1
|
Heichel J, Huth A, Viestenz A, Struck HG. Augenverätzungen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2024; 241:575-591. [PMID: 38412997 DOI: 10.1055/a-2255-5970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Chemical burns of the ocular surface (CBOS) are emergencies of highest urgency. Therefore, an adequate emergency care is mandatory. Following a precise analysis of the initial damage, a staged therapeutic approach is used to prevent persistent impairment of the ocular surface. In the acute stage, the prevention of complications is targeted (symblepharon, conjunctival scarring, lacrimal stenosis, corneal ulceration, intraocular inflammation, elevated intraocular pressure, etc.). In later stages, if complications have developed, a secondary restoration of the ocular surface is focussed. Sometimes this requires several surgical interventions. Based on a review of international literature, this review highlights the pathophysiology according to different chemical agents, CBOS stages as well as main therapy strategies in early and advanced stages of CBOS. Acute treatment aims to lower inflammation, oxidative stress and tries to promote reepithelialisation. Besides conjunctival scarring, loss of goblet cells and corneal opacification a limbal stem cell insufficiency is the most harming complication. Several new techniques have been developed to recover the ocular surface with a sufficient and clear epithelial layer in order to avoid neovascularization of the cornea. The knowledge concerning the high risk potential for persistent visual impairment in CBOS patients and the ability for appropriate emergency care should be kept in every physician's mind dealing with CBOS.
Collapse
|
2
|
Holland EJ, Cheung AY, Djalilian AR. Reply. Cornea 2024; 43:e1-e3. [PMID: 37943719 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Holland
- Cincinnati Eye Institute/University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | - Ali R Djalilian
- The University of Illinois, College of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lohchab M, Gour A. Letter Regarding: Why Are Corneal Specialists Resistant to Treating Patients Who Have Severe Ocular Surface Disease with Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency? Cornea 2024; 43:e1. [PMID: 37824195 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Lohchab
- Dr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, Daryaganj, Delhi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sonntag R, Kassumeh S, Luft N, Priglinger SG, Mayer WJ. [Allogeneic simple limbal epithelial transplantation (alloSLET)-Treatment of bilateral limbal stem cell insufficiency]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2023; 120:1276-1278. [PMID: 37071184 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-023-01849-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ruven Sonntag
- Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Kassumeh
- Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland
| | - Nikolaus Luft
- Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland
- Auge-Laser-Chirurgie, Linz, Österreich
| | - Siegfried G Priglinger
- Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland
- Auge-Laser-Chirurgie, Linz, Österreich
| | - Wolfgang J Mayer
- Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Corneal Epithelial Regeneration: Old and New Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232113114. [DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Corneal blindness is the fifth leading cause of blindness worldwide, and therapeutic options are still often limited to corneal transplantation. The corneal epithelium has a strong barrier function, and regeneration is highly dependent on limbal stem cell proliferation and basement membrane remodeling. As a result of the lack of corneal donor tissues, regenerative medicine for corneal diseases affecting the epithelium is an area with quite advanced basic and clinical research. Surgery still plays a prominent role in the treatment of epithelial diseases; indeed, innovative surgical techniques have been developed to transplant corneal and non-corneal stem cells onto diseased corneas for epithelial regeneration applications. The main goal of applying regenerative medicine to clinical practice is to restore function by providing viable cells based on the use of a novel therapeutic approach to generate biological substitutes and improve tissue functions. Interest in corneal epithelium rehabilitation medicine is rapidly growing, given the exposure of the corneal outer layers to external insults. Here, we performed a review of basic, clinical and surgical research reports on regenerative medicine for corneal epithelial disorders, classifying therapeutic approaches according to their macro- or microscopic target, i.e., into cellular or subcellular therapies, respectively.
