Planned and unplanned deliveries at home: implications of a changing ratio

Births and their outcomes by time, day and year: a retrospective birth cohort data linkage study

Background

Studies of daily variations in the numbers of births in England and Wales since the 1970s have found a pronounced weekly cycle, with numbers of daily births being highest from Tuesdays to Fridays and lowest at weekends and on public holidays. Mortality appeared to be higher at weekends. As time of birth was not included in national data systems until 2005, there have been no previous analyses by time of day.

Objectives

To link data from birth registration and birth notification to data about care during birth and any subsequent hospital admissions and to quality assure the linkage. To use the linked data to analyse births and their outcomes by time of day, day of the week and year of birth.

Design

A retrospective birth cohort analysis of linked routine data.

Setting

England and Wales.

Outcome measures

Mortality of babies and mothers, and morbidity recorded at birth and any subsequent hospital admission.

Population and data sources

Birth registration and notification records of 7,013,804 births in 2005–14, already linked to subsequent death registration records for babies, children and women who died within 1 year of giving birth, were provided by the Office for National Statistics. Stillbirths and neonatal deaths data from confidential enquiries for 2005–9 were linked to the registration records. Data for England were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and data for Wales were linked to the Patient Episode Database for Wales and the National Community Child Health Database.

Results

Cross-sectional analysis of all births in England and Wales showed a regular weekly cycle. Numbers of births each day increased from Mondays to Fridays. Numbers were lowest at weekends and on public holidays. Overall, numbers of births peaked between 09.00 and 12.00, followed by a much smaller peak in the early afternoon and a decrease after 17.00. Numbers then increased from 20.00, peaking at around 03.00–05.00, before falling again after 06.00. Singleton births after spontaneous onset and birth, including births in freestanding midwifery units and at home, were most likely to occur between midnight and 06.00, peaking at 04.00–06.00. Elective caesarean births were concentrated in weekday mornings. Births after induced labours were more likely to occur at hours around midnight on Tuesdays to Saturdays, irrespective of the mode of birth.

Limitations

The project was delayed by data access and information technology infrastructure problems. Data from confidential enquiries were available only for 2005–9 and some HES variables were incomplete. There was insufficient time to analyse the mortality and morbidity outcomes.

Conclusions

The timing of birth varies by place of birth, onset of labour and mode of birth. These patterns have implications for midwifery and medical staffing.

Future work

An application has now been submitted for funding to analyse the mortality outcomes and further funding will be sought to undertake the other outstanding analyses.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 7, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Out-of-hospital deliveries have risen involving greater neonatal morbidity: Risk factors in out-of-hospital deliveries in one University Hospital region in Finland

AIM

Most Finnish births take place in hospital, but out-of-hospital deliveries (OHDs) have increased. This study evaluated trends and reasons for OHDs in the Tampere University Hospital catchment area.

METHODS

The study cohort included all planned and unplanned OHDs in the Hospital area from 1996 to 2011; the control group comprised two hospital births for each OHD. Trends in incidence and risk factors for OHDs, including neonatal morbidities, were established and compared to the controls.

RESULTS

OHDs accounted for 67 (0.10%) of the 76 773 births in the area, the proportion remaining unchanged between 1996 and 2005, but then increasing. Risk factors associated with OHDs were smoking during pregnancy, short labour, higher number of previous births, single status, residence more than 35 kilometres from the delivery unit and fewer prenatal visits. OHD cases were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal care unit than controls and to be treated for suspected infections and hypothermia.

CONCLUSION

Smoking, short duration of labour, a higher number of previous births, single status and longer distances from the delivery unit were associated with OHDs. Eight (12%) mothers had OHDs without antenatal care, and their infants had more neonatal morbidities.

[Maternal and neonatal outcomes of unplanned deliveries]

OBJECTIVES

Know the impact of the unplanned deliveries in a town of medium size, the characteristics of these women and maternal and neonatal risks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted between January 2002 and December 2009. Unexpected delivery was defined as any delivery taking place outside of a non-elective way maternity. Each unexpected delivery was matched at nearest delivery of equivalent term, at the CHU maternity, with an onset of spontaneous labour.

