Is routine episiotomy necessary?

[Evolution of the rate of episiotomies and obstetric anal sphincter injuries since the last recommendations of 2018]

OBJECTIVES

There is a progressive reduction in the rate of episiotomies since the recommendations of the French college of gynaecologists. Our objective was to study the evolution of the rate of episiotomies and Obstetric Anus Sphincter Injury (OASI) since the restriction of episiotomies in our department.

METHODS

Observational monocentric retrospective study performed at the Rouen University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were monofetal pregnancies, delivery at a term greater than or equal to 37 weeks of amenorrhea of a living, viable child and by cephalic presentation. We compared two periods corresponding to before and after the 2018 recommendations. We used logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with the risk of episiotomies and of obstetrical anal injuries, overall and in case of instrumental delivery.

RESULTS

We included 3329 patients for the 1st period and 3492 for the 2nd period, and the rate of instrumental deliveries were respectively of 16.4% (n=547) and 17.9% (n=626). Multivariate analysis showed a significant decrease in the rate of episiotomies in the 2nd period (OR 0.14, CI 95% [0.12; 0.16], P<0.0001). Main factors associated with the risk of OASI were primiparity (OR 6.21, CI 95% [3.19; 12.11]) and the use of forceps (OR 4.23, CI 95% [2.17; 8.27]) overall; and instrumental delivery using forceps (OR 3.25, CI 95% [1.69; 6.22]) and delivery during the 2nd period (OR 1.98, CI 95% [1.01; 3.88]) in case of instrumental delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that the voluntary reduction in the episiotomy rate does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of OASI, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. However, we show an increase in the rate of OASI in case of instrumental delivery since the latest recommendations.

Health care workers' perceptions of episiotomy in the era of respectful maternity care: a qualitative study of an obstetric training program in Mexico

BACKGROUND

Episiotomy in Mexico is highly prevalent and often routine - performed in up to 95% of births to primiparous women. The WHO suggests that episiotomy be used in selective cases, with an expected prevalence of 15%. Training programs to date have been unsuccessful in changing this practice. This research aims to understand how and why this practice persists despite shifts in knowledge and attitudes facilitated by the implementation of an obstetric training program.

METHODS

This is a descriptive and interpretative qualitative study. We conducted 53 pre and post-intervention (PRONTO© Program) semi-structured interviews with general physician, gynecologists and nurses (N = 32, 56% women). Thematic analysis was carried out using Atlas-ti© software to iteratively organize codes. Through interpretive triangulation, the team found theoretical saturation and explanatory depth on key analytical categories.

RESULTS

Themes fell into five major themes surrounding their perceptions of episiotomy: as a preventive measure, as a procedure that resolves problems in the moment, as a practice that gives the clinician control, as a risky practice, and the role of social norms in practicing it. Results show contradictory discourses among professionals. Despite the growing support for the selective use of episiotomy, it remains positively perceived as an effective prophylaxis for the complications of childbirth while maintaining control in the hands of health care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceptions of episiotomy shed light on how and why routine episiotomy persists, and provides insight into the multi-faceted approaches that will be required to affect this harmful obstetrical practice.

Episiotomy practice and associated factors among mothers who gave birth at public health facilities in Metema district, northwest Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Episiotomy is a surgical incision of the perineum to hasten the delivery. There is a scarce of information related to episiotomy practice, and its associated factors, in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Thus, this study was aimed to determine the level of episiotomy practice and to identify its determinants at public health facilities of Metema district, northwest, Ethiopia.

METHODS

Institutional-based cross sectional study was conducted among 410 delivered mothers from March 1 to April 30, 2020. We recruited study participants using systematic random sampling technique. Data were entered to Epi data version 3.1 and exported to STATA version 14 for statistical analysis. Stepwise backward elimination was applied for variable selection and model fitness was checked using Hosmer and Lemshows statistics test. Adjusted odds ratio with the corresponding 95% confidence interval was used to declare the significance of variables.

RESULTS

In this study, the magnitude of episiotomy practice was found 44.15% (95% CI 39.32-48.97). Vaginal instrumental delivery (AOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.36-6.78), perineal tear (AOR 3.56, 95% CI 1.68-7.55), age between 25 and 35 (AOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.25), birth spacing less than 2 years (AOR 4.76, 95% CI 2.31-9.83) and use of oxytocin (AOR 2.73, 95% CI 1.19-6.25) were factors significantly associated with episiotomy practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnitude of episiotomy practice in this study is higher than the recommended value of World Health Organization (WHO). Instrumental delivery, age, oxytocin, birth spacing and perineal tear were significant factors for episiotomy practice. Thus, specific interventions should be designed to reduce the rate of episiotomy practice. Plain English summary The routine use of episiotomy practice is not recommended by WHO. A study that compares routine episiotomy with restrictive episiotomy suggests that the latter is associated with less posterior perineal trauma, less need for suturing, and fewer complications related to healing. In addition, though, the rate of episiotomy has been declined in developed countries, still it remains high in less industrialized countries. The data for this study were taken at public health facilities of Metema district, northwest, Ethiopia. We included a total of 410 delivered mothers. The magnitude of episiotomy practice was found 44%. This result was higher than the recommended value of WHO. The WHO recommends an episiotomy rate of 10% for all normal deliveries. The result of this study showed that episiotomy practice is common among mothers whose age group are 18-24. In addition, mothers whose labor were assisted by instrumental vaginal delivery are more likely to have episiotomy as compared to those delivered by normal vaginal delivery. Laboring mothers who had used oxytocin were about three times more likely to be exposed for episiotomy than laboring mothers who did not use oxytocin drug. Moreover, episiotomy practice was nearly five times more likely among mothers who had birth spacing of 2 years and less as compared to mothers who had birth spacing of more than 2 years.

Episiotomy: history, present and future - a review

Childbirth has always carried traumatic stress to the woman's body. To deliver with less perineal trauma, obstetricians have used episiotomies. Episiotomy is still a common practice despite the controversy regarding its use. Weighing the risks and benefits, the scientific literature supports its selective use. With the worldwide trend to reduce the rate of episiotomy, several techniques have been proposed to achieve that. However, further research is still needed to prove their efficacy. This review will shed light on the historical background of episiotomy, its different techniques, indications, and the future of its practice.

Incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Perineal pain and dyspareunia are experienced by women undergoing a vaginal birth that can have short and longer term physical and psychological morbidities. This review aimed to determine the incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB) with intact perineum, first and second-degree perineal trauma or episiotomy.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and MIDIRS (inception - December 2017) were undertaken with selection criteria of any study evaluating the effect of intact perineum, first- or second-degree perineal trauma on perineal pain or dyspareunia in women with SVB.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (8 RCTs and 10 NRSs) were included. Fourteen and 12 studies were undertaken to assess perineal pain and dyspareunia after SVB, respectively. Meta-analysis of 16 studies (3133 women) demonstrated that women at 2 days postpartum experienced nearly the same incidence of perineal pain whether perineal trauma existed or not. At 4-10 days postpartum there was a significant reduction in the incidence of perineal pain for both presence and absence of any perineal trauma. Episiotomy was associated with the highest rate of perineal pain. The incidence of dyspareunia was high at resumption of sexual intercourse following SVB with an intact perineum. At 12 months, women still experienced dyspareunia whether perineal trauma existed or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Women experience perineal pain and dyspareunia regardless of the presence or absence of perineal trauma after SVB; nonetheless, the reported incidence is higher if perineal trauma occurred.

Socio-historical evolution of the episiotomy practice: A literature review

Episiotomy is an enlargement of the vaginal orifice made by a surgical incision of the perineum. This review aimed to provide a socio-historical retrospective on the practice or episiotomy. Using the criteria from the PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a literature review, browsing twenty databases and several papers available in the gray literature. Sixty-four articles, seven reports, and fifteen books were selected. Through this study, four eras with different approaches to episiotomy practice could be identified: 1792-1920, 1920-1980, 1980-1996, and 1996-2018. This review shows that institutionalization and medicalization of birth lead to a systematic practice of episiotomy in many westernized countries until 1996. Lay questioning and evidence-based medicine may have reversed this trend into a restrictive practice. After making an inventory of the factors associated with the evolution of change in the rate of episiotomies, the review finally revealed that evolution of the practice of episiotomy has also been influenced by ideological, political, and social factors.

[Fetal expulsion: Which interventions for perineal prevention? CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

The objective for all obstetricians and midwifes who intervene during the release of the fetal presentation is to prevent at best the perineal lesions. This work consisted in analyzing the literature, researching and evaluating interventions that reduce this perineal risk during the release.

METHODS

A keyword search for each medical intervention during the expulsion phase was conducted by selecting studies assessing perineal risk. Interventions during pregnancy and during delivery before the expulsion phase were specifically addressed in other sections of the recommendations.

RESULTS

Firstly, the degree of perineal stretching during the second stage of labour does not appear to be a risk factor for OASIS, postpartum incontinence, or sexual disorders (LE3) and that a substantial stretching of the perineum is not an indication of episiotomy (Professional consensus). Then, manual control of the expulsion of the fetus at the end of the second stage of labour and support of the posterior perineum during this time appear to reduce the rate of OASIS (LE3). The crowning of the baby's head should be manually controlled and the posterior perineum manually supported manually to reduce the risk of OASIS (GradeC). There is no recognised benefit to episiotomy in normal deliveries (LE1); the liberal practice of episiotomy results in fewer intact perineums than its restrictive practice, and the latter does not result in increasing the number of cases of OASIS. No evidence indicates that an episiotomy for women with a breech presentation, twin pregnancy, or posterior position prevents OASIS (LE3). Indication for episiotomy during delivery depends on individual risk factors and obstetric conditions (Professional consensus). It is recommended that the indication for episiotomy be explained and the woman's consent received before its performance. The performance of an episiotomy during normal deliveries is not recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade A). The liberal practice of episiotomy to prevent OASIS is not recommended for women with a breech presentation, twin pregnancy, or posterior position (GradeC). Episiotomy during an instrumental delivery appears to be associated with a reduction of the risk of OASIS (LE3). The vacuum extractor appears to induce fewer cases of OASIS than other instruments (LE3). Episiotomy may be indicated in instrumental deliveries to avoid OASIS (GradeC). Training in perineal protection in obstetrics is recommended (Grade B). In operative vaginal deliveries when several instruments can be used, a vacuum extractor is preferentially recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (GradeC). When forceps or spatulas are used, it is preferable that they be withdrawn just before cephalic deflexion so that the fetal head is not "capped" with these instruments at birth (Professional consensus). Couder's maneuver, which consists of lowering the forearm during the release of the fetal shoulders, appears to decrease the rate of second-degree perineal tears and increase the rate of intact perineum (LE3).

CONCLUSION

Manual control of the expulsion and perineal support reduce the risk of perineal injury. There is no benefit to episiotomy in normal delivery, nor in special cases such the breech presentation for example. On the other hand, in case of instrumental delivery, an episiotomy may be indicated to avoid OASIS (GradeC), and it is recommended if it is possible to use the ventouse preferentially. The Couder's maneuver seems to reduce the rate of 2^nd degree perineal lesions (LE3). Finally, training in perineal obstetric protection is recommended (Grade B).

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth

BACKGROUND

Some clinicians believe that routine episiotomy, a surgical cut of the vagina and perineum, will prevent serious tears during childbirth. On the other hand, an episiotomy guarantees perineal trauma and sutures.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects on mother and baby of a policy of selective episiotomy ('only if needed') compared with a policy of routine episiotomy ('part of routine management') for vaginal births.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (14 September 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing selective versus routine use of episiotomy, irrespective of parity, setting or surgical type of episiotomy. We included trials where either unassisted or assisted vaginal births were intended. Quasi-RCTs, trials using a cross-over design or those published in abstract form only were not eligible for inclusion in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A third author mediated where there was no clear consensus. We observed good practice for data analysis and interpretation where trialists were review authors. We used fixed-effect models unless heterogeneity precluded this, expressed results as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

