Double-blind comparison of tolamolol, propranolol, practolol, and placebo in the treatment of angina pectoris

An Assessment of the Anti-Anginal Effect of Tolamolol, a New Beta-Blocking Agent

The anti-anginal activity of a new beta-blocking agent, tolamolol, was investigated in an open study.

Seventeen patients ( fourteen males, three females) from two centres were given tolamolol in doses varying from 150 mg to 800 mg daily for periods of between one and thirty-four weeks. Records were made of the number of attacks of angina and of the consumption of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate ( GTN). Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored together with possible side-effects and the results of routine laboratory tests. There was an over-all reduction in anginal attack rates and the number of GTN tablets used, although these did not reach statistical significance in the small numbers concerned. Heart rate and blood pressure were similarly reduced. Side-effects were of mild severity and were tolerated or disappeared with continued treatment.

Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity--relevance in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease

Beta adrenoceptor blockade has become one of the major therapeutic interventions in the medical management of ischaemic heart disease over the last 15 years. A number of beta adrenoceptor blockers have been developed with differing pharmacological properties including cardioselectivity and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). The relevance of this latter property has been in some doubt. A number of reports suggest that ISA confers haemodynamic benefits although there does not appear to be any clear therapeutic advantage. In addition it would appear that patients with severe or rest angina might benefit more from a pure beta antagonist rather than one with ISA when the beta blocker is used as monotherapy, but this situation rarely arises. This paper reviews and assesses the value of treatment of ischaemic heart disease with beta blockers possessing intrinsic sympathomimetic activity.

Pindolol and propranolol in patients with angina pectoris and normal or near-normal ventricular function. Lack of influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on global and segmental left ventricular function assessed by radionuclide ventriculography

To investigate the role of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on left ventricular (LV) function during antianginal therapy with beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists, 23 patients with chronic, exercise-induced angina pectoris and normal or near normal LV function underwent radionuclide ventriculography at rest and during exercise, during 3 randomly allocated periods: (a) treatment with oral propranolol, a drug without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, 40 to 80 mg 4 times a day; (2) treatment with pindolol, a drug with marked intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, 5 to 10 mg 2 times a day; and (3) a control period. During the control period, the LV ejection fraction decreased from rest (58.9 +/- 8.2%) to exercise (54.3 +/- 10.7%), and the wall motion score decreased from 0.57 +/- 1.08 at rest to 2.39 +/- 2.10 during exercise, p less than 0.001. After propranolol, the ejection fraction did not change significantly at rest (57.2 +/- 8.1%) but improved during exercise (56.8 +/- 11.8%), compared with control values. After pindolol, the ejection fraction did not change at rest (57.9 +/- 8.6%) but improved during exercise (56.9 +/- 8.1%), compared with control values. Similarly, the wall motion score after administration of both agents did not change significantly at rest, but improved during exercise (p less than 0.001). The number of anginal episodes, nitroglycerin tablets consumed, and magnitude of S-T segment depression decreased significantly with both pindolol and propranolol. With both drugs, a similar improvement in exercise tolerance and a similar decrease in exercise heart rate and blood pressure were obtained. It is concluded that pindolol and propranolol, beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists with and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, respectively, have similar effects on global and regional LV function in patients with angina pectoris, at doses producing equal suppression of exercise heart rate and similar antianginal effect.

Combined acebutolol/nifedipine therapy in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: additional improvement of ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction

To assess acute hemodynamic effects of combined oral nifedipine (10 mg) and acebutolol (100 mg), 21 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and stable angina pectoris were studied (three groups of seven randomized patients). Simultaneous hemodynamic and equilibrium radionuclide ejection fraction measurements were performed at rest and during exercise before treatment, 1 hour after administration of nifedipine, acebutolol or a combination of the two and again 1 hour after combined nifedipine and acebutolol. At the same exercise level achieved without drugs, angina, subjectively scored by the patients, decreased significantly after nifedipine, acebutolol and a combination of the two in association with a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (p less than 0.01). There was an additive effect of both drugs on heart rate, systolic blood pressure and therefore the double product (p less than 0.01 each). The negative effects of acute beta receptor blockade on cardiac index, resting ejection fraction and total peripheral resistance were balanced by the vasodilatory action of nifedipine. In patients with borderline heart failure no untoward effects were seen after combined therapy. Thus, acute combined acebutolol/nifedipine therapy in patients with stable angina proved to be hemodynamically superior to therapy with either drug alone and safe even in patients with moderately depressed left ventricular function. This finding provides a basis for appropriately designed long-term studies.

Intravenous beta-blockade in coronary heart disease: is cardioselectivity or intrinsic sympathomimetic activity hemodynamically useful?

