Correlation of ocular rigidity with intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in exudative retinal disease

Evaluation of short-term intraocular pressure changes after intravitreal injection of Conbercept in patients with diabetic macular edema

Background: The study concerning the influence of Conbercept, which is an anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, in intraocular pressure (IOP) spike is limited and warrants further investigation. The current study aimed to investigate the changes of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection (IVI) of Conbercept and evaluate the risk factors associated with intraocular pressure spikes. Methods: Patients with diabetic macular edema receiving intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg) Conbercept were involved in the study. All patients underwent slit lamp examination to determine the status of phakia/pseudophakia. The axial length was measured using IOL Master 500 before intravitreal injection. Patients underwent a Conbercept intravitreal injection with a 30-gauge needle in a standard fashion. The intraocular pressure was measured 2 min before injection, and 2, 10, 30 min, 1, 2, 5, 24 h after injection using a rebound tonometer. The changes of intraocular pressure and the relevant risk factors were evaluated. Patients were subdivided into phakic group and pseudophakic group to analyze the effect of lens status on intraocular pressure changes. Results: Forty patients with a mean age of 62.48 ± 12.22 years were included in the study. The mean intraocular pressure values at baseline and 2, 10, 30 min, 1, 2, 5, 24 h after injection were 14.81 ± 3.13 mmHg, 26.80 ± 9.43 mmHg, 18.76 ± 6.16 mmHg, 16.54 ± 5.94 mmHg, 15.64 ± 3.75 mmHg, 14.46 ± 3.03 mmHg, 14.10 ± 1.88 mmHg, 14.23 ± 2.71 mmHg respectively. The intraocular pressure after injection for 2, 10 min was significantly higher than baseline (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). The intraocular pressure between baseline and post-injection for 30 min or beyond were comparable (all p > 0.05). No significant difference was found between the phakic group and pseudophakic group (p = 0.422). The changes of intraocular pressure were positively correlated with age (r = 0.329, p = 0.038), but negatively with axial length (r = -0.472, p = 0.002). Conclusion: intravitreal injection of Conbercept may cause rapid spike of intraocular pressure, but is safe with respect to short-term changes. The intraocular pressure in patients with older age and shorter axial length is more likely to be higher after intravitreal injection.

Intraocular Pressure Elevation Following Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections: Short- and Long-term Considerations

Published studies agree that transient intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes are common after intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Currently, there is no standard of care guiding if and when to prevent these IOP spikes. Furthermore, there are challenges in determining the impact of postinjection IOP elevation on the health of the retinal ganglion cells, particularly given the often-existing comorbidities of retinal and glaucoma pathology. This review highlights the current literature regarding both acute and chronic postinjection IOP elevations and discusses management of postinjection IOP elevation, especially in patients at high risk for glaucomatous damage.

The Association Between Ocular Rigidity and Neuroretinal Damage in Glaucoma

Purpose

Ocular rigidity (OR) is an important biomechanical property, thought to be relevant in the pathophysiology of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). This study aims to evaluate the relationship between OR and neuroretinal damage caused by glaucoma.

Methods

One hundred eight subjects (22 with healthy eyes, 23 with suspect discs, and 63 with OAG) were included in this study. OR was measured using a noninvasive optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based method developed by our group. We also measured central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF). Pearson and partial correlations were performed to evaluate the relationship between OR and glaucomatous damage represented by ganglion cell complex (GCC), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses, and neuroretinal rim area.

Results

Significant positive correlations were found between OR and minimum GCC thickness (r = 0.325, P = 0.001), average GCC thickness (r = 0.320, P = 0.002), rim area (r = 0.344, P < 0.001), and RNFL thickness in the superior (r = 0.225, P = 0.023), and inferior (r = 0.281, P = 0.004) quadrants. These correlations were generally greater than those found for CCT, CH, and CRF. Furthermore, no correlation was found between OR and corneal biomechanical parameters. After adjusting for age, sex, and ethnicity, significant correlations were found between OR and minimum and average GCC thickness (r = 0.357, P = 0.001 and r = 0.344, P = 0.001, respectively), rim area (r = 0.327, P = 0.001), average RNFL thickness (r = 0.331, P = 0.001), and RNFL thickness in the superior (r = 0.296, P = 0.003) and inferior (r = 0.317, P = 0.001) quadrants.

Conclusions

In this study, we found a positive correlation between structural OCT-based parameters and OR, indicating more neuroretinal damage in eyes with lower OR. These findings could provide insight into the pathophysiology of OAG.

Effect of antiglaucoma agents on short-term intraocular pressure fluctuations after intravitreal bevacizumab injections

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of prophylactic pressure-lowering medications on intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes after intravitreal injections (IVIs) METHODS: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 74 eyes that were candidates for intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection (IVI) (0.05 mL, 1.25 mg of bevacizumab) were enrolled and sorted randomly into five groups, group 1: topical timolol 0.5% (n = 16); group 2: topical brimonidin (n = 15); group 3: oral acetazolamide 250 mg (n = 14); group 4: intravenous mannitol (1.5 gr/kg) (n = 16); group 5: no intraocular pressure-lowering medication (n = 13). Medications were administered 30-60 min prior to injection. None of the patients had history of glaucoma. Intraocular pressure was measured before (baseline), 5 min after (T5), 10 min after (T10), 15 min after (T15) and 30 min after (T30) IVI using Goldmann Tonometer.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant, but relatively weak negative correlation between the amount of vitreous reflux post-IVI intraocular pressure elevation (Spearman's rho = -0.315, p = 0.006). There was no difference of the amount of vitreous reflux (P = 0.196) between study groups. The baseline mean IOP for Groups 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 were 11.19 ± 3.7, 10.07 ± 2.19, 11 ± 2.98, 10.13 ± 3.48 and12.54 ± 2.60 mmHg, respectively. (P = 0.214) There was no difference of peak IOP spike between groups at T5: 37 ± 19.7, 34.80 ± 15.76, 33.43 ± 18.29, 33.56 ± 16.88, 34.92 ± 9.99 mmHg (P = 0.977). There was also no difference of IOP at T10, T15 and T30 between study groups: P = 0.979, P = 0.994 and P = 0.692, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although it is advisable to prevent IOP spikes, our study showed that use of prophylactic pressure-lowering medications with every mechanism of action has no effect in IOP spikes following intravitreal bevacizumab injections in non-glaucomatous eyes. Trial registrationThe study was registered with clinicaltrails.gov (ID# NCT02140450). Trial registration date: 05.09.2014.