This updated review includes 12 studies (6177 women), 11 in women in labour for whom a vaginal birth was intended, and one in women where an assisted birth was anticipated. Two were trials each with more than 1000 women (Argentina and the UK), and the rest were smaller (from Canada, Germany, Spain, Ireland, Malaysia, Pakistan, Columbia and Saudi Arabia). Eight trials included primiparous women only, and four trials were in both primiparous and multiparous women. For risk of bias, allocation was adequately concealed and reported in nine trials; sequence generation random and adequately reported in three trials; blinding of outcomes adequate and reported in one trial, blinding of participants and personnel reported in one trial.For women where an unassisted vaginal birth was anticipated, a policy of selective episiotomy may result in 30% fewer women experiencing severe perineal/vaginal trauma (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94; 5375 women; eight RCTs; low-certainty evidence). We do not know if there is a difference for blood loss at delivery (an average of 27 mL less with selective episiotomy, 95% CI from 75 mL less to 20 mL more; two trials, 336 women, very low-certainty evidence). Both selective and routine episiotomy have little or no effect on infants with Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (four trials, no events; 3908 women, moderate-certainty evidence); and there may be little or no difference in perineal infection (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.82, three trials, 1467 participants, low-certainty evidence).For pain, we do not know if selective episiotomy compared with routine results in fewer women with moderate or severe perineal pain (measured on a visual analogue scale) at three days postpartum (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.05, one trial, 165 participants, very low-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference for long-term (six months or more) dyspareunia (RR1.14, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.53, three trials, 1107 participants, moderate-certainty evidence); and there may be little or no difference for long-term (six months or more) urinary incontinence (average RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.44, three trials, 1107 participants, low-certainty evidence). One trial reported genital prolapse at three years postpartum. There was no clear difference between the two groups (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.41; 365 women; one trial, low certainty evidence). Other outcomes relating to long-term effects were not reported (urinary fistula, rectal fistula, and faecal incontinence). Subgroup analyses by parity (primiparae versus multiparae) and by surgical method (midline versus mediolateral episiotomy) did not identify any modifying effects. Pain was not well assessed, and women's preferences were not reported.One trial examined selective episiotomy compared with routine episiotomy in women where an operative vaginal delivery was intended in 175 women, and did not show clear difference on severe perineal trauma between the restrictive and routine use of episiotomy, but the analysis was underpowered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women where no instrumental delivery is intended, selective episiotomy policies result in fewer women with severe perineal/vaginal trauma. Other findings, both in the short or long term, provide no clear evidence that selective episiotomy policies results in harm to mother or baby.The review thus demonstrates that believing that routine episiotomy reduces perineal/vaginal trauma is not justified by current evidence. Further research in women where instrumental delivery is intended may help clarify if routine episiotomy is useful in this particular group. These trials should use better, standardised outcome assessment methods.

[Can the rate of episiotomy still be lowered? Status update in PACA region (south of France)]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate professional practices relative to episiotomies in the Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur (PACA) region by analysing their incidence in maternity hospitals, by type and by sector of activity. Following this, to analyse maternal and obstetric characteristics associated with episiotomies and the occurrence of perineal tears in Marseille's university hospitals (CHU).

METHODS

Data were extracted from the database for the period from 1st January 2012 to 31 December 2014. The sample included 41 maternity hospitals: 13 private and 28 public. Twenty of the maternity hospitals were level 1, 15 were level 2, and 2 were level 3 (Nice and AP-HM).

RESULTS

In the PACA region, 176,573 patients gave birth by vaginal delivery. The incidence of episiotomy over the 3 years was 21.6% (0.50% - 76.13%) with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence between 2012 and 2014 (P<0.001). There was a significant difference by sector (P<0.001) and level (P<0.001) of maternity hospitals. In the Marseille CHU, 21.6% of women had an episiotomy (66.4% in primiparas - 33.6% in multiparous) and 43% had perineal tears (62.3% in primiparas - 37.7% in multiparous). After multivariate analysis, gender, weight of the newborn, presentation, gestational age, and mode of delivery were shown to be factors significantly associated with occurrence of episiotomy and occurrence of perineal tear (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A significant decrease in the incidence of episiotomy was observed in the PACA region from 2012 to 2014, associated with a wide variation in rates depending on the maternity hospitals, their types and their sectors.

[Assessment of restrictive episiotomy use and impact on perineal tears in the Burgundy's Perinatal Network]

OBJECTIVES

To analyse episiotomy and perineal tears rates in Burgundy after French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) guidelines in 2005.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Multicenter retrospective study, between 2003-2005 (period 1) et 2012-2014 (period 2), conducted on singletons vaginal deliveries, in cephalic presentation from 37 weeks. We compared the episiotomy rate (ER), and perineal lesions in normal deliveries (ND) and instrumental deliveries (ID) between the two periods.

RESULTS

A total of 74,268 women were included. The overall ER significantly decreased from 35.8 to 16.7% (P<0.01), without increasing third degree perineal tears (0.73% vs. 0.66%) or fourth degree (0.14% vs 0.14%). First degree perineal tears rose (42.1% vs 17.6%, P<0.001), second degree decreased (13.5% vs 20.5%, P<0.001). ER decreased whatever the level of motherhood, healthcare ward, vaginal delivery type, or the instrument used.

CONCLUSION

Our study found a strong impact in Burgundy of the French guidelines for the practice of restrictive episiotomy for both ND and for ID without increasing sphincter tears and in decreasing spontaneous morbidity.

Long- and short-term complications of episiotomy

Although extensively applied in obstetrics practice to facilitate delivery by increasing the vaginal birth conduit, most episiotomy studies are in the context of short- or medium-term outcomes, and the number of studies investigating the long-term effects is insufficient. Episiotomy is often considered associated with urinary and/or anal incontinence and dyspareunia; however, there is no concrete evidence for this issue. Current meta-analyses and reviews that assessed the studies available in the literature revealed that episiotomy does not decrease the rates of urinary incontinence, perineal pain, and sexual dysfunction and that routine episiotomy does not prevent pelvic floor damage; thus, the recommended use of mediolateral episiotomy is restricted, rather than routine. According to the limited number of studies on sexual function, there seems to be a linear relationship between the degree of perineal laceration and postpartum dyspareunia. It is still not clear whether episiotomy has any impact on pelvic floor relaxation, pelvic organ prolapse, and sexual dysfunction in the long term.

Processes of change in obstetrics: a cross-national case-study of episiotomy

This article traces and analyzes the evolution of obstetric and midwifery doctrine and use of episiotomy in the United States and England. In the US, the routinization of episiotomy eventually resulted from strenuous lobbying efforts of a small group of obstetrician/gynecologists between 1915 and 1935. These physicians claimed episiotomy prevented perineal lacerations, infant morbidity and mortality, and future gynecological problems. In England, the liberal use of episiotomy came about during the 1970s from pressure from obstetricians although no overt campaigning for the practice occurred. In both countries routine episiotomy was encouraged by medical and extra medical factors which involved changes occurring in the dominant belief system in obstetrics, maternity care practices, and the obstetric and midwifery professions.

