West Berkshire perineal management trial

Pelvic floor dysfunction in postpartum women: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a disease of weakened pelvic floor support tissues, leading to changes in the pelvic organ position and function of pelvic organs, with long-term effects on women. This study aimed to assess pelvic floor function using electrophysiology and clinical symptoms, exploring the risk factors for PFD one month postpartum.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 845 women from postpartum outpatient clinic of Nantong Affiliated Hospital from August 2019 to October 2021. Pelvic floor muscle strength was evaluated via pelvic floor surface electromyography. Clinical symptoms (urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse) were diagnosed by gynecologists. Sociodemographic, pregnancy, and obstetrical data were obtained from self-reported questionnaires and electronic records.

RESULTS

The study identified maternal age, parity, immigrant status, and economic income as factors were related to PFD. Gestational constipation increased the risk of abnormal resting muscle strength (OR:1.553, 95%CI: 1.022-2.359). Cesarean delivery was associated with higher rates of abnormal resting muscle strength than vaginal delivery (post-resting stage: OR, 2.712; 95% CI, 1.189-6.185), but a decreased incidence of UI (OR: 0.302; 95% CI, 0.117-0.782). Increased gestational weight gain was correlated with a greater risk of developing UI (OR:1.030, 95%CI: 1.002-1.058). Women with vaginal inflammation faced a higher risk of abnormal fast-twitch muscle (OR: 2.311, 95%CI: 1.125-4.748).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to uncontrollable factors like mode of delivery, age, and parity, interventions targeting weight gain and constipation during pregnancy and vaginal flora could mitigate the risks of PFD. Educational programs for pregnant women should emphasize a proper diet and lifestyle. For women with vaginal inflammation, clinical treatment should be carried out as soon as possible to avoid further aggravating the damage to the pelvic floor muscles.

[Evolution of the rate of episiotomies and obstetric anal sphincter injuries since the last recommendations of 2018]

OBJECTIVES

There is a progressive reduction in the rate of episiotomies since the recommendations of the French college of gynaecologists. Our objective was to study the evolution of the rate of episiotomies and Obstetric Anus Sphincter Injury (OASI) since the restriction of episiotomies in our department.

METHODS

Observational monocentric retrospective study performed at the Rouen University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were monofetal pregnancies, delivery at a term greater than or equal to 37 weeks of amenorrhea of a living, viable child and by cephalic presentation. We compared two periods corresponding to before and after the 2018 recommendations. We used logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with the risk of episiotomies and of obstetrical anal injuries, overall and in case of instrumental delivery.

RESULTS

We included 3329 patients for the 1st period and 3492 for the 2nd period, and the rate of instrumental deliveries were respectively of 16.4% (n=547) and 17.9% (n=626). Multivariate analysis showed a significant decrease in the rate of episiotomies in the 2nd period (OR 0.14, CI 95% [0.12; 0.16], P<0.0001). Main factors associated with the risk of OASI were primiparity (OR 6.21, CI 95% [3.19; 12.11]) and the use of forceps (OR 4.23, CI 95% [2.17; 8.27]) overall; and instrumental delivery using forceps (OR 3.25, CI 95% [1.69; 6.22]) and delivery during the 2nd period (OR 1.98, CI 95% [1.01; 3.88]) in case of instrumental delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that the voluntary reduction in the episiotomy rate does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of OASI, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. However, we show an increase in the rate of OASI in case of instrumental delivery since the latest recommendations.

Knowledge, attitude and acceptability regarding antenatal perineal massage in Thai pregnant women

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Antenatal perineal massage for obstetric anal sphincter injury prevention is not routinely performed in Thailand. Due to the cultural conservatism in the country, attitudes and acceptability need to be evaluated before procedure implementation. This research was conducted to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage and identify associated factors for acceptability in antenatal perineal massage among Thai pregnant women.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the antenatal clinic at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand between July 2021 and June 2022. Thai women with singleton pregnancies at 22 weeks or more of gestation without an indication for cesarean section were enrolled. Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. In-depth interviews with pregnant women who were not interested in antenatal perineal massage were also completed.

RESULTS

A total of 144 pregnant women were enrolled with 119 participants (83%) having an accepting attitude about antenatal perineal massage. Results on knowledge included 22 (15%) participants aware of this practice, 46 participants (31.9%) knew it should be practiced after GA 34 weeks, 52 participants (36.1%) knew the massage should be maintained for 5-10 min, and 37 participants (25.7%) knew it should be performed daily. Factors associated with acceptability of antenatal perineal massage were prior interest in perineal massage and trust in the benefit of the perineal massage in facilitating vaginal delivery. Reasons for disagreeing in antenatal perineal massage included never hearing of perineal massage, concern about pregnancy complications, fear of pain, believing it to be a useless procedure, and previous successful vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

We found high acceptability for antenatal perineal massage. This program should be routinely explained and offered to Thai pregnant women to prevent severe perineal trauma and postpartum complications.

Patterns of Labour Interventions and Associated Maternal Biopsychosocial Factors in Australia: a Path Analysis

In Australia, nearly half of births involve labour interventions. Prior research in this area has relied on cross-sectional and administrative health data and has not considered biopsychosocial factors. The current study examined direct and indirect associations between biopsychosocial factors and labour interventions using 19 years of population-based prospective data. The study included singleton babies among primiparous women of the 1973-1978 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Data from 5459 women who started labour were analysed using path analysis. 42.2% of babies were born without intervention (episiotomy, instrumental, or caesarean delivery): Thirty-seven percent reported vaginal birth with episiotomy and instrumental birth interventions, 18% reported an unplanned caesarean section without episiotomy and/or instrumental interventions, and 3% reported unplanned caesarean section after episiotomy and/or instrumental interventions. Vaginal births with episiotomy and/or instrumental interventions were more likely among women with chronic hypertension (RRR(95%-CI):1.50(1.12-2.01)), a perceived length of labour of more than 36 h (RRR(95%-CI):1.86(1.45-2.39)), private health insurance (RRR(95%-CI):1.61(1.41-1.85)) and induced labour (RRR(95%-CI):1.69(1.46-1.94)). Risk factors of unplanned caesarean section without episiotomy and/or instrumental birth intervention included being overweight (RRR(95%-CI):1.30(1.07-1.58)) or obese prepregnancy (RRR(95%-CI):1.63(1.28-2.08)), aged ≥ 35 years (RRR(95%-CI):1.87(1.46-2.41)), having short stature (< 154 cm) (RRR(95%-CI):1.68(1.16-2.42)), a perceived length of labour of more than 36 h (RRR(95%-CI):3.26(2.50-4.24)), private health insurance (RRR(95%-CI):1.38(1.17-1.64)), and induced labour (RRR(95%-CI):2.56(2.16-3.05)). Prevention and management of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity during preconception and/or antenatal care are keys for reducing labour interventions and strengthening the evidence-base around delivery of best practice obstetric care.

Pelvic floor disorder and relevant factors in Iranian women of reproductive age: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

With high severity and prevalence, pelvic floor disorder is a health issue that women face worldwide. Different demographic-obstetric factors are involved in the emergence of this dysfunction that can have many adverse effects on a woman's quality of life. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of pelvic floor disorder and its related socio-demographic and obstetric factors among Iranian women of reproductive age.