Beta-blocking drugs are increasingly prescribed in coronary heart disease, but controversy surrounds the hemodynamic relevance of their ancillary pharmacologic properties--cardioselectivity and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. We therefore compared the effects of four intravenous beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists with different ancillary properties on left ventricular function in 24 patients with coronary heart disease. All four drugs depressed the relation between left ventricular filling pressure and cardiac output at rest and during exercise. However, practolol and oxprenolol, which have intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, induced significantly less depression of left ventricular function than either propranolol or metoprolol, which do not have this activity. Cardioselectivity, a property of both practolol and metoprolol, had no discernible hemodynamic advantage. Beta-blocking drugs that have intrinsic sympathomimetic activity appear to be more effective in maintaining cardiac function than drugs without this property, when given intravenously to patients with coronary heart disease.

Atenolol: once-daily cardioselective beta blockade for angina pectoris

The physiology, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of atenolol, a cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent, were evaluated in 10 patients with stable angina pectoris in a single-blind, dose-ranging study. After a 1-month control placebo period, atenolol was administered once daily at dosages of 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg for 2-week periods. All patients had fewer anginal attacks and consumed fewer nitroglycerin tablets than mg for 2-week periods. All patients had fewer anginal attacks and consumed fewer nitroglycerin tablets than during the placebo period. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG recordings showed a decrease in mean hourly heart rate throughout the dosing period, with preservation of diurnal variation. Maximal, symptom-limited, treadmill exercise tests performed 3 hours after drug ingestion showed significantly increased exercise time and decreased double products for all doses, but especially with 100-mg and 200-mg doses. Exercise time 24 hours after drug ingestion continued to show a decrease in maximum heart rate and double product, with 100-mg and 200-mg doses again being most effective. Atenolol serum levels correlated with percent reduction in exercise heart rate and increased exercise time. Serum levels rose linearly, with an average elimination half-life of about 10 hours after chronic oral dosing. Thus, atenolol was an effective antianginal agent and suppressed resting and exercise-stressed heart rate for 24 hours after ingestion when given in a 100-mg or 200-mg dose once daily.

Comparison of five beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists with different ancillary properties during sustained twice daily therapy in angina pectoris

The effects of five beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agents and placebo during twice daily sustained therapy were compared in 23 patients with stable, exertional angina pectoris. The study was double blind in design, and each drug was prescribed for a period of one month in a random fashion. The number of anginal attacks and consumption of glyceryl trinitrate tablets during the one month period were significantly reduced by a similar degree during therapy with all five beta blocking drugs in comparison to the placebo (P less than 0.01). Exercise tolerance, when assessed 12 hours after a previous dose had been given and 1 hour after the morning dose was given, also improved by a similar degree with all five drugs in comparison to the placebo (P less than 0.01). The increase in exercise duration was associated with a significant reduction in the S-T segment depression, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure, with each of the five drugs--effects markedly different from those obtained with the placebo (P less than 0.01). These data show that noncardioselective (propranolol and oxprenolol) and cardioselective (practolol, metoprolol and tolamolol) agents, as well as drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (oxprenolol and practolol), were equally effective antianginal agents during sustained therapy. Furthermore, twice daily therapy with any of these drugs was effective in the management of patients with angina pectoris.

Comparison of the immediate effects of five beta-adrenoreceptor-blocking drugs with different ancillary properties in angina pectoris

We compared the immediate effects of five beta-adrenoreceptor-blocking agents in 16 patients with stable angina pectoris. Acute dose-response studies showed that all five drugs improved exercise tolerance and reduced ST-segment depression, heart rate and blood pressure by a similar degree in comparison with a placebo (P less than 0.01). Near maximum improvement in exercise tolerance occurred when the acute cumulative oral dose had reached 160 mg for propranolol and oxprenolol, 200 mg for metoprolol and tolamolol and 400 mg for practolol. When these drugs were administered as a single doses, increase in walking time before the development of angina and reduction in ST-segment depression, heart rate and systolic blood pressure all occurred within one hour and persisted for eight hours--effects markedly different from the response to a placebo (P less than 0.01). These data show that non-cardioselective agents (propranolol and oxprenolol), cardioselective agents (practolol, metoprolol and tolamolol), as well as drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (oxprenolol and practolol), were equally effective in the treatment of angina pectoris.

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by estimation of coronary sinus lactate

In an attempt to assess the value of coronary sinus lactate estimation before and during atrial pacing for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease, 70 patients with angina were investigated in this way and by selective coronary arteriography. Thirty-five had radiologically normal coronary arteries and 35 had coronary artery disease. When the change in coronary arteriovenous lactate difference was less than 0.09 mmol/l (0.8 mg/100 ml) between the control and the peak atrial pacing sample, the coronary arteries were normal except in one patient who had distal disease of a single vessel. When the change was greater than 0.22 mmol/l (2.0 mg/100 ml) coronary artery disease was always found, and when the change was greater than 0.39 mmol/l (3.5 mg/100 ml) there was always disease of two or three vessels. Unfortunately, the presence or absence of coronary artery disease could not be predicted when the change fell between 0.09 and 0.22 mmol/l (0.8 and 2.0 mg/100 ml). Estimation of coronary sinus lactate before and during atrial pacing can thus frequently distinguish patients with normal coronary arteries from those with coronary artery disease.

