Inequities in surgical outcomes by race and sex in the United States: retrospective cohort study

Modifiable risk factors of inequalities in hypertension: analysis of 100 million health checkups recipients

Inequalities in health behaviors are thought to contribute to inequalities in hypertension. This study examined the extent to which modifiable mediating factors explain income inequalities in hypertension. This repeated cross-sectional study used data from National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB) from 2009 to 2015. Those aged between 40 and 74 were enrollees in the Specific Health Checkups. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90, or the use of antihypertensive medication. The mediating effects of exercise, obesity, smoking, and alcohol drinking on the association between income, as an indicator of SES, and hypertension were determined by the Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) method. The mean age of the 68,684,025 men and 59,118,221 women was 54.7 (SD = 9.6) and 56.7 (SD = 10.0) years, respectively. Prevalence of hypertension was higher in the lowest income group (48.6% for men, 40.2% for women) than in the highest income group (33.3% for men, 21.5% for women). Inequalities tended to increase over time. Inequalities were larger among those who did not use antihypertensive medication. Modifiable risks explained 10.6% of the association between income and hypertension for men and 15.1% for women. In men, drinking and obesity explained 8.8% and 5.5% of the inequalities in hypertension, respectively. In women, obesity explained 18.8%. Exercise increased the proportion mediated over time. Smoking explained 5.5% among women taking antihypertensive medication. There were health inequalities in hypertension among Japanese adults, and the modifiable risk factors partially explained the inequalities.

The Use of Brief Mindfulness Interventions in the Context of Perioperative Care

The purpose of this review was to synthesize and categorize the literature on the use of brief mindfulness interventions for both patients and physicians across the spectrum of perioperative care. Web-based discovery services and discipline-specific databases were queried. Brief mindfulness interventions were defined as sessions lasting 30 min or less on any single occasion, with a total practice accumulation not exceeding 100 min per week, and a duration of up to 4 weeks. Study screening and data extraction were facilitated through the Covidence software platform. After screening 1047 potential studies, 201 articles were identified based on initial abstract and title screening; 10 studies ultimately met inclusion criteria. All ten studies were published between 2019 and 2023; most (n = 9) reports focused on patients (total joint arthroplasty, n = 3; stereotactic breast biopsy, n = 2; minimally invasive foregut surgery, n = 1; septorhinoplasty, n = 1; cardiac surgery, n = 1; and other/multiple procedures, n = 1); one studied investigated mindfulness interventions among surgeons. The duration of the interventions varied (3 min to 29 min). The most common issue that the mindfulness intervention aimed to address was pain (n = 6), followed by narcotic use (n = 3), anxiety (n = 2), delirium (n = 1), or patient satisfaction (n = 1). While most studies included a small sample size and had inconclusive results, brief mindfulness interventions were noted to impact various health-related outcomes, including mental health outcomes, anxiety, and pain perception. Mindfulness interventions may be a scalable, low-cost, time-limited intervention that has the potential to optimize well-being and surgical outcomes broadly construed.

The Significance of Equipment Availability and Anesthesia Educational Conferences to Decision-Making for EKG Lead V5 Abnormalities

Introduction To predict postoperative myocardial infarction rates in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Management recommends assessment of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in certain patients. Serial troponins are measured if the BNP level is elevated. In certain cases, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) alone does not perform well, for example, during vascular surgery. Cardiac events occur in 20% of all vascular surgery patients. The odds ratio for such events is 9.2 if ST segments were depressed by 1 mm intraoperatively (relative to the PR interval) within the first 48 hours postoperatively. Increasing the number of cables and pads from three to five for electrocardiogram (EKG) increases the sensitivity from around 30% to over 80% for ischemic events relative to a formal EKG stress test, and then the monitor continuously displays not only lead II but also lead V5. Methods Our hypothesis was that raising awareness about diagnostic and therapeutic options to reduce the risk of postoperative myocardial infarction would increase the use of five pads. We conducted open-ended surveys at six hospitals to assess the reasons for choosing three pads. In our university hospital practice, we measured a cross-sectional incidence of using three pads before and, once again, a month after an intervention during a single morning. Several resident conferences encouraged the use of five pads. Education included weekly lectures and informal discussions with other staff during surgery, demonstrating that using five pads allows interrogation of an entire 12-lead EKG. In comparison, three pads only allow viewing three leads. Results At baseline, only three pads were available in 96% of our 23 operating rooms. Five cables were available in eight of those surgeries, but two were taped off to the side. Surveys unveiled scarcity of equipment and, more importantly, disempowerment (i.e., knowing how to diagnose or when to treat ischemia). After several conferences, the prevalence of equipment availability of only three pads fell to 47%. Conclusions Education enumerated details of recognizing ischemic configurations of ST depression. Next, education revealed methods to interrupt the progression of ischemia to infarction such as elevated blood pressure and hematocrit, reducing heart rate, and calling a cardiology consultant if the anesthesiologist wishes to draw serial troponins. Barriers to implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway began with a need for more access to manage stress tests or optimize blood pressure medications after a preoperative anesthesia evaluation. The intraoperative barrier was knowing what to do if ST depression occurs. Therefore, we began raising awareness by encouraging the addition of an element of a future ERAS pathway, adding a cost of only $1 to monitor lead V5. Future ERAS pathways can include preoperative stress tests and consults, as found in published guidelines.

No significant differences in 60-day postoperative complication rates between conventional and shortened stems

PURPOSE

To compare 60-day complication rates, radiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes following primary THA with conventional versus shortened stems, in a large cohort study.

METHODS

The authors reviewed a consecutive series of 800 primary THAs, of which 781 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria: 395 received a conventional stem and 386 received a shortened stem. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted. Radiographic and clinical assessments were performed preoperatively and 60 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional stems, shortened stems had significantly less intraoperative complications (2.8% vs 0.3%, p = 0.006), but no significant differences in complications that did not require reoperation (1.0% vs 1.3%, p = 0.620), complications that required reoperation without stem revision (2.0% vs 1.0%, p = 0.384), and complications that required stem revision (0.5% vs 0.5%, p = 1.000). Four hips (two from each group) required stem revision and were thus excluded from 60-day assessment. There were no significant differences between groups in subsidence ≥ 3 mm (1.0% vs 0.5%, p = 0.686), alignment (90.3%vs 86.7%, p = 0.192), net change in offset (within 3 mm, 32.3% vs 30.5%, p = 0.097), and limb length discrepancy (3.0 ± 2.6 mm vs 2.9 ± 2.4 mm, p = 0.695). Compared to conventional stems, shortened stems had significantly better preoperative mHHS (56.5 ± 18.5 vs 64.5 ± 13.5, p < 0.001), and significantly lower net improvement in mHHS (29.9 ± 17.1 vs 24.4 ± 15.0, p < 0.001), but no significant differences in postoperative mHHS (87.3 ± 11.9 vs 89.4 ± 9.6, p = 0.109).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences between conventional and shortened stems in terms of postoperative complication rates, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative mHHS. However, patients implanted with shortened stems had less intraoperative complications, but lower net improvement in mHHS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective comparative cohort study.