METHODS

The statistical population of this cross-sectional study included 400 woman of reproductive age (15-49 years) covered by the health centers of Tabriz, Iran in 2022. The cluster sampling method was employed to select the participants. The data collection tools were a socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics questionnaire and the PDFI-20 (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20). The chi-squared test was conducted to determine the association between socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics and prevalence of pelvic floor disorder in a bivariate analysis, whereas the multivariate logistic regression test was used in a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The general prevalence of pelvic floor disorder was 76%. The prevalence rates of pelvic organ prolapse distress 6 (POPDI-6), colorectal-anal distress 8 (CRAD-8), and urinary distress (UDI-6) were 54.3%, 61.8%, and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the multivariate logistic regression test indicated that constipation (odds ratio = 5.62; 95% CI 1.97 to 16.03; P = 0.001) increased the risk of pelvic floor disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the findings, the prevalence of pelvic floor disorder is high among Iranian women of reproductive age. This condition is correlated with constipation. Therefore, screening is recommended through valid tools in addition to offering preventive measures such as preventing and curing constipation to reduce the risk of pelvic floor disorder.

Ignoring international alerts? The routinization of episiotomy in France in the 1980s and 1990s

As scientific evidence from the UK and the USA in the 1980s was questioning the usefulness of episiotomy, the rate in France increased from 38% in 1981 to 58.4% in 1996. In 1996, the World Health Organization recommended limiting the episiotomy rate to 10%. This article aims to examine this paradox through an analysis of the French medical debate on episiotomy during the 1980s and 1990s. Drawing on an analytical corpus composed of 192 articles published in French professional journals of obstetrician-gynaecologists and midwives, it shows that the majority of these health professionals considered episiotomy to be a preventive intervention. The most influential professional organizations and experts manage to refute most of the international alerts on the limitations and side effects of episiotomy through the constant production of new justifications and competing knowledge for the procedure. In the 1980s, episiotomy was seen as a means to prevent tearing and thus avoid perineal dysfunction. Episiotomy and perineal re-education (which developed into a new health sector) were put forward as 'the' solution to the problem. From the mid-1990s onwards, the focus shifted from the mother to the baby as episiotomy was promoted as a way to reduce the risk of newborn mortality and morbidity. This article shows that the alerts and controversies on the assumed iatrogenic effects of biomedical technologies and practices were silenced through efficient and dynamic production of competing knowledge about their assumed benefits.

Health care workers' perceptions of episiotomy in the era of respectful maternity care: a qualitative study of an obstetric training program in Mexico

BACKGROUND

Episiotomy in Mexico is highly prevalent and often routine - performed in up to 95% of births to primiparous women. The WHO suggests that episiotomy be used in selective cases, with an expected prevalence of 15%. Training programs to date have been unsuccessful in changing this practice. This research aims to understand how and why this practice persists despite shifts in knowledge and attitudes facilitated by the implementation of an obstetric training program.

METHODS

This is a descriptive and interpretative qualitative study. We conducted 53 pre and post-intervention (PRONTO© Program) semi-structured interviews with general physician, gynecologists and nurses (N = 32, 56% women). Thematic analysis was carried out using Atlas-ti© software to iteratively organize codes. Through interpretive triangulation, the team found theoretical saturation and explanatory depth on key analytical categories.

RESULTS

Themes fell into five major themes surrounding their perceptions of episiotomy: as a preventive measure, as a procedure that resolves problems in the moment, as a practice that gives the clinician control, as a risky practice, and the role of social norms in practicing it. Results show contradictory discourses among professionals. Despite the growing support for the selective use of episiotomy, it remains positively perceived as an effective prophylaxis for the complications of childbirth while maintaining control in the hands of health care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceptions of episiotomy shed light on how and why routine episiotomy persists, and provides insight into the multi-faceted approaches that will be required to affect this harmful obstetrical practice.

In women with spontaneous vaginal delivery, repair of perineal tears might be easier compared to episiotomy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To examine a common assumption that suturing of episiotomy, a straight performer-controlled incision, might be easier compared to repair of unpredictable spontaneous perineal tears.

METHODS

Data for this study were collected prospectively, as part of a randomized controlled trial examining the outcomes of episiotomy avoidance. Suturing characteristics were compared between vaginal deliveries with episiotomy vs. spontaneous perineal tears. Primary outcomes included the duration of the repair, number of suture packs used for the repair, and subjective rating of suturing difficulty (rated from 1 to 5 by practitioner performing the suturing).

RESULTS

Of 525 vaginal deliveries, episiotomy was performed in 165 (31.4%) of the cases, 59 of which (35.8%) were accompanied by additional vaginal tears. Spontaneous vaginal tears without episiotomy were noted in 272 deliveries (51.8%). Compared to spontaneous perineal tears, episiotomy performance was associated with an adverse effect on all three suturing characteristics in the overall cohort and in subgroup of non-operative deliveries. When comparing episiotomy only to second-degree tear suturing, in the subgroup of non-operative vaginal deliveries a higher rate of suturing duration < 10 min was noted in favor of spontaneous tears. However, in sub-analysis of vacuum-assisted deliveries, a benefit was noted in favor of the episiotomy-only group in terms of fewer suture packs and lower subjective difficulty.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with non-operative vaginal delivery, suturing of spontaneous perineal tears was easier and shorter compared to episiotomy repair. This might be related to the unpredictable nature of perineal tears, which might be shorter and shallower compared to the standard episiotomy incision.

Feasibility and safety of antepartum tactile imaging

Introduction and hypothesis

Quantitative characterization of the birth canal and critical structures before delivery may provide risk assessment for maternal birth injury. The objective of this study was to explore imaging capability of an antepartum tactile imaging (ATI) probe.

Methods

Twenty randomly selected women older than 21 years with completed 35th week of pregnancy and a premise of vaginal delivery were enrolled in the feasibility study. The biomechanical data were acquired using the ATI probe with a double-curved surface, shaped according to the fetal skull and equipped with 168 tactile sensors and an electromagnetic motion tracking sensor. Software package COMSOL Multiphysics was used for finite element modeling. Subjects were asked for assessment of pain and comfort levels experienced during the ATI examination.

Results

All 20 nulliparous women were successfully examined with the ATI. Mean age was 27.8 ± 4.1 years, BMI 30.7 ± 5.8, and week of pregnancy 38.8 ± 1.4. Biomechanical mapping with the ATI allowed real-time observation of the probe location, applied load to the vaginal walls, and a 3D tactile image composition. The nonlinear finite element model describing the stress–strain relationship of the pelvic tissue was developed and used for calculation of Young’s modulus (E). Average perineal elastic modulus was 11.1 ± 4.3 kPa, levator ani 4.8 ± 2.4 kPa, and symphysis–perineum distance was 30.1 ± 6.9 mm. The pain assessment level for the ATI examination was 2.1 ± 0.8 (scale 1–4); the comfort level was 2.05 ± 0.69 (scale 1–3).

Conclusions

The antepartum examination with the ATI probe allowed measurement of the tissue elasticity and anatomical distances. The pain level was low and the comfort level was comparable with manual palpation.

Review of Episiotomy and the Effect of its Risk Factors on Postepisiotomy Complications at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital

Aim

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of episiotomy and postepisiotomy complications and to assess the relationship between the risk factors and postepisiotomy complications in the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital.