Collapse
|
6
|
KARAYEL M, HARBİYELİ İİ, SULANÇ B, ERDEM E, YAĞMUR M. Farklı endikasyonlarda terapötik kontakt lenslerin etkinliği. CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.17826/cumj.1024078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
7
|
Corneal Epithelial Stem Cells-Physiology, Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options. Cells 2021; 10:cells10092302. [PMID: 34571952 PMCID: PMC8465583 DOI: 10.3390/cells10092302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In the human cornea, regeneration of the epithelium is regulated by the stem cell reservoir of the limbus, which is the marginal region of the cornea representing the anatomical and functional border between the corneal and conjunctival epithelium. In support of this concept, extensive limbal damage, e.g., by chemical or thermal injury, inflammation, or surgery, may induce limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) leading to vascularization and opacification of the cornea and eventually vision loss. These acquired forms of limbal stem cell deficiency may occur uni- or bilaterally, which is important for the choice of treatment. Moreover, a variety of inherited diseases, such as congenital aniridia or dyskeratosis congenita, are characterized by LSCD typically occurring bilaterally. Several techniques of autologous and allogenic stem cell transplantation have been established. The limbus can be restored by transplantation of whole limbal grafts, small limbal biopsies or by ex vivo-expanded limbal cells. In this review, the physiology of the corneal epithelium, the pathophysiology of LSCD, and the therapeutic options will be presented.
Collapse
|
8
|
Prabhasawat P, Chirapapaisan C, Ngowyutagon P, Ekpo P, Tangpagasit W, Lekhanont K, Sikarinkul R, Matamnan S, Boonwong C, Pinitpuwadol W, Thamphithak R, Sukon N, Neti N. Efficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency verified by epithelial phenotypes integrated with clinical evaluation. Ocul Surf 2021; 22:27-37. [PMID: 34214675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) using epithelial phenotype detection integrated with clinical manifestation. METHODS This prospective multicenter study included patients with LSCD who underwent autologous SLET (autoSLET) and living-related allogenic SLET (Lr-alloSLET). All patients were assessed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and impression cytology with immunofluorescence staining (ICIF) before and after surgery. The criteria for success were the presence of a clinically non-conjunctivalized cornea and corneal epithelium detected by IVCM or ICIF. Otherwise, the case would be considered a failure. Visual improvement and risk factors for SLET failure were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 28 eyes of 26 patients (11 autoSLET and 17 Lr-alloSLET) were included. The median age was 53 years (range, 35-63), and the follow-up time was 29.5 months (range, 17.5-39.8). The overall survival rate was 89.3% at 2 years and 75.6% at 3 years with no difference between autoSLET and Lr-alloSLET (p = 0.24). Seven eyes subsequently underwent penetrating keratoplasty. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that all corneal buttons had corneal epithelium and limbal stem cell markers. Visual improvement was achieved in both SLET groups (p < 0.001). Failed SLET developed between 5 and 32 months postoperatively. However, absolute risk factors for SLET failure were unidentified. CONCLUSION The efficacy of autoSLET and Lr-alloSLET for LSCD was excellent. Limbal explants can regenerate and restore the corneal surface while maintaining the characteristics of limbal stem cells as shown by epithelial phenotype detection and immunohistochemistry integrated with clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pinnita Prabhasawat
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chareenun Chirapapaisan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Panotsom Ngowyutagon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pattama Ekpo
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Research Division, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wimolwan Tangpagasit
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Prathumthani, Thailand
| | - Kaevalin Lekhanont
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
| | - Rosanun Sikarinkul
- Department of Ophthalmology, Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Mahidol University, Thailand
| | - Sutthicha Matamnan
- Research Division, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chawikan Boonwong
- Research Division, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Warinyupa Pinitpuwadol
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ranida Thamphithak
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nutchaya Sukon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nutnicha Neti