RESULTS

Ninety-four women gave birth unexpectedly for a total of 48,721 births (incidence of 0.19%). There was a significant difference between cases and controls for parity (1.8 versus 0.9), the lack of follow-up of pregnancy (21.3% versus 1.1%), tobacco (57.4% versus 25.5%), the socio-economic level, the type of feeding (artificial: 61.7% versus 30.6%), the home-hospital distance and obstetric follow-up. We found a significant increase in perinatal mortality (6.4% versus 1%) and stay in Neonatal ICU (19.1% versus 9.2%). The main neonatal morbidity was hypothermia.

CONCLUSION

It is difficult to target a population at risk because the type of these women is non-specific. Prevention of unplanned deliveries and their morbidities through information of patients on the grounds of urgent consultation and support of the newborn to limit hypothermia.

Accidental out-of-hospital deliveries: a case-control study

AIM

To determine risk factors for accidental out-of-hospital deliveries (OHDs), which represent 0.5% of live births in France and are associated with poor neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study assessed accidental OHDs that occurred in the Finistère District (Brittany, France) between January 2007 and December 2009. For each OHD case, two controls were randomly selected. Outcome measures included maternal demographics, obstetric characteristics and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, accidental OHDs accounted for 0.42% of all births; 76 accidental OHDs were included in the analysis. Multivariate analysis found four independent risk factors for accidental OHD: multiparity [OR: 8.84 (3.22-24.29)], unemployment [OR: 4.99 (1.85-13.47)], lack of or poor antenatal care [OR: 9.00 (2.41-33.72)] and a travel time >45 min from home to the delivery unit [OR: 6.18 (1.33-28.65) versus < 15 min]. Significantly more newborns from the OHD group required admission to the neonatal unit (p = 0.04), but accidental OHD was not significantly associated with prematurity or low birth weight.

CONCLUSION

Four risk factors for accidental OHD were identified. Setting up an anonymous registry of OHD cases could improve our knowledge and screening of women at risk.

Mortality in out-of-hospital premature births

AIM

To determine whether the mortality for out-of-hospital (OOH) premature births was higher than for in-hospital premature births and identify additional risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A historical cohort study of a consecutive series of live-born, OOH, births of 24-35 weeks gestation cared for by two Transport Teams working in and around Paris, France 1994-2005. Matching with in-hospital births was according to gestational age, antenatal steroid use, the mode of delivery and nearest year of birth.

RESULTS

Eighty-five OOH premature births were identified, of whom 83 met inclusion criteria, and 132 matching in-hospital premature births were selected. There was 18% mortality in the OOH group compared with 8% for the in-hospital group [p = 0.04, OR 2.9, (CI 95% 1.0-8.4)]. Variables significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the OOH birth were HIV infection, lower maternal age and endo-tracheal intubation, lack of medical follow-up during pregnancy, low temperature and low birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality was more than twice as high in out-of-hospital deliveries than for in-hospital matched controls. Hypothermia was an important associated risk factor. Measures such as oxygen administration to maintain an appropriate saturation for gestational age, the provision of polyethylene plastic wraps and skin-to-skin contact are recommended.

Estimating intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births: when the 'best' available data are not good enough

OBJECTIVE

To critically appraise a recent study on the safety of home birth (Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. BJOG 2008;115:554) and assess its contribution to the debate about risks and benefits of planned home birth for women at low risk of complications.

DESIGN

Critical appraisal of a published paper.

SETTING

England and Wales.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Home births from 1994-2003 and all women giving birth in the same time period.

METHODS

Six members of a multidisciplinary group appraised the paper independently. Comments were collated and synthesised.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Assessment of: overall methodology; assumptions used in estimating figures; methods used for calculations; conclusions drawn from the results and reliability and consistency of data.

RESULTS

Although there were some positive aspects to the study, there were weaknesses in design and an inaccurate estimate of risk. Our evidence suggests that the conclusions drawn did not reflect the results and the methodological weaknesses found in the study rendered both the results and conclusions invalid.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our critical appraisal, the study does not contribute to the existing evidence about the safety of home birth to inform decision-making or provision of care. The limitations could have been identified by the peer review process and the problems were compounded by an inaccurate press release. Great care needs to be taken by journals to ensure the accuracy of information before dissemination to the scientific community, clinicians and the public. These data should not have been used to inform national guidelines.

An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to obtain the best estimate of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality (IPPM) rates for booked home births.

DESIGN

A population-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING

England and Wales.

SUBJECTS

All births in England and Wales, including home births (intended or unintended) occurring between 1994 and 2003.