Methodology

This was a descriptive longitudinal study, in which 403 consecutive women who had episiotomy in the labor ward were recruited for the study. They were followed up and reviewed at the postnatal clinic on the 1^st and 6^th weeks postdelivery. Data regarding age, marital status, occupation, educational status, address, parity, booking status, postepisiotomy complications, and the associated risk factors were entered adequately into a prestructured pro forma, and statistical analysis was done using statistical software (SPSS for Windows^® version 19.0). t-test was used to explore the association of risk factors to postepisiotomy complications.

Results

The episiotomy rate was 22.1%. The prevalence of postepisiotomy complications was 52.1%. The mean age of the women was 23.8 (standard deviation ± 3.2) years. Seventy-two (34.3%) patients had perineal pain, which lasted for 72 h or more; 61 (29.1%) had difficulty in walking, while 37 (17.6%) had perineal discomfort. Four (1.9%) had wound infection and only one (0.4%) had wound dehiscence. The development of postepisiotomy complications was not statistically significantly associated with risk factors such as gestational age (T = 1.4, P = 0.1), packed cell volume on admission (T = 1.0, P = 0.2), duration of first stage of labor (T = 0.5, P = 0.1), duration of second stage of labor (T = 0.7, P = 0.3), duration of rupture of fetal membranes (T = 0.8, P = 0.4), delivery repair interval (T = 0.6, P = 0.2), estimated blood loss (T = 0.9, P = 0.2), duration of Sitz bath (T = 1.0, P = 0.2), duration of analgesic (T = 1.2, P = 0.1), duration of antibiotics (T = 1.3, P = 0.1), or the operator who performed or repaired the episiotomy (P = 0.2).

Conclusion

The prevalence of episiotomy and postepisiotomy complications in this study was high. Necessary attention should be given to ensure adequate pain relief for all parturients who had episiotomy, and the policy of restrictive use of episiotomy should be fully implemented in the department in line with the best practices and evidence-based recommendations. This will further reduce the incidence of episiotomy rate as well complications that may arise from it and ensure a positive pregnancy experience for pregnant women.

Episiotomy: history, present and future - a review

Childbirth has always carried traumatic stress to the woman's body. To deliver with less perineal trauma, obstetricians have used episiotomies. Episiotomy is still a common practice despite the controversy regarding its use. Weighing the risks and benefits, the scientific literature supports its selective use. With the worldwide trend to reduce the rate of episiotomy, several techniques have been proposed to achieve that. However, further research is still needed to prove their efficacy. This review will shed light on the historical background of episiotomy, its different techniques, indications, and the future of its practice.

Postpartum Female Sexual Function: Risk Factors for Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Women's sexual health is a vital and important part of life at any age. In particular, pregnancy and childbirth bring biological, psychological, and social changes which may influence sexual health. It has been shown that sexual function declines during pregnancy and does not return to its baseline levels during the postpartum period. Despite the complexity and significance of this subject, health providers often neglect sexual aspects during pregnancy and postpartum.

AIM

We believe that clarifying the risk factors will help open conversations and improvements in sexual function.

METHODS

In this review, we focus on how postpartum sexual function is affected by mode of delivery, perineal trauma during delivery, episiotomy, and lactation.

CONCCLUSIONS

We conclude that the mode of delivery has no significant effect on short- and long-term postpartum sexual function. On the other hand, 3rd and 4th degree tears are strongly associated with postpartum sexual dysfunction. We found that episiotomy does not adversely affect sexual function, and lactation has a slightly negative effect. We believe that shedding light on this topic will lead to a better understanding for pregnant and postpartum women and the obstetrician. Further studies may elucidate more useful treatment approaches. Ola Gutzeit, Gali Levy, Lior Lowenstein. Postpartum Female Sexual Function: Risk Factors for Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction. Sex Med 2019;8:8-13.

Postnatal pelvic floor muscle stiffness measured by vaginal elastometry in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury: a pilot study

Introduction and hypothesis

Vaginal childbirth is associated with pelvic floor muscle (PFM) damage in a third of women. The biomechanics prediction, detection and management of PFM damage remain poorly understood. We sought in this pilot study to determine whether quantifying PFM stiffness postnatally by vaginal elastometry, in women attending a perineal trauma clinic (PTC) within 6 months of obstetric anal sphincter injury, correlates with their antecedent labour characteristics, pelvic floor muscle damage, or urinary/bowel/sexual symptoms, to inform future definitive prospective studies.

Methods

In this pilot study, we measured postnatal PFM stiffness by vaginal elastometry in 54 women. A subset of participants (n = 14) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to define any levator ani (LA) muscle defects from vaginal childbirth. We investigated the association of PFM stiffness with demographics, labour and delivery characteristics, clinical features and MRI evidence of LA damage.

Results

Raised maternal BMI was associated with reduced pelvic floor stiffness (r = −0.4; p < 0.01). Higher stiffness values were associated with forceps delivery for delayed second stage of labour (n = 14) vs non-forceps vaginal delivery (n = 40; 630 ± 40 N/m vs 500 ± 30 N/m; p < 0.05), and a non-significant trend towards longer duration of the second stage of labour. Women with urinary, bowel or sexual symptoms (n = 37) demonstrated higher pelvic floor stiffness values than those without (570 ± 30 N/m vs 450 ± 40 N/m; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

A history of delayed second stage of labour and forceps delivery was associated with higher PFM stiffness values in the postnatal period. Whether high pelvic muscle stiffness antenatally is a risk factor for instrumental vaginal delivery and LA avulsion is unknown.

Restrictive versus routine episiotomy among Southeast Asian term pregnancies: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether restrictive or routine episiotomy in term pregnant Southeast Asian women results in fewer complications.

DESIGN

A multicentre randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Two tertiary and two general hospitals in Thailand.

POPULATION

3006 singleton pregnant women 18 years or older, ≥37 weeks of gestation, cephalic presentation and planned vaginal delivery.

METHODS

This randomised controlled trial compared routine versus restrictive episiotomies in Thai women giving birth vaginally. Participants were singleton, term pregnant women with cephalic presentation. Block randomisation was stratified by study site and parity. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to indicate between-group differences.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was severe perineal laceration. Secondary outcomes included vaginal laceration, cervical laceration, and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

3006 women were randomly assigned to restrictive (1502) and routine (1504) episiotomy. There was no difference in severe perineal laceration between the groups (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.46-1.12). Restrictive episiotomy resulted in more intact perineums in multiparous women (RR 3.09, 95% CI 2.10-4.56). Restrictive episiotomy increased the risk of vaginal laceration in primiparous (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.62-2.37) and multiparous women (RR 2.21, 95% CI 1.77-2.75) but did not lead to more suturing. There were comparable risks of cervical laceration, postpartum haemorrhage, wound complication, birth asphyxia, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

Restrictive episiotomy results in more intact perineum in multiparous women. Risks of maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two practices. These results strengthen the certainty of the existing Cochrane review findings in supporting restrictive episiotomy.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Restrictive episiotomy results in more intact perineums after vaginal birth in multiparous Southeast Asian women.

FIGO Statement: Restrictive use rather than routine use of episiotomy

International standards for clinical staffing of delivery care in maternity units are currently lacking, with resulting gaps in provision leading to adverse outcomes and very poor experiences of care for women and families. While evidence‐informed modelling approaches have been proposed based on population characteristics and estimated rates of complications, their application and outcomes in low‐resource settings have not been reported. Here, FIGO's Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee proposes indicative standards for labor wards as a starting point for policy and program development. These standards consider the volume of deliveries, the case mix, and the need to match clinical care requirements with an appropriate mix of professional skills among midwifery and obstetric staff. The role of Shift Leader in busy labor wards is emphasized. Application of the standards can help to assure women and their families of a safe but also positive birthing experience. FIGO calls for investment by partners to test these clinically‐informed recommendations for delivery unit staffing at hospital and district level in low‐ and middle‐income country settings.

