RISK FACTORS FOR BODY REGION SPECIFIC INJURIES IN SKIERS AND SNOWBOARDERS

Snowsport experience, expertise, lower limb injury and somatosensory ability

OBJECTIVES

Previous research demonstrates that a history of ankle injuries increases the risk of overall future injuries, and that somatosensory scores are correlated to sport performance. This research explores the relationship between lower limb somatosensory scores in snowsport participants and ankle injury history; and the relationship between lower limb somatosensory scores and Instructor qualification.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Experienced snowsport participants who were recruited through a western Canadian snowsport school completed a questionnaire that included their ankle injury history, the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (idFAI), the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), and their current instructor qualification level, as a proxy for sport performance. Lower limb somatosensory was assessed using the active movement extent discrimination assessment (AMEDA) method.

RESULTS

Of the 75 participants, 55% reported at least one previous ankle injury. An independent sample t-test did not show any significant difference in somatosensory scores of those with an ankle injury history (x¯=.66, SD=.05) or not (x¯=.66, SD=.05). Nor was there any difference between those with a functionally unstable ankle (i.e. CAIT<24 and idFAI>11) and all others [x¯=.66, SD=.04 cf. x¯=.66, SD=.05; t(67)=.54, p=.78]. An ANOVA exploring the relationship between Instructor Qualification and somatosensory scores was significant at p<.05 [F(4, 68)=4.0, p=.006].

CONCLUSIONS

The results did not reveal any significant difference in perceived functional instability and somatosensory scores, which contrasts with previous research. The sport performance finding is consistent with previous work examining the relationship between somatosensory scores and sport performances. Further research is needed to explore if the dynamic snowsport working environment impacts ankle instability and somatosensory scores.

Increased patterns of risky behaviours among helmet wearers in skiing and snowboarding

BACKGROUND

There has been an ongoing debate as to whether wearing helmets in skiing and snowboarding increases the risk tolerance of participants.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the roles of demographic and personality variables, and helmet usage in predicting risk taking behaviours in a cross-sectional sample of intermediate and proficient skiers and snowboarders.

METHODS

Risk taking in skiing was measured using a validated 10-item self-report measure which was designated as the outcome variable in a three step hierarchical regression. Independent predictors included age, sex, education, sport, ability, helmet usage, and personality traits that have been associated with risk taking: impulsivity and sensation seeking.

RESULTS

In the final regression model, helmet use significantly predicted variance in risk taking (standardized β=.10, p=.024), and the relationship remained after accounting for variance due to demographic variables and general trait measures. The partial relationship between risk taking and sex, ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking were also significant (p<.05).

CONCLUSION

High sensation seeking, high impulsivity, male sex, and proficiency were associated with increased patterns of risky behaviours in skiers and snowboarders, and after accounting for these factors, helmet use was a significant predictor of risk taking. The relationship between helmet use and risk taking was modest suggesting that the costs of increased risk taking is not likely to outweigh the protective benefits of a helmet.