1
|
Yilmaz MT, Sari SY, Zorlu F, Yazici G. External Beam Radiotherapy in the Management of Uveal Melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024:10.1007/s11864-024-01212-5. [PMID: 38869695 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01212-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults. With the evidence demonstrating that episcleral plaque brachytherapy (EPB) has similar survival rates as enucleation in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS), eye-sparing treatments have come to the fore today. External radiotherapy techniques (proton beam radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery) are an important treatment option for globe-sparing treatments. There are no prospective randomized trials comparing these techniques; however, retrospective series, meta-analyses, and reviews indicate that these EPB and external radiotherapy techniques are equal. With this review, we aimed to examine the external radiotherapy techniques used in the treatment of uveal melanoma in detail with reference to the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wulff J, Koska B, Ahmad Khalil D, Richter R, Maximilian Bäcker C, Bäumer C, Foerster A, Bechrakis NE, Timmermann B. Uncertainties in ocular proton planning and their impact on required margins. Phys Med 2024; 121:103358. [PMID: 38643558 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review required margins in ocular proton therapy (OPT) based on an uncertainty estimation and to compare them with widely used values. Further, uncertainties when using registered funduscopy images in the 3D model is investigated. METHODS An uncertainty budget in planning and delivery was defined to determine required aperture and range margins. Setup uncertainties were considered for a cohort of treated patients and tested in a worst-case estimation. Other uncertainties were based on a best-guess and knowledge of institutional specifics, e.g. range reproducibility. Margins for funduscopy registration were defined resulting from scaling, rotation and translation of the image. Image formation for a wide-field fundus camera was reviewed and compared to the projection employed in treatment planning systems. RESULTS Values for aperture and range with margins of 2.5 mm as reported in literature could be determined. Aperture margins appear appropriate for setup uncertainties below 0.5 mm, but depend on lateral penumbra. Range margins depend on depth and associated density uncertainty in tissue. Registration of funduscopy images may require margins of >2 mm, increasing towards the equator. Difference in the projection may lead to discrepancies of several mm. CONCLUSIONS The commonly used 2.5 mm aperture margin was validated as an appropriate choice, while range margins could be reduced for lower ranges. Margins may however not include uncertainties in contouring and possible microscopic spread. If a target base is contoured on registered funduscopy images care must be taken as they are subject to larger uncertainties. Multimodal imaging approach in OPT remains advisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany.
| | - Benjamin Koska
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Dalia Ahmad Khalil
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany
| | - Ronald Richter
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus Maximilian Bäcker
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany; Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Andreas Foerster
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nikolaos E Bechrakis
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tseng YH, Hsu CA, Chou YB. Comparing efficacy of charged-particle therapy with brachytherapy in treatment of uveal melanoma. Eye (Lond) 2024:10.1038/s41433-024-03035-y. [PMID: 38565600 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03035-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular tumour in adults. The most used eye-preserving treatments are charged-particle therapy (CPT) and brachytherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacies and complications of these two radiotherapies. METHODS We searched EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2012 to December 2022. Two independent reviewers identified controlled studies comparing outcomes of CPT versus brachytherapy. Case series that utilize either treatment modality were also reviewed. RESULTS One hundred fifty studies met the eligibility criteria, including 2 randomized control trials, 5 controlled cohort studies, and 143 case series studies. We found significant reduction in local recurrence rate among patients treated with CPT compared to brachytherapy (Odds ratio[OR] 0.38, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.60, p < 0.01). Analysis also showed a trend of increased risks of secondary glaucoma after CPT. No statistically significant differences were found in analyzing risks of mortality, enucleation, and cataract. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggested no difference in mortality, enucleation rate and cataract formation rate comparing the two treatments. Lower local recurrence rate and possibly higher secondary glaucoma incidence was noted among patients treated with CPT. Nevertheless, the overall level of evidence is limited, and further high-quality studies are necessary to provide a more definitive conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsuan Tseng
- Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
| | - Chia-An Hsu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Bai Chou
- Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trofimov AV, Aronow ME, Gragoudas ES, Keane FK, Kim IK, Shih HA, Bhagwat MS. A Systematic Comparison of Dose Distributions Delivered in 125I Plaque Brachytherapy and Proton Radiation Therapy for Ocular Melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:501-510. [PMID: 35878716 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize dose distributions with 125I plaque brachytherapy compared with proton radiation therapy for ocular melanoma for relevant clinical scenarios, based on tumor base diameter (d), apical height (h), and location. METHODS AND MATERIALS Plaque and proton treatment plans were created for 4 groups of cases: (1) REF: 39 instances of reference midsize circular-base tumor (d = 12 mm, h = 5 mm), in locations varying by retinal clock hours and distance to fovea, optic disc, and corneal limbus; (2) SUP: 25 superiorly located; (3) TEMP: 25 temporal; and (4) NAS: 25 nasally located tumors that were a fixed distance from the fovea but varying in d (6-18 mm) and h (3-11 mm). For both modalities, 111 unique scenarios were characterized in terms of the distance to points of interest, doses delivered to fovea, optic disc, optic nerve at 3 mm posterior to the disc (ON@3mm), lens, and retina. Comparative statistical evaluation was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS Superior dose distributions favored plaque for sparing of (1) fovea in large (d + h ≥ 21 mm) NAS tumors; (2) ON@3mm in REF cases located ≤4 disc diameters from disc, and in NAS overall. Protons achieved superior dose sparing of (1) fovea and optic disc in REF, SUP, and TEMP; (2) ON@3mm in REF >4 disc diameters from disc, and in SUP and TEMP; and (3) the lens center overall and lens periphery in REF ≤6 mm from the corneal limbus, and in TEMP with h = 3 mm. Although protons could completely spare sections of the retina, plaque dose was more target conformal in the high-dose range (50% and 90% of prescription dose). CONCLUSIONS Although comparison between plaque and proton therapy is not straightforward because of the disparity in dose rate, prescriptions, applicators, and delivery techniques, it is possible to identify distinctions between dose distributions, which could help inform decisions by providers and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexei V Trofimov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Mary E Aronow
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Evangelos S Gragoudas
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Florence K Keane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ivana K Kim
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mandar S Bhagwat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bechrakis NE, Bornfeld N, Heindl LM, Skoetz N, Leyvraz S, Joussen AM. Uveal Melanoma - Standardised Procedure in Diagnosis, Therapy and Surveillance. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238:761-772. [PMID: 34376006 DOI: 10.1055/a-1534-0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma is a rare intraocular tumour, for which there is currently no national evidence-based guideline in Germany. The aim of this project was to provide a common standard operating procedure (SOP) for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of uveal melanoma, within the network of German leading oncology centres funded by German Cancer Aid. The SOP was created as part of a moderated consensus process. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In a multistage process, a common SOP was developed for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of uveal melanoma, as based on current knowledge of the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Norbert Bornfeld
- Zentrum für Erkrankungen des hinteren Augenabschnitts, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Deutschland
| | - Ludwig M Heindl
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Centrum für integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Aachen-Bonn-Köln-Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - Serge Leyvraz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Antonia M Joussen
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|