Coaching a slow birth with the woman in an empowered position may be less harmful than routine hands-on practice to protect against severe tears in birth - A discussion paper

BACKGROUND

Different hands-on interventions to protect women from severe perineal tears after birth have been widely implemented. Evidence to support the routine use of hands-on interventions to reduce severe tears is mainly based on aggregated data from observational studies.

AIM

To critically discuss the current evidence for the implementation of hands-on intervention as a routine practice to protect women from severe tears after birth.

DISCUSSION

Observational studies have been used to justify the routine use of hands-on intervention to protect women from severe perineal tears despite randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews showing lack of benefit. There is strong evidence supporting the slow speed at the time of birth to prevent severe perineal tears. While hands-on intervention does reduce the speed of birth, it may have a negative effect on the birth process, on neonatal outcomes and women's agency.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based practice requires sufficient evaluation of interventions before being implemented in clinical practice as well as valuing the level of evidence when making clinical decisions. Evaluation of hands-on interventions to protect women from severe perineal tears must include not just one outcome of interest, but also an assessment of how the intervention interferes with the normal mechanism of birth, and how it affects neonatal outcomes and the autonomy of women.

Resumption of sexual intercourse post partum and the utilisation of contraceptive methods in China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This is a cross-sectional study that aimed to examine the resumption of sexual intercourse post partum, the utilisation of contraceptive methods and the influencing factors among Chinese women at a tertiary teaching hospital.

DESIGN

This is a questionnaire survey by written and online interview for participants.

PARTICIPANTS

Based on medical records, we sent online questionnaires about postpartum sexual intercourse and contraception plans to 550 eligible women.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Potential factors affecting postpartum sexual intercourse and utilisation of contraception were determined by analysis of epidemiological and clinical factors and sexual experiences during and after pregnancy.

RESULTS

Of 550 eligible participants, 406 women (73.8%) with a postpartum period of 8.5 months (range 6-10) completed the questionnaires; 146 of 406 (36.0%) resumed sexual intercourse within 3 months, and 259 of 279 (92.8%) used contraceptive methods. In univariate and multivariate analyses, sexual intercourse during pregnancy (adjusted OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.8 to 6.9) and resumption of menstruation (adjusted OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.3) were significant influencing factors in resumption of sexual intercourse within 3 months after childbirth. No factor was found to be associated with using contraceptive methods or the general resumption of sexual intercourse post partum. The questionnaire had good reliability and validity.

CONCLUSIONS

Having sexual intercourse during pregnancy and resuming menstruation earlier were independent factors for resumption of sexual intercourse within 3 months after delivery. Almost all women who had postpartum sexual intercourse used various contraceptive methods.

Quantitative assessment of pelvic floor muscle extensibility in pregnant women with a perineal elasticity meter

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare measurements of pelvic floor muscle extensibility in pregnant women obtained through the Epi-no^® and perineal elasticity meter (PEM) devices.Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study with a consecutive sample, conducted in a prenatal care outpatient clinic. The pelvic floors of 62 healthy pregnant women with gestational ages between 35 and 40 weeks were assessed. Perineal extensibility was measured using the Epi-no^® and PEM devices. Through the linear regression method, a formula was created to calculate the Epi-no^® values from the PEM values. To determine the degree of relationship between both variables, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used.Results: In the comparison of the results for 62 pregnant women using the two perineal extensibility assessment methods, the value obtained in the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis (0.621) indicated a moderate relationship between the variables. This finding was not confirmed by the Kappa correlation test. When the measurements were classified into three groups, a slight correlation was identified (perineum with restrictions, moderate extensibility, and good extensibility).Conclusion: There was a relationship between Epi-no^® and PEM from slight to moderate agreement.

Socio-historical evolution of the episiotomy practice: A literature review

Episiotomy is an enlargement of the vaginal orifice made by a surgical incision of the perineum. This review aimed to provide a socio-historical retrospective on the practice or episiotomy. Using the criteria from the PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a literature review, browsing twenty databases and several papers available in the gray literature. Sixty-four articles, seven reports, and fifteen books were selected. Through this study, four eras with different approaches to episiotomy practice could be identified: 1792-1920, 1920-1980, 1980-1996, and 1996-2018. This review shows that institutionalization and medicalization of birth lead to a systematic practice of episiotomy in many westernized countries until 1996. Lay questioning and evidence-based medicine may have reversed this trend into a restrictive practice. After making an inventory of the factors associated with the evolution of change in the rate of episiotomies, the review finally revealed that evolution of the practice of episiotomy has also been influenced by ideological, political, and social factors.

Features of randomised trials designed by the NPEU Perinatal Trials Service during Adrian Grant's directorship

Adrian Grant pioneered methodological innovations in the randomised trials organised by the Perinatal Trials Service established at the national Perinatal Epidemiology Unit in Oxford, UK. This Commentary discusses these innovations, and shows the wide range of trials designed under his directorship.

State of midwifery research in France

OBJECTIVE

We describe French midwives' experience and perception of research and publication as well as their publications in scientific and professional journals.

DESIGN

We conducted an online cross sectional survey of midwives from June to November 2016; complemented by a bibliometric analysis of their publications in any language.

SETTING

This study was conducted in France, where it is necessary to question some midwifery and obstetrical practices.

PARTICIPANTS

146 midwives working/residing in France or holding/studying in France for a PhD or a Masters' degree at the time of the study; or having already published articles in any scientific or professional journal.

FINDINGS

Of the 146 eligible midwives, 91.8% were female; 15 (10.3%) had a PhD degree, 26 (17.8%) and 80 (54.8%) were preparing a PhD and a Master's degree, respectively. A total of 140 midwives (95.8%) were working in midwifery and 54 (37.0%) respondents reported having already participated in midwifery research programs. Publication experience was reported by 73 midwives, including 26 (17.8%) who have published at least one article on midwifery in a journal accessible online and peerreviewed. 97.2% of midwives with publication experience consider it useful to publish but 75.7% consider that it is a difficult process. Lack of time, not mastering scientific writing and English language are their main barriers to publication. We identified 218 articles published by these midwives before January 2016, including 180 (82.6%) on maternal and perinatal health. Of their 134 unique articles on midwifery accessible online, 77 (57.5%) dealt with bio-medical topics, 49 (36.6%) with health system issues, and 17 (12.7%) used human and social sciences approaches. Pregnancy and birth were the two most studied reproductive life phases. Eighty-nine (28.4%) of these 314 articles were about midwifery practices or interventions. Since 1990, 93 articles have been published on midwifery in peer-reviewed journals, including 32 in the French language. The number of publications increased significantly with time with a progression coefficient at +1.18% per year, in particular in scientific journals (+0.78% per year).