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Current and future therapies for persistent corneal epithelial defects and neurotrophic keratopathy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2021; 32:262-267. [PMID: 33630785 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The corneal epithelium is a crucial barrier against pathogens, and when disrupted in the setting of certain underlying risk factors such as neurotrophic keratopathy (NK), may result in persistent epithelial defects (PEDs) of the cornea. Management is challenging and may require a variety of different approaches ranging from conservative medical therapy to surgical intervention. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on current and potential future therapeutic options for PEDs and NK. RECENT FINDINGS Recent research has yielded promising results for numerous novel therapies aimed at treating PEDs. Many of these attempt to stimulate healing at the cellular level, via signaling of corneal epithelial differentiation, migration, and proliferation. Considerable advances have also been made regarding medical and surgical promotion of corneal re-innervation and restoration of corneal sensitivity to directly address the underlying NK condition. SUMMARY Together with the current well established therapeutic options available for PEDs and NK, growing research on newer alternatives suggest increasing potential for both more effective and more convenient therapies for these difficult situations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Jacobs DS, Carrasquillo KG, Cottrell PD, Fernández-Velázquez FJ, Gil-Cazorla R, Jalbert I, Pucker AD, Riccobono K, Robertson DM, Szczotka-Flynn L, Speedwell L, Stapleton F. CLEAR - Medical use of contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021; 44:289-329. [PMID: 33775381 DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The medical use of contact lenses is a solution for many complex ocular conditions, including high refractive error, irregular astigmatism, primary and secondary corneal ectasia, disfiguring disease, and ocular surface disease. The development of highly oxygen permeable soft and rigid materials has extended the suitability of contact lenses for such applications. There is consistent evidence that bandage soft contact lenses, particularly silicone hydrogel lenses, improve epithelial healing and reduce pain in persistent epithelial defects, after trauma or surgery, and in corneal dystrophies. Drug delivery applications of contact lens hold promise for improving topical therapy. Modern scleral lens practice has achieved great success for both visual rehabilitation and therapeutic applications, including those requiring retention of a tear reservoir or protection from an adverse environment. This report offers a practical and relevant summary of the current evidence for the medical use of contact lenses for all eye care professionals including optometrists, ophthalmologists, opticians, and orthoptists. Topics covered include indications for use in both acute and chronic conditions, lens selection, patient selection, wear and care regimens, and recommended aftercare schedules. Prevention, presentation, and management of complications of medical use are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah S Jacobs
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Cornea and Refractive Surgery Service, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Loretta Szczotka-Flynn
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lynne Speedwell
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
| | - Fiona Stapleton
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thokala P, Singh A, Singh VK, Rathi VM, Basu S, Singh V, MacNeil S, Sangwan VS. Economic, clinical and social impact of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 106:923-928. [PMID: 33688000 PMCID: PMC9234414 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Aims To report the global uptake of simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) and compare the economic, clinical and social outcomes of SLET with those of cultured limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET). Methods A comprehensive literature review and an online survey of eye surgeons were conducted to understand the efficacy and current uptake of SLET surgery. A de novo economic model was developed to estimate the cost savings with SLET compared with CLET. Our economic analysis is conducted from an Indian perspective, as this is where the technique originated. A scenario analysis using the UK cost data and a user-friendly Excel model is included to allow users to input the costs from their setting to estimate the cost savings with using SLET compared with using CLET Results The anatomical success with SLET in adults (72.6% (range 62%–80%)) was the same as CLET (70.4% (range 68%–80.9%)). For children, the outcome for SLET (77.8% (range 73%–83%)) was better than with CLET (44.5% (range 43%–45%)). In response to our informal questionnaire, 99 surgeons reported to have performed SLET on 1174 patients in total. They appreciated that SLET negates the requirement for costly tissue engineering facilities. Results of economic analysis suggested that SLET provided an estimated cost-savings of US$6470.88 for adults and US$6673.10 for children. In broad terms, the cost of SLET is approximately 10% of the cost of CLET for adults and 8% for children. Conclusion SLET offers a more accessible and financially attractive alternative to CLET to treat limbal stem cell deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Thokala
- Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aastha Singh
- Cornea and Anterior Segment Services, Dr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Kumar Singh
- Brien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.,Centre for Ocular Regeneration, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Varsha M Rathi
- Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eyecare, The Cornea Institute, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Sayan Basu
- Brien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.,Cornea and Anterior Segment Services, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Vivek Singh
- Brien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India .,Centre for Ocular Regeneration, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Sheila MacNeil
- Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Sheffield Kroto Research Institute, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|