METHODS

All IPPM data were derived from the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Denominators were derived by using unintended home births and transfer rates from home to hospital, from previous studies, with sensitivity analyses. IPPM rates were calculated for the three following subgroups: (a) the completed home birth group, (b) the transferred group and (c) the unintended home birth group.

OUTCOME

IPPM rate.

RESULTS

The overall IPPM rate for England and Wales improved between 1994 and 2003. However, data to obtain a precise estimate of IPPM rate for booked home birth were not available. The average IPPM rate for all births in the study period was 0.79 per 1000 births (95% CI 0.77-0.81), and the estimated IPPM rate for booked home births was 1.28 or 0.74 per 1000 births, depending on the method of calculation (range 0.49-1.47). The IPPM rates for the completed home birth group appeared to be lower throughout the study period compared with the unintended home birth groups. Those women who had booked for a home birth, but later needed to transfer their care for a hospital birth, appeared to have the highest risk of IPPM in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study need to be interpreted with caution due to inconsistencies occurring in the recorded data. However, the data do highlight two important features. First, they suggest that IPPM rates for home births do not appear to have improved over the study period examined, even though rates did so overall. Second, although the women who booked for home births and had their babies at home seemed to have a generally low IPPM rate, those who required their care to be transferred to hospital did not. Women who book for home births should be offered comprehensive evidence-based information about the potential benefits, risks and uncertainties associated with their choice of birthplace by the healthcare professional responsible for supporting their decision. It is of considerable concern that the data recorded nationally in England and Wales do not provide accurate information about when and why a transfer from home to hospital booking occurs and about their outcomes.

A review of the literature on the midwife and community-based maternity care

OBJECTIVE

to review the UK literature relating to community-based maternity care.

DESIGN

all UK research studies published between 1970 and 1998 relating to community-based maternity care were included. Searches were made via a number of electronic databases using defined search terms. All papers included were independently reviewed by a minimum of two researchers. Study findings were tabulated using a pro-forma. Findings are summarised in this paper.

FINDINGS

a total of 241 papers were deemed to meet all inclusion criteria. The majority of studies used descriptive methods with only 11 papers reporting findings from randomised controlled trials. Findings are reported relating to clinical outcomes, the care process and the views of women and health professionals. CONCLUSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS: the overall quality of the evidence in the papers reviewed was very mixed. What limited evidence there is suggests that, for the majority of women, care in community settings is as safe and as acceptable to women as care provided in hospital. Despite a large volume of literature, the amount that is known about midwives' contribution to care, and what women think about it, is limited. There is a need for controlled studies to compare outcomes for different patterns of care and for well-designed observational studies to provide information on the care process.

Meta-analysis of the safety of home birth

BACKGROUND

The safety of planned home birth is controversial. This study examined the safety of planned home birth backed up by a modern hospital system compared with planned hospital birth in the Western world.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of six controlled observational studies was conducted, and the perinatal outcomes of 24,092 selected and primarily low-risk pregnant women were analyzed to measure mortality and morbidity, including Apgar scores, maternal lacerations, and intervention rates. Confounding was controlled through restriction, matching, or in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Perinatal mortality was not significantly different in the two groups (OR = 0.87, 95% Ci 0.54-1.41). The principal difference in the outcome was a lower frequency of low Apgar scores (OR = 0.55; 0.41-0.74) and severe lacerations (OR = 0.67; 0.54-0.83) in the home birth group. Fewer medical interventions occurred in the home birth group: induction (statistically significant ORs in the range 0.06-0.39), augmentation (0.26-0.69), episiotomy (0.02-0.39), operative vaginal birth (0.03-0.42), and cesarean section (0.05-0.31). No maternal deaths occurred in the studies. Some differences may be partly due to bias. The findings regarding morbidity are supported by randomized clinical trials of elements of birth care relevant for home birth, however, and the finding relating to mortality is supported by large register studies comparing hospital settings of different levels of care.

CONCLUSION

Home birth is an acceptable alternative to hospital confinement for selected pregnant women, and leads to reduced medical interventions.

Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home births. Northern Region Perinatal Mortality Survey Coordinating Group

OBJECTIVE

To document the outcome of planned and unplanned births outside hospital.

DESIGN

Confidential review of every pregnancy ending in stillbirth or neonatal death in which plans had been made for home delivery, irrespective of where delivery eventually occurred. The review was part of a sustained collaborative survey of all perinatal deaths.

SETTING

Northern Regional Health Authority area.