In more recent years, eventual declines in episiotomy use resulted from childbirth activists and others questioning of the practice and calling on obstetricians to produce evidence that the operation was in fact beneficial. This was facilitated, particularly in England, by midwifery interest in resisting obstetric control.

While scientific evidence showing episiotomy beneficial was not responsible for the adoption of routine episiotomy in either the US or England, the lack of evidence was central to the initial rejection of routine episiotomy in England and resulted in the launching of randomized controlled trials designed to produce evidence of the operation's effectiveness.

This case-study offers insight into some of the diverse factors implicated in bringing about change in obstetric knowledge and practice.

[The practice of episiotomy in France 10 years after the recommendations of CNGOF: What inventory?]

Since its creation, the practice of episiotomy has evolved, being influenced by several factors. Various stances on its use were stated, until the eventual reduction of this practice, as suggested by numerous practical guides. In 2005, the National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in France published its French Guidelines for Clinical practice in this area. Today, it seems appropriate to focus on the evolution of the use of episiotomy, ten years after the publication of these recommendations. The authors propose a literature review, browsing through all the available epidemiological data in France related to episiotomy, recording all national statistics and some local trends, as there are regional specificities. This review allows to follow the overall evolution of the practice of episiotomy in France between 1981 and 2014, and to identify territorial disparities. Finally, in the specific context of the practice of episiotomy in French gynecological and obstetrics field, the authors conclude it by considering the possible evolution of this surgical practice, as well as, the Clinical Practice Recommendations related to it.

The association of episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injury--a population based matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the independent association of episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) using first a cross-sectional and then a matched pair analysis.

DESIGN

A matched cohort.

SETTING

Data was gathered from the Finnish Medical Birth Register from 2004-2011.

POPULATION

All singleton vaginal births (n = 303,758).

METHODS

Women resulting matched pairs (n = 63,925) were matched based on baseline risk of OASIS defined based on parity (first or second/subsequent vaginal births), age, birth weight, mode of delivery, prior caesarean section, and length of active second stage of birth.

RESULTS

In cross-sectional analysis episiotomy was associated with a 12% lower incidence of OASIS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.98) in first vaginal births and with a 132% increased incidence of OASIS in second or subsequent vaginal births (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.03). In matched pair analysis episiotomy was associated with a 23% (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.86) lower incidence of OASIS in first vaginal births and a 61% (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.29) increased incidence of OASIS in second or subsequent vaginal births compared to women who gave birth without an episiotomy. The matched pair analysis showed a 12.5% and a 31.6% reduction in aORs of OASIS associated with episiotomy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A matched pair analysis showed a substantial reduction in the aORs of OASIS with episiotomy, due to confounding by indication. This indicates that results of observational studies evaluating an association between episiotomy and OASIS should be interpreted with caution.

[A policy of selective episiotomy in a ward: an example of medical professional assessment]

OBJECTIVES

To reduce the episiotomy rates, according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines, of 2005, from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross sectional study was conducted, in the university hospital maternities (Maternity 1 and 2) with a retrospective record from medical files. Patients who had delivered in those maternities, by vaginal route, after 22 weeks amenorrhea were eligible. The global rate of episiotomy was analysed from 2006 to 2008. A descriptive clinical study was performed with a retrospective analysis (from July to December 2005 on 100 medical files and from July to December 2007 on 85 files). Besides, a study of episiotomy rate was conducted from 2006 to 2008. Improvement actions were developed between the two phases of assessment of the audit: sharing and comparing the results to standardized episiotomy rates, and elaborating an informatized regional perinatality file with episiotomy related items and national recommendations.

RESULTS

Episiotomy rate decreased during the study, from 22.35% in 2005 to 19.34% in 2008, in the Ward 1 (p<0.0001) and from 33.62% in 2005 to 17.93% en 2008 (p<0.0001) in the Ward 2. An improvement was observed between the two periods of audits, for each item of the chart but without statistical signification.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Theses procedures have led to a positive impact on practices thanks to the work group and because of the politics of the perinatal network in favour of an episiotomy reduction. We hope these results could be improved in the future.

Episiotomy for vaginal birth

BACKGROUND

Episiotomy is done to prevent severe perineal tears, but its routine use has been questioned. The relative effects of midline compared with midlateral episiotomy are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of restrictive use of episiotomy compared with routine episiotomy during vaginal birth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (March 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing restrictive use of episiotomy with routine use of episiotomy; restrictive use of mediolateral episiotomy versus routine mediolateral episiotomy; restrictive use of midline episiotomy versus routine midline episiotomy; and use of midline episiotomy versus mediolateral episiotomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight studies (5541 women). In the routine episiotomy group, 75.15% (2035/2708) of women had episiotomies, while the rate in the restrictive episiotomy group was 28.40% (776/2733). Compared with routine use, restrictive episiotomy resulted in less severe perineal trauma (relative risk (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 0.91), less suturing (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.81) and fewer healing complications (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85). Restrictive episiotomy was associated with more anterior perineal trauma (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.10). There was no difference in severe vaginal/perineal trauma (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18); dyspareunia (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.16); urinary incontinence (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20) or several pain measures. Results for restrictive versus routine mediolateral versus midline episiotomy were similar to the overall comparison.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Restrictive episiotomy policies appear to have a number of benefits compared to policies based on routine episiotomy. There is less posterior perineal trauma, less suturing and fewer complications, no difference for most pain measures and severe vaginal or perineal trauma, but there was an increased risk of anterior perineal trauma with restrictive episiotomy.

The outcomes of midline versus medio-lateral episiotomy

BACKGROUND

Episiotomy is the surgical enlargement of the vaginal orifice by an incision of the perineum during the second stage of labor or just before delivery of the baby. During the 1970s, it was common to perform an episiotomy for almost all women having their first delivery, ostensibly for prevention of severe perineum tears and easier subsequent repair. However, there are no data available to indicate if an episiotomy should be midline or medio-lateral. We compared midline versus medio-lateral episiotomy for complication such as extended perineal tears, pain scores, wound infection rates and other complications.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort including 1,302 women, who gave birth vaginally between April 2005 and February 2006 at Srinagarind Hospital - a tertiary care center in Northeast Thailand. All women included had low risk pregnancies and delivered at term. The outcome measures included deep perineal tears (including perineal tears with anal sphincter and/or rectum tears), other complications, and women's satisfaction at 48 hours and 6-weeks postpartum.