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION

We evidenced that even though midwives in France have a still limited experience of research, and few of them have completed a PhD degree, or receive a salary for doing research, they publish an increasing number of scientific articles on midwifery topics. However, very few research programs in France examine aspects of midwifery. This scarcity is a major barrier to the involvement of midwives in research. Scientific publications about midwifery in French language are limited mainly due to the lack of adequate and specialized journal in French. However, publishing in French would facilitate the access to knowledge and evidence of midwifery practitioners in Frenchspeaking countries, including French-speaking Africa, where maternal mortality ratios can be very high. We suggest and discuss a number of approaches to increase access to scientific knowledge on midwifery in France and French-speaking countries.

Midwifery management of second-degree perineal tears in New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey of practice

BACKGROUND

Second-degree tears are the most common form of perineal trauma occurring after vaginal birth managed by New Zealand midwives, although little is known about midwives' perineal practice.

AIM

The aim of this study was to identify how midwives managed the last second-degree perineal tear they treated and the level to which their practice reflects National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines.

METHODS

An (anonymous) online survey was conducted over a six-week period in 2013. New Zealand midwives who self-identified as currently practising perineal management and could recall management of the last second-degree tear they treated were included in the analysis.

FINDINGS

Of those invited, 645 (57.1% self-employed, 42.9% employed) were eligible and completed surveys. Self-employed midwives reported greater confidence (88.0% vs 74.4%, p<0.001) and more recent experience (85.1% vs 57.4%, p<0.001) with perineal repair than employed midwives. Midwives who left the last second-degree tear unsutured (7.3%) were more likely to report low confidence (48.9% vs 15.4%, p<0.001) and less recent experience with repair (53.2% vs 24.7%, p<0.001), and were less likely to report a digital-rectal examination (10.6% vs 49.0%, p<0.001), compared to midwives who sutured. Care consistent with evidence-based guidelines (performing a digital-rectal examination, 59.4% vs 49.3% p=0.005; optimal suturing techniques, 62.2% vs 48.7%, p=0.001) was associated with recent perineal education.

CONCLUSIONS

Midwives' management of the last second-degree perineal tear is variable and influenced by factors including: employment status, experience, confidence, and perineal education. There is potential for improvement in midwives' management through increased uptake of evidence-based guidelines and through ongoing education.

The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that complaints after episiotomy repair depend on the method and material used for repair. The objective of our study was to determine which of two frequently used suture materials, Monocryl® (poliglecaprone 25) and Vicryl Rapide™ (polyglactin 910), is superior for intracutaneous closure of the skin in mediolateral episiotomies.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial performed in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2013 250 primiparous women with uncomplicated mediolateral episiotomies were randomly allocated to intracutaneous skin closure with either Monocryl® or Vicryl Rapide™. All other layers were sutured with Vicryl 2-0 and Vicryl 0 in both groups. Pain scores and complications were documented using questionnaires during the first three months post partum. The primary outcome was pain 10 days after delivery in sitting position established by Visual Analogous Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were pain scores at different time points and reported complications such as infections, dehiscence and dyspareunia one day, 10 days, six weeks and three months after delivery.

RESULTS

Of 250 allocated women 54% returned questionnaires. No statistical difference was found between both groups for the primary outcome (VAS 2,8 (95% CI 2,18-3,44) vs. VAS 2,5 (95% CI 2,00-2,98), p = 0,43). With regard to secondary outcomes only self-reported dehiscence was significantly different, favouring Monocryl® (10% vs. 25%, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of Monocryl® 3-0 and Vicryl Rapide™ 3-0 for intracutaneous closure of the skin after mediolateral episiotomy leads to equal pain scores ten days after delivery and therefore both materials may be considered for this use. Monocryl® 3-0 might be favourable over Vicryl Rapide™ 3-0 due to less self-reported dehiscence after intracutaneous closure of the skin in mediolateral episiotomies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was retrospectively registered under trial nr. ISRCTN29869308 on 20-04-2016.

An update on the risk factors for and management of obstetric haemorrhage

Obstetric haemorrhage is associated with increased risk of serious maternal morbidity and mortality. Postpartum haemorrhage is the commonest form of obstetric haemorrhage, and worldwide, a woman dies due to massive postpartum haemorrhage approximately every 4 min. In addition, many experience serious morbidity such as multi-organ failure, complications of multiple blood transfusions, peripartum hysterectomy and unintended damage to pelvic organs, loss of fertility and psychological sequelae, including posttraumatic stress disorders. Anticipation of massive postpartum haemorrhage, prompt recognition of the cause and institution of timely and appropriate measures to control bleeding and replacement of the lost blood volume and restoration of oxygen carrying capacity (i.e. haemoglobin) and correction of the 'washout phenomenon' leading to coagulopathy will help save lives. Obstetric shock index may help in avoidance of underestimation of blood loss and the use of tranexamic acid, oxytocics and timely peripartum hysterectomy, if appropriate, will help save lives. Triple P procedure has been recently developed as the conservative surgical alternative for women with abnormal invasion of the placenta and has been shown to significantly reduce the blood loss and to reduce inpatient stay.

Pattern of episiotomy use & its immediate complications among vaginal deliveries in 18 tertiary care hospitals in India

Background & objectives:

In developed countries, efforts have been made to restrict episiotomy practice. However, in developing countries the episiotomy rates continue to be high. This study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of episiotomy use and its immediate complications among women delivering at tertiary level public hospitals in India.

Methods:

Prospective data of all women undergoing vaginal delivery including instrumental delivery were collected daily from the labour room registers of the 18 tertiary care hospitals on a structured proforma. Weekly data from all sites were sent to a central unit for compilation and analysis. Odds ratio was used to compare the proportion of genital trauma among women with and without episiotomy both in nulliparous and multiparous women.

Results:

Among 1,20,243 vaginal deliveries, episiotomy was performed in 63.4 per cent (n=76,305) cases. Nulliparaous women were 8.8 times more likely to undergo episiotomy than multiparous women. The various genital tract injuries reported were first degree perineal tear (n=4805, 3.9%), second degree perineal tear (n=1082, 0.9%), third and fourth degree perineal tear (n=186, 0.2%), anterior vaginal trauma requiring suturing (n=490, 0.4%), extension of episiotomy/vaginal laceration/excessive bleeding from episiotomy or tear (n=177, 0.15%), vulval/vaginal haematoma (n=70, 0.06%) and cervical tear (n=108, 0.08%). The combined rate of third and fourth degree perineal tears was observed to be significantly lower (P<0.001) among nullipara who received episiotomy (0.13%) compared to those who delivered without episiotomy (0.62%).

Interpretations & conclusions:

Significantly lower rates of third or fourth degree perineal tear were seen among nulliparous women undergoing episiotomy. The risk and benefit of episiotomy and its complications need to be evaluated through randomized clinical trials in the Indian context.

Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Despite all the evidence corroborating the selective use of episiotomy and although routine use of the procedure is contraindicated, there are no evidences corroborating if episiotomy is necessary in any circumstance. The present clinical randomized trial was performed to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in women submitted to a non-episiotomy protocol versus one of selective episiotomy.

METHODS

An open-labelled, randomized clinical trial was carried out in a tertiary teaching hospital in Recife, Northeastern Brazil. Women in labor with a full-term live foetus, dilatation of 6 to 8 cm and cephalic presentation (vertex position) were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of bleeding disorders and an indication for a caesarean section. After signing the consent form, 241 women were randomized to a non-episiotomy protocol (the experimental group) or to a selective episiotomy group (the control group). No episiotomies were to be performed in the experimental group except under exceptional circumstances. In the control group, selective episiotomies were to be performed in accordance with the healthcare professionals' clinical judgement. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were evaluated. Ratio Risk (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for our outcomes.