SUBJECTS

All 558,691 registered births to women normally resident in the former Northern Regional Health Authority area during 1981-94.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Perinatal death.

RESULTS

The estimated perinatal mortality during 1981-94 among women booked for a home birth was 14 deaths in 2888 births. This was less than half that among all women in the region. Only three of the 14 women delivered outside hospital. Independent review suggested that two of the 14 deaths might have been averted by different management. Both births occurred in hospital, and in only one was management before admission of the mother judged inappropriate. Perinatal loss to the 64 women who booked for hospital delivery but delivered outside and to the 67 women who delivered outside hospital without ever making arrangements to receive professional care during labour accounted for the high perinatal mortality (134 deaths in 3466 deliveries) among all births outside hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The perinatal hazard associated with planned home birth in the few women who exercised this option (< 1%) was low and mostly unavoidable. Health authorities purchasing maternity care need to address the much greater hazard associated with unplanned delivery outside hospital.

Community midwives' views and experience of home birth

This two-part study explored the home birth experiences of all full time practising community midwives within three health authorities. The study consisted of a self-completion questionnaire, followed by interviews with a random stratified sub-sample of the midwives. The study sample consisted of 56 midwives of whom 44 (78%) agreed to participate. The total experience of home birth by these midwives was limited. The mean number of home births undertaken in the previous year was only two and 14 midwives had not undertaken any. The average number of home births undertaken in their whole career was six. Four midwives (9%) had never undertaken any. Only two midwives (5%) routinely offered home birth at booking. Despite lack of experience, half the sample were strongly positive about home birth. Factors that influenced their feelings about home birth were more complex but were unrelated to the amount of their home birth experience, their age, training or own experience of childbirth. Positive feelings about home birth resulted from the quality of positive previous experiences, education and knowledge and an autonomous view of women and midwives. Negative feelings tended to result from a lack of specific skills, namely suturing, resuscitation and siting of IVIs, midwives' inadequate support networks, doctors' attitudes and a confused perception of the provision of emergency cover.

A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981-1987

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate practice comparing planned home birth with planned hospital birth

DESIGN

a retrospective analysis of a cohort who had planned to have a home birth compared with a matched hospital birth group

SETTING

Western Australia (WA) PARTICIPANTS: all women (N = 976) who 'booked' to have a home birth 1981-1987 and 2928 matched women who had a planned hospital birth (singleton births only).

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

women in the home birth group had a longer labour, were less likely to have had labour induced or to have had any sort of operative delivery. They were less likely overall to have had complications of labour, but more likely to have had a postpartum haemorrhage and more likely to have had a retained placenta. Babies in the home birth group were heavier and more likely to be post-term. They were less likely to have had an Apgar score below 8 at 5 minutes, to have taken more than 1 minute to establish respiration or to have received resuscitation. The crude odds ratio for planned home births for perinatal mortality was 1.25 (95% CI 0.44-3.55). Postneonatal mortality was more common in the hospital group. Planned home births were generally associated with less intervention than hospital births and with less maternal and neonatal morbidity, with the exception of third stage complications. Although not significant, the increase in perinatal mortality has been observed in other Australian studies of home births and requires continuing evaluation.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Planned home births in WA appear to be associated with less overall maternal and neonatal morbidity and less intervention than hospital births.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

whether these observed differences in intervention and morbidity have any relationship to the small, non-significant increase in perinatal mortality could not be determined in this study. Continuing evaluation of home birth practice and outcome is essential.

Born before arrival--uncovering the hazards

In a retrospective case controlled study the demographic background and outcome of 193 mothers whose babies were born before arrival at hospital was compared to that of a control group who delivered within the maternity units of 2 teaching hospitals in Hong Kong. Mothers who delivered before arrival at hospital were significantly more likely to be single, to have received no antenatal care, to have an unplanned pregnancy, low family income and to come from a socially disadvantaged group such as Vietnamese refugees and illegal immigrants from China. Lacerations to the genital tract, postnatal anaemia and blood transfusions were more common in the study group. Results of cervical cytology and rubella status were available in significantly fewer of these mothers. They were more likely to be ambivalent about contraception and less likely to attend the postnatal clinic. The perinatal mortality and morbidity was significantly increased.

The work of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit. One example of technology assessment in perinatal care

This article describes one approach to assessing the effects of perinatal care--that adopted by the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit in Oxford, England. The unit's research has been based primarily on a combination of simple, descriptive analyses of observational data and statistically robust analyses of evidence derived from randomized controlled trials.