RESULTS

In women with midline episiotomy, deep perineal tears occurred in 14.8%, which is statistically significantly higher compared to 7% in women who underwent a medio-lateral episiotomy (p-value < 0.05). There was no difference between the groups for other outcomes (such as blood loss, vaginal hematoma, infection, pain, dyspareunia, and women's satisfaction with the method). The risk factors for deep perineal tears were: midline episiotomy, primiparity, maternal height < 145 cm, fetal birth weight > 3,500 g and forceps extraction.

CONCLUSION

Midline compared to medio-lateral episiotomy resulted in more deep perineal tears. It is more likely deep perineal tears would occur in cases with additional risk factors.

An Australian prospective cohort study of risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth

OBJECTIVE

to determine risk factors for the occurrence of severe perineal trauma (third and fourth degree tears) during childbirth.

DESIGN

a prospective cohort study was conducted using the hospital's computerised obstetric information system. Additional data were gathered on women who sustained severe perineal trauma. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to assess risk factors for severe perineal trauma. Midwives were asked to comment on possible reasons for severe perineal trauma. Written responses made by midwives were analysed using content analysis. Discussion groups with midwives were held to further explore their experiences.

SETTING

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

all women having vaginal births (n=6595) in a 2-year period between 1 April 1998 and 31 March 2000, in both the birth centre and the labour ward.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

2% of women (n=134) experienced severe perineal trauma. One hundred and twenty-two women had third-degree tears and 12 had fourth-degree tears. Primiparity, instrumental delivery, Asian ethnicity and heavier babies were associated with an elevated risk of severe perineal trauma. Midwives identified several factors they believed contributed to severe perineal trauma. These were lack of effective communication with the woman during the birth, different birth positions, delivery technique, ethnicity and obstetric influences.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

findings support current knowledge that primiparity, instrumental birth, heavier babies and being of Asian ethnicity are associated with increased rates of severe trauma. Specific attention needs to be paid to the strong association found between being of Asian ethnicity and experiencing severe perineal trauma.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

further identification and validation of the concerns expressed by midwives to reduce severe perineal trauma is warranted so that preventative strategies can be used and researched.

Gebären im Wasser: Erfahrung nach 1825 Wassergeburten

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed 1,825 water births at a single institution over a 9-year period.

METHODS

We compared 830 primipara deliveries in water with 424 primipara deliveries in the traditional bed and 136 on the delivery stool. We also evaluated the duration of labour, arterial cord blood pH and base excess in the primiparae, and perineal trauma, shoulder dystocia and deliveries after preceding caesarean section as well as rates of neonatal infection in all the 1,825 water births.

RESULTS

The duration of the first stage of labour was significantly shorter with water births than with the other delivery positions. The episiotomy rate for all water births was found to be much lower compared to deliveries carried out in the bed or on the birthing stool. The rate of perineal tears was similar. There were no differences in the duration of the second stage, arterial cord blood pH and base excess. No woman using the water birth method required analgesics. There were 3 shoulder dystocias with water births. Sixty-eight women delivered in water after a preceding caesarean section.

CONCLUSION

Water births appears to be associated with a significantly shorter first stage of labour, a lower episiotomy rate and reduced analgesic requirements when compared with other delivery positions. If women are selected appropriately, water birth appears to be safe for both the mother and neonate.

Fatores relacionados ao trauma perineal no parto normal em nulíparas

Inúmeros estudos têm sido realizados com a finalidade de contribuir para a prevenção do trauma perineal no parto normal. O objetivo do presente estudo foi relacionar a altura do períneo, duração do período expulsivo, variedade de posição no desprendimento cefálico, tipo de puxo, presença de circular de cordão, peso do recém-nascido e ardor na vulva ao urinar com a ocorrência de lacerações perineais. A pesquisa foi realizada em 2003, no Centro de Parto Normal do Amparo Maternal, com uma amostra de 67 parturientes sem partos vaginais anteriores. Os resultados mostraram que não houve diferença estatisticamente significante em relação às variáveis analisadas.

Episiotomy and perineal tears presumed to be imminent: the influence on the urethral pressure profile, analmanometric and other pelvic floor findings--follow-up study of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The influence of the restrictive use of episiotomy at perineal tears judged to be imminent on the urethral pressure profile, analmanometric, and other pelvic floor findings is unknown.

METHODS

Follow-up study of a randomized controlled trial with two perineal management policies includes the use of episiotomy: (a) only for fetal indications and (b) in addition at a tear presumed to be imminent. Participants were 146 primiparous women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy >34 weeks of gestation. For the intention-to-treat analysis, 68 women after vaginal delivery were included who delivered a live full-term baby between January 1999 and September 2000.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP, cmH2O), functional urethral length (mm), maximum anal pressure (MAP, mmHg), functional anal sphincter length (ASL, mmHg) at rest and during contraction, and pelvic floor muscle strength (5-grade Oxford score) are the outcome measures. The rate of dyspareunia, urinary incontinence, and anorectal incontinence was documented.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 7.3 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (a versus b): mean MUCP at rest (98 versus 101 cmH2O), during contraction (95 versus 103 cmH2O), mean MAP at rest (113 versus 121 mmHg), during contraction (143 versus 166 mmHg), mean ASL at rest (50 versus 50 mmHg), during contraction (42 versus 45 mmHg), mean pelvic floor muscle strength (2.2 versus 2.6), no pain during sexual intercourse (79 versus 67%), prevalence of urinary incontinence (48 versus 27%), and anorectal incontinence (19 versus 24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Episiotomy at a perineal tear presumed to be imminent does not have any advantage with regard to pelvic floor function and should be avoided.

Compliance as strategy: the importance of personalised relations in obstetric practice

This paper highlights the importance of personalised relations in institutionalised obstetric care. It seeks to explore the link between objectification and agency, by examining the way in which women find a new subjectivity in motherhood within the walls of the obstetric institution. The paper focuses on obstetric encounters through the lens of labour and intrapartum routine procedures, and argues that when expectant women enter the obstetric institution, a series of relations ensue through their efforts to become connected with the official obstetric system. The hospital organisation and network of relations that originate in it reflect and reproduce a passive role for expectant women and mothers; however, it would be misleading to represent their behaviour as simply "compliant". Expectant mothers value the connectedness with the obstetric system exemplified by personalised patient-practitioner relations because it is a guarantee of safety. They are happy to follow clinicians' instructions, even when this implies significant sacrifice or suffering because they are projected towards fulfilling their parenting desires. Compliance, like resistance then, is here intended to be understood as yet another maternal strategy, and as such it is the most widespread, deployed by women in order to achieve their ideals and desires.