RESULTS

The analysis include 115 women assigned to a non-episiotomy protocol and 122 to selective episiotomy. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to maternal or perinatal outcomes. The episiotomy rate was similar (two cases in each group, about 1.7%), as was the duration of the second stage of labor, the frequency of perineal tears, severe perineal trauma, need for perineal suturing and blood loss at delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

A non-episiotomy protocol appears to be safe for mother and child, and highlights the need to investigate whether there is, in fact, any indication for this procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under reference number ( NCT02178111 ).

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth

BACKGROUND

Some clinicians believe that routine episiotomy, a surgical cut of the vagina and perineum, will prevent serious tears during childbirth. On the other hand, an episiotomy guarantees perineal trauma and sutures.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects on mother and baby of a policy of selective episiotomy ('only if needed') compared with a policy of routine episiotomy ('part of routine management') for vaginal births.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (14 September 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing selective versus routine use of episiotomy, irrespective of parity, setting or surgical type of episiotomy. We included trials where either unassisted or assisted vaginal births were intended. Quasi-RCTs, trials using a cross-over design or those published in abstract form only were not eligible for inclusion in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A third author mediated where there was no clear consensus. We observed good practice for data analysis and interpretation where trialists were review authors. We used fixed-effect models unless heterogeneity precluded this, expressed results as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

This updated review includes 12 studies (6177 women), 11 in women in labour for whom a vaginal birth was intended, and one in women where an assisted birth was anticipated. Two were trials each with more than 1000 women (Argentina and the UK), and the rest were smaller (from Canada, Germany, Spain, Ireland, Malaysia, Pakistan, Columbia and Saudi Arabia). Eight trials included primiparous women only, and four trials were in both primiparous and multiparous women. For risk of bias, allocation was adequately concealed and reported in nine trials; sequence generation random and adequately reported in three trials; blinding of outcomes adequate and reported in one trial, blinding of participants and personnel reported in one trial.For women where an unassisted vaginal birth was anticipated, a policy of selective episiotomy may result in 30% fewer women experiencing severe perineal/vaginal trauma (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94; 5375 women; eight RCTs; low-certainty evidence). We do not know if there is a difference for blood loss at delivery (an average of 27 mL less with selective episiotomy, 95% CI from 75 mL less to 20 mL more; two trials, 336 women, very low-certainty evidence). Both selective and routine episiotomy have little or no effect on infants with Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (four trials, no events; 3908 women, moderate-certainty evidence); and there may be little or no difference in perineal infection (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.82, three trials, 1467 participants, low-certainty evidence).For pain, we do not know if selective episiotomy compared with routine results in fewer women with moderate or severe perineal pain (measured on a visual analogue scale) at three days postpartum (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.05, one trial, 165 participants, very low-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference for long-term (six months or more) dyspareunia (RR1.14, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.53, three trials, 1107 participants, moderate-certainty evidence); and there may be little or no difference for long-term (six months or more) urinary incontinence (average RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.44, three trials, 1107 participants, low-certainty evidence). One trial reported genital prolapse at three years postpartum. There was no clear difference between the two groups (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.41; 365 women; one trial, low certainty evidence). Other outcomes relating to long-term effects were not reported (urinary fistula, rectal fistula, and faecal incontinence). Subgroup analyses by parity (primiparae versus multiparae) and by surgical method (midline versus mediolateral episiotomy) did not identify any modifying effects. Pain was not well assessed, and women's preferences were not reported.One trial examined selective episiotomy compared with routine episiotomy in women where an operative vaginal delivery was intended in 175 women, and did not show clear difference on severe perineal trauma between the restrictive and routine use of episiotomy, but the analysis was underpowered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women where no instrumental delivery is intended, selective episiotomy policies result in fewer women with severe perineal/vaginal trauma. Other findings, both in the short or long term, provide no clear evidence that selective episiotomy policies results in harm to mother or baby.The review thus demonstrates that believing that routine episiotomy reduces perineal/vaginal trauma is not justified by current evidence. Further research in women where instrumental delivery is intended may help clarify if routine episiotomy is useful in this particular group. These trials should use better, standardised outcome assessment methods.

Long- and short-term complications of episiotomy

Although extensively applied in obstetrics practice to facilitate delivery by increasing the vaginal birth conduit, most episiotomy studies are in the context of short- or medium-term outcomes, and the number of studies investigating the long-term effects is insufficient. Episiotomy is often considered associated with urinary and/or anal incontinence and dyspareunia; however, there is no concrete evidence for this issue. Current meta-analyses and reviews that assessed the studies available in the literature revealed that episiotomy does not decrease the rates of urinary incontinence, perineal pain, and sexual dysfunction and that routine episiotomy does not prevent pelvic floor damage; thus, the recommended use of mediolateral episiotomy is restricted, rather than routine. According to the limited number of studies on sexual function, there seems to be a linear relationship between the degree of perineal laceration and postpartum dyspareunia. It is still not clear whether episiotomy has any impact on pelvic floor relaxation, pelvic organ prolapse, and sexual dysfunction in the long term.

Episiotomy and the risk of severe perineal injuries among Korean women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;30:1745-1749. [PMID: 27549862 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1224833]

PURPOSE

We examined the frequency of severe perineal injuries according to the use of episiotomy in vaginal deliveries of Korean women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in which 358 consecutive parturients were included. Women were divided into episiotomy (n = 115) and no episiotomy (n = 243) groups. The main outcome was the occurrence of severe (third or fourth degree) perineal injuries. Delivery records and medical documents were reviewed to collect the data. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the frequency of severe perineal injuries between two groups (6.1% (7/115) in episiotomy versus 3.7% (9/243) in no episiotomy group, p = 0.308). Anterior perineal laceration was more frequent (40.3% (98/243) vs. 18.3% (21/115), p < 0.001), but intact perineum was found in 15.6% (38/243) of women in no episiotomy group. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent risk factors in the occurrence of severe perineal injuries including maternal age, parity, performance of episiotomy, head position at delivery, length of second stage of labor, birth weight, head circumference, and the use of vacuum during delivery. Only birthweight was a significant factor in predicting severe perineal injuries, and performance of episiotomy did not increase nor decrease the risk of severe perineal injury.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the occurrence of severe perineal injuries according to the use of episiotomy.

The case for a more epidemiologically informed nursing profession

This paper argues that a more epidemiologically informed nursing profession could confidently challenge conventional medical epidemiology, and yet retain those concepts useful to a more holistic interpretation of the discipline and its practice. Situated within biomedicine and based on natural science, epidemiology has often been ignored by nursing, which has developed a more holistic model of health and illness and a wide range of research methodologies. However, epidemiology is evolving as mainstream approaches to research using quantitative methodologies are challenged by qualitative techniques and the emergence of 'popular epidemiology'. An epidemiology which examined questions of sickness and health from different epistemological and methodological perspectives would have more in common with prevailing ideologies in nursing.

Complications arise as disciplines such as nursing and epidemiology, with different epistemologies and theoretical approaches, attempt to tackle similar problems. The difficulties are not only with paradigm incompatibility: each profession will be jealously guarding its particular territory and area of expertise. There has been little exploration of mutual or overlapping concepts and the new insights which these might bring to both disciplines. This paper attempts to redress this gap and argues that nursing has the potential to consolidate an increasingly divergent epidemiology, while gaining valuable skills to add to its own 'tool-box'.