Babies born before arrival at hospital

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence of babies born before arrival at two local hospitals. To identify women at risk of giving birth before arrival, and the morbidity and mortality associated with such births.

DESIGN

A case control study. Each baby born before arrival and its mother were compared with the next born in the hospital (random control), and one matched for gestation and birthweight, together with their mothers.

SETTING

Two maternity units serving East Birmingham and Solihull.

SUBJECTS

All babies (and their mothers) born before arrival at these hospitals from January 1983 to December 1987.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Perinatal mortality rates, patterns of perinatal morbidity, demographic, social and obstetric features of the mothers.

RESULTS

137 (0.44%) of 31,140 consecutive births were before arrival at hospital (BBA group). The perinatal mortality rate in the BBA group was 58.4/1000 (8 deaths) compared with 10.1/1000 for all inborn babies (relative risk 5.8, 95% confidence interval 2.9-11.4). In the BBA group the mean birthweight of 3008 g was 212 g (95% CI 50-374 g) less than that in the random control group; the mean gestation of 266 days was 10 days less (95% CI 5.9-14.1 days) than in the random control group. Hypothermia was the commonest morbidity. Women delivered before arrival tended to be either multigravid inner city Asians living a long way from the hospital or unmarried unbooked younger white Europeans.

CONCLUSIONS

The high perinatal mortality was related to immaturity and low birthweight, rather than to birth before arrival itself. Although groups of mothers at risk of delivery before arrival can be identified more information is needed to establish whether additional antenatal care would be beneficial for these women and their babies.

Planned homebirths in South Australia 1976-1987

Homebirths booked with a group of general practitioners and midwives in South Australia in 1976-1987 are described using data obtained from midwives' and hospital records. The births represented 84.7% of all births occurring at home in South Australia in 1984-1987, as assessed by official birth registrations. Of the 799 women intending to deliver at home, 136 (17.0%) required transfer to hospital before or during labour. A further 38 mothers or babies (4.8%) required transfer after delivery. The women tended to be of a relatively high socioeconomic status and older age distribution when compared with women who had hospital births as identified from the State perinatal data collection. Some had recognised pregnancy risk factors. They had lower frequencies of ultrasound examination, induced labour, epidural analgesia, episiotomy, forceps delivery and caesarean section, and a low frequency of use of oxytocics for the third stage. Their rates of postpartum haemorrhage and, in particular, perinatal mortality were higher. Potential sources of risk and difficulty in homebirth care and evaluation of this care are identified and an approach to providing an effective homebirth service is proposed.

A multifactorial study of birth place options: improving health care delivery in Saudi Arabia

Although consumer demands may dictate a review of the highly mechanized and sophisticated technology of obstetric care provided in some parts of the western world, problems in Saudi Arabia revolve around under-utilization of health care facilities for maternity care and the consequences of this circumstance. A multifactorial analysis was performed to study the association of certain social correlates with options for birth settings in a rural region of the Kingdom. Age and educational level of the mother were found to be highly significant (P less than 0.005) variables influencing the choice for place of delivery, whereas economic status (P greater than 0.1) and housing conditions (NS) tailed to make an equally impressive contribution. Within the constraints of available health care manpower at the local level, suggestions are made for the best strategy to successfully educate mothers for safer options in birth.

Place of delivery in The Netherlands: maternal motives and background variables related to preferences for home or hospital confinement

The decision-making process regarding the preferred site for confinement was investigated in a total of 170 nulliparous women with initially uncomplicated pregnancies. Of these women, 100 had a preference for delivery at home and 45 for hospital confinement. The remaining 25 women were in doubt about the preferred location. Interviews were held at the 18th week of pregnancy. Motives for choosing either a home or a hospital confinement were analysed. Preferences for either home or hospital confinement were predicted by a stepwise discriminant analysis. Educational level, psychological well-being, anxiety concerning complications at birth, and attitudes towards female social roles accounted for 78.6% of the variance. Fear that something might go wrong during labour together with an older age predicted for 62% the group of women doubtful about the place of confinement.