Programme d’assurance qualité pour la prise en charge de la douleur après lésions périnéales obstétricales

INTRODUCTION

A quality insurance program has been set up in order to improve the relief of pain in patients with perineal injury after childbirth.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The program has been developed according to the French standards of accreditation. After elaboration of a referential, a first study (103 patients) allowed to evaluate the ongoing practices and to appreciate the pain intensities. After analysis of the results, an action strategy has been elaborated, with a brand new therapeutic standard and a pain-monitoring program for nurses. Six months later, a second study (105 patients) measured the efficiency of the accomplished actions. The statistic analysis used chi2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests and a multivariate analyse (p <0.05).

RESULTS

Several indicators led to conclude to the success of this program: analgesics prescribed systematically and earlier, best observance, larger utilisation of the NSAI, decrease of the analgesics requests, improvement of the satisfaction referred to the relief of pain. The multivariate analyse showed a risk twice as little as in the second study to have a 36th hour VAS score superior to four (p =0.03).

CONCLUSION

The apply of this quality insurance program allowed to improve the analgesia after obstetric perineal injuries. A few adaptations are needed, and also more formations of the medical and paramedical staff. The durability of the accomplished actions shall be evaluated in the future.

Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of perineal pain in the 6 weeks after vaginal delivery and to assess the association between perineal trauma and perineal pain. Study design This was a prospective cohort study of parturients at 1 day, 7 days,' and 6 weeks' post partum in an academic tertiary obstetric unit in Toronto, Canada. Four hundred forty-four women were followed up, including women with an intact perineum (n=84), first-/second-degree tears (n=220), episiotomies (n=97), or third-/fourth-degree tears (n=46). Primary outcome was the incidence of perineal pain on day of interview; secondary outcomes were pain score measurements and interference with daily activities.

RESULTS

Perineal trauma was more common among primiparous women, those with operative vaginal deliveries, and those with epidural analgesia during the second stage of labor. The incidence of perineal pain among the groups during the first week was intact perineum 75% (day 1) and 38% (day 7); first-/second-degree tears 95% and 60%; episiotomies 97% and 71%; and third-/fourth-degree tears 100% and 91%. By 6 weeks, the frequency of perineal pain was not statistically different between trauma groups.

CONCLUSION

Acute postpartum perineal pain is common among all women. However, perineal pain was more frequent and severe for women with increased perineal trauma.

Incontinences urinaires et anales post-obstétricales : facteurs de risque et prévention

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to review the available data on urinary and fecal incontinence and their association with maternal as well as fetal per partum characteristics.

METHOD

A Pubmed (Medline search performed between 1999 and 2003 using "urinary incontinence and delivery" and "fecal incontinence and delivery" identified 501 relevant papers. Most of them are retrospective analyses whereas few are randomized controlled trials (RCT).

RESULTS

Two studies performed with computer-stored databases analyzed the risk factors of incontinence among 2,886,126 deliveries. Primiparity, birthweight over 4000 g and all types of assisted vaginal deliveries significantly increased the risk of anal sphincter damage. Results concerning the effect of episiotomy are conflicting. Controlled randomized trials have shown that pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy as well as planned cesarean section significantly and moderately decrease the risk of urinary incontinence. The only RCT available has shown that planned cesarean section did not reduce significantly incontinence of flatus. Finally the only trial that compare surgical techniques used to repair the anal sphincter did not show any significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for anal sphincter damage during delivery are well known. RCT focusing on how to prevent and how to cure fecal as well as urinary incontinence are urgently needed.

Episiotomy and perineal tears presumed to be imminent: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The indication of the restricted use of episiotomy at tears presumed to be imminent is not clear.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial with two perineal management policies. Use of episiotomy: (a). only for fetal indications and (b). in addition at a tear presumed to be imminent.

PARTICIPANTS

146 primiparous women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at >34 weeks of gestation. For the intention-to-treat analysis those 109 women were included who vaginally delivered a live full-term baby between January 1999 and September 2000: 49 women in group a, 60 in group b.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction of episiotomies, increase of intact perinea or only minor perineal trauma (intact perineum and first-degree tears), third-degree tears, anterior perineal trauma, perineal pain in the postpartum period, pH of the umbilical artery, Apgar scores, maternal blood loss.

RESULTS

Episiotomy rates were 41% in group a and 77% in group b (p < 0.001). Women in the restrictive policy group had a greater chance of an intact perineum (29% vs. 10%; p = 0.023) or only minor perineal trauma (39% vs. 13%; p = 0.003) and had significant lower pain scores postpartum at different activities. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to third-degree tears, anterior trauma, pre- and postpartum hemoglobin concentrations, Apgar scores and pH of the umbilical artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding episiotomy at tears presumed to be imminent increases the rate of intact perinea and the rate of only minor perineal trauma, reduces postpartum perineal pain and does not have any adverse effects on maternal or fetal morbidity.

Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence of urinary and bowel incontinence in relation to anal sphincter laceration in primiparous women and to identify factors that are associated with anal sphincter laceration in a unit that uses primarily midline episiotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

From January 1, 1997, to March 30, 2000, 2941 questionnaires concerning pelvic floor function 6 months after delivery were mailed to primiparous women who were delivered vaginally at the University of Michigan Medical Center. Charts were reviewed for 2858 deliveries to assess the use of episiotomy and the degree of perineal trauma, along with demographic and pertinent delivery variables. There were 943 women who completed the urinary function questionnaire and 831 women who completed the bowel function questionnaire. Univariate analysis was performed on all covariates. Multiple logistic regression was used for the analysis of the presence of third- or fourth-degree lacerations as the outcome.

RESULTS

Nineteen percent of the women who completed the survey had sustained third- or fourth-degree lacerations during childbirth. The women in the sphincter laceration group were more likely (23.0%) to have bowel incontinence than the women in the control group (13.4%) (P<.05). The incidence of worse bowel control was nearly 10 times higher in women with fourth-degree lacerations (30.8%) compared with women with third-degree lacerations (3.6%, P<.001). Macrosomia (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.61, 2.99), forceps-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% CI, 3.43, 6.57), and vacuum-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.64, 4.66) were associated with higher risks of third- and fourth-degree lacerations. Midline episiotomy (odds ratio, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.81, 2.77), but not mediolateral (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.375, 1.19), episiotomy was associated with anal sphincter lacerations. More than one half of the women had new onset of urinary incontinence after delivery and reported several lifestyle modifications to prevent leakage.