Processes of change in obstetrics: a cross-national case-study of episiotomy

This article traces and analyzes the evolution of obstetric and midwifery doctrine and use of episiotomy in the United States and England. In the US, the routinization of episiotomy eventually resulted from strenuous lobbying efforts of a small group of obstetrician/gynecologists between 1915 and 1935. These physicians claimed episiotomy prevented perineal lacerations, infant morbidity and mortality, and future gynecological problems. In England, the liberal use of episiotomy came about during the 1970s from pressure from obstetricians although no overt campaigning for the practice occurred. In both countries routine episiotomy was encouraged by medical and extra medical factors which involved changes occurring in the dominant belief system in obstetrics, maternity care practices, and the obstetric and midwifery professions.

In more recent years, eventual declines in episiotomy use resulted from childbirth activists and others questioning of the practice and calling on obstetricians to produce evidence that the operation was in fact beneficial. This was facilitated, particularly in England, by midwifery interest in resisting obstetric control.

While scientific evidence showing episiotomy beneficial was not responsible for the adoption of routine episiotomy in either the US or England, the lack of evidence was central to the initial rejection of routine episiotomy in England and resulted in the launching of randomized controlled trials designed to produce evidence of the operation's effectiveness.

This case-study offers insight into some of the diverse factors implicated in bringing about change in obstetric knowledge and practice.

Sexual activity and dyspareunia the first year postpartum in relation to degree of perineal trauma

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Knowledge on sexual complaints and time to sexual resumption after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is scarce. The aim of the study was to investigate self-reported sexual activity and coital problems 1 year postpartum in relation to perineal trauma, in addition to delivery mode.

METHODS

Among 2,846 women recruited during pregnancy, all women who delivered with OASI (n = 42, all third-degree perineal tears), in addition to 20 randomly selected controls per OASI case, a total of 882 women, were sent a self-administered questionnaire addressing time to coital resumption after delivery and potential coital difficulty 1 year postpartum.

RESULTS

By 8 weeks, half of the 561 responders (51.4 %) had resumed intercourse, increasing to 75.2 % by 12 weeks and 94.7 % 1 year postpartum. In multivariate regression analysis OASI was the strongest predictor for postponed coital onset, defined as after 8 weeks (aOR 5.52, CI 1.59-19.16). OASI was also the only significant predictor for dyspareunia 1 year after delivery (aOR 3.57, CI 1.39-9.19). Episiotomy was neither a risk factor for postponed coital onset nor for dyspareunia. There were no differences between episiotomy and second-degree laceration injury groups regarding postponed coital onset (p = 0.45) or dyspareunia (p = 0.67) 1 year postpartum.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury was a strong and independent predictor for both postponed coital resumption after delivery and for dyspareunia 1 year postpartum, whereas episiotomy and spontaneous second-degree lacerations were not. Our main finding of affected sexual activity after OASI further supports the need to reduce the rates of this obstetric injury to a minimum.

[The practice of episiotomy in France 10 years after the recommendations of CNGOF: What inventory?]

Since its creation, the practice of episiotomy has evolved, being influenced by several factors. Various stances on its use were stated, until the eventual reduction of this practice, as suggested by numerous practical guides. In 2005, the National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in France published its French Guidelines for Clinical practice in this area. Today, it seems appropriate to focus on the evolution of the use of episiotomy, ten years after the publication of these recommendations. The authors propose a literature review, browsing through all the available epidemiological data in France related to episiotomy, recording all national statistics and some local trends, as there are regional specificities. This review allows to follow the overall evolution of the practice of episiotomy in France between 1981 and 2014, and to identify territorial disparities. Finally, in the specific context of the practice of episiotomy in French gynecological and obstetrics field, the authors conclude it by considering the possible evolution of this surgical practice, as well as, the Clinical Practice Recommendations related to it.

Nonsuturing or Skin Adhesives versus Suturing of the Perineal Skin After Childbirth: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Suturing of perineal trauma after childbirth can cause problems such as pain, discomfort because of tight sutures, the need for suture removal, and dyspareunia. It is unclear whether leaving the perineal skin unsutured or using skin adhesives might prevent these problems.

METHODS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and prospective trial registers until January 2013 were searched for (quasi-)randomized controlled trials comparing nonsuturing of the perineal skin or skin adhesives versus suturing of the skin when repairing a second-degree perineal tear or episiotomy. Primary outcome measure was short-term and long-term pain and need for analgesic medication.

RESULTS

Four randomized and two quasi-randomized controlled trials (involving 2,922 women) with heterogeneity in contexts, designs, and methodological quality were included. Nonsuturing of the skin leads to less short-term and long-term pain compared to suturing and an increased rate of skin separation. Skin adhesives lead to less short-term pain without an increased rate of skin separation. Nonsuturing or skin adhesives lead to less complaints and there are no other adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsuturing of the skin or the use of skin adhesives appears preferable in terms of pain. Nonsuturing could lead to more short-term skin separation when no adhesives are used, but there is no evidence for the clinical importance of skin separation. There is a need for studies with a follow-up of at least 6 months, in which pain is measured homogeneously and for studies comparing the use of skin adhesives with nonsuturing of the skin with the focus on long-term cosmetic results.

Cross-sectional study comparing public and private hospitals in Catalonia: is the practice of routine episiotomy changing?

BACKGROUND

In Spain, the Strategy for Assistance in Normal Childbirth (SANC) promoted a model of care, which respects the physiological birth process and discards unnecessary routine interventions, such as episiotomies. We evaluated the rate of episiotomy use and perineal trauma as indicators of how selective introduction of the SANC initiative has impacted childbirth outcomes in hospitals of Catalonia.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of all singleton vaginal term deliveries without instrument registered in the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) of Catalonia in 2007, 2010 and 2012. Hospitals were divided into types according to funding (public or private), and four strata were differentiated according to volume of births attended. Episiotomies and perineal injury were considered dependent variables. The relationship between qualitative variables was analysed using the chi-squared test, and Student's t-test was used for quantitative variables. Comparison of proportions was performed on the two hospital groups between 2007 and 2012 using a Z-test. Logistic regression models were used to analyse the relationship between episiotomy or severe perineal damage and maternal age, volume of births and hospital type, obtaining odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The majority of normal singleton term deliveries were attended in public hospitals, where maternal age was lower than for women attended in private hospitals. Analysis revealed a statistically significant (P < 0.001) decreasing trend in episiotomy use in Catalonia for both hospital types. Private hospitals appeared to be associated with increased episiotomy rate in 2007 (OR = 1.099, CI: 1,057-1,142), 2010 (OR = 1.528, CI: 1,472-1,587) and 2012 (OR = 1.459, CI: 1,383-1,540), and a lower rate of severe perineal trauma in 2007 (OR = 0.164, CI: 0.095-0.283), 2010 (OR = 0.16, CI: 0.110-0.232) and 2012 (OR = 0.19, CI: 0.107-0.336). Regarding severe perineal injury, when independent variables were adjusted, maternal age ceased to have a significant correlation in 2012 (OR = 0.994, CI: 0.970-1.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Episiotomy procedures during normal singleton vaginal term deliveries in Catalonia has decreased steadily since 2007. Study results show a stable incidence trend below 1% for severe perineal trauma over the study period.

