Association of anterior segment parameters and 5-year incident narrow angles: findings from an older Chinese population

Long-Term Risk and Prediction of Progression in Primary Angle Closure Suspect

Importance

Identifying primary angle closure suspect (PACS) eyes at risk of angle closure is crucial for its management. However, the risk of progression and its prediction are still understudied in long-term longitudinal studies about PACS.

Objective

To explore baseline predictors and develop prediction models for the 14-year risk of progression from PACS to primary angle closure (PAC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study involved participants from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention trial who had untreated eyes with PACS. Baseline examinations included tonometry, ultrasound A-scan biometry, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) under both light and dark conditions. Primary angle closure was defined as peripheral anterior synechiae in 1 or more clock hours, intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 24 mm Hg, or acute angle closure. Based on baseline covariates, logistic regression models were built to predict the risk of progression from PACS to PAC during 14 years of follow-up.

Results

The analysis included 377 eyes from 377 patients (mean [SD] patient age at baseline, 58.28 [4.71] years; 317 females [84%]). By the 14-year follow-up visit, 93 eyes (25%) had progressed from PACS to PAC. In multivariable models, higher IOP (odds ratio [OR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04-1.25] per 1-mm Hg increase), shallower central anterior chamber depth (ACD; OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.97] per 0.1-mm increase), and shallower limbal ACD (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99] per 0.01 increase in peripheral corneal thickness) at baseline were associated with an increased 14-year risk of progression from PACS to PAC. As for AS-OCT measurements, smaller light-room trabecular-iris space area (TISA) at 500 μm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.77-0.96] per 0.01-mm2 increase), smaller light-room angle recess area (ARA) at 750 μm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase), and smaller dark-room TISA at 500 μm (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase) at baseline were identified as predictors for the 14-year risk of progression. The prediction models based on IOP and central and limbal ACDs showed moderate performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.75) in predicting progression from PACS to PAC, and inclusion of AS-OCT metrics did not improve the model's performance.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study suggests that higher IOP, shallower central and limbal ACDs, and smaller TISA at 500 μm and light-room ARA at 750 μm may serve as baseline predictors for progression to PAC in PACS eyes. Evaluating these factors can aid in customizing PACS management.

Anterior Segment OCT for Detection of Narrow Angles: A Community-Based Diagnostic Accuracy Study

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) screening for detecting gonioscopically narrow angles.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

A stratified random sample of individuals aged ≥ 60 years, selected from a door-to-door census performed in low-lying Nepal.

TESTING

Participants underwent AS-OCT, posterior segment OCT, and intraocular pressure (IOP) testing in the community. Those meeting referral criteria in either eye were invited to have a comprehensive eye examination including gonioscopy. Referral criteria included (i) the lowest 2.5% of AS-OCT measurements, (ii) retinal OCT results suggestive of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, or age-related macular degeneration, and (iii) elevated IOP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity and specificity of 5 semiautomated AS-OCT parameters relative to gonioscopically narrow angles, defined as the absence of visible trabecular meshwork for ≥ 180° on nonindentation gonioscopy.

RESULTS

Of 17 656 people aged ≥ 60 years enumerated from 102 communities, 12 633 (71.6%) presented for AS-OCT testing. Referral was recommended for 697 participants based on AS-OCT criteria and 2419 participants based on other criteria, of which 858 had gonioscopy performed by a glaucoma specialist. Each of the 5 AS-OCT parameters offered good diagnostic information for predicting eyes with gonioscopically narrow angles, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.89. The angle opening distance at 750 μm from the scleral spur (AOD750) provided the most diagnostic information, providing an optimal sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75%-96%) and specificity of 77% (71%-83%) at a cutpoint of 367 μm, and a sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 54%-74%) when specificity was constrained to 90% (cutpoint, 283 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

On AS-OCT, the AOD750 parameter detected approximately two-thirds of cases of gonioscopically narrow angles when test specificity was set to 90%. Although such a sensitivity may not be sufficient when screening solely for narrow angles, AS-OCT requires little additional effort if posterior segment OCT is already being performed and thus could provide incremental benefit when performing OCT-based screening.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Iris volume change with physiologic mydriasis to identify development of angle closure: the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial

AIMS

To assess dynamic change of iris area (Iarea) and volume (VOL) with physiologic pupil dilation for progression of primary angle closure suspects.

METHODS

Participants underwent baseline examinations including gonioscopy and anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) as part of the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial. The AS-OCT images were obtained both in the dark and light. Progression was defined as development of primary angle closure or an acute angle closure attack. Static ocular biometrics and dynamic changes were compared between progressors and non-progressors and multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess risk factors for progression.

RESULTS

A mean 16.8% decrease in Iarea and a mean 6.26% decrease in VOL occurred with pupil dilation, while 22.96% non-progressors and 40% progressors presented VOL increases with pupil dilation. Iarea in light and dark and VOL in light were significantly smaller in progressors. In a multivariable logistic model, older age (p=0.008), narrower horizontal angle opening distance (AOD) 250 µm from the scleral spur (AOD250, p=0.001), flatter iris curvature (IC, p=0.006) and lower loss of iris volume (ΔVOL, p=0.04) were significantly associated with progression. With receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve for ΔVOL alone was 0.621, while that for the combined index (age, AOD250, IC and ΔVOL) was 0.824. Eyes with elevated intraocular pressure had less VOL loss compared with progressors developing peripheral anterior synechiae alone (p=0.055 for ΔVOL adjusted for pupil enlargement).

CONCLUSION

A smaller change in ΔVOL is an additive risk factor to identify eyes more likely to develop angle closure disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN45213099.

Frequency and risk factors of narrow angles in patients with pseudoexfoliation: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency and risk factors of narrow angles in pseudoexfoliation (PXF) patients.

METHODS

A prospective case-control study was conducted during the period from March 2017 to December 2020. Adult patients (above 40 years) presenting with PXF were consecutively enrolled (study group). Cases were matched with individuals above 40 years presenting to a comprehensive ophthalmology clinic without evidence of PXF (control group).

RESULTS

We enrolled 196 PXF patients and 98 controls. The occurrence of narrow angles was 25% in the PXF group and 5.1% in the control group (P = 0.0001). Compared to controls, PXF patients were older (72.6 ± 9.6 vs. 64.4 ± 8.5, P < 0.0001) and had a lower mean ACD (2.79 ± 0.4 vs. 3.05 ± 0.4, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in AL measurements between both groups (23.3 ± 1.4 vs. 23.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.0714). After stratification by age group and gender, the risk of narrow angles was higher in PXF patients above 70 years (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 0.91-23.87; P, 0.044). There was no gender difference in the risk of developing narrow angles.

CONCLUSION

Narrow angles are more frequently encountered in PXF patients compared to controls. Advanced age (> 70 years) is significantly associated with an increased likelihood of developing narrow angles.