eyes were included in the study, and HP was seen in 64 eyes (32%) with a peak IOP (mean ± SD) of 29.6 ± 7.8 mm Hg and peak incidence at 2-3 months after surgery. HP resolved within 3 months of its onset in 60 of the 64 eyes (94%) with additional IOP-lowering medications. The cumulative success rates were 71.8% (95% CI = 59.3%-81.2%) in HP eyes and 76.4% (95% CI = 68.7%-82.7%) in non-HP eyes (P = .23). Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that eyes experiencing HP had a marginally higher risk of failure (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.6-2.1), but this relationship was not statistically significant (P = .61).

CONCLUSIONS

A third of eyes that underwent AADI placement experienced HP. HP was successfully managed with additional IOP-lowering medications in a majority of cases and did not have a significant influence on long-term success rate.

Outcome of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device with posterior chamber/pars plana insertion of the tube

INTRODUCTION

The Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) is a low-cost glaucoma drainage device that is modelled on the Baerveldt glaucoma implant. Studies on AADI have reported absolute success rates of 41.8-93.1% at 1 year. Most studies report on tube placement in the anterior chamber. We report on results of tube insertion in the sulcus/pars plana.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone AADI implantation (with insertion of tube in the sulcus/posterior segment) between June 2015 and November 2018 was done. Patients were asked to stop anti-glaucoma medications on the 40th post-operative day.

RESULTS

The mean age was 57.4 ± 13.8 years (n = 30). The mean IOP prior to surgery was 34.4 ± 6.1 mmHg which reduced to 15.4 ± 8.6 mmHg on the 45th post-operative day (p < 0.001). The absolute success at last review was 10% and the qualified success was 80%. The complication rate was 26.7%. Three patients had hypotony related complications noted at/after the 45th day review (none before 40th day). The incidence of ocular motility disturbances was 26.7% though none of the patients reported diplopia. One patient had sideways rotation of the scleral patch graft resulting in tube exposure. This complication was not seen after we shifted to using 9-0 nylon sutures to anchor the graft. Six patients had loss of best corrected visual acuity and one patient developed endophthalmitis. The endophthalmitis was preceded by conjunctival retraction and sloughing off of the scleral patch graft.

DISCUSSION

AADI implantation results in a substantial drop in IOP. However, many patients continue to require anti-glaucoma medications. Allowing overlap of scleral/corneal patch graft onto the scleral flap may be effective in preventing peritubular leak. It may be advisable to use 9-0 nylon sutures to secure the scleral patch graft anti-glaucoma medications can be temporarily suspended after the 40th post-operative day to minimize hypotony related complications. Melting of the scleral patch graft may be an early sign of endophthalmitis. It would be prudent to specifically look for ocular motility problems in patients undergoing AADI implantation.