Perineal care

INTRODUCTION

More than 85% of women having a vaginal birth suffer some perineal trauma. Spontaneous tears requiring suturing are estimated to occur in at least one third of women in the UK and US. Perineal trauma can lead to long-term physical and psychological problems.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of first- and second-degree tears and episiotomies? What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (third- and fourth-degree tears)? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to November 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 33 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: conventional suturing; different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries; non-suturing of muscle and skin (or perineal skin alone); and sutures (absorbable synthetic sutures, catgut sutures, continuous sutures, interrupted sutures).

Provider contribution to an episiotomy risk model

OBJECTIVE

The extent to which the observed variation in episiotomy rates can be attributed to individual practitioners is not known. We sought to analyze the contribution of the attending midwife to a risk model for episiotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

We prospectively collected data on 736 consecutive vaginal deliveries in nulliparas at a tertiary maternity hospital. The study measures the impact of the attending midwife on the decision to perform an episiotomy, controlling for a host of patient and clinical characteristics. Midwife effect is evaluated in terms of its overall contribution to the explanatory power of logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The overall rate of episiotomy in primiparas was 40.6%. Individual midwife episiotomy rate ranged from 5.6% to 73.9% (p < 0.0001). After controlling for confounding factors with logistic regression, maternal age ≥35 years (OR 1.61, 95%CI: 1.02-2.52), vacuum extraction (OR 26.88, 95%CI: 2.57-280.7), fundal pressure (OR 62.90, 95%CI: 18.39-214.98), second-stage duration (OR 2.24, 95%CI: 1.53-3.28), and the individual midwife were all associated with episiotomy use. The midwife attending the birth and fundal pressure provided the greatest explanatory power of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The attending provider adds a significant independent effect to the episiotomy risk model. This has implications for both practice and research in this clinical area.

Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that the episiotomy rate should be around 10%, which is already a reality in many European countries. Currently the use of episiotomy should be restricted and physicians are encouraged to use their clinical judgment to decide when the procedure is necessary. There is no clinical evidence corroborating any indication of episiotomy, so until the present moment it is not yet known whether episiotomy is indeed necessary in any context of obstetric practice.

OBJECTIVES

To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing a protocol of not performing episiotomy versus selective episiotomy.

METHODS/DESIGN

An open label randomized clinical trial will be conducted including laboring women with term pregnancy, maximum dilation of 8 cm, live fetus in cephalic vertex presentation. Women with bleeding disorders of pregnancy, indication for caesarean section and those without capacity to consent and without legal guardians will be excluded. Primary outcomes will be frequency of episiotomy, delivery duration, frequency of spontaneous lacerations and perineal trauma, frequency of instrumental delivery, postpartum blood loss, need for perineal suturing, number of sutures, Apgar scores at one and five minutes, need for neonatal resuscitation and pH in cord blood. As secondary outcomes frequency complications of perineal suturing, postpartum perineal pain, maternal satisfaction, neonatal morbidity and admission newborn in NICU will be assessed. Women will be invited to participate and those who agree will sign the consent form and will be then assigned to a protocol of not conducting episiotomy (experimental group) or to a group that episiotomy is performed selectively according to the judgment of the provider of care delivery (control Group). The present study was approved by IMIP's Research Ethics Committee.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Register under the number and was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT02178111.

Clinical evaluation of early postpartum pain and healing outcomes after mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate short-term perineal pain among primiparous women after mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) and lateral episiotomy (LE).

METHODS

The prospective randomized study was conducted in the Czech Republic during 2010-2012. Consecutive primiparous women who gave birth at or after 37 weeks of pregnancy and had indications for an episiotomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo MLE or LE. Patients were unaware of the episiotomy type performed. The primary outcomes were pain at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 10 days post partum, measured by a visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, interference with activities of daily living, and amount of analgesic use.

RESULTS

The analysis included 266 women who underwent MLE and 297 women who underwent LE. Complete relief of pain was observed in 6 (2.3%) of 266 women after 24 hours, 21 (8.0%) of 264 after 72 hours, and 77 (29.1%) of 265 after 10 days in the MLE group, and in 11 (3.9%) of 285, 23 (7.7%) of 297, and 78 (26.4%) of 295 in the LE group, respectively (P=0.36). There were no significant differences in overall pain scores from any rating system or in the amount of analgesics used.

CONCLUSION

Incidence and extent of pain in the first 10 days after LE correspond to those after adequately performed MLE.

Using adhesive glue to repair first degree perineal tears: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of adhesive glue in repairing first degree perineal tears. We conducted a noninferiority prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing adhesive glue with traditional suturing. Each case was evaluated immediately after birth and after the puerperium. The two-sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test were applied to compare quantitative variables between the treatment groups. The chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to assess the association between qualitative variables. A total of 102 women participated, 28 in the suture arm and 74 in the adhesive glue arm. While cosmetic and functional results of adhesive glue use were not inferior to suturing, the use of adhesive glue was associated with a shorter procedure, less need for local anesthetic, less pain, and greater satisfaction. Our results suggest a novel approach for the repair of common postpartum first degree lacerations. The use of adhesive glue achieves cosmetic and functional results equal to traditional suturing and offers some immediate advantages for the patient. While further clinical trials are needed to validate our results, it is important to inform obstetrician of the possible use of adhesive glue in these very common clinical scenarios. This trial is registered with NCT00746707.

Episiotomy and obstetric perineal wound dehiscence: beyond soreness

Postpartum episiotomy dehiscence is a rare complication of vaginal delivery. Infection rates in episiotomy wounds are surprisingly low; however, it remains the most common cause of wound dehiscence, which may lead to major physical, psychological and social problems if left untreated. Most dehisced perineal wounds are left to heal naturally by secondary intention. This approach often results in a protracted period of significant morbidity for women. There is emerging evidence that early re-suturing closure of broken-down perineal wounds may have a better outcome, but randomised controlled trials are needed to yield evidence-based guidance for this management approach.

Risk of episiotomy and perineal lacerations recurring after first delivery

BACKGROUND

To assess whether the presence of an episiotomy or spontaneous perineal trauma at the first delivery increases the risk of perineal trauma at the following one.

METHODS

We studied 2,695 women who gave birth twice at Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital of Granada, Spain. All second deliveries were from 2004 to 2011 and prenatal database records were used to obtain information about the first deliveries. All births, first and second, were single, vaginal, unassisted, and in a cephalic presentation. Two groups were made as follows: Intact perineum (no perineal trauma or first-degree spontaneous tear at the first delivery) and perineal trauma (episiotomy or second-degree or higher spontaneous tear at the first delivery). Both groups were compared according to the degree of perineal trauma at the second delivery.

RESULTS

Women included in the perineal trauma group were significantly older and a higher proportion was attended by a midwife with an obstetrician present in the delivery room. No differences were observed according to gestational age, epidural analgesia or fetal birth weight. Adjusting for these possible compounding factors and the year of birth, the risk of undergoing a second-degree or higher spontaneous tear at their next delivery was fivefold (adjusted OR 5.15, 95% CI 3.11-8.54), and the risk of undergoing an episiotomy in the second delivery was threefold (adjusted OR 3.20, 95% CI 2.19-4.69) for the perineal trauma group.

CONCLUSION

The risk of undergoing a spontaneous perineal tear or an episiotomy in the second delivery is increased by the practice of episiotomy in the first one.