CONCLUSION

Women with third- and fourth-degree lacerations were more likely to have bowel incontinence than women without anal sphincter lacerations. Fourth-degree lacerations appear to affect anal continence greater than third-degree lacerations.

Effects of episiotomy on bonding and mothers' health

BACKGROUND

Historically, episiotomy has been carried out during labour to facilitate delivery, shorten the duration of the second stage and prevent spontaneous lacerations. However, recent studies of episiotomy have recommended that it be carried out only when necessary. In Turkey, midwives are authorized to perform episiotomy.

AIM

To analyse the effects of episiotomy on mothers' health and mother-infant bonding.

DESIGN

A cohort study of 100 women who gave birth by normal vaginal delivery in a Turkish hospital between 15 March 1999 and 6 April 2000.

METHODS

Participants were divided into episiotomy (n = 50) and control (n = 50) groups. Data on biographical characteristics and the process of labour were collected in hospital, and follow-up was conducted at home 1, 3 and 12 weeks after labour.

RESULTS

Mean duration of the second stage was longer in the episiotomy group than the control group, but the difference was not significant. The number of spontaneous lacerations was significantly lower in the episiotomy group. Mean time from delivery to maternal rest and time taken to bond with the infant were significantly longer in the episiotomy group. There were significantly higher scores for overall incidence and severity of pain on the first day, and pain incidence and severity at 1 week in the episiotomy group. Significantly fewer women in the episiotomy group were able to do chores and to sit/stand up comfortably in the first postpartum week

CONCLUSION

Episiotomy should not be used unless indicated. Measures should be taken to avoid perineal trauma during labour, establish bonding between mother and infant as soon as possible, and minimize perineal discomfort after delivery.

The role of episiotomy in current obstetric practice

This review traces the clinical use of episiotomy from the eighteenth century to the present and explains why the procedure has a restricted function in current practice. The types of episiotomy are described, and the controversies surrounding the sequelae associated with the procedure are explored. The modern indications for episiotomy including the procedure's place at operative vaginal delivery are discussed. Although the role of the episiotomy in modern obstetrics may be limited, the procedure is important in situations involving nonreassuring fetal status, shoulder dystocia, and perhaps operative vaginal delivery. The optimal type of episiotomy, if any, at forceps or vacuum delivery is yet to be determined.

Changes in postpartum perineal muscle function in women with and without episiotomies

This report presents results of a comparison perineal muscle function between antepartum and postpartum measurements in a cohort of women with different perineal conditions after childbirth. Data were obtained by using prospective electromyographic perineometry measurements to objectively determine perineal muscle function before and after delivery in 102 women. In addition, 24 nulliparous, non-pregnant women were studied to determine the effect of pregnancy on perineal muscle function. Pregnancy is associated with a decrease in perineal muscle strength and endurance compared with the postpartum state. The degree to which women improved or did not improve perineal muscle function after birth was related to perineal trauma at delivery. After controlling for parity, maternal age, birthweight, smoking status, and antepartum scores, the order of best to worst performance was cesarean birth, intact perineum, first-degree perineal injury, second- or third-degree perineal injury, and episiotomy. Pre- and post-delivery scores were compared for each woman and analyzed according to perineal outcome. Although all other perineal outcome groups increased muscle function by 6 months postpartum, women with an episiotomy had a mean net loss of perineal muscle performance after birth. These observations do not support the use of episiotomy for the purpose of preserving perineal muscle function.

Trends in the use of episiotomy in the United States: 1980-1998

BACKGROUND

Despite a relative paucity of clinical evidence justifying its routine use, approximately 40 percent of all vaginal deliveries include an episiotomy. The purpose of this study is to examine trends in episiotomy in the United States from 1980 through 1998, a period during which calls increased to abandon routine episiotomy.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey, which is conducted annually and based on a nationally representative sample of discharges from short-stay non-Federal hospitals.

RESULTS

From 1980 through 1998 the episiotomy rate in the United States dropped by 39 percent. Rates decreased for all age and racial groups investigated, in all four geographic regions, and for all sources of payment. Significant differences remained between groups in 1998, including a higher rate for white women than for black women, and a higher rate for women with private insurance than for women with Medicaid or in the self-pay category. The incidence of first- and second-degree lacerations to the perineum increased for women without episiotomies, but the more severe third- and fourth-degree lacerations remained more frequent for women with episiotomies. Women with episiotomies were more likely to have forceps-assisted deliveries or vacuum extractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite dramatic declines in the use of episiotomy during the last two decades, it remains one of the most frequent surgical procedures performed on women in the United States, and it continues to be performed at a higher rate for certain groups of women.

Episiotomy for vaginal birth

BACKGROUND

Episiotomy is done to prevent severe perineal tears, but its routine use has been questioned. The relative effects of midline compared with midlateral episiotomy are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of restrictive use of episiotomy compared with routine episiotomy during vaginal birth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing restrictive use of episiotomy with routine use of episiotomy; restrictive use of mediolateral episiotomy versus routine mediolateral episiotomy; restrictive use of midline episiotomy versus routine midline episiotomy; and use of midline episiotomy versus mediolateral episiotomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies were included. In the routine episiotomy group, 72.7% (1752/2409) of women had episiotomies, while the rate in the restrictive episiotomy group was 27.6% (673/2441). Compared with routine use, restrictive episiotomy involved less posterior perineal trauma (relative risk 0. 88, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.92), less suturing (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.77) and fewer healing complications (relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.85). Restrictive episiotomy was associated with more anterior perineal trauma (relative risk 1.79, 95% 1.55 to 2.07). There was no difference in severe vaginal or perineal trauma (relative risk 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.50); dyspareunia (relative risk 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.16); urinary incontinence (relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.20) or several pain measures. Results for restrictive versus routine mediolateral versus midline episiotomy were similar to the overall comparison.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Restrictive episiotomy policies appear to have a number of benefits compared to routine episiotomy policies. There is less posterior perineal trauma, less suturing and fewer complications, no difference for most pain measures and severe vaginal or perineal trauma, but there was an increased risk of anterior perineal trauma with restrictive episiotomy.

