Validation of electronic visual acuity (EVA) measurement against standardised ETDRS charts in patients with visual field loss from inherited retinal degenerations

Investigating the impact of asymmetric macular sensitivity on visual acuity chart reading in choroideremia

INTRODUCTION

Degeneration in choroideremia, unlike typical centripetal photoreceptor degenerations, is centred temporal to the fovea. Once the fovea is affected, the nasal visual field (temporal retina) is relatively spared, and the preferred retinal locus shifts temporally. Therefore, when reading left to right, only the right eye reads into a scotoma. We investigate how this unique property affects the ability to read an eye chart.

METHODS

Standard- and low-luminance visual acuity (VA) for right and left eyes were measured with the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Letters in each line were labelled by column position. The numbers of letter errors for each position across the whole chart were summed to produce total column error scores for each participant. Macular sensitivity was assessed using microperimetry. Central sensitivity asymmetry was determined by the temporal-versus-nasal central macular difference and subsequently correlated to a weighted ETDRS column error score. Healthy volunteers and participants with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator associated retinitis pigmentosa (RPGR-RP) were used as controls.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine choroideremia participants (median age 44.9 years [IQR 35.7-53.5]), 23 RPGR-RP participants (median age 30.8 years [IQR 26.5-40.5]) and 35 healthy controls (median age 23.8 years [IQR 20.3-29.0]) were examined. In choroideremia, standard VA in the right eye showed significantly greater ETDRS column errors on the temporal side compared with the nasal side (p = 0.002). This significantly correlated with greater asymmetry in temporal-versus-nasal central macular sensitivity (p = 0.04). No significant patterns in ETDRS column errors or central macular sensitivity were seen in the choroideremia left eyes, nor in RPGR-RP and control eyes.

CONCLUSION

Difficulty in tracking across lines during ETDRS VA testing may cause excess errors independent of true VA. VA assessment with single-letter optotype systems may be more suitable, particularly for patients with choroideremia, and potentially other retinal diseases with asymmetric central macular sensitivity or large central scotomas including geographic atrophy.

Longitudinal assessment of female carriers of choroideremia using multimodal retinal imaging

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Female choroideremia carriers present with a spectrum of disease severity. Unlike in men, the rate of disease progression has not been well characterised in carriers. This longitudinal study aimed to determine the rate of retinal degeneration in choroideremia carriers, using multimodal imaging and microperimetry.

METHODS

Choroideremia carriers previously seen at Oxford Eye Hospital (United Kingdom) between 2012 and 2017 returned for testing between 2015 and 2023, providing up to 11 years' follow-up data. Participants had optical coherence tomography, fundus-tracked microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four eyes of 17 choroideremia carriers were examined using multimodal imaging. Median age was 44 (range: 15-73) years at baseline and median follow-up duration was 7 (range: 1-11) years. At baseline, phenotype was classified as fine (n=5 eyes), coarse (n=13 eyes), geographic (n=12 eyes) or male pattern (n=4 eyes). Thirteen patients showed no change in phenotype classification, four showed slight changes associated with choroideremia-related retinal degeneration. Despite this, carriers with severe retinal phenotypes had a statistically significant decline in average retinal sensitivity (-0.7 dB and -0.8 dB per year, respectively, p<0.001), area of geographic loss defined by FAF (+2.5 mm2 and +3.7 mm2 per year, respectively, p<0.001) and thinning of the photoreceptor complex (up to -2.8 microns and -10.3 microns per year, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Choroideremia carriers, particularly those with severe retinal phenotypes, exhibit progressive retinal degeneration, as evident by multimodal imaging biomarkers and functional testing. Clinicians should not rely on retinal severity classification alone to assess disease progression.

Endpoints for clinical trials in ophthalmology

With the identification of novel targets, the number of interventional clinical trials in ophthalmology has increased. Visual acuity has for a long time been considered the gold standard endpoint for clinical trials, but in the recent years it became evident that other endpoints are required for many indications including geographic atrophy and inherited retinal disease. In glaucoma the currently available drugs were approved based on their IOP lowering capacity. Some recent findings do, however, indicate that at the same level of IOP reduction, not all drugs have the same effect on visual field progression. For neuroprotection trials in glaucoma, novel surrogate endpoints are required, which may either include functional or structural parameters or a combination of both. A number of potential surrogate endpoints for ophthalmology clinical trials have been identified, but their validation is complicated and requires solid scientific evidence. In this article we summarize candidates for clinical endpoints in ophthalmology with a focus on retinal disease and glaucoma. Functional and structural biomarkers, as well as quality of life measures are discussed, and their potential to serve as endpoints in pivotal trials is critically evaluated.

A cross-sectional study to assess the clinical utility of modern visual function assessments in patients with inherited retinal disease: a mixed methods observational study protocol

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with inherited retinal disease are limited, although research into novel therapies is underway. To ensure the success of future clinical trials, appropriate visual function outcome measures that can assess changes resulting from therapeutic interventions are urgently required. Rod-cone degenerations are the most common type of inherited retinal disease. Visual acuity is a standard measure but is typically preserved until late disease stages, frequently making it an unsuitable visual function marker. Alternative measures are required. This study investigates the clinical utility of a range of carefully selected visual function tests and patient reported outcome measures. The aim is to identify suitable outcome measures for future clinical trials that could be considered for regulatory approval.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involves two participant groups, patients with inherited retinal disease (n = 40) and healthy controls (n = 40). The study has been designed to be flexible and run alongside NHS clinics. The study is split into two parts. Part one includes examining standard visual acuity, low luminance visual acuity, the Moorfields acuity chart visual acuity, mesopic microperimetry and three separate patient reported outcome measures. Part two involves 20 min of dark adaptation followed by two-colour scotopic microperimetry. Repeat testing will be undertaken where possible to enable repeatability analyses. A subset of patients with inherited retinal disease will be invited to participate in a semi-structured interview to gain awareness of participants' thoughts and feelings around the study and different study tests.