Comparison of atenolol with propranolol in the treatment of angina pectoris with special reference to once daily administration of atenolol

Fourteen patients with angina pectoris completed a double blind trial of atenolol 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg twice daily and propranolol 80 mg thrice daily. In comparison with placebo, all active treatments significantly reduced anginal attacks, consumption of glyceryl trinitrate, resting and exercise heart rate, resting and exercise systolic blood pressure, and significantly prolonged exercise time. There was no significant difference between the effects of propranolol and atenolol. Nine patients completed a further trial comparing atenolol given once or twice daily. Both regimens were effective and there was no significant difference between the reductions in anginal attacks, glyceryl trinitrate consumption, systolic blood pressure, or heart rate. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms showed that atenolol consistently reduced heart rate throughout the 24-hour period whether given once or twice daily. Atenolol is a potent antianginal agent which, in most patients, is likely to be effective once daily.

An eighteen months' study of the clinical response to metoprolol, a selective beta1-receptor blocking agent, in patients with angina pectoris

Following an initial dose response study, metoprolol, a selective beta1-receptor blocking agent, was compared with equipotent dosages of propanolol in a double blind cross-over study, including exercise tolerance tests, on fourteen patients with angina pectoris. Long term therapy with metoprolol then followed until the seventy-second week. Patients performed 8% more total work on metoprolol with 15% more work recorded up to the onset of S-T depression, in comparison with propranolol. In the long term, ther was no significant difference in work performed when the daily dosage of metoprolol was changed from a q.i.d. to a b.d. regime. Metoprolol was shown to be an effective anti-anginal compound with good tolerance and safety, with gradual improvement in underlying myocardial ischaemia during long term treatment.

Reassessment of failed beta-blocker treatment in angina pectoris by peak-exercise heart rate measurements

Twenty-one patients with angina pectoris were treated with adrenergic beta-receptor antagonists. Previously the resting heart rate had been used as a guide to treatment, a reduction in the rate to 55-60 beats/min without symptomatic improvement indicating failure of medical treatment. These patients were re-evaluated before coronary arteriography using the peak-exercise heart rate as an index of adrenergic beta-receptor antagonism. The dose of beta-blocking drugs was increased to produce a peak-exercise heart rate of less than 100 beats/min or a consistent rate of 100-125 beats/min which would not lessen in spite of progressive dose increments. The resting heart rate was ignored. On these criteria 15 patients previously considered to have responded inadequately to beta-blockade responded satisfactorily and were therefore removed from the waiting list for coronary arteriography. They all remained well up to two years later. Six patients failed to respond and had coronary arteriography with a view to surgical treatment. Reliance on the resting heart rate as the index of optimum adrenergic beta-receptor antagonism is likely to lead to premature or unnecessary referral for surgery; the failure of beta-blockade in the treatment of angina pectoris can be determined simply and accurately by using peak-exercise heart rate.

Cardiac and pulmonary effects of acebutolol

In a double-blind randomised study, single intravenous doses of propranolol (0-1 mg. per kg.), practolol (1 mg. per kg.), acebutolol (1 mg. per kg.), or placebo were each administered at weekly intervals to six healthy volunteers. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (F.E.V.1), resting and exercise heart-rate, and resting and exercise peak flow-rate (P.F.R.) were determined before and at 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours after each treatment. Venous blood-samples were also obtained at these times. Compared with placebo, resting heart-rate was reduced after all three drugs, but the corresponding differences in exercise heart-rate were much greater, more consistent, and of greater statistical significance. At 2, 3, and 4 hours when acebutolol and propranolol produced equivalent cardiac beta-blocking activity (judged by reductions in exercise heart-rate), their mean plasma concentratios were in the ratio of about 8/1; and at 2 hours when practolol and acebutolol gave rise to almost equivalent cardiac beta blockade, their mean plasma concentratio ration was 3/1. At times, reductions in F.E.V.1 and resting P.F.R. after propranolol (but not after practolol or acebutolol) were significantly greater than the corresponding changes after placebo. The reductions in exercies P.F.R. after propranolol (6 hours) and acebutolol (4 hours) (but not after practolol) were significantly greater than the changes after placebo. Changes in F.E.V.1, resting and exercise P.F.R. after propranolol, and the corresponding changes after practolol, were significantly different, all of which confirmed that practolol was more cardioselective than propranolo. In general, the reductions in F.E.V.1 and resting P.F.R. after acebutolol were slightly smaller than after propranolol, excepting at 6 hours when the difference between them was significant. The reductions in exercise P;F.R. after acebutolol and propranolol were of the same order, there being no significant differences between the two, whereas the reductions after acebutolol were clearly greater than the corresponding changes after practolol, the differences being significant at 2, 3, and 4 hours.