Planned and unplanned home births and hospital births in Calgary, Alberta, 1984-87

Information collected on all home births in Calgary (Canada) between the years 1984 and 1987, was examined and analyzed according to whether the home birth environment had been planned or unplanned. The two groups were compared to each other and to all hospital births according to demographic characteristics of mothers, indicators of prenatal care, and birth outcome. Mothers who had planned their home birth were more likely to be primiparous, attend prenatal classes, obtain regular prenatal care from a physician, and have babies with a higher birth weight than either the unplanned or hospital group. Of particular concern, however, were the subset of unplanned home births who were primiparous. These mothers attended prenatal classes less frequently than any other group, reported the lowest number of physician visits, were youngest, and least likely to be married. In addition their babies averaged the shortest gestational age and the lowest birth weight. Findings in general show that planned and unplanned home births must be considered as heterogeneous groups in any comparison of risk factors and of birth outcome between home and hospital births. Further, within the unplanned group, multiparous women differ from primiparous women. Given the limitations inherent in this and similar studies, the apparent better outcome in the planned home birth group, as measured by birth weight, must be viewed with caution.

Perinatal and infant mortality rates and place of birth in Italy, 1980

In 1980, the ratio of home birth to public hospital perinatal and neonatal mortality rates decreased from Northern to Southern Italy, being inversely related to the proportion of home deliveries and probably reflecting the effect of planned versus unplanned home births. The post neonatal mortality rate in Southern Italy was about four times as high in children born at home (9.5/1,000 live births) than in those delivered in public hospitals (2.6/1,000 live births), probably reflecting differences in the socioeconomic status according to the birthplace selection in various regions.

Are hospital confinements really more dangerous for the fetus?

A large number of publications has reiterated the observation that perinatal mortality rates in Britain are higher among births in consultant units than among those occurring at home or in other units. In this paper we show that whereas these observations are themselves undeniable, the conclusion that hospital confinements are more dangerous to the fetus is probably erroneous. To illustrate the methodological difficulties, we have used as much information as possible on the delivery intentions for a national survey of 16,668 singleton births taking place in the United Kingdom in one week of April 1970. Using these data, we show that although deliveries in a consultant unit had a three times higher mortality rate than those delivered elsewhere, this was due almost entirely to the excess mortality among transfers of women originally intending to deliver elsewhere. Consideration of the place the mother was originally intending to deliver altered the picture considerably, with mortality only 38% higher among the consultant unit group. It is pointed out that if account was taken of risk factors such as past obstetric history, marital status and social class it is likely that booking for hospital delivery may well carry a lower risk of perinatal death, but that present data collection systems combined with high rates of consultant delivery are unlikely to resolve this question.

Analysis of 275 planned and 10 unplanned home births

The purpose of this study is to describe the outcome in one family practice of planned home births attended by a physician and an experienced birth assistant in a self-selected, but subsequently screened, population over an 11-year period. All but 26 primigravidas were screened out, as were multiple pregnancies and malpresentations. Study parameters included characteristics of the population and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Of 275 intended home confinements, nine were screened out for medical reasons before labour, five in very early labour, and three for failure to progress. Of the 273 who delivered at home, including 10 unplanned births, two were transferred to hospital for postpartum hemorrhage. One neonate was hospitalized for complications. The results of this study, as well as a review of the relevant literature, illustrate that, for a selected population, home birth is a reasonable alternative to hospital.

Home births in England and Wales, 1979: perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery

A survey was carried out of all 8856 births occurring at home in England and Wales in 1979. Of these births, 67% had been booked for delivery at home, 21% had been booked for delivery in hospital, 3% had not been booked, and for 9% the intended place of delivery was unknown. The perinatal mortality varied almost 50-fold according to the intended place of delivery, ranging from 4.1/1000 births in those booked for delivery at home to 196.6/1000 unbooked births. Deliveries that occurred at home but had been booked for a hospital consultant unit were associated with a perinatal mortality of 67.5/1000. Births that had been booked for delivery at home included the smallest proportion of babies of low birth weight: 2.5% weighed 2500 g or less compared with 18% of those booked for consultant units and 29% of those not booked. Within these low birthweight groups there were noticeable differences in perinatal mortality; births booked to occur at home had the lowest mortality and unbooked births had the highest. Perinatal mortality among babies who weighed more than 2500 g was generally low irrespective of the intended place of delivery; the only exception was in babies whose delivery had not been booked. In all groups perinatal mortality was considerably higher in nulliparous than parous women. Women booking a delivery at home are clearly a selected group, and some may have been transferred to hospital during labour and were thus not included in the survey. Nevertheless, these data suggest that the perinatal mortality among births booked to occur at home is low, especially for parous women.