Risk factors for rupture of the anal sphincter

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate risk factors for rupture of the anal sphincter during vaginal delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All 292 parturients with rupture of the anal sphincter in four neighbouring central hospitals in southern Sweden between 1988 and 1990 were identified retrospectively. For each case a control was selected, the sole matching criterion being that the control woman was the next to give birth vaginally in the same unit as the case. Only singleton deliveries were included. For comparison of risk factors among cases and controls, McNemar's test was used for bivariate testing; multiple regression analysis was restricted to those variables found to be significant in the bivariate analysis. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95% confidence limits (CL).

RESULTS

In all, 292 of 22,653 deliveries (1.3%) had a rupture of the anal sphincter. Of a total of 14 independent variables explored, 8 were found to be significantly associated with rupture of the anal sphincter in the bivariate testing. In the following multivariate analysis, three variables remained significantly associated with rupture of the anal sphincter: birthweight > or = 4000 g (OR 2.6; CL 1.7, 3.9), primiparity (OR 2.2; CL 1.5, 3.3) and episiotomy (OR 1.7; CL 1.1, 2.6).

CONCLUSION

Episiotomy appears to be significantly associated with rupture of the anal sphincter. In contrast to primiparity and birthweight, the incidence of episiotomy during vaginal delivery may easily be reduced. However, only a prospective, controlled study will disclose the true negative or positive effects of episiotomy.

Routine use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics. Should it be performed?

Episiotomy continues to be a frequently used procedure in obstetrics despite little scientific support for its routine use. Although episiotomy does decrease the occurrence of anterior lacerations, it fails to accomplish the majority of goals stated as reasons for its use. Episiotomy does not decrease damage to the perineum but rather increases it. The midline episiotomy increases the risk for third-degree and fourth-degree lacerations. Episiotomy fails to prevent the development of pelvic relaxation and its attendant complications. Rather than decreasing maternal morbidity, episiotomy increases blood loss and is related to greater initial postpartum pain and dyspareunia. It has been associated with a more difficult and lengthy repair as measured by the need for suture material and operating room time. The claims of a protective effect on the fetus in shortening the second stage of labor, improving Apgar scores, and preventing perinatal asphyxia have not been borne out. The value of episiotomy use on a routine basis bears scientific examination in prospective, randomized, controlled trials. These types of trials are certainly achievable, ethically correct, and much needed. Until these trials are completed and published, obstetricians should not routinely perform the procedure but rather determine the need for episiotomy on a case-by-case basis.

Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perineal massage during pregnancy for the prevention of perineal trauma at birth.

STUDY DESIGN

Pregnant women with (n = 493) and without (n = 1034) a previous vaginal birth from 5 hospitals in the province of Québec, Canada, participated in this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. All participants received oral and written information on the prevention of perineal trauma. Women in the experimental groups were requested to perform a 10-minute perineal massage daily from the 34th or 35th week of pregnancy until delivery.

RESULTS

Among participants without a previous vaginal birth, 24.3% (100/411) from the perineal massage group and 15.1% (63/417) from the control group were delivered vaginally with an intact perineum, for a 9.2% absolute difference (95% confidence interval 3.8%-14.6%). The incidence of delivery with an intact perineum increased with compliance with regular practice of perineal massage (chi2 for trend 13.2, P = 0.0003). Among women with a previous vaginal birth, 34.9% (82/235) and 32.4% (78/241) in the massage and control groups, respectively, were delivered with an intact perineum, for an absolute difference of 2.5% (95% confidence interval -6.0% to 11.0%). There were no differences between the groups in the frequency of sutured vulvar and vaginal tears, women's sense of control, and satisfaction with the delivery experience.

CONCLUSION

Perineal massage is an effective approach to increasing the chance of delivery with an intact perineum for women with a first vaginal delivery but not for women with a previous vaginal birth.

Distribution of genital tract trauma in childbirth and related postnatal pain

BACKGROUND

The full extent of genital tract trauma in spontaneous births is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to describe the range and extent of childbirth trauma and related postnatal pain using data from a large randomized clinical trial of perineal management techniques (n = 5471).

METHODS

Descriptive analysis was conducted on trial participants who delivered spontaneously at term and were examined by their midwife after birth (n = 5404). Data are reported for sites of trauma, and the relation to episiotomy, suturing, and maternal reports of pain at 2 days, 10 days, and 3 months after birth.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of all women experienced some form of trauma, with first- or second-degree perineal lacerations occurring in two-thirds of women and outer vaginal tears occurring in one-half. Tears to the rectum and vaginal vault were more common with episiotomy. Nearly all unsutured trauma was restricted to perineal first- or second-degree, outer vaginal, and labial sites. Pain declined over time, and a gradient in pain was observed according to the site and complexity of trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Genital tract trauma is extremely common with spontaneous vaginal birth. Effective measures to prevent or reduce its occurrence would benefit many new mothers.

Changed pattern in the use of episiotomy in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

To study changes in the use of episiotomy since 1989, controlling for variables such as severe tears, epidural anaesthesia, duration of the second stage of labour, instrumental deliveries, birthweight and maternal position at delivery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study. Data were obtained from original birth records and questionnaires.

SETTING

Huddinge University Hospital and all labour wards (n = 62) in Sweden.

POPULATION

10,661 women who were delivered vaginally (4575 nulliparae, 6086 multiparae) between 1992 and 1994, and 3366 nulliparae delivered in all Swedish hospitals during the month of March 1995.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Episiotomy rates, severe tears and instrumental deliveries.

RESULTS

The rate of episiotomy was 1% and of severe tears 0.6% among multiparae delivered vaginally (including instrumental deliveries) at Huddinge University Hospital between 1992 and 1994. The rate of episiotomy was 6.6% and of severe tears 2.3% among nulliparae. Vacuum extraction and epidural anaesthesia were more commonly associated with episiotomy. Factors significantly associated with severe tears were infant birthweight > or = 4000 g, vacuum extraction and episiotomy. In all Swedish labour wards in 1995 the mean incidence of episiotomy in nulliparae was 24.5%, a significant decrease from 33.7% in 1989. Wide variations occurred between hospitals (4%-50%).

CONCLUSION

The use of episiotomy was much reduced at Huddinge University Hospital, with a consistently low rate of severe tears. This supports the growing evidence for individualised and restrictive use of episiotomy at childbirth.