DISCUSSION

The study highlights a need for reliable and sensitive validated visual function measures that can be used in future clinical trials. This work will build on work from other studies and be used to inform an outcome measure framework for rod-cone degenerations. The study is in keeping with the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Care research initiatives and strategies for increasing research opportunities for NHS patients as part of their NHS care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN24016133, Visual Function in Retinal Degeneration, registered on 18th August 2022.

Minimum Detectable Change of Visual Acuity Measurements Using ETDRS Charts (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study)

In our work, we determined the value of visual acuity (VA) with ETDRS charts (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study). The purpose of the study was to determine the measurement reliabilities, calculating the correlation coefficient interclass (ICC), the value of the error associated with the measure (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC). Forty healthy subjects took part. The mean age was 23.5 ± 3.1 (19 to 26) years. Visual acuities were measured with ETDRS charts (96% ETDRS chart nº 2140) and (10% SLOAN Contrast Eye Test chart nº 2153). The measurements were made (at 4 m) under four conditions: Firstly, photopic conditions with high contrast (HC) and low contrast (LC) and after 15 min of visual rest, mesopic conditions with high and low contrast. Under photopic conditions and high contrast, the ICC = 0.866 and decreased to 0.580 when the luminosity and contrast decreased. The % MDC in the four conditions was always less than 10%. It was minor under photopic conditions and HC (5.83) and maximum in mesopic conditions and LC (9.70). Our results conclude a high reliability of the ETDRS test, which is higher in photopic and high contrast conditions and lower when the luminosity and contrast decreases.

Normative pediatric visual acuity using electronic early treatment for diabetic retinopathy protocol

There is a lack of normative data for children tested with the electronic Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) protocol. In the current cross-sectional study, the mean best-corrected normal and 95% lower tolerance limit for E-ETDRS visual acuity by year in children 7-12 years of age was measured. Our objective was to provide a large normative data set for E-ETDRS visual acuity in children for use in clinical management and clinical trials.

Low Luminance Visual Acuity and Low Luminance Deficit in Choroideremia and RPGR-Associated Retinitis Pigmentosa

Introduction

Choroideremia and RPGR-associated retinitis pigmentosa (RP) are two distinct inherited rod-cone degenerations, where good visual acuity (VA) is maintained until late disease stages, limiting its usefulness as a disease marker. Low luminance VA and low luminance deficit (standard VA minus low luminance VA) may be more sensitive visual function measures.

Methods

Standard VA was obtained using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter charts (Precision Vision, Bloomington, IL, USA). Low luminance VA was assessed using a 2.0-log unit neutral density filter, with the same chart setup, without formal dark adaptation. Mean central retinal sensitivity was assessed using MAIA microperimetry (Centervue SpA, Padova, Italy). Optical coherence tomography imaging was attained with Heidelberg Eye Explorer software (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).

Results

Twenty-four male participants with confirmed pathogenic RPGR mutations, 44 male participants with confirmed pathogenic CHM mutations, and 62 age-matched controls underwent clinical assessment prior to clinical trial recruitment. Low luminance VA was significantly reduced in both disease groups compared to controls. The low luminance deficit correlated with microperimetry retinal sensitivity and ellipsoid zone width. Eleven participants with moderate VA had poor low luminance VA (subsequently a large low luminance deficit), no detectable microperimetry sensitivity, and severely constricted ellipsoid zone widths.

Conclusions

Low luminance VA and subsequently low luminance deficit are useful markers of central macular visual function in both choroideremia and RPGR-associated RP, when standard VA is preserved.

Translational Relevance

Low luminance visual acuity and low luminance deficit are useful vision measures in two distinct rod-cone degenerations and may be useful in other retinal degenerations.

Monitoring progression of retinitis pigmentosa: current recommendations and recent advances

INTRODUCTION

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the most common form of inherited retinal degenerations with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 4,000 and more than 1 million individuals affected worldwide. With the introduction of the first retinal gene therapy in 2017 the importance of understanding the mechanisms of retinal degeneration and its natural progression has shifted from being of academic interest to being of pivotal for the development of new therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers standard and innovative diagnostic techniques and complementary examinations needed for the evaluation and treatment of RP. It includes chapters on the assessment of visual function, retinal morphology, and genotyping.

EXPERT OPINION

Monitoring the progression of RP can best be achieved by combining assessments of both visual function and morphology. Visual acuity testing using ETDRS charts should be complemented by low-luminance visual acuity and colour vision tests. Assessment of the visual field can also be useful in less advanced cases. In those with central RP involvement measuring retinal sensitivity using microperimetry is recommended. Retinal morphology is best assessed by OCT and autofluorescence. Genetic testing is pivotal as it contributes to the pathophysiological understanding and can guide clinical management as well as identify individuals that could benefit from retinal gene therapy.